ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON): Among the Large-Cap Stocks Insiders and Short Sellers Are Dumping Like Crazy
We recently compiled a list of the . In this article, we are going to take a look at where ON Semiconductor Corporation (NASDAQ:ON) stands against the other large-cap stocks.
Uncertainty is around every corner of the U.S. stock market, affecting investors' decisions. With President Trump's return to the Oval Office, the market, heavily influenced by his policies, is flashing unmistakable warning signs. Short sellers and insiders are making an aggressive exit from multiple large-cap stocks. These groups are more plugged into market sentiment than the average investor, so their abandonment of stock must be looked into more closely.
READ ALSO:
According to a CNBC report, the market indices are on track to log their worst performance in the first 100 days of a presidency since Richard Nixon's second term as U.S. President. Meanwhile, internal selloffs are experiencing an upward trend in the market alongside bearish bets. Every day, investors wonder whether to stay put or jump overboard.
Concerning the current market situation, Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack pointed out in a recent interview that businesses are growing increasingly wary. Because of tariff concerns and policy instability, they are holding back on investments and hiring. Such hesitation is reflected in insider behavior.
Insiders, including corporate executives, board members, and major shareholders, must report their trades. In addition, in their recent filings, a troubling pattern is noticeable: they are selling more and buying less. The livelihoods and wealth of insiders are often tied directly to the company's performance. Hence, selling shares instead of purchasing them could be seen as their way of locking in gains before tough times hit their company.
Parallel to this pattern, short sellers are also ramping up their activity. They are betting on a wave of economic uncertainty pushing down share prices. These are not moves made on a whim but stemming from a more profound structural concern regarding an organization.
Due to the current environment, the Treasury yields are climbing, and the U.S. dollar is weakening. Consequently, the prices of stocks, even the large market caps, are swinging wildly. The Federal Reserve is expected to hold interest rates steady in May and cut them later in June. Though this may seem advantageous, corporate earnings may still be pressured by higher costs and lower consumer demand, resulting in a negative outlook for equities, particularly the overvalued ones. And with their recent activities, insiders and short sellers are positioning themselves to use the opportunities to exit rather than re-enter.
According to analysts, it is not about pulling your investments by following the insiders and short sellers. Instead, it's about understanding what is going on in the market and using the knowledge to make informed decisions about your portfolio. Historically, the exit of those closest to the financials and forecasts often precedes market corrections. By paying attention to these movements, investors can elevate the resilience of their stocks as well.
We followed multiple criteria when compiling our list of the top 20 large-cap stocks being dumped by insiders and short sellers. We selected the large-cap stocks based on their market cap and stock volume. Only the companies with a market cap between $10 billion and $200 billion were included in this list since anything more would be mega-cap, and anything less is regarded as small-cap or mid-cap. Concerning stock volume, we have disregarded companies with a volume of less than 500,000. We have set the short-float limit as 5% or more to ensure that our list is made up of picks involving high bearish bets. We have included those stocks with a negative insider transaction in terms of insider selling since this signals a negative outlook for the company's future performance. The stocks are ranked according to their short percentage of float. All the data in the article was taken from financial databases and analyst reports, with all information updated as of April 30, 2025.
Why are we interested in the stocks that hedge funds pile into? The reason is simple: our research has shown that we can outperform the market by imitating the top stock picks of the best hedge funds. Our quarterly newsletter's strategy selects 14 small-cap and large-cap stocks every quarter and has returned 373.4% since May 2014, beating its benchmark by 218 percentage points ().
A semiconductor engineer in a state-of-the-art laboratory, analyzing advanced semiconductor products.
ON Semiconductor Corporation (NASDAQ:ON), headquartered in Arizona, is a designer and manufacturer of intelligent power and sensing technologies. With a strategic focus on automotive, industrial, and cloud power markets, the company competes with leading competitors like Infineon and Texas Instruments. The company's silicon carbide (SiC) and image sensor portfolios support critical applications in electric vehicles, renewable energy, and factory automation, offering differentiation in the market. ON Semiconductor Corporation (NASDAQ:ON) aims to meet the accelerating global demand for electrification by investing in capacity expansion.
The Q4 report of the company indicates a consistent decline in regional revenue. Specifically, the Japanese market has incurred a significant fall in revenue. Because of geo-political uncertainty and slower-than-expected growth in the electric vehicle segment, the company anticipates volatility in the automotive sector, which will harm the company's earnings. For 2025, ON Semiconductor Corporation (NASDAQ:ON) anticipates a revenue decline of 25%, thus driving away even the insiders from the stock. It is among the stocks that insiders and short sellers are dumping.
ON Semiconductor Corporation (NASDAQ:ON)'s short float of 6.98% places the company in the interest of speculators betting against its upside. Simultaneously, the insider activity shows a 2.06% net reduction. Though modest, the figure is a noteworthy pullback among executives. Additionally, the sustained short interest casts a shadow over investor sentiment.
Overall ON ranks 16th among our list of the large-cap stocks insiders and short sellers are dumping like crazy. While we acknowledge the potential of ON as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and doing so within a shorter timeframe. There is an AI stock that went up since the beginning of 2025, while popular AI stocks lost around 25%. If you are looking for an AI stock that is more promising than ON but that trades at less than 5 times its earnings, check out our report about this .
READ NEXT: and .
Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at .
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
27 minutes ago
- Axios
Amid backlash, Tesla remained resilient in Texas
Even as Tesla deliveries plunged nationally this year amid Elon Musk's very visible (if short-lived) alliance with President Trump, there was at least one state where Tesla registrations were up: Texas. Why it matters: The registration data, obtained by Axios through public information requests, indicates loyalty to the brand in its home base, including Texas' large urban and suburban counties. The depth of conservatives' enthusiasm for Musk's automobiles now faces a major test amid the absolute meltdown last week between the Tesla CEO and the president. By the numbers: Texans registered 12,918 new Teslas in the first three months of 2025, a period when Musk, who contributed more than $250 million to a pro-Trump super PAC during the 2024 election campaign, was enmeshed in the Trump administration as the overseer of DOGE, the president's cost-cutting initiative. Over the same period in 2024, Texans registered 10,679 Teslas. That's a 21% increase year over year. The intrigue: The spike in Texas registrations came as Tesla was flailing elsewhere. Tesla's vehicle deliveries plunged 13% globally in the first quarter of 2025 (336,681 electric vehicles) compared with Q1 2024 (386,810). Tesla vehicles were torched at showrooms and the brand's reputation cratered. Zoom in: Tesla saw year-over-year improvements in its sales in some of the most populous Texas counties. In Travis County, new Tesla registrations grew from 1,369 in the first quarter of 2024 to 1,424 during the first quarter of 2025. In Harris County, they grew from 1,526 to 1,837 during the same period. Tesla registration grew from 1,316 to 1,546 in Collin County and from 990 to 1,146 in Dallas County. In Bexar County, registrations grew from 631 to 664. What they're saying:"It's homegrown pride," is how Matt Holm, president and founder of the Tesla Owners Club of Austin, explains the car company's resilience to Axios. "And regardless of all the drama going on these days, people can differentiate between the product and everything else going on, and it's just a great product." "Elon has absolutely and irreversibly blown up bridges to some potential customers," says Alexander Edwards, president of California-based research firm Strategic Vision, which has long surveyed the motivations of car buyers. "People who bought Teslas for environmental friendliness, that's pretty much gone," Edwards tells Axios. Yes, but: The company had been enjoying an increasingly positive reputation among more conservative consumers. Musk was viewed favorably by 80% of Texas Republicans polled by the Texas Politics Project in April — and unfavorably by 83% of Democrats. In what now feels like a political lifetime ago, Trump himself even promoted Teslas by promising to buy one in support of Musk earlier this year. "In some pockets, like Austin, you have that tech group that loves what Tesla has to offer, can do some mental gymnastics about Musk, and looks at Rivian and says that's not what I want or might be priced out," Edwards says. Between the lines:"Being in the state of Texas, you're naturally conditioned to think you're better than everyone else in the U.S. And when you buy a Tesla" — a status symbol — "that's what you're saying. It doesn't surprise me that there's an increase in sales" in Texas, Edwards says. Plus: Tesla's resilience in Texas could have practical reasons as well, Edwards says. Texas homes — as opposed to, say, apartments in cities on the East Coast — are more likely to have a garage to charge a car in, he adds. What's next: Musk said late last month that Tesla was experiencing a "major rebound in demand" — without providing specifics. But that was before things went absolutely haywire with Trump and Tesla stock took a bath last week.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
After vowing ‘90 deals in 90 days,' the White House's rhetoric runs into reality
Donald Trump clearly wants the public to believe he recently struck a trade deal with China. The president did not actually reach such an agreement, but he's leaned into his fictional narrative with great enthusiasm lately. Last Thursday, for example, the Republican published an item to his social media platform, noting that he'd spoken to Chinese President Xi Jinping about 'the intricacies of our recently made, and agreed to, Trade Deal.' Soon after, during an Oval Office event, he again touted the same 'trade deal.' A day later, Trump posted a follow-up item, announcing the members of a delegation who would travel to London to meet with Chinese officials about 'the Trade Deal.' The bad news is that the 'trade deal' in question does not exist, no matter how many times the American president pretends otherwise. The good news is that administration officials will actually have some discussions with their Chinese counterparts. NBC News reported: Senior U.S. and Chinese officials will meet in London on Monday in an effort to de-escalate the bitter trade dispute between the world's two biggest economies that has roiled the global economy, with China's restrictions on critical minerals high on the agenda. About a month ago, Trump announced what he characterized as a 'deal' with China, but the closer one looked at the details, the more the truth came into focus. Georgetown University professor Abraham Newman wrote a great piece for MSNBC that explained, "While the U.S. did avoid a major economic calamity, this is not a deal. The U.S. blinked. ... Far from some diplomatic coup, the U.S. climb down reflects the economic risks of maintaining such high tariffs.' The editorial board of The Wall Street Journal came to the same conclusion, noting, '[T]he China deal is more surrender than Trump victory.' Complicating matters, while the White House and Beijing reached a tentative agreement that paused the two countries' tit-for-tat tariffs, both countries have since accused each other of violating the agreement. All of which brings to mind Peter Navarro, the White House's top trade adviser, who boasted in April, 'We're going to run 90 deals in 90 days.' Navarro added that such a plan 'is possible' in part because 'the boss is going to be the chief negotiator.' Roughly two months later, the grand total currently stands at zero. Generous observers might be inclined to give Trump credit for striking a deal with the U.K., but as The Washington Post's Dana Milbank summarized in his latest column, that deal is really more of a 'vaguely phrased framework with Britain that still hasn't been made public.' What's more, a new Politico report added that a month after the agreement was announced, the U.S.-U.K. duties 'remain in place' and 'there is still no clear timeline for when they'll lift.' Or to put it another way, two-thirds of the way into the '90 deals in 90 days' vow, the White House appears to be 90 deals short. Undeterred, Navarro returned to Fox Business late last week, where he was asked when the public should expect to see some breakthroughs. 'We will have deals,' Navarro said. 'It takes time. Usually, it takes months and years. In this administration, it's gonna take more like days.' On average, the typical timeframe for a U.S. trade deal is roughly 30 months. That didn't deter Navarro from pushing the '90 deals in 90 days' talking point in April, and it apparently didn't stop him from claiming again last week that Team Trump will produce amazing results in a matter of days. The White House's top trade adviser should be going out of his way right now to lower expectations after already having set an impossibly high bar. For reasons unknown, Navarro is doing the opposite, setting up the Trump administration for additional failure. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democrats have a dirty secret - they actually like some of the tax cuts in Trump's ‘big beautiful bill'
Some of the sweeping tax cuts proposed in President Donald Trump's massive spending package have found support among Democrats — even as they are expected to oppose the legislation over proposed cuts to Medicaid and other government services when it comes up for debate in the Senate later this month, according to a new report. The gargantuan budget package, which House Republicans and the White House have dubbed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, passed the House by a single vote last month and is now drawing heat from fiscal hawks in both chambers as well as Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who was fresh off his months-long stint as a special government employee when he began threatening to back challengers to any legislator who votes for the bill. Still, there are facets of the proposal that have appeal for some Democrats, the New York Times reports. Virginia Rep. Don Beyer, a Democrat who is also a wealthy car dealership owner, told the Times his party is 'in general very much in favor of reducing taxes on working people and the working poor' when asked about Trump's plan to end taxes on service workers' tips. 'Those people are living on tips,' he added. Trump's tip tax cut plan has also attracted attention from Sen. Jacky Rosen of Nevada, a state where service workers make up a large and powerful voting bloc that has traditionally supported Democrats but shifted to Trump in large numbers during the 2024 presidential election, handing him the Silver State's electoral votes. Rosen, a Democrat, took to the Senate floor last month to advance a bill approving Trump's 'no tax on tips' plan. It passed unanimously even though the measure was largely symbolic because the U.S. constitution requires tax laws to originate in the House 'I am not afraid to embrace a good idea, wherever it comes from,'. she said at the time in remarks on the Senate floor. Yet despite the support for some of the individual tax provisions in the plan, it's highly unlikely that it will be able to muster enough if any Democrats to ease the way to Trump's desk, even under a Senate procedure known as budget reconciliation, which fast-tracks some types of spending legislation without subjecting it to the upper chamber's de facto 60-vote threshold for passage. Democrats are expected to unanimously vote against the legislation in the upper chamber, where it has also attracted opposition from some Republicans who've complained that the cuts to spending in the package don't go far enough to offset the reduced revenue caused by provisions meant to enact Trump campaign promises to end taxes on tips for service workers, as well as taxes on overtime pay for hourly workers and on social security benefits for seniors. Nonpartisan experts such as those at the Congressional Budget Office have warned that the reduced tax receipts would blow a massive hole in the federal budget and jeopardize America's long-term fiscal outlook, but that hasn't stopped some prominent Democrats from getting behind the individuals tax cuts. Trump and his allies hope the prominent tax cut proposals will blunt Democrats' efforts to paint the One Big Beautiful Bill Act as a giveaway to wealthy GOP donors that will gut government services while only providing limited relief for working-class voters. To that end, the president and others in his camp have routinely taken to social media to argue that anyone who votes against the bill is effectively voting for tax increases because the legislation makes permanent a number of temporary tax cuts enacted in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which Trump signed into law during his first term. Democrats, meanwhile, remain opposed to the bill's massive cuts to Medicare and other measures that make it harder for people to claim tax credits meant to boost lower-income Americans' bottom lines. Rep. Brad Schneider, an Illnois Democrat, told the Times that the whole bill had to be considered rather than any individual provision or provisiosn. 'Any one thing — a tax credit or a tax cut — might make sense, but you've got to take a look at the whole picture,' he said.
