
US Diplomats to Return to Iraq
The United States has announced the gradual return of its diplomats to Iraq, following a period of heightened tensions with Iran that led to their temporary withdrawal nearly a month ago.
The move signals Washington's assessment that the threat level in the region has subsided.
While the US State Department did not explicitly outline the reasons behind the decision, such changes in diplomatic staffing typically reflect shifts in security conditions and a lower perceived risk of military escalation.
State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce
stated
that staff who had been temporarily relocated would begin returning to the US Embassy in Baghdad and the Consulate in Erbil, the capital of Iraq's Kurdistan region.
However, Bruce reaffirmed that US citizens are still advised against travelling to Iraq due to ongoing security concerns.
The original withdrawal was prompted by a sharp rise in regional tensions on 22 June, after former US President Donald Trump ordered strikes on nuclear facilities inside Iran, as part of a wider military campaign led by Israel. In response, Iran launched missiles at a key American military base in Qatar.
Despite a recent series of drone attacks targeting oil fields in Iraq's Kurdish region, the US has opted to ease travel restrictions for its personnel. No group has claimed responsibility for the drone strikes, which occurred amid a political dispute between the Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad over oil revenues.
Bruce condemned the drone attacks, calling them a threat to Iraq's stability and economic future. She stressed that it remains the responsibility of the Iraqi government to protect its territory and all of its citizens.
read more
Gold prices rise, 21 Karat at EGP 3685
NATO's Role in Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
US Expresses 'Strong Opposition' to New Turkish Military Operation in Syria
Shoukry Meets Director-General of FAO
Lavrov: confrontation bet. nuclear powers must be avoided
News
Iran Summons French Ambassador over Foreign Minister Remarks
News
Aboul Gheit Condemns Israeli Escalation in West Bank
News
Greek PM: Athens Plays Key Role in Improving Energy Security in Region
News
One Person Injured in Explosion at Ukrainian Embassy in Madrid
News
Israeli-Linked Hadassah Clinic in Moscow Treats Wounded Iranian IRGC Fighters
News
China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier
Sports
Former Al Zamalek Player Ibrahim Shika Passes away after Long Battle with Cancer
Videos & Features
Tragedy Overshadows MC Alger Championship Celebration: One Fan Dead, 11 Injured After Stadium Fall
Lifestyle
Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt
Arts & Culture
South Korean Actress Kang Seo-ha Dies at 31 after Cancer Battle
News
"Tensions Escalate: Iran Probes Allegations of Indian Tech Collaboration with Israeli Intelligence"
News
Flights suspended at Port Sudan Airport after Drone Attacks
Arts & Culture
Hawass Foundation Launches 1st Course to Teach Ancient Egyptian Language
Sports
Get to Know 2025 WWE Evolution Results
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


See - Sada Elbalad
41 minutes ago
- See - Sada Elbalad
Heathrow Airport Expansion to Cost £49 Billion
Israa Farhan Heathrow Airport, Europe's busiest hub by passenger numbers, has announced an ambitious £49 billion expansion and modernization plan, which includes the construction of a long-debated third runway. The entire project will be funded by private sector investment. The airport's Chief Executive Officer, Thomas Woldbye, stated on Friday that the expansion is now more vital than ever, as Heathrow is operating at full capacity. The upgrade aims to significantly enhance the UK capital's global competitiveness in trade and transport. Despite years of legal battles and continued resistance from environmental campaigners, residents, and even London Mayor Sadiq Khan alongside members of the ruling Labor Party, the British government approved the new runway plan in January. According to the announcement, the expansion is set to double Heathrow's annual passenger capacity from 84 million to 150 million. The construction and operational launch of the third runway is scheduled to take place over the next decade. Of the total investment, £21 billion will be allocated directly to the new runway, while the remaining funds will be used for broader airport upgrades and modernization, a process expected to continue over the coming decades. The project has faced legal and political hurdles for years. In late 2020, the UK Supreme Court gave the green light for the third runway after a protracted legal dispute. However, the pandemic significantly delayed progress. The Heathrow Airport Holdings Group, overseeing the project, is majority-owned by international investors. French infrastructure firm Ardian holds the largest share at 32.6%, followed by the Qatar Investment Authority at 20%, and Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund with a 15% stake. read more Gold prices rise, 21 Karat at EGP 3685 NATO's Role in Israeli-Palestinian Conflict US Expresses 'Strong Opposition' to New Turkish Military Operation in Syria Shoukry Meets Director-General of FAO Lavrov: confrontation bet. nuclear powers must be avoided News Iran Summons French Ambassador over Foreign Minister Remarks News Aboul Gheit Condemns Israeli Escalation in West Bank News Greek PM: Athens Plays Key Role in Improving Energy Security in Region News One Person Injured in Explosion at Ukrainian Embassy in Madrid News Israeli-Linked Hadassah Clinic in Moscow Treats Wounded Iranian IRGC Fighters Arts & Culture "Jurassic World Rebirth" Gets Streaming Date News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier News Ayat Khaddoura's Final Video Captures Bombardment of Beit Lahia Business Egyptian Pound Undervalued by 30%, Says Goldman Sachs Videos & Features Tragedy Overshadows MC Alger Championship Celebration: One Fan Dead, 11 Injured After Stadium Fall Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt Arts & Culture South Korean Actress Kang Seo-ha Dies at 31 after Cancer Battle Arts & Culture Lebanese Media: Fayrouz Collapses after Death of Ziad Rahbani Sports Get to Know 2025 WWE Evolution Results


See - Sada Elbalad
an hour ago
- See - Sada Elbalad
Europe's Patience with Israel Is Wearing Thin
Mohammed Mahmoud Abdel Wahab Europe is finally showing the first signs that its patience with Israel is running out. The European Commission's recommendation to restrict Israel's participation in the 'Horizon' scientific research program is not just a technical move—it is, actually, a political message. I believe it reflects a shift in how some European governments see Israel's conduct in Gaza and its disregard for international law. Indeed, for decades Israel has benefited from Europe's academic and research networks while acting with near impunity on the Palestinian issue. I see the current step, supported by Spain and Ireland, as a small but significant break in that tradition of European hesitation. Even the Netherlands has indicated that it would back suspending Israel from Horizon if the EU formally concludes that Israel is breaching international law. This is, in my view, a major development in the political mood of the European Union. Actually, the impact is already visible on Israel's academic scene. I believe the growing academic boycott tells a deeper story: Israeli research is losing its shine internationally. The Council of Israeli University Presidents has reported more than 750 cases of boycott since the Gaza war began, and Horizon grants for young Israeli researchers dropped by about 70% in 2025 compared to the previous year. I see this as a clear sign that Israel's reputation is eroding beyond diplomacy—it is now facing reputational damage in the scientific world as well. From my perspective, the EU's move is largely symbolic, but it carries weight. I think symbolism matters because it signals that the old pattern—military aggression followed by European silence—is no longer guaranteed. Amos Gilad, a former Israeli security official, recently warned in "Yedioth Ahronoth" that Israel's plan for direct military rule in Gaza is a 'dangerous illusion,' reminding me of Israel's failed adventure in Lebanon in 1982. I believe he is right: such policies could drain Israel economically and damage its strategic position. Actually, I see this moment as the beginning of a bigger shift. Even if the EU does not fully enforce the recommendation, the mere debate affects Israel's global image. I think future generations in Europe will be less willing to tolerate unconditional support for a state accused of violating international law and committing crimes against humanity. In my point of view, Europe's message is becoming harder to ignore: Israel cannot continue on this path without consequences. I believe this small step on the Horizon program is not the end—but rather the first sign that the international environment around Israel is changing, and possibly for good. read more Analysis- Turkey Has 0 Regional Allies... Why? Analysis: Russia, Turkey... Libya in Return For Syria? Analysis: Who Will Gain Trump's Peace Plan Fruits? Analysis: Will Turkey's Erdogan Resort to Snap Election? Analysis: What Are Turkey's Aspirations in Iraq? Opinion & Analysis Analysis: Mercenaries In Libya... Who Should Be Blamed? Opinion & Analysis Analysis- How 'Libya Nightmare' Takes Erdogan to Algiers Opinion & Analysis Analysis: What Happens After Brexit? Opinion & Analysis Analysis: Strategic Significance of Libya's Sirte, Jufra! News Israeli-Linked Hadassah Clinic in Moscow Treats Wounded Iranian IRGC Fighters Arts & Culture "Jurassic World Rebirth" Gets Streaming Date News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier News Ayat Khaddoura's Final Video Captures Bombardment of Beit Lahia Business Egyptian Pound Undervalued by 30%, Says Goldman Sachs Videos & Features Tragedy Overshadows MC Alger Championship Celebration: One Fan Dead, 11 Injured After Stadium Fall Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt Arts & Culture South Korean Actress Kang Seo-ha Dies at 31 after Cancer Battle Arts & Culture Lebanese Media: Fayrouz Collapses after Death of Ziad Rahbani Sports Get to Know 2025 WWE Evolution Results


Watani
an hour ago
- Watani
Why the US is in decline
On 4 July, the US celebrated its Independence Day, commemorating, as in every year, the great national legacy established by its Founding Fathers. On 4 July 1776, thirteen states on the American East Coast formed an alliance that initiated the United States of America. Historical remembrance aside, this year's 4th of July celebration could not distract the world from today's reality. Over the last three decades, the world has disturbingly witnessed the decline of the US and the consequences of its prolonged global leadership and dominance as the sole world superpower since the end of WWII in 1945. This decline, and the involvement of the US in igniting and inflaming global conflicts, are widely acknowledged by observers, scholars, and political analysts who monitor and track mounting global crises, the involvement of the US in such crises, and the impact of these crises on global peace. 'Why the US is in decline' was the topic of a recent episode of Judge Andrew Napolitano's podcast Judging Freedom. On 14 July, Judge Napolitano hosted American economist and public policy analyst, Colombia University Professor Jeffrey Sachs to discuss the issue. I today present excerpts of this interview. Judge Napolitano: What do you believe was Trump's purpose in bombing the mountains in Iran, and did he achieve it? Professor Sachs: 'The purpose supposedly was to stop the nuclear activities of Iran. No, he didn't achieve it. I think all expert views concur that nothing much happened except Iran realising that it could not negotiate with the United States, and withdrawing from monitoring by the International Atomic Energy Agency. This was a debacle of the first order.' And the International Atomic Energy Agency turned out to be an asset of Mossad, did it not? 'It played into Israel's hands in a very stupid way. So, it played its role. What we've seen here is the CIA / Mossad operations operating through the international system and operating through the US military. Once again, all to no achieved purposes. That's also standard operating procedure for the US military-industrial complex. We've been at this for decades, nothing comes of it except people making money in the military sector and increasing insecurity for the world.' If the purpose of the bombing was to degrade Iran, or terrify Iran, or bring about regime change. It obviously had the opposite effect. How could Mossad and CIA have been so wrong in their guesstimate as to what this bombing would bring about? 'Which genius forecast of the CIA are you referring to in the last 30 years? The one about remaking Afghanistan as a democracy? The one of American soldiers being greeted with flowers in Iraq? The one about the pushover of Bashar al-Assad in 2011? The one about removing Moammar Gaddafi and leading to 'new stability' in Libya? These people are completely unaccountable. They have no knowledge of the world other than assassinations, coups, and military operations. The world does not settle down that way; the world becomes more dangerous and unstable. These 'geniuses' in quotation marks have done the most remarkable thing in the world; they have absolutely degraded the security of Americans from a position of basically complete security.' What do you think President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu were discussing last week? 'They met in private three times while Netanyahu was in Washington. I don't know specifically what they were talking about, but we once had the idea that there would be a ceasefire, a peace and a resolution of the unending wars in the Middle East. And that kind of talk is basically gone. That talk is also gone in the case of Ukraine. That talk is gone all over the world. Trump is basically proving to be absolutely incapable of solving any problem and he is proving to be the extension of the Biden administration because the Biden administration was nothing more than the military-industrial complex. We're basically stuck with a militarised undemocratic system. Presidents come and go, but the system remains. It does anything Israel wants, to an extent it's actually run by Israel, which is shocking… Whatever it is, we have a permanent State that does not respond to the public will, does not respond to American security, does not respond to the public interest, does not respond to budgetary realities.' Judge Napolitano put on the show an excerpt of a 2017 interview given by Russian President Vladimir Putin to Le Figaro. Despite being said eight years ago, President Putin's words still ring true as pointed out by Judge Napolitano. Professor Sachs quoted President Putin: ''I've dealt with three presidents and they actually come in with ideas, but then those ideas disappear because the men in the dark suits and the briefcases'—that's the CIA, the Pentagon, the Armed Services Committees and so forth, that's the big donors— 'they come in and they say: No, no, no, Mr President, you do it this way.' Now, we've just witnessed this exactly happening with Donald Trump. And Donald Trump ran on a campaign of making peace. He was going to make peace here and there… But he certainly doesn't have the guts to make peace. Because to make peace, you have to go against the CIA. You have to go against the military-industrial complex… We are run by the military-industrial complex. Trump is a sideshow. What Trump has done in recent weeks with Ukraine, the Middle East, China, Epstein tapes, with all of it is just fall into line as presidents are supposed to do. 'MAGA' turns out to be a campaign slogan. Of course, it's nothing new; it's a continuation of the deep State. And the deep State has led us to one war after another.' How close are we to World War III? 'We may already be in it. The problem with WWIII is that there will be no historians alive afterwards to understand when it really started. But if we were in a conventional era with conventional weapons and there would be a world war and it would be devastating, but there would be a history afterward, maybe the historians would say WWIII started in 2014 or maybe 2019 or maybe 2022. Maybe we're in it already… There's no will in the political class to talk about peace. You don't hear peace anywhere… We don't have a serious policy of diplomacy of negotiation that gets to the core issues of why these conflicts exist.' Watani International 1 August 2025 Comments comments