Shareholders confront Axa over investment in companies arming Israel
Shareholders have confronted Axa, the French insurance giant, at its annual general meeting in Paris over investments in arms manufacturers accused of supplying Israel with weapons used in Gaza.
During the meeting, one shareholder reportedly challenged Axa executives over investments in companies whose weapons may have been used in alleged Israeli war crimes.
A report published in October by advocacy groups Eko and American Friends Service, titled Axa: Profiting Off Genocide, stated that the insurance company had invested $173.62m in 14 arms companies.
It said that more than $150m of those funds were invested in firms supplying arms used by Israel in Gaza, including Boeing and General Dynamics.
The arms companies with Axa investments reportedly supplied the bombs dropped on tents in al-Mawasi in southern Gaza, a so-called safe zone, on 10 September 2024, as well as on the Tel al-Sultan refugee camp in Rafah three and a half months prior.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
According to the report, $135m of Axa's arms investments are in companies that produce depleted uranium bombs, white phosphorus and nuclear arms. Activists posit that such investments may violate Axa's own responsible investment policy, which says it excludes companies involved in 'controversial weapons'.
The shareholder action was accompanied by a protest outside the AGM, which took place in the Salle Pleyel concert hall in the French capital.
Action de militants pro-palestiniens devant l'AG des actionnaires d'AXA à Paris.
Ils demandent des comptes au groupe concernant ses investissements dans des entreprises d'armement impliquées dans des massacres par Israël à Gaza. pic.twitter.com/MQMSTK4dRj — Enzo Rabouy (@enzorabouyy) April 24, 2025
Activists played an eight minute audio piece, which mixed sounds from bombs, children's screams, helicopters and the collapse of Palestinian homes.
Footage shared online showed demonstrators, amid a heavy police presence, chanting slogans and holding a banner reading: 'Axa, don't insure Israeli apartheid.'
Several protesters held up posters with the word "Gaza" written in the font of Axa's logo. Others held manakins wrapped in a shroud, resembling dead Palestinian bodies.
There were also protests outside and inside the AGM over Axa's large investments in the fossil fuel industry.
'Benefiting from genocide'
'Not only is Axa profiting from an industry devastating both civilian populations and the planet - it is directly benefiting from an ongoing genocide,' said Leyla Larbi at Eko.
'This is not just a moral scandal - it's a legal and reputational risk. Companies and their executives can be held criminally liable for complicity in international crimes, including war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. Investors must choose: complicity or responsibility.'
In August, Axa reportedly withdrew $20m worth of investments in three Israeli banks that the United Nations had accused of supporting illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank.
Eko said Axa had engaged in a "clear, fast, and intentional divestment" from Bank Hapoalim, Bank Leumi, and Israel Discount Bank, selling off 2.5 million shares, worth $20.4m, between 30 September 2023 and 24 June 2024 after a sustained campaign by pro-Palestine activists.
The insurance company also did not reinvest in two other banks, First International Bank of Israel and Mizrahi-Tefahot Bank, which had also been accused of financial complicity in Israeli crimes.
'Axa backed down on Israeli banks thanks to public pressure,' said Fiona Ben Chekroun, of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions national committee.
'We will keep calling out investors and urging a boycott [of] Axa until the group ends all ties with weapons manufacturers complicit in Israel's genocide in Gaza.'
Last month, a report published by Boycott Bloody Insurance, a UK-based campaign group, said that five major insurance companies were complicit in Israeli crimes through its investment in defence companies.
It said that Axa, Allianz, Aviva, Zurich Insurance Group and RSA (Intact) had invested $1.7bn across 15 companies involved in Israeli 'militarism'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Farsi-speaking VOA journalists return to work after lengthy administrative leave amid Iran-Israel escalation
Farsi-speaking journalists with Voice of America were called back to work on Friday amid the escalating conflict between Iran and Israel. The US Agency for Global Media in March terminated grants for Voice of America and several other broadcasters as President Donald Trump's administration moved to make major cuts to government spending and the federal workforce. "VOA's role in providing independent, factual and authoritative news has been proven throughout countless times of crisis. But after months off the air, we've lost a lot of audience and credibility," White House bureau chief Patsy Widakuswara said. "They should bring us all back so we can respond to breaking news in all parts of the world." The move comes after Israel launched what it called a "pre-emptive" strike on Iran's nuclear and military sites that killed at least 78 people, among them civilians as well as top brass. Iran carried out a retaliatory strike on Israel that injured dozens and killed at least one person. The two countries afterwards began tit-for-tat strikes over the course of Friday night and early Saturday morning. Voice of America is one of the largest and oldest US international broadcasters, producing digital, TV and radio content in 48 languages. Its primary audience is non-Americans in countries without press freedoms or independent journalism, such as Iran. But the Trump administration has charged that Voice of America and other networks have a liberal bias in addition to bloated budgets. "The US Agency for Global media will continue to deliver on all statutory programmes that fall under the agency's purview and shed everything that is not statutorily required," USAGM adviser Kari Lake said in a statement in March. "Waste, fraud and abuse run rampant in this agency and American taxpayers shouldn't have to fund it."
Arabian Post
3 hours ago
- Arabian Post
India Abstaining During Voting On UN Resolution For Ceasefire In Gaza Is The Lowest Point Of Diplomacy
By Nitya Chakraborty On Thursday June 12, Indian diplomacy under the Prime Minister Narendra Modi reached its lowest ebb when India abstained in the United Nations General Assembly from a vote on a resolution demanding an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in Gaza. The 193 member UN general assembly passed the resolution overwhelmingly with 149 countries in favour, 12 against and 19 countries including India, once the real leader of the global South. India did not support this resolution at a time when Israel is engaged in genocide in Gaza and other areas of Palestine killing even the hungry and sick people who were going for food and medicines to the aid centres. Even the G-7 members excepting the U.S. have strongly spoken against the latest killings by Israel and they all excepting USA voted for the resolution. But India did not, it abstained. The 19 countries who abstained included apart from India, countries like Albania, Cameroon, Ecuador, Ethiopia, Malawi, Panama, South Sudan and Togo. These countries are not significant players in UN. All the leading members of the Global South including BRICS and SCO voted in favour of the resolution. USA and Israel, as usual, voted against the resolution. The Indian abstention from voting in such a critical situation when Israel is in its most aggressive form even without listening to the U.S. President Donald Trump, has triggered a big distrust among the leading members of the developing countries as also the two big powers Russia and China. The next summit of BRICS will be taking place in July this year in Brazil. Prime Minister Narendra Modi will be attending that. Israel's action including its attacks against Iran on June 13 will also be on the agenda. How Can Indian Prime Minister face the other members of the BRICS at the summit on the issue of Israel and Gaza? In the explanation of vote on the resolution titled 'Protection of civilians and upholding legal and humanitarian obligations', India's permanent representative to the UN, ambassador Parvathaneni Harish said the resolution comes against the backdrop of worsening humanitarian situation in Gaza.. He then said India is deeply concerned at the deepening humanitarian crisis and condemns the loss of civilian lives but a joint effort should be directed towards bringing the two sides closer. So, India would abstain from the resolution. What an argument under the new normal Modi doctrine? Everyone knows what is the latest attitude of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to any bilateral talks? The immediate need is to save the lives of Gaza people and organize humanitarian aid for sick and hungry. The ceasefire is imperative for that. 149 countries out of the total of 193 members supported the resolution on the basis of this understanding. They wanted to stop the killings with immediate effect. The resolution demanded that Israel, the 'occupying power', immediately end the blockade, open all border crossings and ensure that aid reaches the Palestinian civilian population throughout the Gaza Strip immediately and at scale, in line with its obligations under peace international law and humanitarian principles. It seems that the Narendra Modi government has objection to the term 'occupying power' given to Israel. Even France, Britain are agreeing to this resolution, why not India? The resolution demanded that the parties fully, unconditionally and without delay implement all the provisions of Security Council resolution of June 2024, including an immediate ceasefire, the release of hostages, the return of the remains of hostages who have been killed, the exchange of Palestinian prisoners, the return of Palestinian civilians to their homes and neighbourhoods in the Gaza Strip and the full withdrawal of Israeli forces from the Gaza Strip. The UNGA vote came after the 15-nation Security Council failed to adopt a similar resolution last week after the sole veto by permanent member the United States. For the active members like South Africa and Brazil, there was no other way but to organize a fresh resolution for voting in the UN general assembly where the resolution is decided by voting and no veto power is allowed. On Thursday, the draft resolution was moved by Spain which is a member of the European Union. Prime Minister Sanchez belongs to the socialist part of the coalition and Deputy Prime Minister is Yolanda Diaz, a prominent leader of the Communist Party of Spain.. Spain could organize most members of the European Union in favour of the Resolution. The latest Israeli attack on Iran on Friday and the possibility of the war spreading with serious implications for the Middle East as also global peace poses another challenge to the Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The PM has cultivated special relations with Israel while Iran is very crucial from India's geopolitical strategy. It will be another big challenge to PM's diplomatic acumen. (IPA Service)
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Iran says Israel's actions a 'declaration of war' and accuses US of supporting strikes
Iran 's envoy to the UN accused the US on Friday of providing full political and intelligence support to Israeli strikes on Iranian territory, calling the attacks a 'declaration of war' that killed dozens, including civilians. Iranian ambassador Amir Saeid Iravani told the UN Security Council that 78 people had been killed in the strikes, with more than 320 others injured. 'The majority of them are civilians, including women and children,' he said. 'We will not forget that our people lost their lives as a result of the Israeli attacks with American weapons. These actions amount to a declaration of war.' He accused Israel of seeking to derail nuclear deal negotiations with the US and escalate tension in the region. 'This aggression was intentional, co-ordinated and fully backed by a permanent member of this council,' he said. 'The United States' complicity in this terrorist attack is beyond doubt." Israel's ambassador to the UN Danny Danon echoed this, saying the strikes on Iran are an act of "national preservation' which it undertook alone. 'Imagine when the head of the snake would do with a nuclear warhead?' he said. 'We acted because history has taught us that silence is complicity and hesitation is fatal.' He told the council that Israeli intelligence had confirmed that Iran could have produced enough fissile material for several nuclear bombs within days. 'We struck the core of the nuclear programme, the underground enrichment facilities at Natanz. This facility was operating at a military grade capacity. Intelligence confirmed that within days, Iran could have produced enough material for multiple bombs,' he said. On Thursday, Iran was censured by the UN's nuclear watchdog for not complying with obligations meant to prevent it from developing a nuclear weapon. US senior State Department official McCoy Pitt told the council that Washington was informed in advance of Israel's strikes on Iranian targets but was not militarily involved. Mr Pitt said Israel had advised the US that 'this action' was necessary for its self-defence. 'Every sovereign nation has the right to defend itself, and Israel is no exception,' he said. 'President [Donald] Trump has repeatedly said, this dangerous regime cannot be allowed to have nuclear weapons.' He added that Washington continues to pursue a diplomatic solution aimed at preventing Tehran from acquiring nuclear weapons or 'threatening' regional stability. 'Iran's leadership would be wise to negotiate at this time,' he asserted. The head of the UN nuclear watchdog told the Security Council that the aboveground section of Iran's pilot fuel enrichment plant at Natanz where uranium was being enriched up to 60 per cent has been destroyed in recent Israeli strikes. 'This facility houses both the main fuel enrichment plant and the pilot enrichment plant,' said International Atomic Energy Agency director general Rafael Grossi. Mr Grossi said radiation levels at the Natanz site remained unchanged, with no external radiological impact on the population or the environment. However, he warned of contamination risks within the facility. 'There is radiological and chemical contamination inside the Natanz facilities due to the impacts,' he said. Mr Grossi also said that Iranian authorities informed them of attacks on two other nuclear facilities, Fordow and Isfahan, 'where a fuel plate fabrication plant, a fuel manufacturing plant, a uranium conversion facility … are located'. Russia strongly condemned Israel's attacks on Iran, with its ambassador saying the "military adventure pushes the region to the brink of a large-scale war, and the responsibility for all of the consequences of these actions lies fully with the Israeli leadership and those who encourage them". 'One is left with the impression that the leadership of Israel is convinced that they have a completely free hand in the region, and they probably think that Israel can flout any legal norms and replace all international bodies, including the Security Council and IAEA,' Vasily Nebenzya said. China's ambassador Fu Cong urged Israel to immediately cease all military 'adventurism' and called on countries with 'significant' influence over Israel to play a 'constructive' role.
