NCAA super regionals set after frenzy of upsets
June 3 - The SEC remains a dominant presence ahead of this week's NCAA super regionals despite the conference losing the top two teams in the country in shocking upsets last weekend.
With No. 1 Vanderbilt and No. 2 Texas bounced in the regionals they hosted, No. 3 Arkansas, No. 4 Auburn and No. 6 LSU are now among the favorites as the road to Omaha continues with the eight super regionals beginning Friday. Arkansas will face defending national champion and No. 14 seed Tennessee.
Vandy and Texas were certainly not alone in the frenzy of regional upsets. No. 7 Georgia and No. 10 Ole Miss were also sent packing. Murray St. eliminated Ole Miss to win the first regional in program history and become only the 10th No. 4 seed in Division I baseball history to advance to the super regionals.
Following the upsets, only three of the eight super regional sites will pit ranked teams against each other, while two will feature unranked teams vying for a spot in the College World Series.
Meanwhile, the ACC emerged from the regionals with five teams. That includes No. 5 North Carolina, which finished the regular season ranked No. 1, and former powerhouse Miami, which returns to the super regionals for the first time since 2016.
Miami vs. Louisville
No. 8 Oregon State vs. No. 9 Florida State
No. 5 North Carolina vs. Arizona
No. 4 Auburn vs. No. 13 Coastal Carolina
No. 15 UCLA vs. UTSA
Duke vs. Murray State
No. 6 LSU vs. West Virginia
No. 3 Arkansas vs. No. 14 Tennessee
The three-game super regionals will run June 6-9 across the sites to determine the eight that will advance to the CWS, which begins June 13. The ESPN family of networks will broadcast the games across ESPN, ESPN2 and ESPNU, as well as on Fubo.
--Field Level Media
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Pete Hegseth's war on gay icon Harvey Milk backfires as even his fans call him 'idiotic'
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth 's attempt to erase LGBTQ + icon Harvey Milk's name from a US Navy ship has backfired spectacularly with widespread backlash, including from some of his own supporters. The controversy erupted after reports surfaced that Hegseth, 44, proposed renaming the USNS Harvey Milk - a vessel dedicated in 2021 to honor the slain gay rights pioneer and Navy veteran. Milk served four years during the Korean War before being discharged due to questions about his sexual orientation. He went on to become the first openly gay member of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors and was assassinated in 1978. Hegseth and the broader Trump administration are now facing criticism from veterans' groups, high-profile public figures and former DoD Secretary fans, including Newsweek's political editor Carlo Versano, over the controversial renaming effort. 'I've never before seen a Secretary of Defense so aggressively demote himself to the rank of Chief PETTY Officer,' actor Sean Penn, 64, who portrayed Milk in the Oscar-winning 2008 biopic Milk, said in a statement to The Hollywood Reporter. Dustin Lance Black, the film's screenwriter, also criticized the move as politically divisive. 'This is yet another move to distract and to fuel the culture wars that create division,' Black, 50, told The Hollywood Reporter. 'It's meant to get us to react in ways that are self-centered so that we are further distanced from our brothers and sisters in equally important civil rights fights in this country. It's divide and conquer.' The progressive veterans' group VoteVets also condemned the move. 'At the start of Pride Month, Pete Hegseth ordered the Navy to strip Harvey Milk's name from a ship,' the group wrote on X, formerly Twitter. 'A man who served with honor - erased to send a message. This is a deliberate insult to LGBTQ troops and Americans that weakens our force and shreds the values we fight for.' Versano, who was once a cautious supporter of Hegseth's Pentagon appointment, has since turned sharply critical. In a column titled 'Now Boarding the USS Idiocracy,' the Newsweek's political editor wrote, 'I cannot believe I once wrote here that I was cautiously optimistic about Hegseth as someone who could shake up the Pentagon. Was I on drugs?' He added, 'This guy is such an embarrassment to be leading our military… this is what the Defense Department is sitting around worrying about right now?' Several public officials have also voiced their outrage. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer posted on X: 'Erasing Harvey Milk's name is disgusting, blatant discrimination - and during Pride Month to boot. He served the U.S. Navy and his country honorably... Hegseth should be ashamed of himself and reverse this immediately.' Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi added, 'The reported decision... is a shameful, vindictive erasure of those who fought to break down barriers for all to chase the American dream.' Former Pentagon official Alex Wagner, who helped lead the department's first Pride event in 2012, said the decision was 'disappointing, but no surprise.' Wagner noted, 'When I served... we prioritized building and resourcing a ready force capable of deterring, denying, and - if necessary - defeating the People's Liberation Army. We sought to harness one of our greatest strategic advantages - the diverse experiences and expertise of all Americans.' In defense of the renaming initiative, Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell stated, 'Secretary Hegseth is committed to ensuring that the names attached to all DOD installations and assets are reflective of the Commander-in-Chief's priorities, our nation's history, and the warrior ethos.' According to CBS News, an internal Navy memo cited the renaming as an effort to ensure 'alignment with president and SECDEF objectives and SECNAV priorities of reestablishing the warrior culture.' The document also indicated that other Navy ships - named after historical figures such as Thurgood Marshall, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Harriet Tubman, Cesar Chavez, and Medgar Evers - are also under review for potential renaming.
BBC News
27 minutes ago
- BBC News
Which storylines will define the NBA Finals?
Oklahoma City Thunder face the Indiana Pacers in the 2025 NBA Finals, starting on Thursday Thunder booked their place in their first national finals since 2012 with a 4-1 series win over the Minnesota Timberwolves in the Western Conference the east, the Pacers beat the New York Knicks 4-2 to reach their second ever national finals and their first since of the final, BBC Sport's Ask Me Anything team looks at what to watch out for in during the best-of-seven series. First-time hopefuls vs a 46-year wait As far as historic NBA longevity goes, a final between the Thunder and the Pacers is one that is a surprise to Pacers are only here for the second time in their history, while the Thunder are only making their fourth finals outing by Olympic champion Tyrese Haliburton, the Pacers are among the 10 active franchises never to win the NBA's national championship, with the Thunder only boasting one Thunder's only NBA finals crown came in 1979 when they were the Seattle Sonics, meaning no Oklahoma-based side has ever won the thing is for sure, the Larry O'Brien Trophy is heading to a new state for the first time in either Indiana or Oklahoma. Will SGA join the exclusive MVP club? Thunder point guard Shai Gilgeous-Alexander became the first Canadian to win the NBA's Most Valuable Player (MVP) award since Steven Nash in 2006. this season.A finals win with the Thunder could also see him join an exclusive club with some of basketball's all-time since 2015 has the season MVP gone on to win the finals with their franchise that season, with the last being Steph known as 'SGA', Gilgeous-Alexander is the third Thunder player to be named MVP, but Kevin Durant (2014) and Russell Westbrook (2017) both failed in their quests to complete the finals and MVP would join the likes of LeBron James, Michael Jordan, Shaquille O'Neal, Magic Johnson and Larry Bird, should the Thunder claim a series win. Thunder's 2-0 record vs Pacers The two finalists have met twice already this season, coming in December in Indiana and March in both occasions, the Thunder came out on top and it gives them a psychological advantage heading into this best-of-seven Christmas and New Year, the Thunder were 120-114 winners on the road, going on to claim a 132-111 scalp of the Pacers three months the play-offs, the Thunder recorded wins in 12 of their 16 games that included a 4-0 sweep of the Memphis Grizzlies in the first Pacers have an identical record since the start of the play-offs in April. Pacers' outstanding comebacks A major factor in the Pacers reaching a first finals in a quarter of a century has been their ability to overturn games that have at times, seemed close to impossible to do game five of their play-off first round meeting with the Milwaukee Bucks, the Pacers found themselves 118-111 down with 40 seconds of overtime remaining, only for Andrew Nembhard to nail a three-pointer and Haliburton to score five unanswered points for a 119-118 by 14 points in the third quarter of game two in the Eastern Conference semi-finals against the Cleveland Cavaliers, the Thunder were 119-112 down with 57 seconds but recorded a 120-119 as Haliburton found a three-pointer with one second remaining.A hat-trick of memorable play-off comebacks again had Haliburton at the heart of it. In the first game of the Eastern Conference finals, the Pacers trailed 121-112 to the Knicks with 52 seconds remaining of regular time. As the buzzer sounded, Haliburton's long-range shot with one foot on the three-point line bounced up off the rim and dropped in for two points, sending the game to overtime before the Pacers won can be said about the Pacers is their relentless attitude and their ability to dig deep into games, something which they will need against a Thunder side that averaged 3.1 more points per game than them in the regular season. Thunder's home-court advantage The Thunder have got the home court advantage for the seven-game series, meaning they will host games one, two, five and seven of the series, should all seven matches be is because the Western Conference champions had a significantly better record during the 82-game regular season, winning 68 matches to the Pacers' the Pacers' previous finals appearance in 2000, 16 of the 25 teams with home court advantage have won the each of the 2024, 2023 and 2022 finalists with home court advantage all failed to make it article is the latest from BBC Sport's Ask Me Anything team. What is Ask Me Anything? Ask Me Anything is a service dedicated to answering your want to reward your time by telling you things you do not know and reminding you of things you team will find out everything you need to know and be able to call upon a network of contacts including our experts and will be answering your questions from the heart of the BBC Sport newsroom, and going behind the scenes at some of the world's biggest sporting coverage will span the BBC Sport website, app, social media and YouTube accounts, plus BBC TV and radio. More questions answered... Epsom Derby start time, horses and previous winnersHow is the Ballon d'Or winner decided?What does the new Premier League ball look like?What are penalty points in F1 and how do they work?
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
WhyHunger marks 50 years of fighting for food security, a point of 'pride and shame'
WhyHunger would have liked to be out of service by now. Singer-songwriter Harry Chapin and radio DJ Bill Ayres founded the grassroots support organization in 1975 with the idea they could eradicate hunger at its root by leveraging their music industry connections to fund community groups advancing economic and food security. And, yet, the global nonprofit is hitting the half-century mark this year — an anniversary that reflects the sobering need for continued food assistance. 'It is pride and shame in equal measure,' said Jen Chapin, the daughter of Harry Chapin and a WhyHunger board member, at the nonprofit's gala Wednesday night. 'That this organization is still relevant when hunger is a completely solvable problem — it's embarrassing.' Established amid transformative expansions of federal food programs just before the United States significantly cut social welfare, WhyHunger marks its 50-year milestone at a time of worsening food insecurity worldwide when some of the wealthiest countries are decreasing their humanitarian commitments. As part of the Trump administration's swift scaling back of the federal government, funding streams are being shut off for many in the nonprofit's network that help millions of hungry people access nutritious food. Chapin said the immense need, and 'that the political conversation has gone backward,' would be 'infuriating' to her late father. 'But he wouldn't pause to rant,' she said. 'He'd be like, 'OK, what can we do?'' The U.S. Department of Agriculture estimates more than 47 million people, including nearly 14 million children, lived in food-insecure households in 2023 — a crisis WhyHunger blames on 'deeper systemic issues' of rising inflation, the rollback of pandemic relief and poor wages. Those statistics were 'ridiculous' to Grammy award-winning rockers Pat Benatar and Neil Giraldo. The couple, which performed its hit 'Love Is a Battlefield,' was recognized Wednesday with the ASCAP Harry Chapin Humanitarian Award, given to artists who use their influence to foster social justice. Giraldo said they've been involved with WhyHunger for 30 years. The support began with their relationship to Harry Chapin and his family, as well as their advocacy for children's causes. 'Music brings so many people together,' Benatar told the Associated Press. 'I think it's just always a good start.' 'If we can help in any way, that's what we're trying to do: just be helpers,' Giraldo added. The annual awards gala, hosted by Jazz at Lincoln Center's Frederick P. Rose Hall, raised more than $125,000 on Wednesday night alone. The proceeds directly supported WhyHunger's programs in the U.S. and 24 other countries. The nonprofit aims to not only feed people but create systems-level change by training local farmers, connecting people to government benefits, promoting indigenous food sovereignty and defending food workers' rights. 'It's not enough to feed people for a day,' Jen Chapin said. "It's not even enough to teach a man to fish so that he can get his own food. You have to also create the social movement so that there is a food system that enables that farmer, that fisherperson, to get a fair price for their work, feed their local community.' Among the benefactors were WhyHunger Board of Directors Chair Cindy Secunda and billionaire Bloomberg L.P. co-founder Tom Secunda, whose family foundation has contributed over $8 million to WhyHunger since 2020. Like many WhyHunger supporters, Cindy said she was first introduced to their work during Harry Chapin concerts in college. She would donate $10 or so, per his end-of-show requests. But she said she didn't ramp up her giving until more recently when she was invited to see the work of WhyHunger's partners up close. 'They get so much more done with such a small staff," she said. "I've never seen anything like it.' The nonprofit has not increased its staff totals much over its 50 years to 'stay nimble and serve those who are serving,' according to Chapin. The biggest change has been the philanthropic sector's overall approach to fighting food insecurity, staff say. Paternalistic, top-down attitudes toward aid were more dominant when the organization was founded. The idea that hunger is connected to issues of racism and climate was not as widespread then, according to Debbie DePoala, WhyHunger's senior director of communications The nonprofit has long centered public policy in conversations about hunger, according to Jan Poppendieck, a former board member and CUNY professor who has studied the history of food assistance. She hopes the outlook isn't lost. 'What they have done best is assist local innovative progressive organizations," Poppendieck said. 'Assist them financially because of this ability, as I say, to extract moolah from the entertainment industry, and assist them with sharing best practices, introducing them to each other, bringing them together so that people can learn from each other.' ___ Associated Press coverage of philanthropy and nonprofits receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content. For all of AP's philanthropy coverage, visit
