'Liberal propaganda' media outlet could see taxpayer funding slashed if GOP efforts succeed
National Public Radio could see its funding slashed as a new bill would scrap both "direct or indirect" federal taxpayer support for the news organization.
Rep. Kat Cammack, R-Fla., and Sen. Jim Banks, R-Ind., introduced the "Defund NPR Act" this week as spending across the board is being scrutinized by Republican lawmakers.
"I'm glad to join my longtime friend, Senator Banks, in introducing the Defund NPR Act in the House," Cammack said in a statement. "Last Congress, the Energy & Commerce Committee held a hearing about the status of NPR and how federal funds are often used for left-wing activism under the journalism moniker."
The public radio orgnization receives 1% of its budget from the United States government, but local NPR affiliates rely on federal government grants much more heavily. However, it also takes aim at the "dues" and "fees" paid out by those affiliates, which NPR describes on its website as a significant source of income.
NPR's website also describes the funding from the government as "essential" and would risk "weakening the institution" if it were scrapped, as it would have to rely more heavily on donations and other sources of revenue.
"Taxpayers shouldn't be forced to fund NPR's liberal propaganda. If NPR can't stay afloat without government funding, that tells you all you need to know about the quality of their news," Banks said in a statement. Bank iontroduced legislation under the same title while he was in the House in April 2024.
Earlier this month, Rep. Claudia Tenney, R-N.Y., and Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, introduced the "Defund Government Sponsored Propaganda Act," taking aim at both NPR and PBS.
"Americans have hundreds of sources of news and commentary, and they don't need politically biased, taxpayer-funded media choosing what they should see and hear. PBS and NPR are free to compete in the marketplace of ideas using donations, but their public subsidy should end," Lee said in a statement at the time.
NPR did not respond to a request for comment in time for publication.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Dave Ramsey sends major message to Americans on IRAs, Roth IRAs
Americans preparing for retirement encounter various challenges, primarily centered on maintaining financial security and sustaining the lifestyle they envision after leaving the workforce. Key concerns involve estimating potential Social Security payments and evaluating how much they will be able to depend on their accumulated retirement funds. Dave Ramsey, bestselling personal finance author and radio host, offers important words for Americans on traditional IRAs, Roth IRAs and some key advice on ways to achieve a financially comfortable retirement. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Making sure retirement funds can adequately cover future expenses is a top priority for many Americans. With rising life expectancies and the uncertainty of financial markets, retirees must strategize how to extend their savings throughout their retirement years. To build financial security, individuals wisely invest in 401(k)s, IRAs, and similar accounts while factoring in tax considerations. Another significant concern is health care costs, which tend to increase as medical needs grow with age. Although Medicare helps alleviate some expenses, it does not cover everything, requiring retirees to account for out-of-pocket costs such as medications, long-term care, and some additional medical services. Related: Dave Ramsey warns Americans on Social Security The impact of rising inflation is a significant concern, as it reduces the purchasing power of fixed retirement incomes. Many retirees worry that inflation could hinder their ability to maintain their preferred lifestyle, especially those who depend heavily on Social Security benefits. While Social Security remains a crucial source of retirement income, relying on it entirely brings uncertainty. Questions surrounding its long-term viability, cost-of-living adjustments, and possible benefit reductions due to solvency concerns add to the financial stress many retirees face. Recognizing these challenges, Ramsey issues a caution regarding traditional IRAs and Roth IRAs, offering Americans guidance on setting financial priorities and navigating the complexities of retirement planning. Ramsey explains that both Roth IRAs and traditional IRAs are valuable tools for retirement savings, but the key distinction lies in how they are taxed. A Roth IRA is funded with after-tax dollars, allowing investments to grow tax-free. When retirement arrives, withdrawals from the Roth IRA remain tax-free, providing financial flexibility. In contrast, a traditional IRA is funded with pretax money, offering an immediate tax advantage. However, when funds are withdrawn during retirement, both the contributions and their accumulated growth are subject to taxation. "While a Roth IRA doesn't offer any current-year tax benefits like a traditional IRA, it gives you something even better: tax-free growth and tax-free withdrawals once you retire," Ramsey wrote. "Now, that's a sweet deal!" More on retirement: Dave Ramsey sounds alarm for Americans on Social SecurityScott Galloway warns Americans on 401(k), US economy threatShark Tank's Kevin O'Leary has message on Social Security, 401(k)s Another significant difference between these accounts is the income limits. A traditional IRA has no income restrictions, meaning individuals can contribute regardless of how much they earn annually. A Roth IRA, on the other hand, has specific eligibility requirements. In 2025, those filing as single or head of household can contribute the full amount if their gross income is below $150,000. For married couples filing jointly, the threshold is $246,000. Related: Dave Ramsey sends strong message to Americans on 401(k)s Once a person turns 59-and-a-half and has held their Roth IRA for at least five years, they are free to withdraw both contributions and earnings without facing taxes or penalties - an excellent advantage for retirees. However, if one's Roth IRA has been open for less than five years, any earnings they take out will be subject to taxes. In 2025, the Roth IRA contribution limit remains $7,000 for those under 50, translating to a monthly contribution of $583.33 when divided over 12 months. Individuals aged 50 and older can contribute up to $8,000, which allows for monthly contributions of $666.67. These limits require savers to plan smartly, ensuring steady growth in their retirement accounts while optimizing tax advantages, Ramsey explains. By making consistent contributions, individuals can build financial security for their future while taking advantage of tax-free growth. Related: Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary makes bold prediction on U.S. economy The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
Bengals' Trey Hendrickson contract standoff gets a hot take from VP JD Vance
Bengals' Trey Hendrickson contract standoff gets a hot take from VP JD Vance Cincinnati Bengals defensive end Trey Hendrickson now has politicians talking about his contract standoff with the team. Appearing on Theo Von's podcast this week, Vice President JD Vance joked around about the contract standoff, with the Middletown, Ohio, politician expressing optimism about the Bengals in the process. "Trey, if you're watching this show: If you're a Republican, I will show up to a Bengals game and take a photo with you if you sign on with the Bengals," Vance joked. "And if you're a Democrat, I'll stay the hell away. Just sign with the Bengals, because we've got a chance, man." RELATED: Bengals news: Jermaine Burton buzz, practice urgency and more As Bengals fans know all too well, though, outside noise doesn't really have a way of impacting how the team does business. That's a rule that will certainly apply to an office as high as Vance's right now, even if he does happen to hail from Ohio. Joe Burrow and others have commented on Hendrickson's standoff with the team recently, too. The next entry in the saga will happen soon when it's revealed if the star pass-rusher shows up to mandatory minicamp or gets fined by the team. RELATED: Bengals' Andrei Iosivas adds 15 pounds while eyeing breakout season
CNBC
3 hours ago
- CNBC
CCTV Script 06/06/25
The war of words between Elon Musk and Donald Trump, which seemed to escalate almost hourly, has already cost real money in the capital markets. Overnight, Musk's personal net worth reportedly fell by approximately $34 billion. By aligning the timing of their social media exchanges with Tesla's stock movements, a clear pattern emerges: as the feud grew more intense, with language becoming increasingly blunt and emotional, Tesla's share price continued to slide. Many analysts believe that Tesla's stock is likely to remain volatile. To assess its future trajectory, we can start with the trigger of this conflict: a recently passed House spending bill. One provision would eliminate tax credits for electric vehicles—directly impacting Tesla. JPMorgan analysts estimate that the new legislation could cut Tesla's annual profits by around $1.2 billion. However, some market observers note that both Musk and others in the industry had long anticipated that the Trump administration would eventually scrap EV subsidies. This expectation has been priced in—it was only a matter of timing. But of even greater consequence is the second layer of impact: the broader regulatory posture of the White House toward Musk, particularly in the autonomous driving space. Timing is critical. Next week, Tesla is expected to debut its long-awaited Robotaxi service in Austin, Texas. Progress in self-driving technology has been a key reason many investors remain bullish on Tesla. But the breakdown in Musk's relationship with Trump could undermine those expectations. "there's a view that the battle here going on between musk and Trump, that this is going to continue to sort of, you know, increase, and with that, ultimately does is that autonomous and the regulatory vision does Trump now, now not start to play nice in the sandbox with musk.""Elon Musk, as brilliant as he can be, can also be mercurial and impetuous. CUT TO from a trading perspective, I think the stock could easily trade down into the 250s 260s until you get some support." Beyond the personal feud, the spotlight is also shifting to the broader relationship between Silicon Valley—the U.S. tech hub—and Washington, D.C.—the political center. As Musk and Trump move from allies to adversaries, their split is drawing attention to the evolving dynamic between big tech and federal power. Analysts told CNBC that during Trump's first term, major tech firms often found themselves in the administration's crosshairs. Companies like Meta, Google, and to some extent Apple were all named in antitrust inquiries. Now, the rift between Musk and Trump may open new doors for tech leaders who have had tense relations with Musk. For instance, Jeff Bezos—who also leads a space company—has in recent months made efforts to court Trump more closely, reportedly taking cues from Musk's political playbook. This shift may also present an opportunity for Sam Altman, CEO of AI startup OpenAI. "If you're a startup that's trying to make big names or big headlines with investments for the US, that's probably a good place to be." Still, some analysts caution that this overnight drama may not deserve too much attention. A defining feature of the Trump-era policymaking process has always been its volatility—things can shift dramatically within just a few hours. What ultimately matters is returning to the fundamentals and taking a long-term view of where the industry—and the economy—are heading.
