logo
Sen. Josh Hawley calls on DOJ to investigate FICO

Sen. Josh Hawley calls on DOJ to investigate FICO

Yahoo15-04-2025

ST. LOUIS – 'I think the rates credit card companies are charging are outrageous,' U.S. Senator Josh Hawley said during an October 2024 debate.
Even before the Senate debate hosted by FOX 2 in November, Sen. Hawley wanted more accountability in the financial services industry. Now in his second Senate term, he's again taking aim at Fair Isaac Corporation, or FICO. Earlier this month, Hawley sent a letter asking the Department of Justice to investigative FICO, alleging anticompetitive practices and repeated price hikes.
'There's only one company in America who basically does those FICO scores, and what they charge to consumers is outrageous, and it goes up every year, and most of the time, you don't know about it 'til you get billed,' Hawley said.
Family sues youth league after teen's suicide following coach's alleged abuse
Hawley told the DOJ, 'FICO enjoys a sweetheart deal from the federal government wherein its credit scores are required for loans originated with multiple government entities.'
Hawley says FICO has abused its government-granted market power.
'Some bank runs your FICO score. You've got to pay for it. You go to buy a car; a car dealer runs your FICO score. You've got to pay for it. You get charged,' he said. 'The charges go up and up and up, and nobody can afford it, and nobody has given me given any option to opt out of it or have a competitor do it instead.'
FOX 2 reached out to FICO to inquire about these allegations. The company responded with a statement:
FICO continues to compete vigorously across consumer credit markets, and the FICO Score has long been freely chosen by lenders, investors, and other participants across consumer credit markets because it is trusted as the most predictive and reliable credit score, enabling lenders to fairly expand credit access to American consumers. The success of the FICO Score is not due to any government action in the mortgage market. In fact, the vast majority, approximately 99%, of FICO Scores used for decisioning across the consumer credit industry are used outside mortgage originations.
And even within the mortgage market, lenders originate nearly thirty percent of all mortgages outside the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac programs but still choose to use FICO Scores for those mortgages. The royalty collected by FICO remains a small percentage of the cost of the tri-merge credit report and score bundle (on average approximately 15% of the $80 to well over $100 tri-merge bundle cost), which is itself an exceedingly small share of overall mortgage closing costs. The FICO Score represents less than 2/10 of 1% of the approximately $6,000 in average closing costs for a mortgage—also compelling value given the central role the FICO Score plays in the origination of approximately $2 trillion in mortgages each year.
'This needs to stop. I've asked for investigation into their anti-competitive practices,' Hawley said. 'I just think this is a basic protection of American consumers and Missouri consumers. We are getting ripped off here by these people that it needs to stop.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tesla's Model Y sales outpaced this model by an 11:1 ratio in Q1. Will Toyota's EV rebrand fare any better?
Tesla's Model Y sales outpaced this model by an 11:1 ratio in Q1. Will Toyota's EV rebrand fare any better?

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tesla's Model Y sales outpaced this model by an 11:1 ratio in Q1. Will Toyota's EV rebrand fare any better?

Sales numbers for the first quarter of 2025 are in — and Tesla's performance might surprise you. While it's no shock that the American electric vehicle giant led the EV market, the extent to which Tesla outpaced its competitors is remarkable. Tesla sold over 11 times as many electric SUVs as Toyota, according to a new sales report compiled by Kelley Blue Book. Why is Tesla's electric SUV outselling Toyota's model by such a large margin? Here's how the two electric SUVs compare and how Toyota intends to reinvigorate its EV nameplate. The 2025 Tesla Model Y starts at $44,990. It has a top speed of 125 miles per hour and accelerates from 0-60 miles per hour in 5.4 seconds. The Model Y small electric SUV has a whopping 357 miles of driving range in its base form. Tesla's Model Y All-Wheel Drive starts at $48,990. It zooms from 0-60 miles per hour in just 4.6 seconds. Toyota's bZ4X is the Japanese automaker's first small electric SUV model for the American market in recent years. The bZ4X entered the great EV race after the arrival of several popular rivals including the Model Y, Volkswagen ID.4. Hyundai Ioniq 5, Kia EV6 and Ford Mustang Mach-E. The 2025 Toyota bZ4X starts at $37,070. Unlike the Model Y, it does not currently qualify for the federal electric vehicle tax incentive. That said, Toyota offers an EV incentive for leasing the bZ4X. It has a top speed of 104 miles per hour (all-wheel drive trim) and accelerates from 0-60 miles per hour in around 6.5 seconds. The bZ4X comes in three trims and has 252 miles of driving range. Upper trim level bZ4X models have slightly less driving range. The Tesla Model Y and Toyota bZ4X may both be electric SUVs, but they are very different. They have completely different design languages and Toyota's model falls short in several areas. Both small electric SUVs have starting prices under $38K when you account for the EV tax incentive. The main differences are performance specs and cabin design. The Model Y has 102 more miles of driving range than the Toyota bZ4X, which is no small figure in terms of range. Additionally, the Tesla Supercharger Network is one of the largest EV charging networks in the world. The Tesla Model Y is capable of replenishing 200 miles of range in just 15 minutes via a Tesla Supercharger. The Model Y is quicker than the bZ4X, it has more driving range, and it has a more refined interior. U.S. News & World Reported cited "down-market cabin materials" as one of the three bZ4X cons listed in its review. In contrast, the publication praised the Model Y for its "loads of passenger and cargo space, thrilling acceleration, and deft handling". The bZ4X nameplate may not have been a huge success for the company, but it still has a role to play in the EV space, thanks to a major upgrade. Toyota is completely rebranding the bZ4X nameplate as the Toyota bZ, a redesigned EV with more driving range and design updates. Toyota is addressing the main issues that car buyers have with the bZ (formerly bZ4X) with better performance specs. Its driving range is getting a huge bump to 314 miles. It also boasts up to 50% more horsepower on all-wheel drive models (338 combined system net horsepower), according to Toyota's press release. Standard NACS (North American Charging Standard) port, giving it access to Tesla chargers Quicker charging time (10%-80% in close to 30 minutes with DC fast-charging) Updated interior and exterior styling So, Toyota's bZ4x electric SUV may not pose a major threat to the Tesla Model Y, but the upcoming bZ could give it a run for its money. It is expected to hit dealers in the second half of 2025, according to Toyota. No pricing information is available at this time, but the EV will not be eligible for the federal electric vehicle tax incentive. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Tesla outpaced Toyota sales 11:1 in Q1. Will bZ4X rebrand fare better?

Congress votes to rescind California vehicle emissions waiver
Congress votes to rescind California vehicle emissions waiver

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Congress votes to rescind California vehicle emissions waiver

This story was originally published on Smart Cities Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Smart Cities Dive newsletter. The U.S. Senate passed three joint resolutions May 22 nullifying California's ability to set emissions standards for passenger cars, light duty vehicles and trucks that are stricter than national standards set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Auto and petroleum industry lobbyists targeted California's Advanced Clean Car II regulations, adopted in 2022, which require all new passenger cars, trucks and SUVs sold in the state to be zero-emission vehicles by the 2035 model year. Federal law set in 1990 allows 17 additional states and the District of Columbia to follow California's regulations. California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, announced the state's intention to file a lawsuit blocking the congressional resolutions, which await the signature of President Donald Trump to become law. California's ability to set its own vehicle emissions standards stem from the 1967 Air Quality Act, passed at a time when smog and poor air quality often permeated the Los Angeles basin. While air quality in California has improved over the years, experts fear a setback from the Senate's action. 'Public health could potentially suffer as a consequence,' said Michael Kleeman, a professor at the University of California, Davis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. 'This is, plain and simple, a vote against clean air to breathe," said Aaron Kressig, transportation electrification manager at Western Resource Advocates, in an emailed statement. He warned of potential lost days at school or work and premature deaths. 'Over 150 million people in the United States are already exposed to unhealthy levels of air pollution,' Steven Higashide, director of the Clean Transportation Program at the Union of Concerned Scientists, said in an emailed statement. 'The standards are based on the best available science, and were finalized with extensive public input.' Along with public health concerns, the debate around California's emissions waivers include policy, auto and petroleum industry resistance and debate over states' rights. Republicans argue that California overstepped its prerogative. 'The California waivers rules are an improper expansion of a limited Clean Air Act authority and would endanger consumers, our economy, and our nation's energy supply,' Republican Sen. John Thune of South Dakota said May 20 in the Senate chamber. Industry opponents of the emission waivers cheered the Senate's action. 'The fact is these EV sales mandates were never achievable,' John Bozzella, president and CEO of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, an auto industry lobbying group, said in a statement. Bozella noted the automakers key concern: 'The problem really isn't California. It's the 11 states that adopted California's rules without the same level of readiness for EV sales requirements of this magnitude.' Petroleum industry leaders weighed in May 23 with a joint statement. 'The United States Senate delivered a victory for American consumers, manufacturers, and U.S. energy security by voting to overturn the prior administration's EPA rule authorizing California's gas car ban and preventing its spread across our country,' said American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers President and CEO Chet Thompson and American Petroleum Institute President and CEO Mike Sommers in a published statement. California and 10 other states formed a coalition to foster cleaner and more affordable vehicles, Newsom announced May 23. Led by the U.S. Climate Alliance, a bipartisan group of 24 governors, the Affordable Clean Cars Coalition said in a news release that it would 'consider next steps for our clean vehicle programs' and work to preserve the states' authority under the Clean Air Act. Participating states include California, Colorado, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Washington. 'The fact remains that states have the legal right under the Clean Air Act to protect their residents from vehicle pollution,' Sierra Club Climate Policy Director Patrick Drupp said in an emailed statement. Recommended Reading Congress could soon revoke California's vehicle emissions standards Sign in to access your portfolio

Are Beta Systems Software AG's (FRA:BSS) Mixed Financials The Reason For Its Gloomy Performance on The Stock Market?
Are Beta Systems Software AG's (FRA:BSS) Mixed Financials The Reason For Its Gloomy Performance on The Stock Market?

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Are Beta Systems Software AG's (FRA:BSS) Mixed Financials The Reason For Its Gloomy Performance on The Stock Market?

It is hard to get excited after looking at Beta Systems Software's (FRA:BSS) recent performance, when its stock has declined 4.9% over the past three months. It is possible that the markets have ignored the company's differing financials and decided to lean-in to the negative sentiment. Fundamentals usually dictate market outcomes so it makes sense to study the company's financials. Specifically, we decided to study Beta Systems Software's ROE in this article. ROE or return on equity is a useful tool to assess how effectively a company can generate returns on the investment it received from its shareholders. Simply put, it is used to assess the profitability of a company in relation to its equity capital. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. The formula for return on equity is: Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Beta Systems Software is: 1.6% = €438k ÷ €27m (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2025). The 'return' is the yearly profit. One way to conceptualize this is that for each €1 of shareholders' capital it has, the company made €0.02 in profit. See our latest analysis for Beta Systems Software Thus far, we have learned that ROE measures how efficiently a company is generating its profits. Depending on how much of these profits the company reinvests or "retains", and how effectively it does so, we are then able to assess a company's earnings growth potential. Assuming all else is equal, companies that have both a higher return on equity and higher profit retention are usually the ones that have a higher growth rate when compared to companies that don't have the same features. It is hard to argue that Beta Systems Software's ROE is much good in and of itself. Not just that, even compared to the industry average of 13%, the company's ROE is entirely unremarkable. Given the circumstances, the significant decline in net income by 28% seen by Beta Systems Software over the last five years is not surprising. However, there could also be other factors causing the earnings to decline. For instance, the company has a very high payout ratio, or is faced with competitive pressures. So, as a next step, we compared Beta Systems Software's performance against the industry and were disappointed to discover that while the company has been shrinking its earnings, the industry has been growing its earnings at a rate of 6.8% over the last few years. Earnings growth is an important metric to consider when valuing a stock. What investors need to determine next is if the expected earnings growth, or the lack of it, is already built into the share price. By doing so, they will have an idea if the stock is headed into clear blue waters or if swampy waters await. If you're wondering about Beta Systems Software's's valuation, check out this gauge of its price-to-earnings ratio, as compared to its industry. Beta Systems Software doesn't pay any regular dividends, meaning that potentially all of its profits are being reinvested in the business, which doesn't explain why the company's earnings have shrunk if it is retaining all of its profits. It looks like there might be some other reasons to explain the lack in that respect. For example, the business could be in decline. In total, we're a bit ambivalent about Beta Systems Software's performance. Even though it appears to be retaining most of its profits, given the low ROE, investors may not be benefitting from all that reinvestment after all. The low earnings growth suggests our theory correct. With that said, we studied the latest analyst forecasts and found that while the company has shrunk its earnings in the past, analysts expect its earnings to grow in the future. To know more about the latest analysts predictions for the company, check out this visualization of analyst forecasts for the company. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store