
Challenges galore as India eyes developed nation status by 2047
None of us can vouch for the fact that such heinous and inhuman incidents won't be reported any more, but must be curtailed effectively if we are really interested in realizing the goal of inclusive Viksit Bharat by 2047. India was never a strong nation when discrimination on the pretext of caste and religion was rampant. India was a powerful country so long as we were living in a well-knit inclusive society. Foreign invaders looted us, not because we were weak, but we were a fragmented society with multiple boundaries and demarcations drawn with the foul colour of caste, religion and ethnic considerations. Britishers capitalized on that as well and enslaved us for nearly two hundreds of years. I would not like to get into the debate of good or bad done by the Britishers to us, but will certainly reiterate the fact that they ruled over us for such a long time with the help of the people of this great country only.
I would have been on cloud nine had I found the assertion of the World Bank that India's Gini Index-2025 stands at 25.5, placing our country as the fourth most equal country globally, behind only the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, and Belarus, in sync with the ground realities. Similarly, the World Bank's Spring 2025 Poverty and Equity Brief revealed that 171 million Indians were lifted out of extreme poverty between 2011 and 2023. The share of the population living on less than $2.15 per day, a standard measure for extreme poverty, has plunged from 16.2 per cent in 2011-12 to just 2.3 per cent in 2022-23. Under the World Bank's revised extreme poverty line of $3.00 per day, the rate for 2022-23 stands at a modest 5.3 per cent. Can someone tell us what kind of facilities a household of four members can have even if they earn $5 per day in Tier-II or Tier-III cities? It will be extremely difficult for them to meet even their basic needs.
In recent decades, India has witnessed a surge in developmental initiatives, ranging from digital transformation to infrastructure expansion, skill development missions, and economic reforms. Government programmes like Digital India, Startup India, Skill India, and flagship schemes like Ayushman Bharat or PM AwasYojana reflect an ambition to uplift the nation and empower its citizens. However, the million-dollar question remains: What grand purpose will these initiatives ultimately serve if a significant section of the population continues to be systematically deprived of their rightful share in the country's resources, opportunities, privileges, and responsibilities? No doubt, India is a vibrant and complex democracy, home to immense cultural, linguistic, caste, and religious diversity. Yet, this diversity often masks deep-rooted structural inequalities.
Large segments of the population, especially those from Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), Other Backward Classes (OBC), and religious minorities, remain underrepresented in key sectors like education, employment, and policymaking. The gap between aspiration and access remains stark. Despite constitutional guarantees and decades of affirmative action, socio-economic mobility for many remains limited. For instance, while urban centres flourish with digital and financial services, many rural and tribal communities still lack reliable access to electricity, clean water, quality healthcare, and education. Similarly, while metropolitan cities speak of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, countless young Indians in small towns and villages are yet to receive foundational skills or job opportunities. Moreover, the issue is not merely one of access but also of recognition and participation.
True nation-building requires equitable participation in decision-making processes and sharing of both responsibilities and benefits of growth. When significant populations are systemically sidelined through structural bias, caste-based exclusion, or regional neglect, the very legitimacy of these national initiatives comes under scrutiny. Unless the benefits of growth are equitably distributed, and unless every citizen feels a sense of belonging and ownership in the nation's progress, even the grandest policy visions risk becoming hollow symbols. In essence, for any initiative to have real transformative impact in India, it must be rooted in social justice, ensure proportional representation, and consciously bridge historic gaps so that all Indians, regardless of their background, have a fair share in the republic's promises and potential.
We must pause and reflect deeply: Why, despite having the world's finest Constitution, a visionary document crafted under the leadership of Bharat RatnaDr BR Ambedkar, are we still struggling to address the socio-economic and political nightmares faced by millions of our own people? The Constitution promises justice, equality, liberty, and fraternity. Yet, large sections of society continue to grapple with poverty, unemployment, caste and gender discrimination, and political marginalization. This disconnect is not due to any flaw in the Constitution itself, but in our collective failure to implement its spirit with honesty and inclusivity.
The rising social unrest, distrust in institutions, and frequent communal and caste-based tensions point to deeper systemic issues that remain unaddressed. By engaging in honest introspection and public discourse, we can uncover where we are going wrong, whether in policymaking, governance, or social behaviour. Such enlightenment is essential if we are to heal the fractures in our society. It will help us move towards reconciliation, bridge divides, and truly realize the vision of an inclusive, harmonious, and Viksit Bharat, a developed India where no citizen is left behind. The dream is not distant. It demands courage, integrity, and unity of purpose.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Growth's losing steam, govts must steer better
Infinite growth won't end poverty, better distribution will A motorcar is made of steel, aluminium, copper, glass, rubber, and numerous other things. All of these are finite resources. Steel is also needed for buildings and machinery. Glass for bottles and watch dials. Aluminium for pressure cookers and soda cans. When finite resources have competing uses, it's a miracle that the production of cars, etc, keeps increasing year after year, and the world becomes a wealthier place with it. It wasn't always so, though. Two centuries ago, economists were a grim lot, and Robert Malthus was more pessimistic than most. He worried that there wasn't enough land on Earth to feed the increasing population, which was nudging 1bn then. But we're 8bn-plus now, and growing, without exhausting Earth's carrying capacity. In fact, we've become so used to the idea of growth that a 6.5% increase in GDP seems lacklustre, 5% dismal. In his new book, The Invention of Infinite Growth: How Economists Came to Believe a Dangerous Delusion, Christopher F Jones, associate professor of history at Arizona State University, examines how growth became a modern 'ideal', and its impact on the planet. GDP may be an abstruse idea for most, but it's become the default measure of growth – up is good, down bad, and the faster it rises the better. Some say it's the most powerful number in the world. But as Jones points out, GDP is a relatively recent concept, developed in 1934, and applied only after WW2. The real big change that came with it was that growth – through its proxy GDP – came to be seen as key to jobs, peace and prosperity. Hence, for the first time in history, it became govt's responsibility. Using different policy tools, govts were expected to make national economies run faster. Those that couldn't were booted out in democracies. The idea of infinite growth, however, didn't form for almost 20 years after. It happened in the 1960s when US and USSR were pursuing growth intensely during the Cold War, and oil production in West Asia doubled in a decade, even as the known oil reserves trebled. These developments gave rise to irrational exuberance among economists and policymakers. In 1992, when he was World Bank's chief economist, Larry Summers declared: 'There are no limits to the carrying capacity of the Earth.' But ask scientists if infinite growth is possible, and they'll say no. They're also deeply concerned about the ecological impacts of unbridled growth. So, why are economists divorced from observed reality? Jones says it's because they trust technology to overcome natural limits, and don't concern themselves with the natural world. As long as the 'delusion' of infinite growth shapes policy, clearing forests for highways and mines will be seen as 'progress'. But Jones says it's time economists started taking the environment – and its limits – seriously. The 'false confidence' about 'managing' the consequences of climate change and biodiversity loss should be abandoned. It's known that economic growth and well-being don't increase in tandem beyond the mid-income level. Billionaires are not happier than millionaires – at least not because of their wealth. Since infinite growth is not sustainable, govts should now focus on income distribution rather than maximisation, Jones says. Growth can't be an end anymore – it has to be targeted at those who need it most, and away from those who don't. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Who is Adriana Kugler? U.S. Fed Governor resigns early. Will Jerome Powell step down as Federal Reserve chair in August?
U.S. Federal Reserve announced on Friday that Adriana Kugler will step down from her position as a governor of the Federal Reserve Board on August 8. Her term was due to expire in January, but her early resignation gives President Donald Trump an opportunity to more quickly appoint someone who could eventually replace Jerome Powell as chair. Kugler missed the Fed's most recent policy meeting this week and did not vote. In a recent speech, she said the Fed should not cut interest rates "for some time" as tariffs trickle through to consumer prices. The Fed statement about Kugler's early resignation did not give a reason for her decision. The central bank declined to comment beyond the announcement. "It has been an honor of a lifetime to serve on the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System," Kugler said in a statement. Powell said in a statement that Kugler "brought impressive experience and academic insights to her work on the board." Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Artificial Intelligence Leadership Project Management Public Policy PGDM Design Thinking others Digital Marketing Product Management Finance Data Science healthcare Healthcare Others Data Science Cybersecurity Data Analytics Operations Management Technology CXO Degree MBA MCA Management Skills you'll gain: Duration: 7 Months S P Jain Institute of Management and Research CERT-SPJIMR Exec Cert Prog in AI for Biz India Starts on undefined Get Details Who is Adriana Kugler? Adriana Kugler has served as a governor at the Fed since September 2023 after being nominated by former President Joe Biden. She plans to return to her job as a public policy professor at Georgetown University in the fall. Kugler is an economist with a background in labor economics who has Colombian heritage and was the U.S. executive director of the World Bank. Live Events When will Jerome Powell Retire? Kugler's decision means that Trump will have the ability to reshape the top ranks of the central bank, both in terms of picking a new chair and filling Kugler's seat. If Trump makes clear that whomever he chooses for Kugler's seat is his pick for the chair, that could make for an awkward and potentially market-rattling situation in which the new governor is seen as something of a shadow chair, potentially undercutting Powell. The opening on the board comes as Trump pressures the Fed to cut interest rates and publicly berates Powell, saying he should lower borrowing costs or resign. The president has also toyed with firing Powell or naming a successor before Powell's term as chair ends in May. On Friday, he went so far as to call on the board to remove Powell from his position as chair. FAQs Q1. Who is U.S. Fed Chair? A1. U.S. Fed Chair is Jerome Powell. Q2. Who is Adriana Kugler? A2. Adriana Kugler is an economist with a background in labor economics who has Colombian heritage and was the U.S. executive director of the World Bank.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Post Trump, 8 Indians deported daily on average compared to 3 before
File photo BENGALURU: That deportations of Indians from the US have surged significantly since Donald Trump returned to office in Jan this year is no secret. Now here's how much more it is when compared to the Biden term and the last year of Trump's previous term that preceded it: On average, at least 8 Indians were sent back everyday this year, compared to around 3 daily between Jan 2020 and Dec 2024. According to data from the ministry of external affairs (MEA), in the five-and-a-half years between Jan 2020 and July 2025, 7,244 Indians were deported for various reasons, and nearly a quarter of them — 1,703 — were sent back after Trump took office for the second time. This rise also coincides with more aggressive enforcement mechanisms. On June 26, the US state department reminded people that the visa screening doesn't stop after a visa is issued. '...We continuously check visa holders to ensure they follow all US laws and immigration rules — and we will revoke their visas and deport them if they don't.' While this was for legal immigrants, a couple of days before this statement, the US had said: 'The US has increased enforcement of immigration laws and removal of illegal aliens. Illegal entry will lead to detention, deportation, and permanent consequences for future visa eligibility…Embarking on a costly and dangerous journey will land you in jail or back in your homeland with a permanent mark on your record.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Stylish New Mobility Scooters Available for Seniors (Prices May Surprise You) Mobility Scooter | Search Ads Search Now Undo Of the 1,703 deported this year, 864 deportations occurred through state-arranged charter and military flights, as per MEA. US Customs and Border Protection (military flights) repatriated 333 people across three dates in Feb: 5, 15, and 16. US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), through its Enforcement and Removal Operations, deported a total of 231 individuals via chartered flights on March 19, June 8, and June 25. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) also carried out deportations via charter flights, sending 300 people back to India on July 5 and 18. Humane deportation W hile 747 individuals were deported via commercial flights from the US — they arrived individually or in small groups, depending on when their flight tickets were arranged — another 72 individuals came through commercial flights from Panama in a similar staggered manner. India doesn't maintain its own firm estimates of illegal immigration into the US. And so far as consular and deportation exercises are concerned, it relies on information shared by US authorities. The MEA has said that 'it remains engaged with US counterparts to ensure deportations are carried out humanely. It has also raised concerns regarding the reported use of shackles, particularly on women and children, and other issues related to cultural and religious sensitivities.' 90% from 5 states Further, a state-wise analysis of the 1,703 Indian deportations in 2025 so far shows that the trend is heavily skewed towards a few northern states. Punjab topped the list with 620 deportees, closely followed by Haryana with 604 — together accounting for over 70% of all cases. Gujarat was a distant third, with 245 individuals sent back, while Uttar Pradesh and Goa followed with 38 and 26 deportees respectively. These top five states collectively represent more than 90% of all deportations recorded this year. The remaining states and UTs reported far fewer cases. Maharashtra and Delhi had 20 deportees each, Telangana 19, Tamil Nadu 17, and Andhra Pradesh and Uttarakhand 12 each. Karnataka saw only 5.