Dueling approaches: Aurora and Denver clash over homelessness strategy
The Common Sense Institute, a conservative-leaning research organization, recently released findings that claim Denver's 'Housing First' initiative is spending roughly $69,000 per year per homeless individual, while the overall number of people experiencing homelessness continues to rise.
Aurora: Twice as many encampments removed in first 3 months of 2025 than last year
In response, Aurora leaders unveiled plans for a new facility grounded in a 'Work First' model. Their upcoming Regional Navigation Campus will include over 200 temporary housing units, available only to individuals who are working or actively pursuing employment. The city says the approach reflects a form of 'tough love,' aimed at long-term self-sufficiency.
'This is a very tough-love approach to helping people,' said Aurora Mayor Mike Coffman. 'The evidence is that the housing-first model is just not working.'
Coffman said he recently brought the city's plan to Washington, D.C., sharing the approach with members of the Trump administration.
Meanwhile, Denver leaders are pushing back, not only against Aurora's strategy but also the data used to support it. City officials questioned the accuracy of the CSI report and stood by their existing model, which prioritizes getting people housed first.
'There's never been a bad idea out of Washington, D.C.,' said a spokesperson for Denver Mayor Mike Johnston's office, responding to news of Coffman's visit.
'How are you going to stabilize your life if you don't have a place to sleep that night?' the spokesperson added.
Aurora's mayor questions why Tren de Aragua impacts have been felt less in Denver
Both cities agree that the homelessness crisis is worsening, but remain deeply divided on how best to solve it. While Aurora's new facility is slated to open in November, Denver officials say their focus remains on expanding supportive housing and regional coordination.
FOX31 will continue to follow developments on both fronts as cities across the metro area seek solutions to one of Colorado's most urgent challenges.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
11 hours ago
- Fox News
Border official fires back at Gavin Newsom's political ‘tantrum' over immigration raids in Los Angeles
A top Customs and Border Protection official is pushing back against California Gov. Gavin Newsom's allegations that federal agents staged an immigration raid to coincide with his rally in Los Angeles. CBP El Centro Chief Patrol Agent Gregory Bovino dismissed Newsom's comments as a political "tantrum." "Does the governor or Mayor Bass, when they have these meltdowns, these tantrums like that, do they want those individuals walking the streets," Bovino wondered Friday on "America's Newsroom." "Where's the outrage [when] there are Tren de Aragua members walking with impunity on the streets of Los Angeles, or child rapists, or a whole litany of other bad people and bad things, bad criminals walking the streets of Los Angeles?" Federal agents conducted immigration enforcement operations across the city Thursday while Newsom held a press conference outlining the state's plan to redraw congressional maps. During his remarks, the governor shifted to discussing the Trump administration's deportation agenda, and claimed dozens of agents were positioned just outside the event. "Do you think it's coincidental?" Newsom asked the crowd. "Donald Trump and his minions, Tom Homan, tough guy, decided, coincidentally or not, that this was a location to advance ICE arrests. Indiscriminate? Perhaps. We'll find out later." Bovino and other officials, such as Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, insisted the raids had nothing to do with the governor's public appearance. "We absolutely targeted all of Los Angeles yesterday," Bovino admitted, adding that 40 law enforcement teams were deployed throughout the city to go after criminal migrants. He claimed that not far from the governor's location, a suspected member of Tren de Aragua, a violent transnational gang from Venezuela, was arrested. That suspect was allegedly the main target of the operation. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem also confirmed on "America Reports" Thursday that information about the suspects is what spurred the raid. "Every single one of our ICE and border patrol operations is built on information. On investigative work. It's a case and an operation that has been planned because of who they think could be in that area and what they have for information that shows that there are illegal criminals there." Bovino stressed that these types of arrests and raids have been ongoing in Los Angeles. "We have hundreds of law enforcement officers conducting that mission every day in Los Angeles. I know the governor said the time and the location," he said, addressing Newsom's claim. "The time is every time. And the location is everywhere. That location's [going to] be where we think we need to go, anywhere, anytime, to effectively conduct that mission." In a statement to Fox News Digital, Newsom's office responded in all capital letters: "WE WILL NOT BE INTIMIDATED BY WEAK LITTLE DONALD TRUMP, THE CRIMINAL PRESIDENT!"
The Hill
2 days ago
- The Hill
The Venezuelan dictator's days are numbered
Nicolás Maduro, the dictator of Venezuela, is on the ropes. President Trump has directed the Pentagon to prepare options for the possible use of military force against drug cartels. The Cartel de los Soles, linked to the Venezuelan government, was designated as a foreign terrorist organization. And a $50 million reward — the highest in U.S. history — was announced for the capture of Maduro himself. The reward on Maduro's head is not just a random number, but a sign of the weight the Trump administration places on the Chavista tyranny. Numbers matter. The reward for Osama Bin Laden was $25 million and was$30 million for Saddam Hussein's sons. In the case of Mexican drug lords, 'El Chapo' Guzmán reached $5 million and Rafael Caro Quintero $20 million. All of these men were arrested or assassinated. Rewards matter and determine the fate of many terrorists and tyrants. Secretary of State Marco Rubio acknowledged the direct connection between Maduro's regime and terrorist organizations such as the Cartel de los Soles and Tren de Aragua. Rubio also emphasized that this designation provides 'legal authority to target them in ways you can't if they're just a bunch of criminals. It's no longer a law enforcement issue. It has become a national security issue. It allows us to now target what they're operating and to use other elements of American power, intelligence agencies, the Department of Defense, whatever.' But Maduro isn't just a threat in terms of international drug trafficking. He is a threat to Venezuelans themselves. According to United Nations reports, the government of Venezuela continues to engage in actions constituting crimes against humanity, including persecution of political leaders, imprisonment of civic rights defenders and severe deprivation of physical liberty, and other crimes. María Corina Machado, Venezuela's main opposition leader, said Maduro poses a threat to hemispheric security. Indeed, Venezuela represents the most urgent crisis in the Western Hemisphere, and its final resolution is everyone's responsibility. Machado also noted that Maduro's criminal regime continues to repress and violate human rights, implementing practices that constitute state terrorism, according to the Inter American Commission of Human Rights. The latest signals issued by the U.S. are unwavering. This doesn't sound like a warning, but like a warrant. The days of sanctions and statements are over in the face of a regime that seems indifferent and immovable. In 1989, the U.S. implemented Operation Just Cause, invading Panama in order to extract narco-dictator Manuel Noriega and to recognize the true winner of that country's presidential elections. Maduro in Venezuela, like Noriega before him, has become a vociferous narco-dictator who opposes the U.S. But in 2025, it is no longer necessary to have a massive deployment of troops on the ground. The recent U.S. airstrikes in Iran known as Operation Midnight Hammer demonstrated that other resources are available to change the course of history. Very specific actions and precise objectives can help bring about regime change from within, or at least alter the status quo. After nearly 25 years of the Chavista regime, the situation in Venezuela is worsening every day. International collaboration is needed to end a tragedy that represents a clear and present danger to Latin America and the U.S. What happens in Venezuela will have an extraordinary impact on preventing, persuading and weakening other dictatorships in the Western Hemisphere. Peace through strength is urgently needed to renew and recover U.S. leadership as a guarantor and defender of security, democracy and freedom for all. Arturo McFields is an exiled journalist, former Nicaraguan ambassador to the Organization of American States, and a former member of the Norwegian Peace Corps. He is an alumnus of the National Defense University's Security and Defense Seminar and the Harvard Leadership course.
CNN
3 days ago
- CNN
Giving homeless people stable housing was federal policy for decades. Trump is ending it
Rachelle Ellison spent 17 years sleeping on the streets of Washington, DC, cycling in and out of jails and hospitals. She finally moved into an apartment in 2008, thanks to a rental voucher with mental health treatment and support services attached through a non-profit organization. 'Once I got the housing stabilization and the foundation underneath my feet, I was able to work on myself,' Ellison said. Ellison benefited from Housing First, a policy that moves chronically homeless people into permanent housing, without requiring them to be sober or in treatment beforehand. Housing First programs then offer services for drug abuse, mental illness, education and employment. Housing First has enjoyed bipartisan support for more than two decades. But the Trump administration wants to cut funding, claiming the model is ineffective, contributing to 'crime and disorder' and the record number of people sleeping on the streets. Instead, Trump wants to fund programs with stiffer sobriety or work requirements, and commit more homeless people with mental health issues without their consent. Trump ordered federal troops to forcibly remove homeless people from Washington, DC, this week. It's a major change for the federal government. Since the George W. Bush administration, giving people a home with social services has been the government's main policy to combat homelessness. Leading researchers and homelessness advocates say the move away from Housing First will have dire consequences for people struggling and unhoused. After landing an apartment, Ellison began treatment for drug use and mental health disorders, stemming from abuse as a child. For years, she worked to maintain sobriety with a team of mental health and drug treatment counselors. 'I had to fail quite a few times, and then finally I got tired, and I had a roof over my head,' she said. 'I've been clean and sober ever since.' Ellison, now a national advocate on homelessness, said that 'Housing First actually saved my life.' Housing First emerged in the early 2000s, replacing a treatment-first model of addressing homelessness. The approach mandated people become sober or participate in programs before they got housing, which was often emergency shelters or transitional housing. Several studies have found that Housing First programs offer greater long-term housing stability than treatment-first, and may even lower overall costs by reducing hospital and ER visits, according to a HUD review of evidence in 2023. The Department of Veterans Affairs has used Housing First to decrease veterans' homelessness by 55% since 2009. Houston, Denver and other cities have successfully used the approach to drive down homelessness. But a White House executive order last month seeks to bring back the old model, directing federal agencies to end funding for organizations that offer housing to people without first requiring treatment for substance abuse or serious mental illnesses. The Trump administration is 'proposing to turn the clock back to transitional housing model of 1990s. We did that and it failed. It's the whole reason Housing First came about,' said Dennis Culhane, a professor of social policy at the University of Pennsylvania whose research on chronic homelessness laid the groundwork for Housing First programs. 'What the administration will find out is exactly what happened before: The people who need the most extensive supports get evicted' from transitional housing, Culhane said. Trump's executive order also calls for local jurisdictions to use civil commitment laws to remove people living on the streets who 'cannot care for themselves' or 'pose risks to themselves or the public.' The administration wants to shift these people into 'long-term institutional settings,' but it may run into a shortage of mental health hospital beds in America. Trump has also cut funding for Medicaid and grants for drug addiction and mental health programs, which may make it harder for people to get treatment. 'What we're seeing is a total lack of investment in solutions we do know work,' said Lara Pukatch, the chief advocacy officer at Miriam's Kitchen, a housing and social services nonprofit in Washington, DC. 'The executive order certainly doesn't address issues of homelessness or make access to health and mental health care any easier.' Mass street homelessness is a relatively recent phenomenon in America. A number of factors contributed, including de-institutionalization without provisions for housing or social services starting in the 1950s, government cuts to housing, and an underfunded, patchwork mental health care system. Results of the treatment-first approach during the 1980s and 1990s 'were not very positive,' Dennis Culhane said. 'People who entered were often discharged for failing to comply with sobriety requirements, and so they ended up back on the streets.' George W. Bush's administration began to tackle chronic homelessness, spurred by advocates and Culhane's research that found New York City was spending $40,000 a year for each chronically homeless person due to time in detox centers, prisons and hospitals. Supportive housing reduced costs annually by $16,000. In 2003, Bush announced a 10-year plan to end homelessness as part of its 'compassionate conservatism' agenda, adopting Housing First as the model. 'The shift came during the Bush administration, where they began to recognize that there was real value in addressing chronic homelessness,' said Frederick Shack, the CEO of Urban Pathways, a housing and social services provider in New York City. 'You can do that best by helping people address their core housing need and surrounding them with services.' The Obama administration continued the approach and in 2009 launched a goal of ending veteran homelessness built around Housing First. Congress that year passed legislation that accelerated funding to Housing First programs. The first Trump administration initially continued the Housing First approach, praising the model. But the administration began shifting its position as unsheltered homelessness became more visible, especially in Democratic-run cities on the West Coast. Housing First also became a larger target of the right. Conservative think tanks and policy institutes such as the Cicero Institute and Manhattan Institute opposed Housing First, arguing that housing without treatment requirements has not worked. 'Housing First was oversold, it became far more dominant than it deserved, and homelessness reached historic levels. What you're going to see under Trump is simply a rebalancing of priorities,' said Stephen Eide, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute who studies homelessness. 'For too long, the GOP neglected Housing First's influence.' Republicans in Congress introduced legislation to redirect funding away from Housing First programs to providers that require job training, addiction treatment or other services. Florida, Georgia, Missouri and other Republican-led states also passed laws restricting Housing First programs. But Housing First proponents say the model is not the problem — it's a lack of funding. Both to keep up with rising homelessness and counter a crippling affordable housing shortage. 'Housing First has failed because we haven't fully invested in Housing First,' Shack from Urban Pathways said. 'You can't solve the problem without the resources.' Only about 15% of people experiencing homelessness get into a Housing First program, according to Dennis Culhane's research. In 2022, he and other researchers conservatively estimated it would cost $9.6 billion to provide Housing First to every household in US shelters. Most homelessness service providers employ Housing First principles. They fear the loss of federal funding and a retreat back to policies they abandoned years ago. Ellison said Trump's approach will make it harder for homeless people to get housing, deepening the cycle of criminal justice interactions and trips to the hospital she experienced while living on the streets. 'Housing is the only solution to homelessness, along with wraparound services, if needed,' she said. 'The new executive order is going to make this so much harder, and it's going to add more unhoused people to the population.'
