logo
Sudan: Plundered Wealth and Mounting Debt Amid Economic Liberalization, Corruption, and War

Sudan: Plundered Wealth and Mounting Debt Amid Economic Liberalization, Corruption, and War

Al Taghyeer14-04-2025

Sudan: Plundered Wealth and Mounting Debt Amid Economic Liberalization, Corruption, and War
By Omer Sidahmed
Introduction:
The news that Ethiopia—a country with limited resources—had established the largest sovereign wealth fund in Africa, valued at $45 billion, compelled me to reflect on Sudan, a nation rich in natural resources but drained by corruption and authoritarian regimes for decades. Sudan's tragedy, however, extends beyond the systematic plundering of its resources. It also encompasses a devastating war ignited by the same corrupt system in an effort to preserve its grip on power.
Islamists ruled Sudan under the banner of the National Salvation regime for thirty years, during which they plundered the country mercilessly. The state was transformed into a machine for personal wealth accumulation through the exploitation of international loans and Sudan's abundant natural resources. When popular opposition grew, they established the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) as a tool to safeguard their regime. However, the RSF soon evolved into an independent power center, competing with the army for control and wealth. When the Sudanese revolution emerged with calls for civilian transition, remnants of the military and Islamist establishment ignited a war between the army and the RSF—seeking to block democratic change, even at the cost of national destruction.
A War Sparked by Islamists to Block Democratic Transition—Accelerating Collapse:
The Sudanese revolution that toppled Omar al-Bashir's regime in 2019 marked a pivotal moment in the country's history. It opened the door to hopes of a civilian-led government and genuine democracy. But the forces that had benefited from the Salvation regime—led by the military elite and the Islamist alliance—were unwilling to relinquish their power. As Sudan began moving towards democratic transformation, these forces conspired to halt it by any means necessary.
The war is a direct result of this power struggle. Military leaders and their affiliated militias clung to their economic interests and refused to hand over power to an elected civilian government. When it became clear that democratic transition might threaten their privileges, they ignited a conflict under the guise of a confrontation between the army and the RSF—even though the RSF itself was a creation of the Bashir regime to protect its authority.
Thus, the dream of civilian rule was shattered, and Sudanese hopes for building a modern state descended into a brutal war that destroyed lives, infrastructure, and livelihoods, pushing the country to the brink of total collapse.
Mounting Debt and Systematic Looting:
Sudan has always been rich in resources, but the Islamists who ruled under the Salvation regime turned it into one of the most corrupt, impoverished, and indebted nations on earth. External debt soared from $5 billion in the 1980s to over $66 billion today—with no visible improvement in citizens' lives. Most of the borrowed funds ended up in the pockets of officials and warlords, while infrastructure decayed and the economy collapsed.
A Shocking Regional Comparison:
While Sudan's economic indicators continue to decline, neighboring countries like Ethiopia and Kenya are experiencing significant growth. As Ethiopia announces a sovereign wealth fund worth $45 billion, Sudan faces resource scarcity and a GDP that dropped to under $30 billion in 2020—compared to over $100 billion in Kenya and approximately $360 billion in Egypt.
Economic Liberalization and the Plundering of Sudan's Wealth:
Since the late 1980s, Sudan has adopted economic liberalization policies in line with IMF recommendations. However, instead of fostering development, these policies led to the privatization of public institutions, removal of subsidies, and the rise of a parasitic elite connected to the ruling class.
Phases of Economic Liberalization in Sudan:
1990s: Sale of state-owned enterprises, inflation, rising poverty.
1999–2011: Oil boom squandered without investment in long-term development.
2011–2019: Loss of oil revenues post-secession, growing livelihood crisis.
2019–2024: Currency devaluation, subsidy removal, outbreak of war.
The Result: Economic disintegration, surging poverty, and widespread distrust in state institutions.
War's Devastating Impact on Sudan's Economy: Total Collapse and Reconstruction as a Priority
Since the outbreak of war in April 2023 between the army and the RSF, Sudan's economy has entered a phase of complete collapse. The crisis has moved beyond currency depreciation and inflation—it now poses an existential threat to the state itself. The war has destroyed what remained of infrastructure, halted agricultural and industrial production, displaced millions, and rendered major cities like Khartoum economically non-functional.
Key Economic Consequences of the War:
Infrastructure destruction: Power plants, roads, ports, and critical facilities have been devastated.
Human capital drain: Skilled professionals are emigrating, thousands have died, and millions have been displaced.
Investment paralysis: No local or foreign investor is willing to inject funds into a chaotic, lawless economy.
GDP contraction: Sudan lost more than half of its economic activity within the first year of war.
Hyperinflation and currency collapse: The Sudanese pound has lost over 90% of its value; prices have surged by 500%.
The Cost of Reconstruction: An Unquantifiable Burden Amid Ongoing Conflict:
It is currently impossible to accurately estimate the cost of rebuilding Sudan, as the war is ongoing and daily destruction escalates. However, it is certain that the required funds will be astronomical—potentially hundreds of billions of dollars.
Reconstruction will go beyond physical rebuilding and involve reestablishing the very foundations of the state:
A new infrastructure network
An effective public service system
Functional civilian institutions
A viable production sector
Solutions for mass displacement and the collapse of healthcare and education systems
The Only Way Out: End the War Immediately
There can be no development without peace. No economy can function amid war. Social justice is impossible as long as militias control power.
Ending the war is not a political option—it is an existential necessity.
If the fighting continues, Sudan will become a failed state, a hostage to foreign agendas, with no margin left to survive the destructive path it is on.
Conclusion: Where is Sudan Headed?
After two years of war and four decades of corruption, Sudan stands on the edge of total collapse. There will be no improvement unless the system that destroyed the economy is dismantled, and a unified national project is launched to save what remains.
Sudan doesn't need miracles—it needs genuine political will to stop the war and rebuild the state on foundations of justice, citizenship, and competence. This is possible, but only if the corrupt order is uprooted and the economy is restructured to serve the people—not the elites.
Sources:
April 2025

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sudan's Shadow Economy: The Hidden Alliances Funding War and Suppressing Civilian Transition
Sudan's Shadow Economy: The Hidden Alliances Funding War and Suppressing Civilian Transition

Al Taghyeer

time23-05-2025

  • Al Taghyeer

Sudan's Shadow Economy: The Hidden Alliances Funding War and Suppressing Civilian Transition

Sudan's Shadow Economy: The Hidden Alliances Funding War and Suppressing Civilian Transition By: Omer Sidahmed May 2025 From State Economy to Loot Economy Sudan's shadow economy didn't arise in a vacuum. It wasn't formed on the margins of the state — it emerged from its very core. Over decades, it became a central tool in the hands of a militarized system comprising the army, intelligence agencies, and militias. These forces forged alliances with Islamist political networks to entrench control over the state and society. With the eruption of the revolution and then the outbreak of war, the true nature of this economy became clear: not just a source of illicit wealth, but a fuel for conflict, a platform for distorting public consciousness, and a shield protecting power networks from collapse. An Economy Without — and Against — the State Sudan's shadow economy has evolved beyond the traditional definition of informal activities. It is now a structured system operating outside the state, financing, smuggling, exporting, and militarizing with no oversight or accountability. It manifests in the smuggling of gold from conflict zones via armed and politically protected routes across borders, in currency trading that sustains the parallel market outside the banking system, and in a web of foreign trade activities managed by a small elite tied to security apparatuses. These include fuel import companies shielded by the remnants of the former regime, as well as informal financial transfers that sustain the war economy. Estimates suggest that between 50% and 80% of Sudan's gold production is smuggled out of official channels. The country's gold smuggling losses over the past decade are estimated at no less than $23 billion — and possibly as high as $36.8 billion. These numbers highlight the catastrophic economic impact of the shadow economy, and how gold has shifted from a national resource to a secret source of war funding and elite enrichment. From Sanctions to Domination: The Birth of a Hidden Alliance During the years of U.S. sanctions, alternative networks for trade and finance emerged, led by businessmen and security-linked institutions aligned with the regime. Instead of addressing the crisis through national alternatives, the state opened the market to a parasitic class that thrived in the shadows, becoming the economic arm of the ruling power. Even after sanctions were lifted in 2020, this structure was not dismantled — it deepened. Following the October 25 coup, these networks reasserted control over markets and resources, initiating a new phase: converting the shadow economy into a direct war-financing mechanism. Rentierism: The Structural Foundation of the Shadow Economy One of the deep-rooted causes behind the swelling of Sudan's shadow economy is the dominance of a rentier economy — the prevailing model since independence. Sudan has historically relied on raw material exports with no added value: from cotton and oilseeds in the 1960s and 70s, to oil in the 2000s, and finally to gold after South Sudan's secession in 2011. This dependency has left the country vulnerable to external markets and lacking an independent domestic production base. Under authoritarian regimes and institutional corruption, the revenues from these resources were not invested in sustainable development. Instead, they were redistributed through patronage networks favoring ruling elites and security agencies. Rather than being a driver for development, the rentier model became a breeding ground for the shadow economy. Crucially, this economy did not emerge from the peripheries, as often assumed — it was born and nurtured in the center, within state institutions themselves, with complicity from the ruling elite. It became a tool for unofficial financing and consolidating political and military power. In this way, rentierism fused with corruption and militarization to create a parallel economy — not based on production, but on looting, not governed by law, but shielded by it. Arms and Narcotics Trade: The Forbidden Face of the Shadow Economy One of the most dangerous aspects of the shadow economy is the involvement of the ruling system in arms and narcotics trafficking. During the Al-Ingaz regime, documented reports from media and social platforms revealed incidents of 'drug containers' arriving in or passing through Sudan under the protection or complicity of security agencies. Though hidden from public view, this trade became a covert funding source for war, a tool for militia recruitment, and a means of money laundering that expanded the influence of power centers. A Funded War on Awareness: Media as a Weapon Against Civilian Rule The shadow economy doesn't just fund weapons; it also fuels a war for control over public consciousness. This media campaign is managed from hubs outside Sudan — in capitals such as Cairo, Istanbul, Dubai, and Doha — led by media figures from the former regime and affiliated ideological-security networks. These groups produce funded content on social media that justifies the war, demonizes revolutionary forces, rallies public opinion against civilian transition, and promotes the continuation of a war that has displaced millions, killed thousands, and devastated the country. The objective isn't only to suppress armed revolution, but to assassinate the very idea of a civilian state. Democracy is portrayed as a threat to stability, while military rule is presented as the only option for national unity — a blatant embodiment of state and societal militarization. Dismantling the System: Not Administrative Reform, But a Long-Term Struggle The dismantling of Sudan's shadow economy cannot be viewed as an administrative or legal procedure — especially in the context of an open war, institutional collapse, and military control over economic lifelines. This system won't fall through decisive victory alone, but through the erosion of its absolute control, when cracks begin to show in the regime's security and economic structure. Despite the militarization of daily life, civilian action must not be paralyzed or surrender to the status quo. The path forward lies in working within the war, not on its margins, to develop a realistic and radical transition project. This begins with fostering new public awareness that exposes the structural link between arms and wealth, and places the shadow economy under popular and international scrutiny. This effort requires close monitoring of the parallel market and analysis of its mechanisms, paving the way for fair economic policies and legislation that reorganize the market and dismantle smuggling monopolies. Crimes such as trafficking, narcotics trade, and gold theft must be documented and transformed into legal and media files that can be pursued, not merely retold. At the same time, independent and community-based media must rise as a front of resistance, countering the disinformation produced abroad and challenging the official narratives that justify war and vilify civilian transition. This media confrontation is not a luxury — it's essential for building a coherent, resistant public opinion. Finally, any attempt at transformation must include building flexible and realistic civilian alliances that propose a national alternative project. This project must redefine the state, sever the link between power and wealth, and shift economic control from militias back to the community. This is not a ready-made plan — it's an open front that requires daily effort and initiative from within the cracks war has created, not in waiting for its end. Working Amid War: No Time to Wait Despite the militarized reality and escalating conflict, this should not be an excuse for inaction or surrender to the status quo. On the contrary, the need now is to work from within the war — within its cracks — to lay the groundwork for a true civilian transformation. In a context like Sudan, change doesn't wait for victory — it is built inside the struggle itself, through realistic, deliberate steps rooted in public action and collective will. Tools for Change: From Awareness to Organization This path requires new tools and the creation of a critical public consciousness that understands the battle is not just military or political — but economic and cultural too. It begins by exposing the economic foundations of the armed system and highlighting the structural link between weapons and wealth. This enables internal and external pressure on power centers. Monitoring the parallel market and understanding its mechanisms is key for a future confrontation using just policies that dismantle shadow monopolies and restore the economy to the public. Equally important is the documentation of crimes like smuggling, drug trafficking, and gold looting — vital for building legal and media cases that can be pursued in future moments of accountability. On the media front, alternative, independent, and community media must be supported to counter the misinformation spread from foreign media rooms and to promote a resistance narrative based on the revolution, not the war machine. In parallel, civilian alliances must be built — realistic and resilient — offering a political and economic alternative that redefines the state-society-resource relationship and breaks the link between authority and plunder. An Open Front: A Beginning, Not an End What we face today is not a passing political crisis but a historic moment requiring a complete redefinition of the national project. This is not a finished blueprint, but an open front for gradual transformation — built not from outside collapse, but from within it. The true challenge is not waiting for war to end, but using the fractures it created to fuel civil resistance and spark new beginnings — toward a democratic, civilian, just, and salvaging state that reflects the people's aspirations, not the interests of entrenched elites. References 1. 1. Global Witness (2019). 'The Ones Left Behind: Sudan's Secret Gold Empire.' 2. 2. International Crisis Group (2022). 'The Militarization of Sudan's Economy.' 3. 3. Human Rights Watch (2020). 'Entrenched Impunity: Gold Mining and the Darfur Conflict.' 4. 4. United Nations Panel of Experts on the Sudan (2020–2023). Reports to the Security Council. 5. 5. BBC Arabic & Al Jazeera Investigations (2021–2023). Coverage of Sudan's illicit trade and media operations. 6. 6. Radio Dabanga (2015–2023). Reports on drug trafficking and corruption during Al-Ingaz regime. 7. 7. Sudan Tribune (2020). 'Forex crisis and informal currency trading in Sudan.'

Appointment of Kamal Idris as Prime Minister of Sudan stirs contradictory reactions
Appointment of Kamal Idris as Prime Minister of Sudan stirs contradictory reactions

Al Taghyeer

time20-05-2025

  • Al Taghyeer

Appointment of Kamal Idris as Prime Minister of Sudan stirs contradictory reactions

Observers describe the appointment as void of required political legitimacy and apparently failing to secure broad consensus. Port Sudan: Altaghyeer The appointment of Dr. Kamal Idris as Prime Minister of Sudan on Monday has stirred intense debate among those who support him and a strong reaction among those who opposing his appointment, as he has been linked to controversial regimes, including Omar al-Bashir's, the December Revolution but equally with the current war period. Who is Kamal Idris? Idris graduated from the University of Khartoum's Faculty of Law. He holds a Ph.D. in International Law from the Graduate Institute of International Studies in Geneva, Switzerland. He served as Director-General of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) in 1997-2003. Throughout his career, he has held various distinguished positions, including member of the UN International Law Commission and spokesperson for the Group of Developing Countries. He is fluent in Arabic, English, and French, with knowledge of Spanish. Idris has received numerous awards and honors, including honorary doctorates from several universities worldwide. Contradiction and Criticism The newly appointed Prime Minister was described as a self-contradictory who seeks only his own interests. Critics pointed out that he was an uncommitted member of the Sudanese Communist Party and engaged in activities of its university students' offshoot 'the Democratic Front' and a member of the late Sudan military ruler Jaffar Nimeri's party 'the Sudanese Socialist Union' before aligning with the Islamic Front. He was a candidate in the 2010 Presidential Elections against al-Bashir with the support of Islamists, who wanted to make the elections plausible as a true democratic process. He appeared in a video clip during the latest revolution describing al-Bashir's regime as criminal and demanding it's resignation and recently appeared in a recording speech denouncing any debasing of the national army, saying such persons should be denied to assume any public posts. Challenges Ahead of the New Prime Minister The new Prime Minister Faces significant challenges, including managing the political and economic crisis, rebuilding state institutions, and achieving stability amidst the ongoing war between the Sudanese army and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces. He also faces challenges of being accepted by the Sudanese masses, with many expressing their rejection of his appointment, citing corruption cases linked to his career. In 2006, he reportedly faked his birth date certificate, pushing his birth date from 1945 to 1954, to fit for staying at his job, leaping away from looming retirement age at the time. Reactions Some observers believe that Kamal Idris's chances of success might be greater than expected given his neutral stance and this step could potentially pave the way for a ceasefire. But others cited reservations. Nour al-Din Salah al-Din, a partisan leader, stated that the appointment lacks the required political legitimacy, emphasizing such a move needs broad consensus resulting from a Sudanese inclusive political process. Academic Adel Taha Suleiman believes that the question was not rejecting Kamal Idris' appointment but rather putting an end to the current raging war. Idris' appointment was backed by the Islamic movement leadership who wanted the war to continue therefore Idris will come and leave without solving the roots causes of the problem, he argued.

We Have Hope for Promoting the Peace Agenda in Sudan During the U.S. President's Visit to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
We Have Hope for Promoting the Peace Agenda in Sudan During the U.S. President's Visit to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Al Taghyeer

time13-05-2025

  • Al Taghyeer

We Have Hope for Promoting the Peace Agenda in Sudan During the U.S. President's Visit to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

We Have Hope for Promoting the Peace Agenda in Sudan During the U.S. President's Visit to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia By Yasir Arman The important visit by U.S. President Donald Trump to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia comes into an amid of regional and international developments and issues that have a significant impact on geopolitics and the future of our region. Saudi Arabia and the United States are the sponsors of the Jeddah Initiative concerning the stopping and ending the war in Sudan. This visit presents a rare opportunity to revive the initiative and push it forward with other regional and international partners. The war in Sudan has deep repercussions on issues related to the Red Sea and migration — those who cannot find the right to stay in their own country will seek it in others. It also influences terrorism and its regional and global complexities,also the suffering of millions of internally displaced persons in Sudan when witnessing the collapse of the health system and famine. The Sudanese war affects neighboring countries, many of which are also experiencing instability. Saudi Arabia shares with us, among other ties, connections of proximity, mutual interests, culture, history, the sea, geography, the mosque, and shared humanity — as well as millions of Sudanese professionals and others who have migrated there for work, and we share a common future. Millions of Sudanese hope that the U.S. President's visit to Saudi Arabia and the Gulf countries will contribute to promoting the agenda of ending the war and achieving peace. They seek a humanitarian ceasefire that enables Sudanese people to explore the future of their country, close the chapter of war crimes and human rights violations, and silence the guns that have been turned against the people.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store