Keelings fruit company fails in bid for private hearing of whistleblower allegations
The Keelings fruit and vegetable group has failed in an attempt to have allegations of whistleblower penalisation and multiple employment rights breaches by a former employee heard entirely behind closed doors.
At the Workplace Relations Commission on Wednesday an adjudicator told the firm's representatives that the prospect of 'certain people being named' in connection with the case was not reason enough to justify hearing the matter out of the public eye.
Keelings Logistics Solutions had sought a private hearing into claims by the worker, former warehouseman Rudolph Csikos, which were called on Wednesday at the employment tribunal.
He has alleged breaches of the Minimum Notice and Terms of Employment Act 1973, the Unfair Dismissals Act 1977, the Organisation of Working Time Act 1997 and the Protected Disclosures Act 2014 against the company.
READ MORE
At the hearing, adjudicator Brian Dalton noted the application by the company's representative, Emily Maverley of the Irish Business and Employers' Confederation (Ibec), for a hearing 'in private'.
'That's quite unusual, because this case is about the administration of justice,' he said. 'I do have the power to have a hearing in private, but I have to have very good reasons for it,' he said.
'Certain wrongs, certain people being named – that in itself is not a reason,' he added.
'In the administration of justice, the whole process is tested, and ultimately I will make a ruling. You can't make an allegation of defamation in the administration of justice. It's up to me to decide,' he said. He added that the law required 'exceptional' circumstances for a private hearing.
Mr Dalton said he was only aware of the basis for the application for a private hearing at a 'high level' and said there was 'no point' discussing the detail any further with a member of the press in the room.
'I'm going to ask the press to leave temporarily,' he said.
The matter proceeded for around 25 minutes behind closed doors before Mr Dalton reopened the hearing to the public.
'An application was made for the hearing to be heard in private, and it was turned down,' he said.
After a short adjournment, Mr Dalton quoted a section of the Workplace Relations Act, as amended, to the parties.
He said the legislation required a hearing 'in public, unless the adjudicating officer… determines that due to the existence of special circumstances, the proceedings or part thereof should be conducted otherwise than in public'.
'In other words, most of this case will be heard in public,' Mr Dalton said.
The adjudicator gave May 27th as the date for a further hearing and adjourned the matter shortly after that.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Garda inquiry into Evan Fitzgerald followed tip-off Irish person trying to buy guns on darknet
The Garda investigation into 22-year-old Evan Fitzgerald over his alleged efforts to buy guns on the darknet started after an international law enforcement agency provided information to the force , it is understood. That intelligence, which appears to have come through Interpol , suggested an unknown person in the Republic was on the darknet trying to buy guns. Acting on the information, the Garda Drugs and Organised Crime Bureau established contact with the Irish suspect. It is understood that undercover gardaí made contact with the person, on the darknet, while posing as a criminal with guns for sale. The Irish Times understands agreement was reached that weapons would be sold, with cash paid and the guns delivered by undercover officers in an investigative process known as 'controlled delivery'. READ MORE However, after delivery of the firearms – a machine gun and pistol, with ammunition – a Garda interception was made. The guns and bullets were seized and Fitzgerald was charged with four offences following the sting operation early last year. A search of a property linked to him yielded an assortment of ammunition, as well as powders that can be used to make explosive devices. That discovery resulted in Fitzgerald being charged with nine further offences. Fitzgerald, of Portrushen, Kiltegan, Co Wicklow, was facing 13 charges and was at liberty on bail when he went to the Fairgreen Shopping Centre in Carlow town last Sunday week, firing several shots and taking his own life. The gun he used, a stolen shotgun legally held by another person, was unrelated to the undercover operation that resulted in his arrest early last year. The guns used by the undercover gardaí in the 2024 sting operation were taken from Garda stores. They had been decommissioned and the ammunition was non-functioning. When arrested in early 2024, Mr Fitzgerald made admissions. His first court appearance was told that there was no suspicion he wanted the guns to further any involvement in organised crime. Instead, he had acted in a 'naive' way in trying to buy guns for recreational shooting. Concerns have been raised by Labour TD Alan Kelly and Senator Michael McDowell, the former minister for justice, about the manner of Fitzgerald's arrest and the charges against him. Both have questioned why an alternative, unspecified, legal option was not used to deal with him, rather than his being charged with possession of the guns and ammunition. In reply to queries, Garda headquarters said it could not comment on a specific case. However, commenting in general terms, it said gardaí use 'a range of internationally recognised investigative techniques when tackling serious crimes such as drug dealing and procuring of firearms, either of which could then be used to cause significant harm to the public. 'One of these is controlled deliveries. In controlled deliveries any material used is made safe by the law enforcement agency before being used, [for example], firearms are deactivated.' On Wednesday, Mr Kelly and Mr McDowell raised the case in the Dáil and Seanad, asking about court reports that suggested gardaí had told the judge in the case that they were 'investigating' how Fitzgerald and others acquired the guns. 'The guns were actually given to him by An Garda Síochána ... how could they say in court that they didn't know where the guns came from?' asked Mr Kelly. In the Seanad, Mr McDowell said: 'I am also very deeply concerned that by informing the court that the gardaí were still investigating by whom the weapons in question were sold; the court was actively misled.'
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Dublin firefighter accused of raping woman in Boston hotel says he ‘didn't touch' her, US court hears
The Dublin firefighter arrested on rape charges over St Patrick's Day weekend last year told Boston detectives he 'didn't touch' the female complainant in an audio played in a US court on Wednesday. The complainant, a 29-year-old attorney, claims she was raped by Terence Crosbie (39) while his Dublin Fire Brigade colleague Liam O'Brien slept in a separate bed in a shared hotel room. She said she had consensual relations with Mr O'Brien after meeting him at The Black Rose bar in Boston. She subsequently fell asleep and, she says, later woke up to a man raping her. The man was later identified as Mr Crosbie. He denies the charges and has pleaded not guilty. READ MORE On Wednesday, the third day of the trial in Boston, jurors heard an audio recording of Mr Crosbie denying having sex with the woman, touching her or finding her in his bed when he returned to his room at the Omni Parker House hotel in Boston in the early hours of March 15th, 2024. 'There's nothing missing there, there's nothing I'm skipping, there's nothing I'm leaving out,' Mr Crosbie said, after repeated questioning by the detectives. Boston Police detective Joseph McDonough testified that the woman did not recall Mr O'Brien's name and did not recall meeting Mr Crosbie before the alleged assault. The court was told that the detective tracked down Mr Crosbie with the help of hotel security footage as well as images of Mr O'Brien and Mr Crosbie provided to him by a federal agent. He said that on March 16th, 2024 – a day after the complainant reported the rape – he approached Mr Crosbie by the lift of the hotel. Detectives initially asked Mr Crosbie of his whereabouts on March 14th and March 15th. Mr Crosbie said he was one of 10 members of Dublin Fire Brigade who travelled to Boston to march in the city's St Patrick's Day parade. He said that he interacted with the woman, later identified as the complainant, on Thursday night at The Black Rose bar and again briefly, when the woman went up to the hotel room with Mr O'Brien. The Black Rose Irish pub in Boston Mr Crosbie said he waited in a chair in the corridor outside of room 610 while the complainant and Mr O'Brien were inside. He told detectives that when he returned to the room, he knocked on the door, used his phone as a torch and 'didn't see anybody in the bed'. Mr Crosbie said he removed his pants and shirt, pulled the bed covers off while still wearing his boxer shorts and got into the bed. A minute and a half after he laid down, he said he 'heard a girl moving' and saw her collect her belongings in the dark and leave. He told detectives he did not have any interactions with the complainant before she left. 'Didn't say hello, didn't say goodbye, didn't say anything,' Mr Crosbie said. When detectives asked whether Mr Crosbie had sex with the woman, he replied: 'No, I didn't touch her.' The detectives also asked Mr Crosbie if the woman was crying as she left. 'I don't know – it didn't sound like she was crying,' he replied. Mr Crosbie was arrested later that evening after booking an early flight back to Ireland and boarding a plane. The detective seized Mr Crosbie's luggage and took photos of his clothing, including a series of specialised T-shirts and jumpers with emblems featuring American flags in the shape of shamrocks and embroidered lettering saying: 'Dublin Fire Brigade Boston 2024.' Mr Crosbie was identified as wearing similar clothing in surveillance video taken of The Black Rose and the Omni Parker House hotel shown to the court. The Omni Parker House hotel in Boston where the woman alleges she was raped. The woman previously testified that she and Mr O'Brien had consensual sex and then she fell asleep in a separate bed. She told the court in tears that she 'woke up to somebody on top of me' and they were raping her. She said the man, alleged to be Mr Crosbie, disparaged Mr O'Brien while assaulting her. She claimed that while Mr Crosbie was having sex with her, he said: 'I know you want this; [Mr O'Brien] can't even do this for you – what a loser.' She testified that she told him to 'stop' and that she eventually managed to manoeuvre her legs off the side of the bed and break free. According to the complainant, Mr Crosbie continued to follow her around the hotel room. When she collected her clothes and went to the bathroom, she said Mr Crosbie tried to get in and 'was jiggling the handle' after she locked the door. Under cross examination on Wednesday, Mr Crosbie's defence attorney Daniel C Reilly asked Mr McDonough about discrepancies in the complainant's earlier interviews. Mr Reilly asserted that the woman did not provide detectives with details of Mr Crosbie attempting to push his way into the bathroom until April 8th – weeks after the alleged assault – in an email. 'In her prior interviews she did not mention being in a separate bed [from Mr O'Brien] when Mr Crosbie arrived,' Mr Reilly said. Mr McDonough confirmed that was correct. Jurors previously heard that Mr O'Brien was listed as a potential witness as part of the jury selection process. On Wednesday Mr Reilly said 'Mr O'Brien declined to participate in this trial'. Mr McDonough said that was correct. On Wednesday, jurors also heard from Lindsey Walsh, a physician at Massachusetts General Hospital, and the second medical professional to testify that the woman was found to be suffering from a vaginal tear hours after the alleged assault.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Q&A: What is the pension payment error all about and can the money be recouped?
Unions and representatives of retired civil servants say they are awaiting detail of the errors made in relation to the pensions of their current or former members . However, there is concern that some of the issues could require legislation and that senior politicians could be impacted by any changes to the law. What has happened? On Tuesday the Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers said 'serious and systemic operational issues' had been identified at the National Shared Services Office (NSSO), which employs about 850 people and handles payroll administration for all government departments. The belief is these errors have resulted in some retired civil servants being underpaid in their pensions; incorrect pension contributions having been deducted from current and previous ministers; and the wrong amount of tax being deducted from the lump sums paid to about 30 senior civil servants upon retirement. With a review of 13,000 retirees' positions under way, however, and an external audit of the NSSO to be undertaken, it is uncertain how the situation will develop. READ MORE What will happen in respect of people who owe or are owed money? Mr Chambers said he was committed to ensuring 'all monies owed to the State are fully recouped and monies owed to individuals are refunded'. The former is likely to create issues, however, especially in relation to the larger amounts, with one retiree said to owe €280,000. With Mr Chambers suggesting some ministers may be asked to repay more than €30,000, the tax issue could be considerable. Details of the time frame have not been clarified, but Ciaran Rohan of the Association of Higher Civil and Public Servants says recouping overpayments stretching back more than four years could leave retirees, or potentially some politicians, substantially out of pocket. This is because current legislation would only allow the reclaiming of the extra tax paid as a result of receiving the extra money for the past four years, even if the overpayments stretched further back. Could that be changed? Only by legislation, says employment lawyer Barry Kenny, who says the issue means 'the original error has financial implications beyond a simple repayment issue'. It also has the potential to make it a political one. How could the money be recouped? A government circular in 2018 sets out the various ways in which overpayments can be reclaimed but there is no provision for anything like a liability of €280,000. The intention should be to recoup all the money and ideally within a year, it suggests, usually by deductions from pay or pensions of up to 8 per cent of the gross amount the person is receiving. But these people can afford to repay, no? The largest figures relate to people who had pension funds on retirement worth more than €2 million. That would certainly suggest they are well off but coming up with the funds to repay a six-figure sum is likely to be regarded as an issue. Cloda Ryan of the Retired Civil and Public Servants Association (RCPSA), which has some 7,000 members, says the vast majority of amounts involved are likely to be far smaller but still have the potential to cause problems for the pensioners concerned. 'Contrary to public perception, the majority of Civil Service pensioners have moderate pensions, in many cases lower than they would receive under the social welfare State pension for which, in general, civil servants recruited before April 6th, 1995 do not qualify.' The organisation is seeking assurances 'that no recovery of pension overpayments would take place without consultation and agreement with each pensioner affected'. And if an agreement can't be reached? 'Any civil servant faced with a request to refund money, large or small, should take legal advice to clarify the legal basis for the demand to repay and whether the figures are accurate,' says Mr Kenny. He says where the validity is established, 'reasonable' deductions or instalments would need to be agreed.
