New bird flu variant found in Nevada dairy cows has experts sounding alarms: ‘We have never been closer to a pandemic from this virus'
The disclosure that dairy herds in Nevada have been infected by a version of the H5N1 bird flu not previously seen in cows, has put virologists and researchers on high alert. Among other things, the news from the Nevada Department of Agriculture, suggests that driving the virus out of the U.S. cattle population won't be nearly as simple as federal officials once suggested—or perhaps hoped.
On Friday came a second and potentially more serious blow: A technical brief by the U.S. Department of Agriculture reported that the genotype, known as D1.1, contains a genetic mutation that may help the virus more easily copy itself in mammals—including humans.
This D1.1 version of the virus is the same variant that killed a man in Louisiana and left a Canadian teen hospitalized in critical condition. It is not the B3.13 genotype widely found in sick cattle dating to early last year.
'This can be of significant concern if this virus continues to spread among cows and infects more people,' immunologist and former federal health official Rick Bright tells Fortune. 'This mutation has not been associated with improved human transmission, so there are no telling signs of enhanced spread yet. But when this virus gets into people, it is ready to cause a much more serious disease than the (B3.13) virus that has been circulating in cows before now.
'We have never been closer to a pandemic from this virus,' Bright adds. 'And we still are not doing everything possible to prevent it or reduce the impact if it hits.'
The D1.1 genotype has been detected in wild birds in all North American flyways, as well as mammals and poultry, so it isn't surprising that it's made the leap to cows. But its newfound presence in the Nevada dairy herds is considered by many virologists to mark a sort of inflection point in the spread of H5N1, and it could spell more trouble for humans going forward.
'Given the fact that D1.1 seems to be more virulent in humans, this could indicate a major change in terms of public health risks from the earlier scenario with the B3.13 strain,' veterinary science pioneer Juergen Richt, a former director at the National Institutes of Health, tells Fortune.
In response to an emailed series of questions, a spokesperson for the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said the agency still deems the risk to human health for the general public to be low. 'However, people with close, prolonged, or unprotected exposures to infected birds or other animals (including livestock), or to environments contaminated by infected birds or other animals, are at greater risk of infection,' the spokesperson said.
The USDA on Friday noted that although the Nevada cattle did not display clinical signs of infection prior to its detection via testing, such signs have since been reported, along with die-offs of a large number of wild birds near the affected dairies.
Should humans be taking more precautions? What is the scope of the risk? And are there mitigating actions that should already be in place on America's farms and dairies?
The urgency of those questions suggests that in the coming weeks, an absolute premium should be placed upon the timely dissemination of information and testing updates from the federal sources upon which researchers and health officials often rely. But that information flow is no longer to be taken for granted.
On Jan. 21, under orders from the Trump administration, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) placed a freeze on almost all external communications, including documents and health guidance, until a Trump-appointed official could be installed and approve them. Such a move is not unprecedented, but when the information freeze blew past its Feb. 1 deadline without being fully lifted, Democratic leaders began crying foul.
One important casualty of that action was the CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. The MMWR, as it's known, is a critical source of information on public health issues. The MMWR failed to publish for the first time in more than sixty years on January 23rd and again on January 30th. Publication did resume on February 6th, but there was no mention of bird flu nor any information about the three H5N1 studies which were scheduled to be published in January according to the Washington Post.
Further, per the Wall Street Journal, the Trump administration is reportedly planning to eliminate the jobs of thousands of U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) employees. Senior public-health officials are reportedly being told to rank employees based on how critical their roles are.
Depending upon where those cuts land across the various agencies of the department, practices like tracing bird-flu outbreaks and approving new drugs could be affected. And Trump's nominee to run HHS, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., in 2023 said he'd tell federal health scientists, 'Thank you for your public service. We're going to give [studying] infectious diseases a break for about eight years.'
These developments have ramped up the concern of scientists and researchers tracking the spread of H5N1, which, according to the CDC, has now infected 959 dairy herds in the U.S. and been responsible for the death of 156 million poultry, sending the price of eggs to record highs because of scarce supply.
Researchers are also loudly asking whether dairy workers should be vaccinated using existing supplies from the federal stock of bird flu vaccine, and whether personal protective equipment should become mandatory on dairy farms and egg-laying facilities for frontline workers.
This all comes back to the timely flow of information and communication—and, experts say, it is being throttled at a critical moment.
'This is chilling but not at all surprising, given the gag put on scientists and the manipulation of scientific communication in 2020 at the start of the COVID pandemic,' says Bright, a vaccine researcher who filed a whistleblower complaint against the Trump administration in 2020 and has been urging health officials for months to ramp up testing and precautions around bird flu.
'When it happened in 2020,' Bright says, 'it slowed the response, sowed distrust in science and public health, and as a consequence many more people died during that time. It is horrifying that lessons were not learned, and we find ourselves in the same or worse situation–not only on H5N1, but on numerous ongoing outbreaks in the U.S.'
A Nevada official tells Fortune that the new cases of D1.1 in cows were traced to dairy farms in Churchill County, with six herds placed under quarantine. Previously, the state's agriculture director, J.J. Goicoechea, told Reuters, 'We obviously aren't doing everything we can and everything we should, or the virus wouldn't be getting in.' Goicoechea said Nevada farmers needed to follow 'good animal health safety practices and bolster biosecurity measures' for their animals.
Where does this all leave humans? According to University of Saskatchewan virologist Angela Rasmussen, the development in Nevada doesn't directly increase the likelihood of human-to-human transmission, but rather 'increases risk of zoonotic human cases—that is, from cows to farmworkers. Beyond that, it is D1.1's ability to mutate (perhaps in ways B3.13 has not mutated) that concerns researchers. That adaptability may allow the virus to more easily spread from person to person.
'This new genotype of H5N1 virus, D1.1 was associated with more severe illness and death in the few known human infections,' Bright says. 'It (the Nevada case) is a significant event, because we now know how easily H5N1 viruses can spread among dairy cows, from farm to farm, jump from milk to other mammals, including mice and cats, and even infect people.'
Federal health agencies have taken 'some positive steps' in recent months to increase testing via a National Milk Testing Strategy, and of testing and subtyping influenza in people, says James Lawler, director of the University of Nebraska's Global Center for Health Security.
'To better control risk, however, we should aggressively ramp up testing and isolation of affected dairy herds and animals, facilitate more widespread surveillance and testing in people, and accelerate vaccine development and production,' Lawler says. Clinicians also need to know that the virus is circulating, Bright says, and to 'test for influenza, not guess.'
Scott Hensley, a viral immunologist at the University of Pennsylvania, agrees. 'We need to closely monitor D1.1 viruses because they have already shown the ability to adapt and cause severe disease in humans,' Hensley says. 'Our H5N1 vaccine stocks are well matched to the D1.1 viruses and would likely provide high levels of protection—we need to ramp up H5N1 vaccine production in case these viruses evolve to spread from human to human.'
In the meantime, Richt says, people need to avoid drinking raw milk, which might contain live virus from infected dairy cows, wash their hands often and report influenza-like illnesses, presumably so that tests can be run. States may follow the lead of California, where the governor declared a bird flu emergency and health officials have facilitated the distribution of millions of pieces of personal protective equipment to farmworkers.
Every effort to contain the virus, though, ultimately will depend to a tremendous extent on the distribution of accurate and timely information—and a government and health community that commits to fighting bird flu and its concerning strains.
'There is a lot that we do not know about D1.1. viruses, and we will all be working overtime to learn more in the coming days and weeks,' Hensley says. It is the mass sharing of what experts learn that will be most critical in the fight.
More on bird flu:
Bird flu could merge with seasonal flu to make mutated virus that could spread among humans, CDC warns
Can you get bird flu from eating eggs? Milk? Poultry? What to know about staying safe
New York City is shutting down all its live bird markets after discovering 7 cases of avian flu
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
43 minutes ago
- Axios
How animal welfare became a GOP issue
Animal welfare is becoming part of the Trump health team's agenda, as officials press for changes to drug approvals and product evaluations and portray lab animal testing as a symptom of big-government bloat. Why it matters: The effort is the product of a more than decade-long push to elevate animal welfare issues with the political right that now features congressional oversight hearings and threats to cut off taxpayer funding. Case in point: The Food and Drug Administration is phasing out animal testing requirements for antibody therapies and other drugs and telling companies that use other methods that they may receive streamlined product reviews. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and the leaders of the FDA and National Institutes of Health urged Canadian food inspection officials last month to spare hundreds of ostriches infected with bird flu from a planned cull, saying there would be benefit in studying the birds' immune response. Congressional Republicans like Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) have also held hearings on " taxpayer funded animal abuse" and proposed measures that would close down federally funded labs that use animals. Trump had a mixed record on animal welfare issues in his first term. While he signed a federal law outlawing animal cruelty as well as animal fighting, his administration rolled back protections for certain at-risk animals, reversed rules restricting hunting on public lands and even deleted records of animal welfare violations. The FDA's new non-animal testing strategy could accelerate the process for bringing cures to market and give drug and biotech companies more flexibility — though it relies on some still-unproven alternatives like certain AI models. Between the lines: Among those driving the shift is the White Coat Waste Project, a libertarian-leaning group that is targeting what it calls "wasteful and secretive" taxpayer-funded experiments over its ethical concerns around animal testing. Founder Anthony Bellotti, a former Republican congressional staffer, told Axios the group adapted the playbook for cutting off federal funding for Planned Parenthood. Activists "went after the money source, because if you can fund a problem, you can defund it," Bellotti said. "And I said, 'Holy crap, animal testing is virtually all taxpayer-funded.'" The group has portrayed animal experiments as government waste, pointing to studies that show an 85% failure rate in studies that rely on animal models. The group has published controversial investigations of NIH-funded research, claiming taxpayers funded experiments where beagles were "bitten to death by flies" and that former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases director Anthony Fauci wasted $1 million on painful experiments on the dogs. NIAID has disputed the findings. Zoom in: The shift in framing animal welfare so it appeals to conservatives, including linking it to causes like states' rights, has taken place over many years, said Republican lobbyist Marty Irby. "I use the term creation care a lot ... we have all these things that we talk about: taking care of people, health care, whatever the case may be. But you know, you can't just push animals to the side." Efforts to address factory farming not only overlap with the Make America Healthy Again movement's interest in food quality but with national security concerns, since one of the biggest pork producers, Smithfield Foods, is owned by a Chinese company, Irby pointed out. There also are attempts to tie animal testing back to conservative suspicion over the pandemic response, including subjecting hamsters, rabbits, monkeys and many other animals to infectious disease experiments without pain management. The issue polls highly among voters on both sides of the aisle, Irby said. The other side: Animal testing remains critical to understanding disease progression and evaluating the safety of drugs, vaccines, food additives and household products. Because they're susceptible to many of the same diseases and have shorter life spans, lab animals provide a window into disease processes across several generations. Experts say the solution in the near time likely will involve a combination of animal and non-animal testing. What's next: Bellotti said plans to phase out animal testing don't go far enough, and he's continuing to push for more lab closures. "There's a lot of rhetoric coming out of the NIH that doesn't match reality," he said. "Without a funding cut for animals and labs, without a timetable and a deadline and a commitment to phasing it out ... it's status quo."


Business Wire
an hour ago
- Business Wire
We Need to Talk About Erectile Dysfunction: 38% of Canadian Men Don't Know You Need a Prescription for ED Medication
TORONTO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--For Men's Health Week (June 9 to 15), Phoenix, Canada's leading digital health clinic for men, is raising awareness to break the stigma around erectile dysfunction (ED), a medical condition that affects almost half (49.4%) of Canadian men aged 40 to 88. Thirty-eight per cent of men are unsure or don't think they need a prescription to purchase medication, such as Viagra, for ED. ED is a medical condition that prevents the ability to get and maintain an erection sufficient for sexual intercourse, with a range of potential causes that could each contribute to the condition, including age, medications, injury, and lifestyle. Despite its prevalence, Phoenix's survey of more than 1,500 Canadians found that there is a significant lack of awareness around ED and its treatment, likely contributing to stigma surrounding the condition. CANADIANS UNDERESTIMATE THE REACH OF ED Despite nearly half of Canadian men over 40 being affected, ED's prevalence is underestimated, driving undue stigma. In fact, almost half of Canadians (45%) think that ED affects less than 40 per cent of men 40+. Twenty-seven per cent of Canadians think it affects less than 30 per cent of men 40+. While Canadians underestimate the prevalence of ED in middle-aged and older men, many are also unaware that the condition can also impact younger men. The survey found that 64 per cent of Canadians don't know that men aged 35 and younger can experience ED. That percentage grows as you look at younger men, with 71% of Canadians unaware that men aged 18 to 25 can be affected. This common misconception can contribute to the stigma around experiencing ED as a younger man, making it more difficult for those struggling to seek care. 'ED is a medical condition that men of all ages can experience. There shouldn't be anything awkward about it, but there is. We're trying to change that," says Kevin Bache, co-founder and co-CEO of Phoenix. "While it may feel uncomfortable, men need to understand what the condition entails, and not shy away from being proactive in discussing it with a doctor. The sooner you get started, the better your chances are at finding mental and physical relief." WIDESPREAD MISUNDERSTANDING OF ED MEDICATION Treatment for ED and its underlying cause can vary greatly depending on a patient's prognosis, however, medication is a common and effective treatment. Despite this fact, Phoenix's survey found 18 per cent of men are unsure if ED is treatable with medication, revealing a lack of awareness that may leave many suffering needlessly. The data also highlighted a concerning gap in awareness that ED medication requires a prescription. Thirty-eight per cent of men are unsure or don't think they need a prescription to purchase medication, such as Viagra, for ED. However, the lack of awareness is most significant among younger Canadians. About three in five Gen Z (59%) don't know that you need a prescription for ED medication: 32 per cent are unsure, and 27 per cent don't think you need a prescription at all. It is important that Canadians know that ED medication requires a prescription from a medical professional, as they may otherwise be vulnerable to purchasing unauthorized sexual enhancement products sold over the counter, which Health Canada warns could pose serious health risks. 'It's no surprise that people aren't aware of the prevalence of ED – it just doesn't get talked about enough. But the good news is, there are treatment options, and with more openness and awareness, more people can seek support immediately,' says Gavin Thompson, co-founder and co-CEO of Phoenix. 'We built Phoenix to change that. Our mission is simple: make expert care easy to access – fast, discreet, and doctor-led. We're building a future where men take charge of their health with confidence.' WHAT CANADIANS NEED TO KNOW ABOUT ED ED can affect men at any age, but it becomes more common as you get older. ED is more common than you may think, affecting almost half of Canadian men aged 40 to 88. Many factors can cause ED, including: low levels of testosterone, nervous dysfunction, blood flow complications, medications, medical conditions, lifestyle factors, obesity, diet, drug abuse, smoking, and emotional or psychological complications. ED is highly treatable, but the first step is consulting a medical professional. Treatment for erectile dysfunction and its underlying cause can vary greatly, making it important to consult a medical professional to receive a diagnosis and devise an effective treatment strategy. ED medication requires a prescription from a medical professional. Phoenix is currently available in Ontario, Alberta, British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, PEI, and Newfoundland. To learn more about Phoenix's ED support, visit ABOUT PHOENIX Phoenix is Canada's leading digital health clinic for men, specializing in three areas of treatment – erectile dysfunction, weight loss, and hair loss. The telehealth platform facilitates access to licensed Canadian physicians, treatment options, and free, discreet shipping of prescription medication from coast to coast. Visit to learn more. SURVEY METHODOLOGY These findings are from a survey conducted by Phoenix from May 20th to May 22nd, 2025, among a representative sample of 1509 online Canadians who are members of the Angus Reid Forum. The survey was conducted in English and French. For comparison purposes only, a probability sample of this size would carry a margin of error of +/-2.53 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.


Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
Americans Told to Stay Indoors in Three States
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Air quality alerts were in effect for three U.S. states on Monday morning, with officials cautioning that heightened levels of air pollution could present a health risk to certain members of the population. Sensitive groups, such as older adults, children, and those with respiratory conditions are at particular risk during periods of poor air quality, experts say. The National Weather Service (NWS) published alerts for Maine, Ohio, and New Hampshire. An alert for Maine warned that smoke from Canadian wildfires would linger in the state's Northern region through Sunday evening. Smoke from Canadian wildfires can be seen partially obscuring the skyline of downtown Kansas City, Missouri on Wednesday, June 4, 2025. Smoke from Canadian wildfires can be seen partially obscuring the skyline of downtown Kansas City, Missouri on Wednesday, June 4, 2025. Nick Ingram/AP Photo "The Maine Department of Environmental Protection recommends that individuals consider limiting strenuous outdoor physical activity to reduce the risk of adverse health effects," it advised. "People who may be especially sensitive to the effects of elevated levels of pollutants include the very young, the elderly, those with pre-existing respiratory problems such as asthma, those with heart disease and anyone who is working hard outdoors," it added. This is a developing story and will be updated shortly.