Crews break ground on Edmonton's Capital Line south LRT extension
The City of Edmonton is marking a milestone for transit in the city on Thursday, putting shovels in the ground for the Capital Line LRT south extension.
It comes as the city deals with a growing population.
Edmonton transit users at Century Park, like Penelope Siame, are eagerly awaiting the expansion of the transit system.
'I live in Allard, which is quite far (south), so it really takes a long time to get to school and get home,' said Siame.
Other transit users like Isabel Luzio say taking multiple buses can make for a long commute.
'It would definitely make it easier. Currently, it's a lot more difficult with all the construction, it's not very organized,' said Luzio.
That construction is work on the Capital Line South LRT extension.
Story continues below advertisement
The Capital Line South will run from Century Park to the Derochers/Allard neighbourhood.
The 4.5-kilometre extension will run from Century Park to the Desrochers neighbourhood. Stops include Twin Brooks, the Heritage Valley park and ride, and in the Allard.
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
The city says the south was prioritized, as it's the fastest-growing area in the city.
'This is where we see the growth, this is where we see the largest increase in planned ridership. I think it will probably be around 15,000 people a day when we open it. It will continue to grow,' said Bruce Ferguson with the City of Edmonton.
The project's budget is $1.38 billion, which includes $365 million from the provincial government. Phase 1 will build two overpasses, one underpass and two new stations.
The high-floor LRT extension will run along the west side of 111 Street from Century Park station to the future Heritage Valley North station at the Heritage Valley Transit Centre and Park & Ride.
Story continues below advertisement
'We are growing as a city, we have had over 140,000 people move here in the last three years. We're gonna be a city of 1.25 million people, projected by the end of this year. We can't stop building transit; we can't stop building ways for people to move,' said Edmonton city councillor Michael Janz.
1:52
Edmonton Transit Service adding 50,000 bus service hours, 20 new buses
The construction is expected to take four or five years.
Coun. Janz and the construction company, Ledcor, say getting the project completed on time is a priority.
'We have to keep building, but we need to do it in a way that clearly communicates to people what you can expect, where closures are going to be. We need to make it easier and more accessible for people to plan their trips so they can plan detours, plan alternatives. It's not just what we are doing, the construction, it's the how we are doing it,' said Janz.
Story continues below advertisement
And transit riders say they hope to see the work finished as soon as possible.
'I feel like it will make my transit shorter and I wouldn't have to take as many buses,' said Siame.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
5 hours ago
- Global News
Paying mortgage into retirement? Here's how you could plan your finances
A generation ago, it would have been unthinkable for many Canadians to carry the mortgage on their home into retirement. But for many on the cusp of retirement now, that's no longer the case. A survey of 1,626 Canadians conducted by real estate firm Royal LePage in May found that two per cent of Canadians expect to retire in 2025 and three per cent in 2026. Of these, around one-third (29 per cent) say they will continue to pay down their mortgage into their retirement years. 'Canadians today are much more inclined to carry debt because either working later into their lives or they've got some more disposable income that they can utilize to pay these things off down the road. But they're not just saying, 'I want to have my home paid off,'' said Shawn Zigelstein of Royal LePage. Canadians are also buying their homes a lot later in life, one financial planner said. Story continues below advertisement 'People are buying homes later and now they also have the option for a 30-year amortization. That pushes mortgage payments further into what used to be the traditional retirement years,' said Jason Evans, whose firm offers financial planning advice for retirement. Bloom Financial works exclusively with Canadians aged 55 or over and CEO Ben McCabe said a large part of his clientele is now retirees looking for options on how to pay down their mortgage. 'For 80 per cent of the clients that we speak to at Bloom, that is a situation that they're in,' he said. 2:06 Missed debt payments reach highest level since 2009: Equifax How can you plan? 'Retiring with a mortgage is possible, but there are some pitfalls to watch out for,' Evans said. Story continues below advertisement Evans recommends waiting until you're 70 to start drawing Canada Pension Plan benefits. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'The first is the temptation to start CPP benefits early. While this can help with cash flow, it means smaller CPP payments for life. For many people, waiting until age 70 leads to higher monthly income and would provide them with the most value from the program,' he said. He said some older Canadians might want to dip into investments to pay off mortgages, but they need to watch the markets carefully. 'A mortgage also means higher monthly expenses in retirement. To cover those costs, retirees may need to take out more from their investments. That can work when markets are strong, but during a downturn, it might force them to sell at a loss just to pay the bills,' he said. McCabe said the problem some Baby Boomers face is that there is a huge gap between how much their home is worth and the amount of liquid cash they hold. 'They've never earned more than $30,000 or $40,000 a year in their career, but they're sitting on a $2-million home because they happened to buy a house in Little Portugal (in Toronto) in the '70s,' he said. 'There's this disproportionate amount of real estate wealth versus liquid wealth or income,' he said. Story continues below advertisement An option that some homeowners can exercise to get some cash in hand is a HELOC – a home equity line of credit. As the name suggests, a HELOC is a form of credit that you can take out on your home. However, McCabe said it might not be for you if you're already well into your retirement. 'It's a better solution for younger people who have employment income and can service the interest payment that's required on that HELOC,' he said. 5:49 Creating a Financial Plan for Retirement How do reverse mortgages work? A financing option available almost exclusively for Canadians over 55 is a reverse mortgage. Story continues below advertisement 'A reverse mortgage is a loan against one's home. It's only available if you're a senior,' McCabe said. The key difference between a reverse mortgage and any other kind of financing option is that there are no monthly payments. 'The loan isn't due until you pass away or until you sell your home. So effectively, until you no longer occupy that home as your principal residence,' he said. He said many older Canadians use their reverse mortgage to replace the primary mortgage on their homes. 'Effectively, you'd be replacing a mortgage that has monthly payment obligation with a mortgage that doesn't have one,' he said. He gave the example of a retiree with a household income of $4,000 a month, with $1,500 going to the bank every month for a mortgage payment. 'Now all of a sudden, you have that full $4,000 of income in your net income that you can apply towards your living expenses and living well retirement,' he said. 2:05 Business Matters: Canadian home sales fell in February amid tariff uncertainty Downsizing According to the Royal LePage report, 47 per cent said they don't plan to downsize within two years of retiring, while 44 per cent said they do. The rest were not sure. Story continues below advertisement The most popular downsized dwelling was a standard condominium, with 43 per cent saying they would prefer to downsize to a condo and a quarter (25 per cent) preferring to downsize to a senior living community. Only 16 per cent said they would live in a detached home and 11 per cent said they would prefer live in an attached home. The rest were undecided. Condominium prices have been dropping rapidly in some of Canada's hottest housing markets. According to one report, condo prices will have dropped by 15 to 20 per cent in the Greater Toronto Area by the end of the year, compared to a 2023 high. 'Downsizing can be a good option for some. However, it can sometimes be challenging to find a suitable next home at a lower price point,' Evans said. 'Moving to a new area is often required to free up a meaningful amount of equity. If downsizing is part of a person's retirement plan, it's important to keep an eye on the real estate market and consider a few different housing options,' he said.
Global News
12 hours ago
- Global News
Council draws ire of Calgary developers after ‘housekeeping' land-use changes defeated
Two groups of developers are calling out Calgary city council after proposed 'housekeeping' changes to the city's land-use bylaw were defeated, and a move to reconsider the vote was also shot down. Global News has obtained two letters sent to city council on Thursday: one from the Calgary Inner City Builders Association (CICBA), and the other from a group of 18 high-rise developers. In its letter, CICBA noted its members are 'exceedingly disappointed and frustrated' with council's decision. 'The introduction of politics to administrative, housekeeping amendments is a dangerous exercise,' the letter read. 'It reduces our ability to deliver much-needed housing units and it erodes housing affordability across the city.' Earlier this month, city council was presented with 12 amendments to the city's land-use bylaw, which outlines the rules and regulations for development of land in Calgary within each zoning district. Story continues below advertisement The updates included updated language around rear setbacks, parcel coverage and garage rules, as well as the removal of requirements for mobility storage lockers, and the removal for rezoning and public hearing for child-care services in an existing building. The proposal also included a language change around the period for appeals, aligning it with the provincial rules. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy According to the city, the amendments 'streamline process, reduce timelines and costs for applicants, and focus on enabling housing and services for families,' and were done in consultation with the building industry. However, the changes were defeated in a tie vote with councillors Sean Chu, Sonya Sharp, Dan McLean, Jennifer Wyness, Andre Chabot, and Terry Wong voting against. 'My frustration is we have a bunch of people who talk about finding efficiencies, saving money, and creating partnerships with industry, and creating more affordable housing, but at every single turn they vote against that,' said Ward 11 Coun. Kourtney Penner. Earlier this week, council then debated a motion to reconsider the vote on the land-use bylaw amendments, which required a two-thirds majority. However, that reconsideration vote was also defeated with councillors Sharp, McLean, Wyness, Chabot, and Wong voting against. 'It was pointed out to me by several members of council that had they been able to break apart the various housekeeping changes, they felt it would've been a better decision so we prepared that,' Calgary mayor Jyoti Gondek told Global News. Story continues below advertisement 'Instead (of) letting that happen, enough members of council just turned it all down again.' In the other letter to councillors, the highrise developers noted they 'do not understand' why council would 'not at least support reconsideration through voting separately on each of the individual amendments,' asking councillors to once again reconsider. 'These types of amendments represent necessary and impactful incremental improvements to our shared planning and development system,' the letter read. 'These types of amendments result in reduced red tape and costs which can increase the supply and affordability of housing.' In an interview with Global News, McLean, who represents Ward 13, said he agreed with what he read in the letter, and does support some of the housekeeping amendments, but defended his decision to vote against the reconsideration. 'I think if we broke them apart one by one they would've all passed, and I didn't want them to all pass,' he said. 'Bring them back separate if you want them to pass.' Wong, the councillor for Ward 7, told Global News in a statement that he felt five of the updates were policy matters bundled into an omnibus vote, not housekeeping. 'I voted against the reconsideration as there was no official mechanism to 'straw vote' which amendments would be supported or rejected; thus I was not confident that an amended omnibus package could be achieved,' his statement read. Story continues below advertisement Wong said he is engaged in discussions to approve some of the 'less contentious amendments' during a council meeting in June.
Global News
12 hours ago
- Global News
BC Ferries' new lounge menu prices have some passengers feeling at sea
BC Ferries' new Seascapes Dining Lounge menu is making waves — but not in a good way, with some passengers saying the prices are enough to rock the boat. Admission to the lounge is $6 per person, which includes unlimited tea, coffee and soft drinks. However, the newly-released prices for food and other beverages could quickly rack up the bill. A bowl of cranberry and coconut oatmeal begins at $9.99 while a continental breakfast plate or banana caramel crepe will set you back $13.99. The lunch and dinner menu ranges in price from $9.49 for a bowl of soup, to $19.99 for a beef barbacoa and rice bowl. 'I think that's silly. We're paying to get on the ferry anyways,' passenger Lauren said. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy She was echoed by her friend and fellow student Georgia. Story continues below advertisement 'I would not be caught dead paying $14 for a breakfast as a student personally,' Georgia said. 'We know Vancouver is expensive. We know B.C. is expensive, but that's just totally, totally unreasonable.' 2:11 BC Ferries introduce new lounge with $6 entrance fee Alcoholic drinks may feel comparable to any restaurant on land, with beer, cider and cocktails ranging from $7.99 to $8.99, and wine goes for $14.99, but they must be accompanied by a meal. By comparison, a full dinner in the former Pacific Buffet onboard was $27, including unlimited dessert. 'I feel a bit sad that the buffet ended up closing, actually, because it was a very nice experience to be able to do that,' passenger Janine Mayers said. 'I understand that there is the need for cost, but I do think that it's not as good of an experience.' Story continues below advertisement BC Ferries says it ditched the buffet because it wasn't attracting many passengers and lost more than $1 million a year.
