Row over infrastructure pot spending at Waverley Borough Council
Conservative councillors say that money raised through funds for infrastructure and community projects has become a "hidden revenue stream" for Waverley Borough Council.The council allocates income generated by the interest from unspent Community Infrastructure Levies (CIL) and Section 106 (S106) agreements to its main revenue account, the general fund, which includes spending on providing services.Its Conservative leader, Jane Austin, said other local authorities had made the decision to ringfence it for infrastructure and that Waverley should do the same.The Liberal Democrats, part of a coalition that run the council, said the interest earned was managed responsibly and in line with national guidance and is a standard practice.
CIL are charges made by councils on any new developments and are typically used to pay for infrastructure, such as schools and roads.Meanwhile, S106 agreements are negotiated between developers and councils, with funds used to benefit communities, and try to limit and mitigate the impact of new houses.
The council is setting up a cross party working group to look at CIL and is reviewing cases of charges, after some homeowners were asked to pay thousands of pounds in fees for making home improvements, without the ability to appeal.The Conservatives said the council had £28.3m of unspent CIL and S106 money as of 31 March 2025, which they claim is a large amount in proportion to the size of the authority.Ms Austin said it had "quietly become a hidden revenue stream for the council" and that there would be a "black hole" in the finances without it."We've got to the stage where our council is basically relying on the interest from this CIL and from this S106 money," she told BBC Radio Surrey.A council spokesperson refuted this, stating that Waverley had been "independently recognised as the most financially stable local authority in Surrey"."It is also, to our knowledge, the only council in the UK to have published a balanced budget for both 2024/25 and 2025/26," they added.The Liberal Democrat leader of the council, Paul Follows, said it was "standard practice" for "funds to be allocated to specific infrastructure projects and held by the council until they need to be paid for"."These projects typically require extensive planning and can take several months, or even years, to complete," he said."All funds held by the council are managed in accordance with our approved treasury management strategy. This ensures that they generate interest, in line with our statutory responsibility to secure best value for public money."Any interest earned is retained within the council's general fund and is reinvested into local services and the enhancement of public amenities."According to the council, more than £2.1m of the £27.5m collected in CIL receipts to date had already been spent, with more than £15.2m allocated to specific infrastructure projects."Each year, we are committed to setting a responsible and balanced budget that maximises the resources available to deliver high-quality public services for the people of Waverley. This commitment remains unchanged, regardless of the level of interest income received," a council spokesperson added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
Reform-led councils in ‘shambles' since local elections, opponents claim
Reform UK gained control of nine councils and minority control in three more in May's local elections, but opposition councillors claim the party's organisation and productivity have been a "shambles" since. Across the 12 Reform-controlled councils, 33 meetings have been cancelled or postponed in the first nine weeks since the election, and at least 21 Reform councillors have missed their first meetings. In Kent, nine out of 22 scheduled meetings have been cancelled since the election, including legally required meetings like the governance and audit committee. Kent County Council said some meetings, such as planning committees, were scheduled on an 'if required' basis, and were cancelled because there were no applications requiring an immediate decision. Nottinghamshire Council's new Reform leader Mick Barton dismissed the criticisms as "political rhetoric from the opposition."
Daily Mail
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Ministers admit they spent £35,580 - more than a nurse or teacher's annual pay - on thousands of BEER MATS in pubs to boast about minimum wage going up
Labour ministers have admitted they spent £35,580 - which is more than a nurse or teacher's starting salary - on beer mats in pubs. The Department for Business and Trade (DBT) revealed the sum was spent on printing the drink coasters as part of an awareness campaign. Some 500,000 beer mats were distributed to 1,000 pubs across the country to help ensure workers were aware of this year's increase to the national minimum wage. Those who used or saw the beer mats were urged to 'make sure you're getting paid correctly' by visiting the website. Justin Madders, the minister for employment rights, said the distribution of beer mats was 'a unique opportunity to engage audiences in a social, high-dwell environment'. He described pubs as places 'where financial conversations naturally occur', adding: 'This setting encourages discussion and word-of-mouth sharing about rate changes.' According to the Government's National Careers Service website, the salary of a nurse at the beginning of her career is £31,000. And a newly-qualified secondary school teacher can expect to earn £32,000 a year. Mr Madders revealed the spending on beer mats in reply to a written parliamentary question by Tory MP Richard Holden, the shadow paymaster general. He said this year's campaign to advertise higher rates of the national minimum wage and national living wage was budgeted to cost up to £650,000 in total. 'The cost to advertise in pubs using beer mats was £35,580, which was approved at official level,' Mr Madders added. 'The 2024 campaign saw an increase in reach to eligible workers. 'However, recognition remained low, reinforcing the need for bolder, more engaging formats for the 2025 campaign, which expected to deliver an estimated 3.2 million impressions.' In April, the national living wage for those aged 21 and over rose from £11.44 per hour to £12.21 per hour. Meanwhile, the national minimum wage for 18 to 20-year-olds was increased from £8.60 to £10 per hour. But, despite the boost to pay packets, experts warned working age households are on track to be £400 worse off on average in this tax year. The Resolution Foundation said households were facing a 'triple hit' from the impacts of tax, higher bills, and benefits that are not keeping pace with the cost of living. Long-running freezes to personal tax thresholds will mean some people are dragged into paying more tax. And Labour's hike to employer national insurance will feed through to households through slower wage growth as employers recoup costs, the think tank said. The hospitality industry - including pub bosses - issued dire warnings about the impact of the national insurance hike when it was announced at October's Budget. They expressed fears about a 'double whammy' increase to costs, due to the rise in the national minimum wage coming in at the same time.
The Independent
32 minutes ago
- The Independent
Why Man United can freely spend in transfer window
Manchester United cut their wage bill by £20m in the third quarter of the financial year, aiming to comply with Financial Fair Play regulations and fund summer spending. Sir Jim Ratcliffe 's cost-cutting measures led to over 250 staff redundancies, reducing staff payments to £71.2m from over £91m year-on-year. Departures and loan deals for players like Marcus Rashford, Antony, and Tyrell Malacia, along with the absence of Champions League bonuses, contributed to the reduced wage bill. United have initiated summer transfer activities, agreeing to a £62.5m deal for Matheus Cunha from Wolves and bidding £45m for Brentford 's Bryan Mbeumo. Despite recording a net profit of £0.7m for the quarter, United acknowledges a disappointing season with their lowest finish in half a century and failure to qualify for Europe, expecting significant improvement next season.
