US Shares Test Footage Of Bunker Busters To Prove Damage In Iran Strikes
On Thursday, in a news conference at the Pentagon, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff described in great detail the planning and execution of the US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities.
Gen. Caine shared test footage of the bunker buster bombs. 12 of these were used during the Iran strikes, a US official told CNN.
Pentagon releases test footage showing how bunker-busters work. @SecDef Hegseth: 'Because of the hatred of this press... your people are trying to leak & spin that it wasn't successful. It's irresponsible.' Gen. 'Razin' Caine, on the mission: 'I have chills..talking about this.' pic.twitter.com/nS1q6ml7Ae
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) June 26, 2025
They pushed back against the classified Defense Intelligence Agency report that the attacks damaged the facilities but did not destroy them, and that the country's nuclear programme has been pushed only by a few months.
Hegseth said that the strike was "decimating - choose your word - obliterating, destroying." He added that the report was "low confidence" and had "gaps in the information".
They played videos of how the bombing took place on the nuclear sites, explaining how the bombers attacked. Unlike other normal bombs, the damage done by a bunker-buster bomb, cannot be seen on the surface level. They are designed to deeply bury and then function.
"A bomb has three effects that cause damage: blast, fragmentation and overpressure. In this case, the primary kill mechanisms in the mission space were a mix of overpressure and blast," Gen Caine added.
'The video I'm about to show you is the cumulation of 15 years of testing and development…100s of test shots on various models.'
- and if that wasn't explicit enough, the building model and impact measuring poles should resolve that bad faith take pic.twitter.com/gq81bj0Gg8
— TheLegalProcess (v3.0 | Instruction Not Therapy) (@ALegalProcess) June 26, 2025
Hegseth blamed the media for questioning the success of the strike and said the media cannot cheer for Trump. "Searching for scandals, you miss historic moments like recruiting at the Pentagon, historic levels in the Army, the Air Force and the Navy", he said.
Gen. Caine did not get political, but focussed on the two officers at the Defence Threat Reduction Agency who studied the subterranean nuclear plant at Fordow for 15 years to plan the attack, the personnel who developed the 30,000-pound bombs that the B-2's dropped, the crew who flew the 37-hour mission, and the troops who defended an American base from Iranian retaliation.
He described how all the six bombs "went exactly where they were intended to go" and added that "unlike a normal surface bomb, you won't see an impact crater". He said the bombs targeted ventilation shafts located on the opposite sides of Fordow, that Iran tried to cover with concrete before the strikes.
On each side, he said, the first bomb opened the shaft and the four bombs after it entered "at greater than 1,000 feet per second". The final and sixth bomb would act like a "flex weapon" in case any of the bombs preceding it had an issue.
However, they did not speak about Natanz, which was attacked with only two penetrator bombs, and Isfahan, which was struck by only one missile fired from a Navy submarine. Asked by reporters on what happened to the 880 pounds of uranium buried in the underground tunnels at Isfahan, Hegseth said, "We're looking at all aspects of intelligence and making sure we have a sense of what was where."
US President Donald Trump took to Truth Social to share that, "The cars and small trucks at the site were those of concrete workers trying to cover up the top of the shafts. Nothing was taken out of facility. Would take too long, too dangerous, and very heavy and hard to move."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
40 minutes ago
- India.com
‘You Have 12 Hours – Save Your Wife And Kids': Israel's Covert Calls That Shattered Iran's Nerves
New Delhi: Inside hotel rooms, military bases and secret compounds across Iran, top officers were jolted by phone calls they never expected. On the line – a calm voice in flawless Persian, warning them their lives were ticking down. 'You have 12 hours. Take your wife. Take your children. Get out.' Some hung up in disbelief. Others vanished. And a few, as Israel claims, did not survive the warning. This was not just war with missiles. It was psychological warfare. A parallel operation. A whisper campaign backed by precision airstrikes and names checked off a death list. The Other War While Israeli drones and stealth jets were hitting Iranian missile sites and nuclear bunkers, another operation was underway – one with no coordinates on a map. Code-named 'Rising Lion', the covert campaign targeted Iran's nerves. One phone at a time. Three operatives involved in the mission – along with a leaked recording – confirmed the plan's scope to The Washington Post. Around 20 senior Iranian officials received direct calls. The message was blunt. Stop backing Ayatollah Khamenei or join the dead. A chilling audio clip, now circulating among intelligence watchers, captures one such call. An Israeli operative speaks softly but firmly, 'You are on our list. We are closer than your carotid artery. Remember that.' The target was a high-ranking general. He reportedly escaped. Others did not. From Threat to Aftershock Israeli sources claim some of the men warned by phone were killed soon after. The calls were not bluffs. They were preludes. The strikes that followed wiped out important names – Major General Hossein Salami of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corpse (IRGC), Major General Mohammad Bagheri of Iran's armed forces and others. Subsequent calls invoked their deaths. One officer recalled a voice saying, 'I am calling from the country that, two hours ago, sent Bagheri and Salami straight to hell. You are next if you do not wake up.' Letters at the Door The pressure was not only through phones. Some officers found anonymous letters on their doorstep. Others were contacted through their spouses. It was personal, deliberate and meant to rattle men deep inside the regime's ranks. No bombs. No gunshots. Just fear. The campaign's goal? To paralyse succession planning. To ensure that after the decapitation strikes on top brass, those next in line would hesitate. Ayatollah Khamenei, reportedly hiding in a bunker during the height of the war, struggled to replace fallen commanders. One Israeli security official put it simply, 'We wanted those left behind to doubt everything. Their safety. Their futures. Their leader.' Despite the psychological pressure, no large-scale defection surfaced from the IRGC or Iran's armed forces. But insiders say the fear ran deep. At mid-levels, command chains frayed. Paranoia was growing. And that was always the point. This was not only about breaking bunkers but breaking resolve and killing silence whisper by whisper.
India Gazette
an hour ago
- India Gazette
US to hold QUAD Foreign Ministers meeting on July 1: State Department
By Reena Bhardwaj Washington DC [US], June 27 (ANI): Secretary of State Marco Rubio will host the Foreign Ministers from the QUAD countries on July 1 in Washington DC for the QUAD Foreign Ministers Meeting, the Principal Deputy Spokesperson for US Department of State Tommy Pigott announced on Thursday (US local time). Making the remarks during a press briefing, Pigott said, 'Next week, Secretary Rubio will host foreign Ministers from Australia, India and Japan for the 2025 Quad Foreign Ministers Meeting on July 1 in Washington, DC. The secretary's first diplomatic engagement was with the Quad, and next week's summit builds on that momentum to advance a free, open, and secure Indo-Pacific. This is what American leadership looks like: strength, peace and prosperity'. Dhruva Jaishankar at ORF Washington DC, spoke to ANI about the expectations and impressions on the American priorities for the QUAD Summit. 'US relations with its Quad partners have been complicated of late, given differences with Japan over defense spending, Australia over AUKUS, and India over Pakistan. For these reasons, even maintaining the Quad agenda going forward is difficult, despite the US concentrating the groups's focus on security, prosperity, tech, and homeland security,' he said. The developments follow after, earlier on June 18, when US President Donald Trump accepted Prime Minister Narendra Modi's invitation to attend the QUAD Summit, which will take place in New Delhi later this year, Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri had previously informed. The telephonic conversation with US President Donald Trump took place on the sidelines of the G7 Summit in Canada. 'For the next meeting of QUAD, PM Modi invited President Trump to India. While accepting the invitation, President Trump said that he is excited to come to India', Misri had said in a video message. The QUAD is a diplomatic partnership between Australia, India, Japan, and the United States committed to supporting an open, stable and prosperous Indo-Pacific that is inclusive and resilient. The QUAD's origins date back to our collaboration in response to the December 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami. Earlier in January, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, on his first day in office, hosted the Foreign Ministers of Australia, India, and Japan for a significant meeting of the QUAD alliance. 'On day one as Secretary of State, I hosted the Foreign Ministers of Australia, India, and Japan for an important meeting of the Quad. We are committed to strengthening economic opportunity and peace and security in the Indo-Pacific region,' Rubio posted on X. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio held the meeting with his Quad counterparts--External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, Japan's Takeshi Iwaya, and Australia's Penny Wong--at the US Department of State. In a joint statement, the Foreign ministers of QUAD countries reaffirmed their shared commitment to strengthening a free and open Indo-Pacific where 'sovereignty and territorial integrity are upheld and defended.' The Quad nations also expressed strong opposition 'to any unilateral actions aimed at changing the status quo through force or coercion.' (ANI)
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
No evidence Iran moved enriched uranium before strikes: US defence chief
US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday said he was unaware of any intelligence suggesting Iran had moved any of its highly enriched uranium to shield it from U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear program during the weekend.U.S. military bombers carried out strikes against three Iranian nuclear facilities early Sunday local time using more than a dozen 30,000-pound bunker-buster results of the strikes are being closely watched to see how far they may have set back Iran's nuclear "I'm not aware of any intelligence that I've reviewed that says things were not where they were supposed to be, moved or otherwise," Hegseth told an often fiery news President Donald Trump, who watched the exchange with reporters, echoed his defense secretary, saying it would have taken too long to remove anything."The cars and small trucks at the site were those of concrete workers trying to cover up the top of the was taken out of (the) facility," Trump wrote on his social media platform, without providing experts have cautioned that Iran likely moved a stockpile of near-weapons-grade highly enriched uranium out of the deeply buried Fordow site before the strikes, and could be hiding it in locations unknown to Israel, the U.S. and U.N. nuclear noted satellite imagery from Maxar Technologies showing "unusual activity" at Fordow on Thursday and Friday, with a long line of vehicles waiting outside an entrance to the facility. A senior Iranian source told Reuters on Sunday most of the 60% highly enriched uranium had been moved to an undisclosed location before the OF URANIUMThe Financial Times, citing European intelligence assessments, reported that Iran's highly enriched uranium stockpile remains largely intact since it was not concentrated at comments denying such claims came at the news briefing where he also accused journalists of downplaying the success of the U.S. strikes following a leaked preliminary assessment from the Defence Intelligence Agency suggesting they may have only set back Iran by said the assessment was low confidence, and, citing comments from CIA Director John Ratcliffe, said it had been overtaken by intelligence showing Iran's nuclear program was severely damaged and would take years to Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and General Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, held a classified briefing on the strikes on Thursday for all 100 members of the U.S. Gabbard, who would normally conduct such briefings as director of national intelligence, was not scheduled to participate. Trump said last week that she was wrong in suggesting there was no evidence Iran was building a nuclear Senate briefing had been scheduled for Tuesday, but was postponed. Senators are expected to vote this week on a resolution that would require congressional approval for strikes against Iran, although the measure is not expected to be the Pentagon news conference, Hegseth described the strikes as "historically successful." His comments came after Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said on Thursday Iran would respond to any future U.S. attack by striking American military bases in the Middle claimed victory after 12 days of war, and promised Iran would not surrender despite Trump's 'HATRED'During the news conference, Hegseth criticised the media, without evidence, for having an anti-Trump bias."It's in your DNA and in your blood to cheer against Trump because you want him not to be successful so bad," Hegseth said."There are so many aspects of what our brave men and women did that ... because of the hatred of this press corps, are undermined," he praised Hegseth's news conference as: "One of the greatest, most professional, and most 'confirming' news conferences I have ever seen!"advertisementOn X, Hegseth thanked Trump for his the press conference, Caine, the top U.S. general, largely stuck to technical details, outlining the history of the bunker-busting bombs used. Caine showed a video testing the bombs on a bunker like the ones struck on declined to provide his own assessment of the strike and deferred to the intelligence community. He denied being under any pressure to change his assessment to present a more optimistic view of the U.S. also said he would not change his assessment due to politics. Uniformed military officials are supposed to remain apolitical and provide their best military advice."I've never been pressured by the president or the secretary to do anything other than tell them exactly what I'm thinking, and that's exactly what I've done," he said.- EndsMust Watch
