
‘They called us enemies of God': Yemeni journalist describes torture in Houthi jail
Today, he sits in black suit and tie which covers the scars inflicted on him during eight years of detention and torture by Yemen's Houthi rebels. Abdulkhaleq Imran was abducted nine years ago after Houthi militias seized Yemen's capital Sanaa and overthrew the government. He was detained along with eight other journalists, and sentenced to death five years later. "Calling it a death sentence legitimises it, and limits its meaning. It was a religious fatwa [edict]. I am at risk at all times," he told The National on the sidelines of the Yemen International Forum in Amman. Mr Imran was released in a UN-mediated prisoner exchange two years ago, but not before he suffered psychological and physical torture that caused irreversible damage to his health. Heart disease, liver enlargement, kidney and joint infections, a slipped disc, respiratory infections and nerve pain are some of the ailments that Mr Imran hides beneath his sleek outfit. But the pain appears on his face every time he tells his story or shifts in his seat. "I was placed in solitary confinement, in a cell that's less that one-by-one metre big. It was filthy, cold and grim. When they took us out, they would hang us up against the wall and crucify us, beating us until we bled, then deny us medical help," he said, using the lanyard of his conference ID to demonstrate. Just after they took over, the Houthis cracked down hard on the media, which they accused of undermining their ideological cause and belief that they are the righteous leaders of Yemen. "They beat us not to extract information from us. They had all our data on our phones and devices. They beat us because we posed an existential threat to them." Mr Imran said that the constant transfer of prisoners like him from one place to another was sometimes a risk to their lives, as they were kept at locations that could be struck by forces fighting the Houthis. "They used us as human shields when they put us in weapons depots. Being moved it was as if they were transporting us from hell to Hades." Although his case was widely covered by international NGOs and media, Mr Imran says one of the lesser-known facets of the torture inflicted on the Houthis' prisoners was psychological. "They would play tapes for hours, from sundown to 12am, of a religious Houthi leader who would pray out loud for our demise and for our lineage to disappear. They called us not only enemies of the state, but enemies of God," he said. During these attempts to brainwash prisoners, Mr Imran said, the religious leaders would refer to them as "hypocrites and apostates". When asked whether he considered telling his captors that he was convinced by their rhetoric so that they would stop torturing him, he replied: "Never. Sympathising with your abuser is becoming devoid of dignity." Mr Imran says it was his and his colleagues' deep belief in their rights as journalists that helped them to remain resilient during their time in captivity. After he was released, Mr Imran says he found his family living in tents, among the 4.5 million people displaced by the 10-year-old war. One of the men Mr Imran says abused him and his colleagues personally is Abdulkader Al Murtada, head of the Houthi prisoner exchange committee and negotiator. Mr Al Murtada was sanctioned by the US last year after the UN found that he was complicit in "inhuman treatment", based on prisoners' testimonies. Mr Imran and his freed colleagues are still searching for justice. "We are currently making efforts to file a lawsuit before the national judiciary against leaders of the terrorist Houthi militias who committed war crimes and crimes against humanity against us," he said. In targeting Mr Al Murtada and the leader of the militia, Abdulmalik Al Houthi, Mr Imran hopes to see his torturers on trial at the "international level". He says that even if the Houthis fall and their grip on Yemen weakens, he does not want to see the men who tortured him escape accountability. "This is the only way to protect journalists, civilians and society as a whole from a repeat of such crimes," he said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The National
8 hours ago
- The National
Whistle-blowers must report tax fraud judiciously but also be protected
You cannot get into business without accepting that you have entered a competitive space. Therefore, it is reasonable to expect that all players operate within the law. Legally mandated periodic regulatory reporting and the knowledge that an external audit by an empowered body can occur at any time should be enough to ensure that no one cheats. Unfortunately, cheating happens. Even the clearly communicated punishments for doing so never seem to be sufficient to deter bad behaviour. Legally, you must fail two tests. They are, and to reinforce how dim a view is taken of this, I am using the legal Latin terms, mens rea and actus reus (meaning: guilty mind and guilty act). You need to think about committing an offence and then act on that thought. So far, we are talking about malfeasance being uncovered by a non-trading external body. Today, in the light of a recently issued Federal Tax Authority (FTA) guide, I wish to address the mechanism in place for all other actors that might likewise reveal potential illegal activity. I say potential because tax law is very complex in parts, and it is not impossible that someone might misunderstand a situation or treatment they have witnessed, and then innocently report it. Issued in December 2024, a whistle-blower programme for tax violations and evasion represents the first detailed approach to the issue. I addressed this topic in a more general way in an article published by The National on April 29, 2017, as VAT was being launched. There was no formal programme then to protect whistle-blowers but their impact could be imagined. Particularly worrying was the potential for aggrieved personnel who were returning to their home countries unleashing a litany of allegations to the relevant authorities. Trying to sift through that reported in anger would be a challenge. Also, now abroad, a person might assume that there would be no consequences to their actions. Understand that this new regime does not just relate to people, but to any juridical entity. I might have used a different word than informant, which represents the reporting party. While the word is absolutely accurate, language changes over time based on its usage and television has not been kind to the general perception of what an informant is and what often happens to them. The guidance lists two categories of information they are interested in. Firstly, there is suspected tax evasion, which includes anything from registering with false information to submitting returns that are manipulated to reduce or mitigate any payable tax. Secondly, there is non-compliance – from falsifying invoices, be it with incorrect amounts or use of a different currency, to trading under the counter for cash and keeping such transactions off the business's financial accounts. This is clearly identifiable fraudulent activity. An approach may be rebuffed if it is considered insufficient to prosecute. However, this does not prevent further approaches if additional and more substantial evidence is collected and presented. In presenting their evidence, the informant must clearly identify themselves. This will naturally remain confidential. Importantly, should any legal proceedings commence, the informant will remain unnamed. Two interesting things follow. One is whether the prosecuted party is made aware that their actions were uncovered and reported by a person or a juridical entity. Clarity on this element would be useful. Second is the matter of a monetary reward. A non-disclosure agreement is signed as part of this process. Any reward would be paid subsequent to a successful prosecution and collection of monies due. There are specifics worth reviewing, although it might be hoped that any reports made would be from a desire to see fairness than the prospect of a monetary windfall. The informant's involvement ends as action is being taken. No updates are provided on the nature of the continuing case, which would seem to be a sensible protocol. For someone to step forward and provide information about the actions of another creates on them a burden, which must be co-shouldered. Hence, the receiving party provides for protections where it's accurate and in good faith. The submission is made using the FTA portal and the process is well documented. I finish by highlighting this because the FTA document is, and I quote, 'not a legally binding document and is not intended to provide comprehensive details associated with taxes and is not intended for legal reference'. Either protection exists or it does not. I am not a solicitor, but for someone to agree to fall backwards, they must be certain that they are falling into the arms of safety.


Middle East Eye
a day ago
- Middle East Eye
Israel's shock and awe has proven its power but lost the war
War is good for business and geopolitical posturing. Before Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu arrived in Washington in early February for his first visit to the US following President Donald Trump's inauguration, he issued a bold statement on the strategic position of Israel. "The decisions we made in the war [since 7 October 2023] have already changed the face of the Middle East," he said. "Our decisions and the courage of our soldiers have redrawn the map. But I believe that working closely with President Trump, we can redraw it even further." How should this redrawn map be assessed? Hamas is bloodied but undefeated in Gaza. The territory lies in ruins, leaving its remaining population with barely any resources to rebuild. Death and starvation stalk everyone. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Hezbollah in Lebanon has suffered military defeats, been infiltrated by Israeli intelligence, and now faces few viable options for projecting power in the near future. Political elites speak of disarming Hezbollah, though whether this is realistic is another question. Morocco, Bahrain and the UAE accounted for 12 percent of Israel's record $14.8bn in arms sales in 2024 - up from just 3 percent the year before In Yemen, the Houthis continue to attack Israel, but pose no existential threat. Meanwhile, since the overthrow of dictator Bashar al-Assad in late 2024, Israel has attacked and threatened Syria, while the new government in Damascus is flirting with Israel in a possible bid for "normalisation". The Gulf states remain friendly with Israel, and little has changed in the last 20 months to alter this relationship. According to Israel's newly released arms sales figures for 2024, which reached a record $14.8bn, Morocco, Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates accounted for 12 percent of total weapons sales - up from just 3 percent in 2023. It is conceivable that Saudi Arabia will be coerced into signing a deal with Israel in the coming years, in exchange for arms and nuclear technology for the dictatorial kingdom. An Israeli and US-led war against Iran remains a distinct possibility, though a unilateral Israeli strike is highly unlikely. In the West Bank, Israel's annexation plans are surging ahead with little more than weak European statements of concern. Israel's plans for Greater Israel - vastly expanding its territorial reach - are well underway in Syria, Lebanon and beyond. Shifting alliances On paper, Israel appears to be riding high, boasting military victories and vanquished enemies. And yet, many Israelis and pro-war Jews in the diaspora do not feel confident or buoyed by success. Instead, there is an air of defeatism and insecurity, stemming from the belief that the war for western public opinion has been lost - a sentiment reinforced by daily images of Israel's campaign of deliberate mass destruction across the Gaza Strip. What Israel craves and desperately needs is not simply military prowess, but legitimacy in the public domain. And this is sorely lacking across virtually every demographic worldwide. Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war It is why Israel is spending at least $150m this year alone on "public diplomacy". Get ready for an army of influencers, wined and dined in Tel Aviv's restaurants and bars, to sell the virtues of Israeli democracy. Even pro-Israel journalists are beginning to question how this money is being spent, wishing Israeli PR were more responsive and effective. Gaza flotilla: The Madleen shows us the world as it could be Read More » Today, Israeli Jews proudly back ethnic cleansing and genocide in Gaza in astoundingly high numbers. This reflects a Jewish supremacist mindset that is being fed a daily diet of extremist rhetoric in mainstream media. There is arguably no other western country with such a high proportion of racist, genocidal mania permeating public discourse. According to a recent poll of western European populations, Israel is viewed unfavourably in Germany, Denmark, France, Italy and Spain. Very few in these countries support Israeli actions. Only between 13 and 21 percent hold a positive view of Israel, compared to 63-70 percent who do not. The US-backed Pew Research Centre also released a global survey asking people in 24 countries about their views on Israel and Palestine. In 20 of the 24 nations, at least half of adults expressed a negative opinion of the Jewish state. A deeper reckoning Beyond Israel's image problems lies a deeper question: can it ever expect full acceptance in the Middle East? Apart from kings, monarchs and elites from Dubai to Riyadh and Manama to Rabat, Israel's vicious and genocidal actions since 7 October 2023 have rendered "normalisation" impossible with a state intent on building a Jewish theocracy that subjugates millions of Arabs indefinitely. While it is true that most states in the region are undemocratic, with gross human rights abuses a daily reality, Israel has long claimed to be different - "the only democracy in the Middle East". But Israel's entire political system, built with massive western support and grounded in an unsustainable racial hierarchy, precludes it from ever being fully and formally integrated into the region. The American journalist Murtaza Hussain, writing for the US outlet Drop Site News, recently published a perceptive essay on this very subject. He argues that Israeli actions have been so vile and historically grave - comparable to other modern holocausts - that they cannot be forgotten or excused, especially as they are publicly carried out with the explicit goal of ethnically cleansing Palestine: "This genocide has been a political and cultural turning point beyond which we cannot continue as before. I express that with resignation rather than satisfaction, as it means that many generations of suffering are ahead on all sides. Ultimately, the goal of Israel's opponents must not be to replicate its crimes in Gaza and the West Bank, nor to indulge in nihilistic hatred for its own sake. People in the region and beyond should work to build connections with those Israelis who are committed opponents of their regime, and who are ready to cooperate in the generational task of building a new political architecture." The issue is not just Netanyahu and his government. All his likely successors hold similarly hardline views on Palestinian rights and self-determination. The monumental task ahead lies in crafting an alternative to today's toxic Jewish theocracy. But this rebuilding must also take place in the West. Far too many Jews, conservatives and evangelical Christians continue to cling to the fantasy of eradicating, silencing or expelling Arabs from their land entirely. Pushing back against this fascism is one of the most urgent generational tasks of our time. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.


The National
2 days ago
- The National
Israeli navy attacks docks in Yemen port city of Hodeidah
The Israeli navy attacked docks in Yemen 's Houthi rebel-held port city of Hodeidah on Tuesday, striking sites that are crucial to handling aid shipments to the country. It was the first time the Israeli navy has been involved in attacks against the Iran-backed Houthis. Israel launched two strikes on docks in Hodeidah, the Houthi-run Al Masirah TV channel reported. The attacks come after the Israeli military on Monday called on people to leave the Houthi-controlled ports of Ras Isa, Hodeidah and Salif. "Israeli navy missile ships struck terror targets belonging to the Houthi terrorist regime in the port of Hodeidah ... following the aggression of the Houthi terrorist regime towards the state of Israel, including the launch of surface-to-surface missiles and UAVs towards Israeli territory," the military said in a statement on Tuesday. 'The port is used to transfer weapons and is a further example of the Houthi terrorist regime's cynical exploitation of civilian infrastructure in order to advance terrorist activities.' Hodeidah has been the main entry point for food and other humanitarian aid since Yemen 's civil war began in 2014, when the Houthis seized the capital Sanaa. The Houthis have exchanged fire with Israel since the start of the Gaza war in October 2023. The rebels have also launched persistent missile and drone attacks against commercial shipping in the Red Sea, in what they describe as an effort to end Israel's offensive in Gaza. The crisis has greatly reduced the flow of trade through the maritime corridor, which typically handles $1 trillion of goods a year. Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz threatened the Houthis with a naval and air blockade if their attacks continue. "We warned the Houthi terror organisation that if they continue to fire towards Israel, they will face a powerful response and will be subjected to a naval and aerial blockade," he said in a statement on X. The US has also launched strikes on Houthi sites, but announced a ceasefire with the group early last month. President Donald Trump paused the attacks just before a trip to the Middle East, saying the rebels had 'capitulated' to US demands. Israel was not part of the ceasefire deal. American navy ships travelled through the Red Sea and Bab Al Mandeb strait 'multiple times in recent days' without facing Houthi attacks, US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth said in a post on X early on Tuesday. 'These transits occurred without challenge and demonstrate the success of both Operation Rough Rider and the President's peace through strength agenda,' he said, referring to an intense US bombing campaign against the Houthis between March and May. In early May, Israel launched a devastating attack on Sanaa airport. Its general director, Khaled Al Shaief, said the strikes caused 'extensive damage'. The attacks involved 50 bombs and dozens of aircraft, the Israeli military said, adding that the airport was "fully disabled".