European Parliament to grill Commission over ditched AI liability rules
The Legal Affairs committee in the European Parliament will ask European Commission representatives to explain why it wants to withdraw its AI Liability Directive proposal, Parliament sources have told Euronews.
In the Commission's 2025 work program, presented earlier this month in Strasbourg, the EU executive said it plans to scrap the AI Liability Directive because 'no foreseeable agreement' is expected on the proposal.
The rules were intended to offer consumers a harmonised means of redress when they experience harm arising from AI products or services. They were proposed in 2022 but no significant progress has been made since.
Last week, group coordinators from the Internal Market and Consumer Protection Committee (IMCO) voted to keep working on liability rules for the time being. The Legal Affairs committee, which leads the Parliament's work on the issue, has not yet officially decided what to do, but will get together early March to decide on the next steps.
The Parliament is divided over the need for the rules, however, with the centre-left, left and greens in favour of continuing with the file, whereas the centre-right and conservative groups, including ECR and EPP, broadly behind scrapping the plan.
The rapporteur in the IMCO committee, Kosma Złotowski (Poland/ECR), said in his draft opinion published in January that the 'adoption of an AI Liability Directive at this stage is premature and unnecessary.'
Regarding the member states, Euronews understands that there are no plans to discuss the Commission's proposal to get rid of the rules, at working party level.
The question of what value they would add has been raised several times by member states during the examination of the proposal in the Council, the EU official said.
The Brussels tech lobby and consumer organisations were likewise divided about the need for additional rules.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
9 hours ago
- France 24
AI-generated Pope sermons flood YouTube, TikTok
An AFP investigation identified dozens of YouTube and TikTok pages that have been churning out AI-generated messages delivered in the pope's voice or otherwise attributed to him since he took charge of the Catholic Church last month. The hundreds of fabricated sermons and speeches, in English and Spanish, underscore how easily hoaxes created using artificial intelligence can elude detection and dupe viewers. "There's natural interest in what the new pope has to say, and people don't yet know his stance and style," said University of Washington professor emeritus Oren Etzioni, founder of a nonprofit focused on fighting deepfakes. "A perfect opportunity to sow mischief with AI-generated misinformation." After AFP presented YouTube with 26 channels posting predominantly AI-generated pope content, the platform terminated 16 of them for violating its policies against spam, deceptive practices and scams, and another for violating YouTube's terms of service. "We terminated several channels flagged to us by AFP for violating our Spam policies and Terms of Service," spokesperson Jack Malon said. The company also booted an additional six pages from its partner program allowing creators to monetize their content. TikTok similarly removed 11 accounts that AFP pointed out -- with over 1.3 million combined followers -- citing the platform's policies against impersonation, harmful misinformation and misleading AI-generated content of public figures. - 'Chaotic uses' - With names such as "Pope Leo XIV Vision," the social media pages portrayed the pontiff supposedly offering a flurry of warnings and lessons he never preached. But disclaimers annotating their use of AI were often hard to find -- and sometimes nonexistent. On YouTube, a label demarcating "altered or synthetic content" is required for material that makes someone appear to say something they did not. But such disclosures only show up toward the bottom of each video's click-to-open description. A YouTube spokesperson said the company has since applied a more prominent label to some videos on the channels flagged by AFP that were not found to have violated the platform's guidelines. TikTok also requires creators to label posts sharing realistic AI-generated content, though several pope-centric videos went unmarked. A TikTok spokesperson said the company proactively removes policy-violating content and uses verified badges to signal authentic accounts. Brian Patrick Green, director of technology ethics at Santa Clara University, said the moderation difficulties are the result of rapid AI developments inspiring "chaotic uses of the technology." Many clips on the YouTube channels AFP identified amassed tens of thousands of views before being deactivated. On TikTok, one Spanish-language video received 9.6 million views while claiming to show Leo preaching about the value of supportive women. Another, which carried an AI label but still fooled viewers, was watched some 32.9 million times. No video on the pope's official Instagram page has more than 6 million views. Experts say even seemingly harmless fakes can be problematic especially if used to farm engagement for accounts that might later sell their audiences or pivot to other misinformation. The AI-generated sermons not only "corrode the pope's moral authority" and "make whatever he actually says less believable," Green said, but could be harnessed "to build up trust around your channel before having the pope say something outrageous or politically expedient." The pope himself has also warned about the risks of AI, while Vatican News called out a deepfake that purported to show Leo praising Burkina Faso leader Ibrahim Traore, who seized power in a 2022 coup. AFP also debunked clips depicting the pope, who holds American and Peruvian citizenships, criticizing US Vice President JD Vance and Peru's President Dina Boluarte. "There's a real crisis here," Green said. "We're going to have to figure out some way to know whether things are real or fake."
Euronews
18 hours ago
- Euronews
Commission strengthens imports monitoring amid fear of trade diversion
The European Commission presented on Thursday a new system for monitoring imports arriving in the EU based on customs data. It should be complemented by member states and EU industries' data to identify import surges coming from foreign countries following US tariffs affecting global trade. 'Recent turbulence in the global trading system has increased the risk of harmful trade diversion - products diverted from high tariff markets could find their way to Europe,' EU trade commissioner Maroš Šefčovič said, adding: "With this new import surveillance tool we are boosting our capacity to protect our own interests and stop surges in imports diverted to our market." On 7 April the Commission announced the creation of a task force to monitor variations in imports of products arriving in the EU since 1 January 2025. The biggest fear concerns diversion of products coming from China. At the peak of trade confrontation between the US and China in April, Washington imposed tariffs of up to 145% on Chinese goods. However, the two economic giants reached a truce in May, lowering these duties on Chinese products to 30%. According to the latest figures from Chinese customs, exports from China to the EU increased by 8.2% in April 2025 compared with April 2024. At the member state level, exports to Germany rose by 20.4% over the same period, while the Netherlands saw an increase of 5.6%, Italy 4.7%, and France 2.6%. In the meantime, Chinese exports to the US have fallen by 20% over the same period. The data also showed a surge in Chinese exports to South-East Asian countries, with Thailand up 28% and Indonesia up 37%. To defend itself from excessive trade diversion, the Commission can resort to safeguards, which enable the EU to limit temporarily imports of a product when they might cause market distortion. It can also impose anti-dumping duties if a foreign country exports a product at a lower price than the price on its domestic market. Trade expert Simon Evenett, from the St Gallen Endowment for Prosperity Through Trade, in Switzerland, compiled data showing accelerating price falls between January and April 2025 for Chinese automotive and petroleum products, and prices starting falling over the same period for medicines and ships exported by China across the globe.
Euronews
19 hours ago
- Euronews
EU lawmakers take aim at Eurovision over ‘rigged' televote
Just over two weeks after the conclusion of the 2025 Eurovision Song Contest, controversy over the integrity of televoting continues to mount. A group of 12 MEPs from socialist, leftist, green, and liberal groups has written to the top brass of the European Broadcasting Union (EBU), which organises the contest, expressing 'renewed apprehension regarding increasing concerns of irregularities tied to the 2025 contest' in a letter seen by Euronews. Their appeal follows a wave of concern from national broadcasters, including the Netherlands' AVROTROS/NPO, Norway's NRK, Spain's RTVE, Slovenia's RTVSLO, Iceland's RÚV, Belgium's Flemish VRT, and Finland's Yle. The broadcasters cited suspicions of televoting manipulation and questioned the role of state-backed promotion, particularly involving this year's runner-up in the contest, Israel's entry, which reportedly benefited from campaigns pursued by the Israeli Government Advertising Agency (Lapam). Irish broadcaster RTÉ has formally requested access to the voting data, while VRT publicly questioned whether it will continue participating in the contest if full transparency is not ensured. 'While the Eurovision Song Contest is meant to unite Europe through music and culture, recent developments have cast a shadow over its credibility and neutrality,' Slovenian MEP Matjaž Nemec, who initiated the letter, told Euronews. Nemec criticised the involvement of national governments in promoting their acts, calling it a breach of the EBU's principles of fairness, impartiality, and independence. The letter cites data from VRT revealing significant and unexplained discrepancies between viewer numbers and televoting participation during the 2023–2025 contests. 'These trends are not easily explained by organic fluctuations in viewer enthusiasm and warrant further scrutiny,' the letter reads, warning that the increasing number of broadcasters questioning their own data points to a deeper, systemic issue. 'This is not an isolated concern: it signals a broader problem that must be addressed,' Nemec said. The MEPs have called on the EBU to take specific actions, including releasing complete voting data, authorising an independent audit, and enforcing safeguards to prevent political interference in the contest. 'Without answers and accountability, Eurovision risks losing the trust of its audience and becoming a stage not for unity, but for manipulation,' Nemec warned, adding that the European public deserves full transparency on this year's voting process. Eurovision Song Contest director Martin Green has issued an open letter addressing concerns about transparency and the integrity of the voting process. Green acknowledged the issues raised by broadcasters and confirmed that they would be discussed at the upcoming EBU Reference Group meeting. He noted that while promotional efforts by participating countries are permitted and common in the music industry, the EBU is reviewing whether such campaigns could unduly influence public voting. He also pointed out that Eurovision's voting system incorporates 'multiple security layers' and is overseen by over 60 professionals across Cologne, Vienna, and Amsterdam, while the voting is managed by Once Germany GmbH and independently verified by EY (Ernst & Young). Regarding the current rule limiting votes to 20 per payment method per person, Green stated that there is no evidence this affects the results. Nonetheless, the issue will be re-examined as part of the post-contest review process.
