European Parliament to grill Commission over ditched AI liability rules
In the Commission's 2025 work program, presented earlier this month in Strasbourg, the EU executive said it plans to scrap the AI Liability Directive because 'no foreseeable agreement' is expected on the proposal.
The rules were intended to offer consumers a harmonised means of redress when they experience harm arising from AI products or services. They were proposed in 2022 but no significant progress has been made since.
Last week, group coordinators from the Internal Market and Consumer Protection Committee (IMCO) voted to keep working on liability rules for the time being. The Legal Affairs committee, which leads the Parliament's work on the issue, has not yet officially decided what to do, but will get together early March to decide on the next steps.
The Parliament is divided over the need for the rules, however, with the centre-left, left and greens in favour of continuing with the file, whereas the centre-right and conservative groups, including ECR and EPP, broadly behind scrapping the plan.
The rapporteur in the IMCO committee, Kosma Złotowski (Poland/ECR), said in his draft opinion published in January that the 'adoption of an AI Liability Directive at this stage is premature and unnecessary.'
Regarding the member states, Euronews understands that there are no plans to discuss the Commission's proposal to get rid of the rules, at working party level.
The question of what value they would add has been raised several times by member states during the examination of the proposal in the Council, the EU official said.
The Brussels tech lobby and consumer organisations were likewise divided about the need for additional rules.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
3 hours ago
- Euronews
Kyiv residents react to Zelenskyy-Trump talks on ending war in Ukraine
Residents of Kyiv held their breath as they closely watched meetings between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, US President Donald Trump and European leaders. During the summit, Trump expressed hope that he and Zelenskyy would soon hold talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin with the objective of ending Russia's all-out war in Ukraine, now well into its fourth year. Following the conclusion of the meetings, Trump phoned Putin to initiate the three-way talks. Volodymr Novytskyy, who lives in the Ukrainian capital, said a truce can be achieved but that it will not be the end of the war. 'Even if there is a truce, this enemy will not stop within the border he has now.' 'I would not like to be in Zelenskyy's place," Kyiv resident Svetlana Gerasimenko said. 'He will not give in to Putin's desires, but it is difficult to think how the situation will unfold further.' Political analyst Oleh Saakian said the meeting went "satisfactorily". "Trump did not come out and say he was strengthening sanctions against Russia. But we live in a certain reality. The task of this meeting was to prevent Trump from pressuring Ukraine with Russian demands. We managed to achieve that 100%," Saakian said. "For Ukraine, the meeting with Putin is important to show Trump whether Russia is really ready to end the war. It is important to demonstrate that Ukraine has done everything possible on its side," he explained. "I don't think anyone in Ukraine has the illusion that a meeting with Putin could suddenly bring peace." Zelenskyy and European leaders said that Putin has demanded that Ukraine give up the Donbas in eastern Ukraine, which has seen some of the most intense fighting for over a decade, ever since Russia's initial invasion in 2014. Euronews previously reported that Russia would be unable to seize Donetsk -- which makes up the Donbas together with another eastern region, Luhansk -- unless Ukraine withdraws from it, according to the US-based Institute for the Study of War think tank.
Euronews
6 hours ago
- Euronews
Bolivia's presidential frontrunner has 'phone stolen' during rally
The surprise frontrunner in Bolivia's presidential elections reportedly had his phone stolen on Sunday while giving a speech to supporters to celebrate his first-round victory. Centrist senator Rodrigo Paz topped Sunday's polls with 32% of the votes cast, although he did not receive a high enough share to secure an outright victory. Paz will face right-wing former President Jorge "Tuto" Quiroga — who received just over 26% of the votes — in a runoff on 19 October. On Sunday evening, while Paz was addressing his supporters in Bolivia's capital of La Paz after his first-round win, the candidate's phone was stolen, local media reported. In videos shared by Bolivian news outlets and on social media, a man at Paz's rally can be heard shouting: "Rodrigo Paz's cell phone has gone missing". It is unclear how the phone was stolen. The footage could not be independently verified by Euronews. Paz told the El Deber newspaper that his phone had been stolen, but did not give any more details. As of Monday morning, the device was still missing, the outlet reported. It's not the first time a politician's stolen mobile has made headlines in Bolivia. In August 2022, former Bolivian President Evo Morales said that his phone was taken during a campaign event in Santa Cruz, the country's largest city. The disappearance of his phone sparked a massive police operation in a bid to find it, according to local media. Sunday's vote signalled the end of an era for the MAS party, which has ruled almost uninterrupted since Morales rose to power as part of the "pink tide" of leaders who came into office across Latin America during the commodities boom of the early 2000s. The official MAS candidate — Eduardo del Castillo — finished sixth with just 3.2% of the vote. A leftist candidate considered to be the party's best hope — 36-year-old Senate president Andrónico Rodríguez — won 8% of the vote. During his almost 14 years in power, Morales expanded the rights of Bolivia's Indigenous majority, defended coca growers against US-backed eradication programmes and poured natural gas profits into social programs. But his increasingly high-handed attempts to prolong his presidency soured public opinion against him. Meanwhile, Paz's promotion of what he calls "capitalism for all" has sparked excitement among voters as Bolivia undergoes its worst economic crisis in almost four decades. The country's annual inflation rate has soared from 2% less than two years ago to 25% as of last month. A scarcity of fuel has paralysed the nation, while a shortage of US dollars needed to pay for essential imports such as wheat has crippled its economy.
Euronews
8 hours ago
- Euronews
Russian dissidents face limbo as Germany halts humanitarian visas
ADVERTISEMENT Bright sun, Ukrainian flag, a woman's hand gesture shielding from Russian drones and warplanes, and the slogan: "No to Putin, no to war". The drawing by Russian sixth-grader Masha Moskalyova was widely shared around the world — and it was the one thing she and her father took with them "first and foremost" when they left their homeland. Today, Masha, now 15, and her father are together, but the past years have come at a significant cost: Alexey Moskalyov spent almost two years in prison for "discrediting the Russian army" — a harsh consequence of his daughter's drawing. It was also the direct result of the Kremlin's intensified repression against those straying from the official narrative. Since the start of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Moscow has expanded the legal tools it uses to silence practically anyone it wants to. After Moskalyov's release, the two managed to cross the border and settle in Armenia, and then tried to leave for a place where the Russian authorities would be unable to reach them. Yet, the fate of the single father and his daughter remains in limbo. Just recently, the German Federal Ministry of the Interior (BMI) rejected the Moskalyovs' applications for a humanitarian visa. Armenians, for their part, have been quite welcoming. "Good-natured people, a beautiful city," Alexey Moskalyov told Euronews. Yerevan residents sometimes recognise the two in stores, he said, "say words of support, are glad that we are now in a safer place than in Russia." At the same time, concerns over their safety persist as threats to Russians with anti-war sentiments in this republic of the South Caucasus remain. "There is a Russian military base in Armenia," he explained. "There have been repeated attempts to kidnap unwanted people, Russian oppositionists, those who oppose the Putin regime, those who did not want to be cannon fodder." "There were attempts to kidnap and then transfer them to Russia. And then - it's criminal cases and imprisonment all over again," Moskalyov said. The detention of Russian citizen Dmitry Setrakov, who left for Armenia over objecting to mobilisation back home, carried out by Russian security forces from the military base in the Armenian city of Gyumri, was previously reported by the Vanadzor branch of the human rights organisation Helsinki Citizens' Assembly. This was not an isolated case. According to Armenian domestic media, there were at least four similar cases since the beginning of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in early 2022 — to the point where Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan criticised the Kremlin's actions and called Setrakov's detention a "kidnapping". Dissidents who find themselves in transit countries even with barely lingering links to the Kremlin also often fear possible extradition to Russia. This is why, hoping to start a new life, the Moskalyovs applied for a so-called "humanitarian visa" in Germany. Unlike political asylum, this type of permit would allow them to work immediately and pay taxes, an argument in favour of their further integration. 'Admissions are mostly suspended' Upon request, a German Federal Ministry of the Interior (BMI) spokesperson told Euronews that, despite not commenting on individual cases, they can confirm that the current government aims to "end voluntary federal admission programmes as much as possible". The spokesperson elaborated, saying that, "until a decision is made, admissions under § 22 sentence 2 of the Residence Act, which allows entry for political reasons, are mostly suspended." This means that, in general, no new admissions are being granted, and no visas are being issued. Urgent cases, however, may still be approved, but there are no fixed rules for what counts as an exception. The decision, however, rests entirely with the ministry. Moskalyov says he was shocked when he learned that Germany had stopped issuing and approving humanitarian visas. "We turned to a country that associates itself with democracy, freedom of speech. We turned not so much for help as for protection from the tyranny that is happening in my country, from the dictatorial regime, from the repression that is persecuting me and my daughter," he emphasised. Marco Fieber, Director of Germany's Libereco – Partnership for Human Rights, an NGO committed to the protection of human rights in Belarus and Ukraine, called the ministry's statement sent to Euronews "absurd". "The BMI's reasoning that exceptions are only made in 'special individual cases' is absurd in view of the procedure applied to date for those affected from Belarus," he told Euronews. "In the past, these were always individual case decisions, in which we were in close contact with the German authorities. Nevertheless, in the two cases we are currently handling, nothing has actually happened for months – apparently due to intervention by the BMI", Fieber explained. "There is no way for Russians to obtain other protection in Germany, as they cannot legally apply for political asylum in Germany, which means that by closing paragraph 22.2 for Russians, Germany is closing off any possibility for them to obtain any kind of protection," a coordinator at the German-based human rights initiative inTransit told Euronews. Despite the suspension of humanitarian admissions under § 22.2, Russian nationals retain the fundamental right to seek asylum in Germany, as guaranteed by the country's Basic Law. The process for seeking asylum can be complex and may involve challenges such as lengthy waiting periods, limited access to employment during the application process, and potential difficulties in proving the grounds for persecution. 'We will not give you peace for the rest of your life' Returning to Russia is out of the question for Moskalyov and his daughter. During Moskalyov's last interrogation while at the penal colony, an FSB officer told him that he "would not be left alone" after his release. "You will now be on our radar for the rest of your life. We will come to you, visit you often, we will call you in for questioning, we will monitor you on the Internet, your accounts, and who you correspond with... We will not give you peace for the rest of your life," Moskalyov recalled. After leaving prison, he did not think of leaving Russia right away. However, the next day, a neighbour called him and said that the police had tried to break into his and Masha's house while the two were out to the supermarket, and he realised that the threats had come true. Human rights activists he knew gave Moskalyov clear advice: "You and Masha need to leave the country immediately." 'This is not how you fight dictatorships' The coordinator at the German-based human rights initiative inTransit also expressed "deep shock" at the programme's closure for Russians and Belarusians. "This is not how you fight dictatorships," they said, adding that "closing this program is a catastrophe" due to people having to wait for about two years for a visa. During that time, they will be detained and imprisoned, the coordinator told Euronews. "We are advocating for the resumption of the Paragraph 22.2 program for the Moskalyov family and for all others currently in the process who meet the program's criteria," they continued, emphasising the numbers: since June 2022, only 2,600 people - including children and spouses - have been accepted, averaging no more than 1,000 per year. The coordinator argues that the criteria could be made even stricter, adding that "in recent years they have already been made so restrictive that obtaining German protection was like passing through the eye of a needle". InTransit confirmed that around 300 applications are currently in limbo. "If Germany closes this program, The political goals declared by German politicians regarding present-day Russia and opposing the war in Ukraine will lose much of their meaning", the inTransit-coordinator concluded. The French alternative For now, the organisation inTransit, which is working on assisting the Moskalyovs, is not going to look for another host country for Alexei and Masha, "because we do not believe Germany can simply shift all responsibility for protecting persecuted Russians onto another country, such as France." InTransit cited the possibility of the French alternative programme's closure, or waiting times that "could stretch to two years," among further reasons for this decision. While activists working in different countries welcome the fact that France is accepting Russian dissidents, Paris is simultaneously tightening its general migration policy and, like other European countries, is wary of Kremlin interference. According to Le Monde, France has turned down around 1,200 visa and accreditation requests from Russians since early 2022, citing espionage fears. Those whose applications were rejected include diplomats, businessmen, conference participants, visitors to cultural events, and those who applied as journalists — a category under intense scrutiny over concerns of possible Kremlin-instigated propaganda and disinformation campaigns. The French authorities are also aware that, due to a shortage of experienced personnel, Moscow is increasingly relying on "illegals", agents who are not protected by diplomatic immunity and who work abroad under false names on long-term assignments. While the number of asylum requests in France has fallen by 44% in 2024 compared to 2023, the demand for humanitarian visas has not decreased. "People who have not been able to legalise (their status) in other countries, such as Serbia, Georgia or Spain, during the entire period of full-scale invasion and repression in Russia, are now turning to France, where the chances of legalisation are higher," Olga Prokopyeva, director of the French human rights group Russie-Libertés, told Euronews. Prokopyeva explained that one of the main reasons why Russians seek political asylum in France is desertion or conscientious objection to military service. "Perhaps this is also related to the rather low percentage of approvals, because these are complex cases," the human rights activist noted. "As far as we know, many are forced to appeal the decisions of the French authorities through the courts," she added. Punished because she 'couldn't lie' to children Natalia Taranushenko, a teacher from the Moscow region, received a French humanitarian visa. She was convicted in absentia after telling eighth-graders the truth about the mass murders committed by the Russian army in Bucha during a so-called "lesson of kindness," a mandatory class in today's Russia. Russian officials, including Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, have repeatedly called the Bucha massacre a "fake attack" staged by the West or Ukrainian authorities, despite never providing evidence to back their claims. Investigations, including those by the United Nations, have documented mass killings during Russia's occupation of the Kyiv suburb in the early days of the full-scale invasion. As many as 458 residents were killed, many executed at close range, tortured, maimed, raped or burned, often in so-called "cleansing" operations. Taranushenko knew her students might report her to the authorities, but she said she "couldn't lie to eighth-graders." Two parents of schoolchildren wrote denunciations against the teacher. She was charged last year and, like the Moskalyovs, fled to Armenia. She was detained at the airport when she tried to leave the country for Montenegro. After several NGOs took up her case and got Armenia to refuse extradition, she was able to leave for France, where she now lives. "I feel pain and shame for my country. And my profession is also a thing of the past: now I am among human rights defenders and I am very proud of it," Taranushenko told Euronews. Despite Taranushenko's positive experience, "immigration )is perceived by EU citizens and authorities) extremely negatively," Dmitry Zakhvatov from the NGO Action4life told Euronews. "The only guarantee of stopping this flow is the restoration of democracy, both in Belarus and in Russia," he explained. Otherwise, "this confrontation will intensify," Zakhvatov said, referring to the fact that the Russian regime builds its foreign policy exclusively on confrontation with its immediate neighbours and other countries. "Confrontation is the only way for this regime to survive. It simply does not know how to survive any other way," Zakhvatov concluded.
