
Louth man who sexually assaulted stepdaughter and her friend jailed for eight years
A 47-year-old man who offered his stepdaughter €50 for sex has been jailed for eight years.
The defendant was sentenced at Dundalk Circuit Court after being convicted by a jury of sexually assaulting the girl and of her sexual exploitation when she was 14.
He was also convicted of sexually assaulting her friend when she was thirteen.
The man, aged 41 and 42 at the time of the offending, had been in a relationship with Victim A's mother and was effectively her stepfather. They lived in his house and initially had a good relationship.
Victim B was in the sitting room of the house on February 21, 2020 when the man put his hand down the back of her trousers. She immediately became upset and ran to another room where she was joined by two friends and told them what happened. Gardaí were contacted.
The defendant was convicted of sexually assaulting Victim A on a date unknown between September 1, 2018, and February 28, 2020; and with her sexual exploitation on a date unknown between February 17, 2020 and February 21, 2021 at the house.
He bought her a bottle of vodka. She drank half of it. He was at the back door smoking. He kissed her and put two fingers in her vagina. She pushed him away.
On another occasion the girl was in her bedroom. The man offered her €50 for sex. She refused and he went away.
He returned, saying that he didn't want to make her feel like a prostitute, and asked her if she was sure.
The defendant stole Victim B's innocence, the court heard. She couldn't sleep and found it hard to make friends. Her education was impacted.
Her mother had suffered since, while the trial brought everything back.
He had been a father figure to Victim A. They had a close relationship but that changed when she was about 12.
She didn't understand what happened. Her mother believed him over her, and the relationship with her mother was never the same.
She couldn't put things behind her and had made an attempt on her life.
Judge Dara Hayes said that the defendant's previous conviction for drink driving was not relevant.
His relationship with the girl's mother ended almost immediately when the complaint was made.
A probation report said that he showed no remorse and was 'victim blaming.'
He was adopted and had no close relationship with his birth mother nor with his adult son. He was not working.
There were alcohol issues, while he couldn't explain 'drugs related' messages on his phone.
Judge Hayes said that Victim B was a guest in his house. Thankfully, she had the strength to immediately report what happened.
The defendant saw Victim A as something other than a daughter.
It was a 'degrading and disgusting way to speak to any child.'
The judge added it was an extraordinary breach of trust, and noted the disparity in age between the man and the two young girls.
The defendant had pleaded 'not guilty' which was his constitutional right.
He doesn't accept the verdicts and it was 'difficult to see where any mitigation might lie,' Judge Hayes continued.
For the sexual assault and sexual exploitation of Victim A, concurrent prison terms of 5 years, nine months and 4 years, nine months, respectively, were imposed, consecutive to 3 years and three months for the sexual assault of Victim B, a total of 9 years.
The final 12 months were conditionally suspended, and the sentence backdated to March 4 last.
The man must place himself on Probation Service supervision for two years post release and have no contact with the two victims.
Funded by the Courts Reporting Scheme

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Irish Sun
an hour ago
- The Irish Sun
Ex-solicitor jailed for being ‘key component' in scheme to change ownership of two Dublin properties with fake deeds
A FORMER solicitor who helped to change the ownership of two Dublin properties with fake deeds has been jailed. Herbert Kilcline, 64, was convicted of eight charges following a trial last November. He was convicted of two counts of using a false instrument, two counts of failing to keep records, and two counts of the fraudulent procurement of an entry into the Property Registration Authority's registry. He was also convicted on two counts of failing to apply the required measures as a designated person. The offending relates to two properties: one on Phibsborough Road, Dublin, and the other on St Mary's Road, Dublin 4. Read more in News Today Judge Sinead Ni Chulachain said Kilcline was a 'key component' in the scheme and abused his position of trust with the Property Registration Authority (PRA). She said Kilcline's role was in 'no sense peripheral'. She added that his actions contributed to the losses suffered by the injured parties and had also put the integrity of the land registry system at risk. Judge Ni Chulachain also said that this may not have been a 'deliberate or calculated fraud' on Kilcline's part, but his actions were reckless and went further than professional negligence. Most read in Irish News The judge noted that Kilcline does not accept his actions were criminal and characterises them as professional negligence. Imposing a two-and-half-year sentence, Judge Ni Chulachain said she had taken into account that custody would be more challenging for Kilcline due to his medical and mental health issues. 1 Herbert Kilcline was jailed for two and a half years Credit:


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Worker who said she was forced to quit Arranmore Island co-op over ‘cute hoorism' remark loses claim
An Arranmore Island co-operative worker who claimed she was forced out of her job, alleging its then-chairperson 'slighted' her in public with a remark about 'cute hoorism', has failed in a constructive dismissal case. The Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) has rejected a complaint under the Unfair Dismissals Act 1977 against Comharchumann Oileán Árainn Mhór CTR by Fiona Glynn in a decision just published. The community organisation, which operates sporting facilities, holiday homes, a cafe and a cultural centre on the Co Donegal island, had wholly denied the claim. Its solicitor said its defence was 'hampered' by the fact that the worker had 'wiped thousands of emails' from the organisation's systems before quitting in August 2022. READ MORE Ms Glynn said what brought about her resignation was that she had been 'publicly rebuked' by the then-chairperson of the Arranmore co-operative. Her evidence to the WRC was that the chairperson 'slighted' her by making 'a reference to 'cute hoorism' in a context regarding [her] in a public place'. She characterised the chairperson's language as 'undermining and divisive'. The complainant told the WRC that she did not use the organisation's grievance process before resigning because a 'previous disagreement' with another colleague dating back to 2020 had been resolved by mediation. She alleged she was being 'bullied' and 'did not feel safe about reporting' the issue. The co-op's position was that it was 'unaware' of any outstanding issues, the WRC heard. The co-operative's solicitor, Seán Boner, put it to Ms Glynn in cross-examination that she 'drew the maximum sick leave allowable before resigning, then left and claimed constructive dismissal'. Ms Glynn replied that she was 'trying to consider matters'. Mr Boner also pointed out in a legal submission that Ms Glynn 'wiped thousands of emails' from the employer's systems before she quit and hampering the co-op's defence of her claim. Ms Glynn said the emails were linked to her personal account, her credit card or personal phone and that she was not satisfied with the organisation's data protection protocols. Asked whether she could put forward 'any concrete example of engaging with the [employer's] grievance procedure' she 'was not able to provide any example', the WRC noted. An employee of the co-op's funding authority said in evidence that she spoke by phone with Ms Glynn and that the complainant 'had made her mind up to leave'. Adjudicator Conor Stokes wrote Ms Glynn could not 'simply disregard' a formal grievance mechanism and go on to claim constructive dismissal. 'The issue of the complainant deleting thousands of emails before she left further undermines her position that she was left with nowhere else to turn other than resignation,' Mr Stokes added. He said it would have been reasonable for Ms Glynn to 'exhaust all avenues open to her' before quitting and ruled that she 'was not unfairly dismissed' for that reason.


Irish Independent
an hour ago
- Irish Independent
Trial of UK High Court claims against Andrew Tate brought forward to next summer
The trial of civil claims against social media influencer Andrew Tate is due to be held months earlier than originally planned after a High Court judge in London said she was "very keen to get on" with the case.