
Mexico threatens retaliation as US doubles metal tariffs, EU and others race to avoid further levies
WASHINGTON: Mexico has threatened to impose retaliatory tariffs after the United States doubled its import duties on steel and aluminium, deepening a global trade dispute that has disrupted markets and strained diplomatic ties.
US President Donald Trump's decision to increase the levies to 50 per cent took effect at midnight on Wednesday (Jun 4), applying to all countries except the United Kingdom, which secured a temporary exemption via a preliminary trade agreement.
Mexico's Economic Minister Marcelo Ebrard said the hike was 'unsustainable and unfair,' and confirmed that countermeasures were being prepared. 'We cannot accept this in silence. Our response will be firm but calibrated,' he said at a press conference in Mexico City.
The Mexican Chamber of Commerce also urged immediate government action, while industry leaders warned of rising production costs and job losses in the country's manufacturing sector.
EU, US cite progress in tariff talks
Meanwhile, the United States and European Union reported progress during high-level trade discussions in Paris on the same day the new tariffs were enacted.
EU trade negotiator Maros Sefcovic and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said the meeting was constructive, with technical-level talks continuing in Washington and further negotiations planned.
'What makes me optimistic is I see the progress, the discussions are now very concrete,' said Sefcovic.
Greer echoed the sentiment, noting a 'willingness by the EU to work with us to find a concrete way forward to achieve reciprocal trade.'
Markets react to metals hike
Markets responded with volatility to the hike in tariffs, which doubled the previous 25 per cent duty rate introduced in March. Canada and Mexico, the US's largest trading partners for steel, are among those hit hardest.
The new tariffs also jolt the aluminium sector, with Canada being the top exporter of the metal to the US. Prime Minister Mark Carney said Canada was engaged in 'intensive' talks to reverse the levies, which Ottawa considers illegal. Labour union Unifor called for reciprocal tariffs on US metal imports.
The American Automotive Policy Council warned the measures would increase vehicle production costs and harm US competitiveness. Meanwhile, the Congressional Budget Office forecast a negative impact on US economic output.
Broader fallout and 'best offer' deadline
Wednesday also marked the deadline set by the White House for countries to submit proposals aimed at averting additional reciprocal tariffs expected to take effect on July 8.
Only the UK has reached a provisional agreement so far, with talks continuing with other trading partners. The US has asked for concessions on both tariff rates and non-tariff barriers in exchange for exemptions.
Minerals and manufacturing in flux
Separately, supply chain concerns are growing over China's restrictions on rare earth exports. European automakers have reported production disruptions, while German carmaker BMW noted delays in its parts supply due to shortages of essential minerals.
Global uncertainty over tariffs has already affected firms across sectors, with French spirits group Remy Cointreau slashing its long-term sales goals and German manufacturers citing reduced orders.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

AsiaOne
2 hours ago
- AsiaOne
In surprise victory, UK's Labour wins Scottish by-election after bitter contest, World News
LONDON — British Prime Minister Keir Starmer's Labour Party won a surprise victory in a fiercely fought by-election for the Scottish parliament on Friday (July 6) after one of the most bitter election campaigns in the country's recent history. In an election when race became a major issue, Labour won the seat from the Scottish National Party (SNP) in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse following the death of a former government minister. The result provides some relief for Starmer, whose party has suffered a steep fall in support since it won a landslide in a British general election last year after it raised taxes, cut welfare benefits and got into a row over the use of donations. Voters rallied around Labour in the closely watched contest after Reform UK, led by Nigel Farage, repeatedly referred to the ethnicity of the Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar, who is of Pakistani heritage, drawing criticism from the other parties. The Labour candidate Davy Russell won 8,559 votes in the election for the Scottish parliament, which has devolved powers over issues like health and education. The SNP won 7,957 votes, and Reform finished third with 7,088 votes. The betting odds had predicted a comfortable victory for the SNP with Labour pushed into third place behind Reform. Russell told his supporters that his victory had "sent a message to Farage and his mob, the poison of Reform isn't us, it isn't Scotland and we don't want your division here". But a recent surge in support for Reform suggests the party is making inroads in Scotland as well as in England, a year before the Scottish parliament elections are held next year. The support for Reform in Scotland is particularly surprising because the party's brand of low tax, anti-immigration, anti-EU politics, has often been more associated with English nationalism. Farage visited Scotland on Monday, days after a row over an online video put out by his party that falsely claimed Sarwar had said he would "prioritise" the Pakistani community. Labour branded the advert "blatantly racist" and the SNP leader John Swinney urged voters to reject Reform's "gutter politics". Farage responded by accusing Sarwar of introducing sectarianism into Scottish politics. [[nid:717553]]


CNA
5 hours ago
- CNA
From bromance to brickbats: Timeline of the Trump-Musk breakup
US President Donald Trump on Thursday (Jun 6) threatened to cut off government contracts with Elon Musk's companies, as the once-close relationship between the world's most powerful man and its richest unravelled publicly on their rival social media platforms. Trump said in a televised Oval Office diatribe that he was "very disappointed" after his former aide and top donor criticised his "big, beautiful" spending Bill before Congress. The pair then hurled insults at each other on social media – with Musk even posting, without proof, that Trump was referenced in government documents on disgraced financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The row could have major political and economic fallout, as shares in Musk's Tesla car company plunged and the South African-born tech tycoon vowed that he would end a critical US spaceship program. Speculation had long swirled that a relationship between the world's richest person and its most powerful could not last long – but the speed of the meltdown took Washington by surprise. MAY 22 House Republicans on May 22, took a major step forward on President Donald Trump's agenda, approving a legislative package that combines tax breaks, spending cuts, border security funding and other priorities. House committees laboured for months on the Bill, which underwent late changes to win over holdouts in the Republican conference. It exceeds 1,000 pages and is titled the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, a nod to Trump himself. Republicans made one last round of revisions before the Bill reached the House floor, boosting the state and local tax deduction to win over centrists and speeding up the work requirements in Medicaid to win over those who did not believe the Bill did enough to curb spending. The One Big, Beautiful Bill Act - which has now moved to the Senate - would usher into law Trump's vision for a new "Golden Age", led by efforts to shrink social safety net programmes to pay for a 10-year extension of his 2017 tax cuts. MAY 28 Musk, in an interview with CBS News, criticised the Bill - but in relatively tame language. "I was disappointed to see the massive spending Bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, not just decreases it, and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing," Musk said "I think a Bill can be big or it can be beautiful, but I don't know if it can be both. My personal opinion," Musk added. In a separate interview with the Washington Post, Musk said: "The federal bureaucracy situation is much worse than I realised." "I thought there were problems, but it sure is an uphill battle trying to improve things in DC, to say the least." JUN 3 Less than a week later, the gloves came off and the tone became significantly more confrontational. "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending Bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it," Musk wrote on his X platform. "It will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to US$2.5 trillion and burden American citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt." Musk also posted on X: "In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people," referring to the Senate elections which are scheduled to be held on Nov 3, 2026. JUN 4 On Wednesday, Musk made several posts on X about the Bill, writing that "a new spending Bill should be drafted that doesn't massively grow the deficit and increase the debt ceiling by 5 trillion dollars". In another post later in the day, he wrote: "Call your Senator, Call your Congressmen, Bankrupting America is NOT ok! KILL the BILL." He also called the spending Bill the "Debt Slavery Bill", as, according to him, the Bill contains the largest increase in the debt ceiling in US history. JUN 5, 12PM EASTERN TIME (JUN 6, 12AM, SINGAPORE TIME) Trump, after he met with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, addressed Musk's criticisms and added that he anticipated Musk criticising him personally. 'Elon is upset because we took the EV mandate, and you know, which was a lot of money for electric vehicles,' Trump said in the Oval Office. 'They're having a hard time - the electric vehicles - and they want us to pay billions of dollars in subsidies. And, you know, Elon knew this from the beginning.' "Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore," he added. "He said the most beautiful things about me, and he hasn't said bad about me personally, but I'm sure that'll be next. But I'm, I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot." He went on to say Musk knew the inner workings of the Bill. JUN 5, 12.10PM On Wednesday, Musk posted on X: "Slim Beautiful Bill for the win". Musk then replied to this post on X at 12.13PM, writing: "Keep the good, remove the bad." Musk appeared to respond in real time to Trump's claims from the Oval Office about the EV mandate. "Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the Bill, even though no oil& gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the mountain of disgusting pork in the Bill," he said. "In the entire history of civilisation, there has never been legislation that is both big and beautiful. Everyone knows this! "Either you get a big and ugly Bill or a slim and beautiful Bill. Slim and beautiful is the way." JUN 5, 12.25PM Musk then responded to a clip of Trump from the Oval Office that said Musk knew the inner workings of the bill. "False. This Bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!" Musk wrote on X. At 12.44pm, Musk, in a repost of X user Jesse Paltan's post, who compiled a number of Trump's old tweets in a picture, wrote: "Where is this guy today?" JUN 5, 1.57PM At 1.57pm, Musk launched a poll on X with the question: "Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80 per cent in the middle?" The poll is now pinned to his X account. More than four million people have voted. JUN 5, 2.37PM Trump hit back on his social media platform, Truth Social: "Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!" Trump, in another Truth Social post, also said that he did not mind Musk turning against him, but "he should have done so months ago". "This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress. It's a Record Cut in Expenses, US$1.6 Trillion Dollars, and the Biggest Tax Cut ever given. If this Bill doesn't pass, there will be a 68 per cent Tax Increase, and things far worse than that," Trump said. "I didn't create this mess, I'm just here to FIX IT. This puts our Country on a Path of Greatness. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" He added that the easiest way to save "billions and billions of dollars" was to "terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!" JUN 5, 3.10PM Musk then alleged that Trump is featured in secret government files on rich and powerful former Epstein associates. "Time to drop the really big bomb: (Trump) is in the Epstein files," Musk posted on X. "That is the real reason they have not been made public." Supporters on the conspiratorial end of Trump's base allege that Epstein's associates had their roles in his crimes covered up by government officials and others. They point the finger at Democrats and Hollywood celebrities, however, not at Trump himself, and no official source has ever confirmed that the president appears in any of the material. Musk did not reveal which files he was talking about, and offered no evidence for his claim. Musk, in a later post, responded to Trump's statements about the cancellation of his government contracts and said that "SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately".


CNA
5 hours ago
- CNA
OpenAI appeals data preservation order in NYT copyright case
OpenAI is appealing an order in a copyright case brought by the New York Times that requires it to preserve ChatGPT output data indefinitely, arguing that the order conflicts with privacy commitments it has made with users. Last month, a court said OpenAI had to preserve and segregate all output log data after the Times asked for the data to be preserved. "We will fight any demand that compromises our users' privacy; this is a core principle," OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said in a post on X on Thursday. "We think this (The Times demand) was an inappropriate request that sets a bad precedent." U.S. District Judge Sidney Stein was asked to vacate the May data preservation order on June 3, a court filing showed. The New York Times did not immediately respond to a request for comment outside regular business hours. The newspaper sued OpenAI and Microsoft in 2023, accusing them of using millions of its articles without permission to train the large language model behind its popular chatbot. Stein said in an April court opinion that the Times had made a case that OpenAI and Microsoft were responsible for inducing users to infringe its copyrights. The opinion explained an earlier order that rejected parts of an OpenAI and Microsoft motion to dismiss, saying that the Times' "numerous" and "widely publicized" examples of ChatGPT producing material from its articles justified allowing the claims to continue.