logo
Milwaukee Job Corps campus shutdown leaves participants at risk of homelessness

Milwaukee Job Corps campus shutdown leaves participants at risk of homelessness

Yahoo3 days ago

The Milwaukee Job Corps Center is pausing operations after June 6, leaving some participants at risk of homelessness. (NNS file photo by Sue Vliet)
Republished from Milwaukee Neighborhood News Service.
A week ago, Khalil Shanklin was introducing newcomers to the Milwaukee Job Corps Center, 6665 N. 60th St.
Now he is one of 130 students having to change their plans for the future, including many who may now have to scramble to find somewhere to live since room and board are a key component of the program.
'I am fortunate because I have a friend from high school who is offering me a job opportunity,' he said. 'But this was a shock to all of us and some people don't know what's next.'
Shanklin said he found out online that the Jobs Corps lost its funding and learned earlier this week that the pause would happen sooner rather than later.
On May 29, the U.S. Department of Labor issued a phased pause in operations for Job Corps centers across the country, including the Milwaukee Job Corps location, which is operated by Horizons Youth Services.
According to housing advocates, participants are at risk of being displaced as of Friday, June 6. In addition, 100 staff members at the Milwaukee Job Corps Center will lose their jobs. The center will cease all operations by June 13.
Center officials have not responded to attempts for an interview.
Shanklin, who practiced welding in the program, said he had expected to complete his certification within two months.
Job Corps is the nation's largest free residential career training and education program for low-income young adults ages 16 to 24, many of whom have experienced homelessness. Since 1964, the corps has trained people in nursing, manufacturing and the trades.
According to a U.S. Department of Labor press release, the program's pause is a result of financial challenges and a transparency report done by the department's Employment and Training Administration that exposed issues like low graduation rates, drug usage, violence and sexual assaults within the program.
According to the report, the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act graduation rate at the Milwaukee Job Corps Center in 2023 was 32.6% and there were 125 infractions.
The pause at all contractor-operated Job Corps centers was scheduled to occur by June. 30, but a federal judge issued a temporary restraining order on June 4 that stopped the elimination of the program.
Syreeta Austin, a former full time and current on-call residential adviser, said she understands the pause but is hurt at the impact this will have on the young people.
'I knew something would happen eventually because of the things that were happening,' she said.
She mentioned drug and other issues in Milwaukee.
DeShanda Williams-Clark, chief program officer at Pathfinders, said the group's youth shelter received a call saying the Job Corps had to stop its work and that there would be a lot of young people, ages 16 to 24, that would be displaced. The nonprofit serves youths in crisis.
'Some of those young people who are minors had no guardian to be released to, and some of those young people just had no other alternative housing arrangement at such a last-minute notice,' she said.
IMPACT, a private nonprofit that provides resources to residents in crisis, Pathfinders and other agencies are now partnering with the Job Corps to help the youths avoid becoming homeless.
These groups are going to the campus to provide vulnerability assessments for impacted participants.
'We are going in hopes of avoiding sending people to emergency shelters,' said Kimberly Liptow, coordinator entry manager for IMPACT. 'But we won't be sure of what exact resources are needed until we assess each situation.'
Williams-Clark said Pathfinders is working within a reduced capacity because of cuts it recently faced, but may be able to assist some students who are homeless, at risk of homelessness or at risk of domestic violence.
'The challenge is that there's a priority list based on vulnerability – an ever-growing list of 200 young people that could be facing homelessness and now we'll be adding those people leaving the Job Corps,' she said.
An issue that has come up is storage for young people having to uproot their lives, Liptow said.
'People want to know where they'll put their things, so if you or someone you know has space or resources, that would help,' she said.
Any job or housing opportunities that members can take advantage of would be helpful, Shanklin said.
Austin said, 'Remember it takes a village, the kids will need our help more than ever.'
If you know or meet any of the participants, offer them a meal, she said.
Volunteers are needed in the youth shelter or drop-in centers, Williams-Clark said.
There is also a campaign to save the Job Corps.
This article first appeared on Milwaukee Neighborhood News Service and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Federal appeals court to hear arguments in Trump's long-shot effort to fight hush money conviction
Federal appeals court to hear arguments in Trump's long-shot effort to fight hush money conviction

CNN

time16 minutes ago

  • CNN

Federal appeals court to hear arguments in Trump's long-shot effort to fight hush money conviction

Five months after President Donald Trump was sentenced without penalty in the New York hush money case, his attorneys will square off again with prosecutors Wednesday in one of the first major tests of the Supreme Court's landmark presidential immunity decision. Trump is relying heavily on the high court's divisive 6-3 immunity ruling from July in a long-shot bid to get his conviction reviewed – and ultimately overturned – by federal courts. After being convicted on 34 counts of falsifying business records, Trump in January became the first felon to ascend to the presidency in US history. Even after Trump was reelected and federal courts became flooded with litigation tied to his second term, the appeals in the hush money case have chugged forward in multiple courts. A three-judge panel of the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals – all named to the bench by Democratic presidents – will hear arguments Wednesday in one of those cases. Trump will be represented on Wednesday by Jeffrey Wall, a private lawyer and Supreme Court litigator who served as acting solicitor general during Trump's first administration. Many of the lawyers who served on Trump's defense team in the hush money case have since taken top jobs within the Justice Department. The case stems from the 2023 indictment announced by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, a Democrat, who accused Trump of falsely categorizing payments he said were made to quash unflattering stories during the 2016 election. Trump was accused of falsifying a payment to his former lawyer, Michael Cohen, to cover up a $130,000 payment Cohen made to adult-film star Stormy Daniels to keep her from speaking out before the 2016 election about an alleged affair with Trump. (Trump has denied the affair.) Trump was ultimately convicted last year and was sentenced without penalty in January, days before he took office. The president is now attempting to move that case to federal court, where he is betting he'll have an easier shot at arguing that the Supreme Court's immunity decision in July will help him overturn the conviction. Trump's earlier attempts to move the case to federal court have been unsuccessful. US District Judge Alvin Hellerstein, nominated by President Bill Clinton, denied the request in September – keeping Trump's case in New York courts instead. The 2nd Circuit will now hear arguments on Trump's appeal of that decision on Wednesday. 'He's lost already several times in the state courts,' said David Shapiro, a former prosecutor and now a lecturer at John Jay College of Criminal Justice. And Trump's long-running battle with New York Judge Juan Merchan, Shapiro said, has 'just simmered up through the system' in New York courts in a way that may have convinced Trump that federal courts will be more receptive. Trump, who frequently complained about Merchan, has said he wants his case heard in an 'unbiased federal forum.' Trump's argument hangs largely on a technical but hotly debated section of the Supreme Court's immunity decision last year. Broadly, that decision granted former presidents 'at least presumptive' immunity for official acts and 'absolute immunity' when presidents were exercising their constitutional powers. State prosecutors say the hush money payments were a private matter – not official acts of the president – and so they are not covered by immunity. But the Supreme Court's decision also barred prosecutors from attempting to show a jury evidence concerning a president's official acts, even if they are pursuing alleged crimes involving that president's private conduct. Without that prohibition, the Supreme Court reasoned, a prosecutor could 'eviscerate the immunity' the court recognized by allowing a jury to second-guess a president's official acts. Trump is arguing that is exactly what Bragg did when he called White House officials such as former communications director Hope Hicks and former executive assistant Madeleine Westerhout to testify at his trial. Hicks had testified that Trump felt it would 'have been bad to have that story come out before the election,' which prosecutors later described as the 'nail' in the coffin of the president's defense. Trump's attorneys are also pointing to social media posts the president sent in 2018 denying the Daniels hush money scheme as official statements that should not have been used in the trial. State prosecutors 'introduced into evidence and asked the jury to scrutinize President Trump's official presidential acts,' Trump's attorneys told the appeals court in a filing last month. 'One month after trial, the Supreme Court unequivocally recognized an immunity prohibiting the use of such acts as evidence at any trial of a former president.' A White House spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment. If Trump's case is ultimately reviewed by federal courts, that would not change his state law conviction into a federal conviction. Trump would not be able to pardon himself just because a federal court reviews the case. Bragg's office countered that it's too late for federal courts to intervene. Federal officials facing prosecution in state courts may move their cases to federal court in many circumstances under a 19th century law designed to ensure states don't attempt to prosecute them for conduct performed 'under color' of a US office or agency. A federal government worker, for instance, might seek to have a case moved to federal court if they are sued after getting into a car accident while driving on the job. But in this case, Bragg's office argued, Trump has already been convicted and sentenced. That means, prosecutors said, there's really nothing left for federal courts to do. 'Because final judgment has been entered and the state criminal action has concluded, there is nothing to remove to federal district court,' prosecutors told the 2nd Circuit in January. Even if that's not true, they said, seeking testimony from a White House adviser about purely private acts doesn't conflict with the Supreme Court's ruling in last year's immunity case. Bragg's office has pointed to a Supreme Court ruling as well: the 5-4 decision in January that allowed Trump to be sentenced in the hush money case. The president raised many of the same concerns about evidence when he attempted to halt that sentencing before the inauguration. A majority of the Supreme Court balked at that argument in a single sentence that, effectively, said Trump could raise those concerns when he appeals his conviction. That appeal remains pending in state court. 'The alleged evidentiary violations at President-elect Trump's state-court trial,' the Supreme Court wrote, 'can be addressed in the ordinary course on appeal.'

Global Markets Mostly Higher; U.S. Futures Down Ahead of Inflation Data
Global Markets Mostly Higher; U.S. Futures Down Ahead of Inflation Data

Wall Street Journal

time34 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Global Markets Mostly Higher; U.S. Futures Down Ahead of Inflation Data

Global markets were mostly higher and U.S. stock futures were lower after U.S and China officials hit the reset button following two days of trade talks, and ahead of the U.S. CPI inflation report due later Wednesday. Little detail from the talks was released, but representatives from the countries said the framework agreed would essentially restore a pact they agreed to in Switzerland last month, a deal that saw both sides lower tariffs.

Propane Trade Shows Signs of Revival as US and China Mend Ties
Propane Trade Shows Signs of Revival as US and China Mend Ties

Bloomberg

time35 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Propane Trade Shows Signs of Revival as US and China Mend Ties

Chinese plastics makers are showing tentative signs of reviving US propane purchases as the two economies seek to mend ties. Propane dehydrogenation plants, which turn the gas into building blocks for plastics, bought at least four US cargoes this month, an increase from May, according to traders with knowledge of the matter, who asked not to be identified. Aiding the trade, US propane was also becoming cheaper relative to alternatives, they said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store