Trump DOJ sues New York City over long-standing sanctuary immigration policies
The lawsuit filed in a New York federal court names New York City Mayor Eric Adams and several other city officials as defendants.
The lawsuit claims the city has enacted policies with the intent of impeding the federal government's ability to enforce immigration laws.
"New York City has long been at the vanguard of interfering with enforcing this country's immigration laws," the lawsuit states. "Its history as a sanctuary city dates back to 1989, and its efforts to thwart federal immigration enforcement have only intensified since."
The Justice Department cited New York's policy that prohibits its Department of Corrections from honoring U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detainers, which requests that federal immigration authorities be notified upon the release of a criminal illegal immigrant from jail.
The New York Police Department was subject to a similar provision, the lawsuit states. In 2014, the city further resisted cooperation with ICE, including adding an amendment to its sanctuary city policy that immigration detainers would not be honored without a warrant issued by an Article III judge (or magistrate judge) and unless the subject of the detainer had been convicted of a "violent or serious" crime within the past five years or was a possible match on the federal terrorist watch list.
The lawsuit said crimes committed by illegal immigrants in the city have prompted several city leaders to call for cooperation with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
Attorney General Pam Bondi said the federal government was left with no choice but to protect New Yorkers.
"If New York's leaders won't step up to protect their citizens, we will," she wrote on X.
U.S. Rep. Nicole Malliatakis, R-N.Y., applauded the move, calling sanctuary polices "misguided," "costly and dangerous."
"Restoring public safety in our communities starts with New York City cooperating with ICE's detainer requests. Failing to do so keeps dangerous criminals on our streets," she wrote on X.
The lawmaker said she filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request that showed more 16,000 crimes were committed by thousands of people who were living in hotels and shelters at taxpayer expense.
Fox News Digital has reached out to the Adams and the White House.
In June, the Justice Department filed a lawsuit against Los Angeles over its sanctuary policies. The city has become embroiled in a feud with the Trump administration over its deportation raids and anti-ICE protests.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The winners and losers in US-EU trade deal
The US and EU have struck what is being billed as the largest trade deal in history, after talks in Scotland. It actually resembles the framework for an agreement rather than a full trade deal, with details still unclear. But the headline figures announced by President Donald Trump and EU chief Ursula von der Leyen do offer clues about which sectors and groups could be hit hardest or have most to gain. Follow reaction live Trump - winner After promising new trade deals with dozens of countries, Trump has just landed the biggest of them all. It looks to most commentators that the EU has given up more, with instant analysis by Capital Economics suggesting a 0.5% knock to GDP. There will also be tens of billions of dollars pouring into US coffers in import taxes. But the glowing headlines for Trump may not last long if a slew of economic data due later this week show that his radical reshaping of the US economy is backfiring. Figures on inflation, jobs, growth and consumer confidence will give a clearer picture on whether Trump's tariffs are delivering pain or gain. US consumers - loser Ordinary Americans are already aggrieved at the increased cost of living and this deal could add to the burden by hiking prices on EU goods. While not as steep as it could have been, the hurdle represented by a 15% tariff rate is still significant, and it is far more pronounced than the obstacles that existed before Trump returned to office. Tariffs are taxes charged on goods bought from other countries. Typically, they are a percentage of a product's value. So, a 15% tariff means that a $100 product imported to the US from the EU will have a $15 dollar tax added on top - taking the total cost to the importer to $115. Companies who bring foreign goods into the US have to pay the tax to the government, and they often pass some or all of the extra cost on to customers. Markets - winner Stock markets in Asia and Europe rose on Monday after news emerged of the deal framework. Under the framework, the US will levy a 15% tariff on goods imported from the EU. While this rate is significant, it is less than what it could have been and at least offers certainty for investors. The agreement is "clearly market-friendly, and should put further upside potential into the euro", Chris Weston at Pepperstone, an Australian broker, told AFP. European solidarity - loser The deal will need to be signed off by all 27 members of the EU, each of which have differing interests and levels of reliance on the export of goods to the US. While some members have given the agreement a cautious welcome, others have been critical - hinting at divisions within the bloc, which is also trying to respond to other crises such as the ongoing war in Ukraine. A big Trump win but not total defeat for Brussels French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou commented: "It is a dark day when an alliance of free peoples, brought together to affirm their common values and to defend their common interests, resigns itself to submission." He was joined by at least two other French government ministers as well as Viktor Orban, the Hungarian leader, who said that Trump "ate von der Leyen for breakfast". Carmakers in Germany - loser The tariff faced by importers bringing EU cars to the US has been nearly halved, from the rate of 27.5% that was imposed by Trump in April to a new rate of 15%. Cars are one of the EU's top exports to the US. And as the largest manufacturer of cars in the EU - thanks to VW, Mercedes and BMW - Germany will have been watching closely. Its leader, Friedrich Merz, has welcomed the new pact, while admitting that he would have welcomed a "further easing of transatlantic trade". That downbeat sentiment was echoed by the German carmaking trade body, the VDA, which warned that even a rate of 15% would "cost the German automotive industry billions annually". Carmakers in the US - winner Trump is trying to boost US vehicle production. American carmakers received a boost when they learned that the EU was dropping its own tariff on US-made cars from 10% to 2.5%. Theoretically that could result in more American cars being bought in Europe. That could be good for US sales overseas, but the pact is not all good news when it comes to domestic sales. That is down to the complex way that American cars are put together. Many of them are actually assembled abroad - in Canada and Mexico - and Trump subjects them to a tariff of 25% when they are brought into the US. That compares with a lower tariff rate of 15% on EU vehicles. So US car makers may now fear being undercut by European manufacturers. EU pharmaceuticals - loser There is confusion around the tariff rate that will be levied on European-made drugs being bought in the US. The EU wants drugs to be subject to the lowest rate possible, to benefit sales. Trump said pharmaceuticals were not covered by the deal announced on Sunday, under which the rate on a number of products was lowered to 15%. But von der Leyen said they were included, and a White House source confirmed the same to the BBC. Either scenario will represent disappointment for European pharma, which initially hoped for a total tariffs exemption. The industry currently enjoys high exposure to the US marketplace thanks to products like Ozempic, a star type-2 diabetes drug made in Denmark. This has been highlighted in Ireland, where opposition parties have pointed out the importance of the industry and criticised the damaging effect of uncertainty. Ireland 'not celebrating' Trump's EU deal US energy - winner Trump said the EU will purchase $750bn (£558bn, €638bn) in US energy, in addition to increasing overall investment in the US by $600bn. "We will replace Russian gas and oil with significant purchases of US LNG [liquified natural gas], oil and nuclear fuels," said Von der Leyen. This will deepen links between European energy security and the US at a time when it has been pivoting away from importing Russian gas since its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Aviation industry in EU and US - winner Von der Leyen said that some "strategic products" will not attract any tariffs, including aircraft and plane parts, certain chemicals and some agricultural products. That means firms making components for aeroplanes will have friction-free trade between the huge trading blocs. She added that the EU still hoped to get more "zero-for-zero" agreements, notably for wines and spirits, in the coming days. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Miami Herald
5 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Social Security quietly backtracks on unpopular benefit change
The Social Security Administration made a big announcement recently, but it was not popular. The announcement was intended to save the government money and improve efficiency - a big focus for the Trump administration, which came into office and made creating the Department of Government Efficiency its top priority. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Over half a million Social Security benefit recipients were slated to be impacted by the shift, but it has drawn many objections, including from lawmakers who have expressed serious concern about its impact. In light of all this pushback, Social Security has now quietly backtracked. The change isn't going to happen starting September 30, 2025, after all. Here's more about the proposed benefit change, along with insight into why it was scrapped. Social Security had planned to revolutionize the benefits delivery process as part of its efforts to enhance efficiency. Specifically, the intent was for paper checks to be stopped permanently beginning September 30, 2025. Lawmakers have long desired to make this change, and there has officially been a rule requiring electronic delivery of benefits for well over a decade since 2011. However, no one in the past took decisive action to stop sending paper checks. Related: Social Security's 2026 COLA will be good news for older Americans The White House wanted to be the administration that put an end to physical checks. A July 2025 notice posted on the Social Security Administration's website stated: "Starting September 30, 2025, the Social Security Administration (SSA) will no longer issue paper checks for benefit payments. This change is part of a broader government-wide initiative to modernize payment systems and enhance service delivery." The announcement about shifting to paper checks outlined some of the reasons why the Social Security Administration made this plan, including: Improving speed and efficiency, as direct deposits are quickerCost savings, because sending out a paper check costs the government $0.50, while it's possible for the government to make a direct deposit of a Social Security check for just $0.15Better security, since paper checks are 16 times more likely to be stolen Because of these benefits, the government said that Social Security recipients would have two options for receiving payments after September - direct deposit or a Direct Express card. Related: AARP CEO shares blunt 9-word warning about Social Security While there were clearly some good reasons for shifting away from paper checks, the decision was also a very unpopular one. The reason: There was serious concern that people who most need their benefits would lose access because they are unbanked or underbanked. Some Social Security recipients face barriers to opening bank accounts. These include being unable to afford account fees, being ineligible due to previously overdrafting or other problems, or lacking a government-issued ID needed to open an account. Senator Elizabeth Warren was a vocal critic of the plan to switch, commenting on a press call, "There are about 600,000 Americans who still receive their paper checks - it's a small fraction of people who receive Social Security payments, but it's a population that often needs checks through paper." More on retirement: Dave Ramsey offers urgent thoughts about MedicareJean Chatzky shares major statement on Social SecurityTony Robbins has blunt words on IRAs,401(k)s Warren met with Social Security Commissioner Frank Bisignano, and after that meeting, the Administration backtracked on the change. Warren announced on July 23 that Commissioner Bisignano had agreed to keep sending out physical checks to those who need them, and an SSA spokesperson confirmed this to both CBS MoneyWatch and Kiplinger. While the Administration has agreed to cancel the unpopular change, it will still be pushing people to switch to electronic means of receiving payments by communicating about the benefits of making the change and explaining how to do it. The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
USA Today
5 minutes ago
- USA Today
ICE's threat to classrooms
Good morning!🙋🏼♀️ I'm Nicole Fallert. Do you know what "MKT" means on a menu? ICE deported these teenagers and children in immigration raids Martir Garcia Lara's seat in his fourth grade classroom was empty May 29. His classmates in Torrence, California, went on with the school day. He likely won't return to school this fall: Martir is one of at least five children and teens who have been rounded up by ICE and deported from the United States with their parents since the start of President Donald Trump's second presidential term. More immigration coverage from USA TODAY: Farmers say few native–born residents will pick fruit or tend cows. The agriculture worker visa program can be costly, burdensome and limited. And they say Congress has failed to act for years. Suspect faces terror charges in Michigan Walmart stabbing Authorities said they will file terrorism and attempted murder charges against a Michigan man accused of wounding 11 people in a stabbing rampage at a local Walmart. Grand Traverse County Sheriff Michael Shea said July 27 that bystanders were "absolutely instrumental" in preventing further injuries after the attack began July 26 at about 4:43 p.m. − a busy time for the sprawling store. One of the citizens who stepped in was armed with a gun, Shea said. One witness said she saw three people with stab wounds as she fled the store. There was 'blood everywhere,' she said. More news to know now What's the weather today? Check your local forecast here. Hurricane season warning signs are piling up The hurricane map in the Atlantic Ocean may be quiet now, but forecasters say that may not last much longer as several signs point to an uptick in activity across the basin. With three named tropical storms (Andrea, Barry and Chantal) so far, the number of storms is actually above average for this time of year. During this past week, water temperatures have surged to the 7th warmest in the satellite record (back to 1981), running only slightly cooler than 2017 and 2005 at this point in the season. At the same time, experts say the belt of water just north of the tropics has cooled since the start of the season, creating a more conducive orientation that favors rising air and storminess in the tropical Atlantic. Here are more signs pointing to a rough hurricane season. Israel pauses some military action in Gaza as starvation spreads Beginning Sunday, Israel will pause military action for hours each day in parts of Gaza and increase aid drops in the enclave, as the country has faced an international uproar over reports and images of starving Palestinians. Aid groups have criticized Israeli leaders for months over the growing humanitarian crisis in Gaza. The country cut off supplies to the region at the start of March before reopening aid lines – with new restrictions – in May. Where are ceasefire talks? Today's talkers Which football helmet should I buy my child? Have you ever wondered about the force of a hit to the head your kid sees in practice and in games, and how their helmets are tested to protect from them? The question seemed simple enough. Until a Virginia Tech athletics equipment manager and his colleagues delved deeper into it in 2009, leading to the development of Virginia Tech's Helmet Lab that today has national acclaim for its testing and studies. Just recently, the lab updated its rating system with new thresholds for those used in varsity and youth football and by bicyclists. No helmet is concussion-proof, the lab says, and any athlete can sustain a head injury. But the experts identified the helmets that best reduce your chances. Photo of the day: Kelly's prancing PK Chloe Kelly made her trademark prancing run-up before firing the decisive spot-kick as England defeated Spain, 3-1,in a penalty shootout to win Euro 2025 on Sunday, successfully defending the title they won three years ago. The enthralling game ended 1-1 after extra time — and Princess Charlotte cheered on the Lionesses. Nicole Fallert is a newsletter writer at USA TODAY, sign up for the email here. Want to send Nicole a note? Shoot her an email at NFallert@
