Dollar lingers near six-week low as trade war wears on US economy
The dollar hovered near six-week lows on Tuesday, as mounting evidence of economic damage from the trade war waged by President Donald Trump's administration weighed on sentiment.
While global equity markets have broadly recovered in the wake of the on-again, off-again saga of Trump's tariff threats, the greenback remains firmly on the back foot. Factory and jobs data in the coming days may give further signs of the toll that trade uncertainty is wreaking on the world's biggest economy.
U.S. duties on imported steel and aluminium are set to double to 50% starting on Wednesday, the same day the Trump administration expects countries to submit their best offers in trade negotiations.
"What this whole dynamic is basically saying is trade tensions are not really improving in that regard, and we've seen the dollar getting hammered widely," said Rodrigo Catril, senior FX strategist at National Australia Bank. "Interestingly, the Aussie and the kiwi have been the good performers this time around."
The dollar index, which measures the U.S. currency against six others, touched 98.58, the lowest since late April, before rising 0.5%.
The dollar was up 0.26% against the yen at 143.075. The euro fell 0.44% to $1.1392, having briefly touched a six-week high of $1.1454. Data earlier showed inflation in the euro zone slowed below the European Central Bank's target of 2%, underpinning expectations for a rate cut later this week.
The dollar sank broadly on Monday after data showed U.S. manufacturing contracted for a third month in May and tariff snarls meant suppliers took longer to deliver goods. Attention now turns to U.S. factory order numbers on Tuesday, followed by jobs data later in the week.
The dollar got some respite last week, rising 0.3% after trade talks with the European Union got back on track and a U.S. trade court blocked the bulk of Trump's tariffs. An appeals court reinstated the duties a day later, and Trump's administration said it had other avenues to implement them if it loses in court.
Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping were likely to have a call soon to iron out trade differences, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Sunday, although on Monday there was an angry rejection from China's Commerce Ministry of U.S. accusations that Beijing violated their trade agreement.
"Trade developments remain crucial. Reports suggest China is gaining leverage over the U.S. through its control of chip supply chains and rare earths," ING strategist Francesco Pesole said.
"Trump and Xi Jinping are set to speak this week, and past direct talks have sometimes eased tensions. That leaves room for a positive surprise that could help the dollar at some point this week," he said.
Fiscal worries have also given rise to a broad "sell America" theme that has seen dollar assets from stocks to Treasury bonds dropping in recent months.
Those concerns come into sharp focus this week as the Senate starts considering the administration's tax cut and spending bill, estimated to add $3.8 trillion to the federal government's $36.2 trillion in debt over the next decade.
(Reporting by Rocky Swift; Editing by Sonali Paul, Jacqueline Wong and David Evans)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
35 minutes ago
- Zawya
US stocks heal from tariff pain but trade news to keep markets edgy
After months of Wall Street gyrations to the twists and turns of U.S. trade policy, signs suggest stock investors are becoming more resilient to developments and cautiously defaulting to optimism that they have weathered the worst of the tariff-related shocks. U.S. equities have edged higher over the past two weeks as they digest a sharp rally that has brought the benchmark S&P 500 within 3% of its February record high, fueled in part by easing fears about the economic fallout from tariffs. A case in point: stocks ended Monday's session higher even as markets had grappled with President Donald Trump's announcement of doubling steel tariffs to 50%. Trump's stunning "Liberation Day" tariff announcement on April 2 sent stocks plunging and set off some of the most extreme market swings since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic five years ago. Since then, volatility measures have moderated considerably, and, with the market's rebound, there are signs that technical damage from the slide has healed. Still, investors are mindful that markets remain susceptible to daily swings stemming from negotiations between the U.S. and trading partners as key deadlines near in coming weeks, with elevated valuations making stocks more vulnerable to disappointments. "What has allowed this almost full recovery in the stock market hinges on the negotiations that are now under way," said Angelo Kourkafas, senior investment strategist at Edward Jones. "Markets, consumers and businesses have vested interest that we get clarity sooner than later," Kourkafas said. "So potentially it's going to be a critical summer that is going to test the market's momentum." After falling to the brink of confirming a bear market on April 8, the S&P 500 has surged back nearly 20% and erased its losses for the year. Near the halfway mark of 2025, the index is now up 1.5%. While Trump's tariffs remain a risk, the market no longer is perceiving them as "this big outlier event," said Keith Lerner, co-chief investment officer at Truist Advisory Services. "We went through a period where the only thing that mattered for the markets was tariffs," Lerner said. "And now we are in a period where tariffs still matter, but they are not the only thing that matters." Truist is among the firms becoming more upbeat on the outlook for equities, with RBC Capital Markets and Barclays this week lifting their year-end targets for the S&P 500. Deutsche Bank strategists this week boosted their year-end target to 6,550, about 10% above current levels, as they cited a less severe expected tariffs hit to corporate profits. The strategists noted they expect the rally to be "punctuated by sharp pullbacks on repeated cycles of escalation and de-escalation on trade policy." Several investors and strategists pointed to a "base case" on Wall Street emerging for Trump's tariffs - 10% broadly, 30% on China along with some specific sectoral levies. The market "started saying the worst is behind us in terms of this whole tariff discussion," said King Lip, chief strategist at BakerAvenue Wealth Management. "The U.S. and China still have a lot of things to work out, but likely the worst is behind us." MODERATING VOLATILITY Volatility measures indicate calming fears about trade. The Cboe Volatility Index, an options-based measure of investor anxiety, reached 52.33 in early April, its highest closing level in five years, but has steadily receded and hovered at 17.6 on Wednesday, around its long-term median. In another sign, the average daily range of the S&P 500 has fallen to about 75 points, on a 10-session basis, about one-third the size from April during the height of post-Liberation Day volatility. Meanwhile, the S&P 500 has traded above its 200-day moving average - a closely watched trend-line - for about three weeks. The percentage of S&P 500 stocks trading in some form of an uptrend has jumped from 29.4% at the April 8 low to 60% as of last week, said Adam Turnquist, chief technical strategist for LPL Financial. "There is a growing list of technical evidence that suggests this recovery is real," Turnquist said in a note this week. Options data also suggests growing bullishness. Over the last month, on average about 0.84 S&P 500 call options traded daily against every put contract traded, the most this measure of sentiment has favored call contracts in at least the last four years, according to a Reuters analysis of data from options analytics firm Trade Alert. Calls confer the right to buy stocks at a specific price and future date, while puts grant the right to sell shares. To be sure, some investors warn the threat of tariff disruptions is not going away anytime soon and are wary of market complacency. "There is still just so much uncertainty," said Matthew Miskin, co-chief investment strategist at John Hancock Investment Management. Indeed, talk of the acronym "TACO" - Trump Always Chickens Out - has spread on Wall Street as a rationale for why markets should not fear harsh tariffs because many believe they will likely be walked back. But some investors are worried about a backlash from the president. BCA Research strategists said they were wary of "relying on a TACO backstop." "Trade tensions may have peaked, but we are unwilling to assume they won't sporadically rise from current levels," BCA said in a note this week. Stock valuations also continue to swell, with the S&P 500's forward price-to-earnings ratio reaching 21.7, its highest level since late February and well above its long-term average of 15.8, according to LSEG Datastream. Stocks are at "a more vulnerable level," said Chuck Carlson, chief executive officer at Horizon Investment Services. "The market is probably going to be a little bit more sensitive to what it perceives as negative news." (Reporting by Lewis Krauskopf in New York; Additional reporting by Saqib Iqbal Ahmed in New York; Editing by Alden Bentley and Matthew Lewis)
Zawya
35 minutes ago
- Zawya
Putin is ready to help Trump on Iran nuclear negotiations, the Kremlin says
President Vladimir Putin told U.S. President Donald Trump that he was ready to use Russia's close partnership with Iran to help with negotiations over Iran's nuclear programme, the Kremlin said on Thursday. Trump said after a phone call with Putin on Wednesday that time was running out for Iran to make a decision on its nuclear programme and that he believed Putin agreed that the Islamic Republic should not have nuclear weapons. Putin, according to Trump, suggested that he participate in the discussions with Iran and that "he could, perhaps, be helpful in getting this brought to a rapid conclusion", though Iran was "slowwalking". "We have close partner relations with Tehran and, naturally, President Putin said that we are ready to use this level of partnership with Tehran in order to facilitate and contribute to the negotiations that are taking place to resolve the issue of the Iranian nuclear dossier," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters on Thursday. Asked when Putin could join the negotiations, Peskov said that dialogue with Tehran and Washington continued through various channels. "The president will be able to get involved when necessary," Peskov said. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said on Wednesday that abandoning uranium enrichment was "100%" against the country's interests, rejecting a central U.S. demand in talks to resolve a decades-long dispute over Tehran's nuclear ambitions. The U.S. proposal for a new nuclear deal was presented to Iran on Saturday by Oman, which has mediated talks between Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi and President Donald Trump's Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff. After five rounds of talks, several hard-to-bridge issues remain, including Iran's insistence on maintaining uranium enrichment on its soil and Tehran's refusal to ship abroad its entire existing stockpile of highly enriched uranium - possible raw material for nuclear bombs. Khamenei, who has the final say on all matters of state, said nothing about halting the talks, but said the U.S. proposal "contradicts our nation's belief in self-reliance and the principle of 'We Can'".
Zawya
an hour ago
- Zawya
Google is going ‘all in' on AI. It's part of a troubling trend in big tech
Google recently unveiled the next phase of its artificial intelligence (AI) journey: 'AI mode'. This new feature will soon be released as a new option to users of Google's search engine in the United States, with no timeline yet for the rest of the world. The company says it will be akin to having a conversation with an expert well versed on a wide range of topics. This is just one of many steps Google is taking in pursuit of its 'all-in' approach to AI. The 'all-in' approach extends beyond just integrating the technology into different applications. Google is providing products all along the AI supply chain – a process known as 'vertical integration' – housing everything from AI computer chips through to the user interfaces we interact with on a daily basis, such as Google maps or Gmail. Google isn't the only AI company with ambitions of vertical integration. For example, OpenAI recently acquired a hardware startup co-founded by Apple's Jony Ive, which will centralise hardware development within the company. Amazon is taking similar steps. It owns cloud computing platforms, custom chips, device plans and is incorporating more AI services into products. This may be the beginning of a trend of vertical integration across big tech. And it could have significant implications for users and companies alike. The AI 'tech stack' Hardware, software, data sources, databases and servers are some of the layers that make up what is commonly referred to as the 'AI tech stack'. There are four main layers to Google's evolving vertical tech stack: 1. Hardware layer. Google develops its own AI chips, known as tensor processing units (TPUs). The company claims these chips provide superior performance and efficiency compared to general purpose processors. 2. Infrastructure layer. The company uses its own cloud infrastructure to source its computing power, networking and storage requirements. This infrastructure is the foundation for running and scaling AI capabilities. 3. Model development layer. In-house research capabilities are used to drive the development of their products and services. This includes research around machine learning, robotics, language models and computer vision. 4. Data layer. Data is constantly sourced from users across all Google platforms, including its search engine, maps and email. Data collection is a condition of using any Google application. Some argue vertical integration is an optimal and cost-effective business strategy in many industries, not just tech. However, the realities of this set-up prove otherwise. Fuelling power imbalances Google and OpenAI are two of just a handful of companies which dominate the global technology market. Thanks to this market dominance, these companies can charge higher markups for their goods and services and abuse practices in online advertising. Vertical integration further skews this power imbalance by centralising the layers of the AI tech stack to one company. A distribution of hardware, infrastructure, research and development and data across multiple industries helps support a more equitable playing field across the industry. The loss of this equity creates greater barriers to entry for smaller companies as the larger conglomerates keep everything in-house. It also reduces incentives to innovate in ways that benefit consumers because it eliminates the business competition that usually drives innovation. Data is often described as the new gold. This is especially true in the case of AI, which is heavily reliant on data. Through its many platforms, Google has access to a continuous stream of data. In turn, this gives the company even more power in the industry. The vulnerabilities of vertical integration The success of a company that is vertically integrated relies on housing the best knowledge and expertise in-house. Retaining this level of resourcing within a small handful of companies can lead to knowledge and expertise hoarding. Research shows knowledge and expertise hoarding reduces social learning and increases disparities between 'winners' and 'losers' in a given market. This creates an overall vulnerable industry because net gains are lost in the pursuit of exclusivity. Exclusivity also breeds a lack of resilience. That's because the points of failure are centralised. Risk is better managed with additional oversight, transparency and accountability. Collaborations across industry rely on these processes to work together effectively. Centralising the AI tech stack within one organisation eliminates external scrutiny, because it reduces interactions with external providers of products and services. In turn this can lead to a company behaving in a more risky manner. Regulatory bodies can also provide external scrutiny. However, the current push to deregulate AI is widening the gap between technology development and regulation. It is also allowing for big tech companies to become increasingly opaque. A lack of transparency raises issues about organisational practices; in the context of AI, practices around data are of particular concern. The trend towards vertical integration in the AI sector will further increase this opacity and heighten existing issues around transparency.
