Wales suffer heavy Australia defeat in final World Cup warm-up
Australia (21) 36
Tries: Stewart, Moleka, Amosa, Tuinakauvadra 2, Marsters Cons: Wood 3
Wales (5) 5
Tries: Joyce-Butchers
Wales suffered a heavy defeat to Australia in their final World Cup warm-up.
Sean Lynn's side had headed to Sydney full of confidence after an impressive showing in the first Test in Brisbane, but were completely outclassed at the Oval.
Perhaps more concerning was a foot injury to co-captain Alex Callender who limped off early in the first half and returned to the sideline on crutches.
She now has just over three weeks to recover before Wales' tournament opener against Scotland.
Player of the match Tabua Tuinakauvadra claimed two tries for the hosts, while Maya Stewart crossed on her first appearance since May.
Faitala Moleka, Katalina Amosa and Ashley Marsters were also on the scoresheet, while Wales were consoled with a try for Jasmine Joyce-Butchers on her 50th appearance.
Wales dominated possession and territory in the opening 10 minutes, playing most of the rugby in Australia's 22 with Gwenllian Pyrs coming close, but it was the hosts who drew first blood.
A cut out pass from Caitlyn Halse exposed Wales on the blindside with the returning Stewart running in the opening try.
The score came against the run of play but Wales responded with Pyrs again leading the charge.
Despite the driving rain, Wales managed to get the ball through the hands to find Joyce-Butchers in a rare bit of space and she needed no second invitation to cross.
That would prove to be Wales' only score on a disappointing evening for Lynn's side.
Australia played with a clinical edge that had been lacking last weekend, with Moleka easing her way over with a show and go.
Wales' penalty count continued to rise under pressure and they conceded on the stroke of half-time with Katalina Amosa diving over a pile of bodies.
It was more of the same after the break, Australia picking up where they left off.
Tuinakauvadra had been a threat all game and she drove over in the corner as Wales struggled to live with the physicality of the Wallaroos.
They were then dealt another blow with Pyrs sent to the sin bin for a deliberate knock-on when Australia had been in another promising position.
The fifth try came five minutes later, Tuinakauvadra again bulldozing over the defence with Wales now staring down the barrel of a record defeat to Australia, that coming last year at WXV2 where they lost 37-5 in South Africa.
Australia's replacement Marsters powered over in the final five minutes to rub salt into Welsh wounds. She crossed again in the dying seconds, but to Wales' relief that effort was chalked off for a knock-on.
Still, it was a sobering evening for the Welsh in Sydney.
Australia: Caitlyn Halse; Maya Stewart, Georgina Friedrichs, Trilleen Pomare, Desiree Miller; Faitala Moleka, Samantha Wood; Faliki Pohiva, Katalina Amosa, Bridie O'Gorman, Kaitlan Leaney, Michaela Leonard, Piper Duck, Emily Chancellor (capt), Tabua Tuinakauvadra.
Replacements: Tania Naden, Lydia Kavoa, Alapeta Ngauamo, Ashley Fernandez, Ashley Marsters, Layne Morgan, Tia Hinds, Waiaria Ellis.
Wales: Nel Metcalfe; Jasmine Joyce-Butchers, Carys Cox, Courtney Keight, Lisa Neumann; Kayleigh Powell, Keira Bevan; Gwenllian Pyrs, Carys Phillips, Sisilia Tuipulotu, Gwen Crabb, Abbie Fleming, Kate Williams (co-capt), Bethan Lewis, Alex Callender (co-capt).
Replacements: Molly Reardon, Maisie Davies, Jenni Scoble, Alaw Pyrs, Georgia Evans, Meg Davies, Hannah Dallavalle, Catherine Richards.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rugby club 'delighted' after announcing new two-year kit deal
A rugby club in Carlisle has said that it is 'delighted' after announcing a new multi-year kit partnership with local car dealer. Creighton Rugby Club (RUFC) has announced that it has entered into a partnership with Wigton Road Car Sales. This partnership will see the club wear match kit, warm-up tops, and training gear bearing the Wigton Road Car Sales logo for the next two years, until 2027. (Image: Supplied) After the partnership was announced, Creighton RUFC chair John Rogers was on hand to express his delight. He said: "We are so grateful to Richard and his team for their support; we are an amateur sports club and all we want to do is provide the opportunity for men, women and children to join the rugby family. "But that comes at a cost and we rely to a great degree on partnerships like this."
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Panthers premiership hero and two Broncos stars revealed as targets for rival team
Four new names have emerged as top targets of Mal Meninga and the Perth Bears, including a four-time premiership-winner with the Panthers, and two outside backs from the Broncos. It's been well documented that the NRL's newest franchise would love to snare a big fish like Cameron Munster or Tino Fa'asuamaleaui, and Meninga is reportedly preparing a $7.5m deal for Tino. But more players have been revealed to be on the Bears' hit-list. Phil Rothfield has revealed that Scott Sorensen is in Meninga's sights, with the Panthers and New Zealand forward off contract at the end of 2026. Sorensen has won four-straight premierships with Penrith and would add some steel to the Bears' forward pack, in the same way Felise Kaufusi and the Bromwich brothers did when the Dolphins entered the competition. With Sorensen off contract at the end of next season, he'd be free to sign with the Bears for their inaugural season in 2027 as of November 1 this year. Speaking on Triple M radio this week, Brent Read revealed the other names he's heard as being on the Bears' radar. Read named Sharks captain Cameron McInnes, Broncos outside backs Gehamat Shibasaki and Deine Mariner, and Titans gun Jayden Campbell. Shibasaki and Mariner are both off contract at the end of 2026, and the Broncos have a well-documented salary cap squeeze to try and manage. Campbell and McInnes are also without a deal past the 2026 season, and Campbell would be a huge coup for the Perth team. "There's been a lot of talk about Jayden Campbell's future," Read said. "He's got one more year left on his deal and he's raised some obvious concerns - similar concerns that Tino's had about Gold Coast at the moment. If they (the Bears) aren't looking at him they're mad." View this post on Instagram A post shared by Triple M NRL (@triplem_nrl) Phil Gould questions Tino Fa'asuamaleaui money The Titans recently stated that coach Des Hasler will still be around in 2026, despite recent reports he's facing the sack. It's believed the Gold Coast ownership group are trying to provide players like Fa'asuamaleaui and Campbell with some clarity in an attempt to convince them to stay. Last week, Fa'asuamaleaui's manager stated he'll test the open market when he's allowed to do so on November 1. The State of Origin star is on a long-term contract at the Titans, but has a clause in his contract that allows him to leave in 2027. RELATED: Parramatta grand final player announces immediate retirement NRL farce could see Selwyn Cobbo re-sign with Broncos this year It's believed Fa'asuamaleaui is keen to remain on the Gold Coast due to family reasons, but has a close relationship with Meninga and is reportedly set to be offered $1.5m per year to switch clubs. Speaking on the 'Six Tackles with Gus' podcast on Wednesday, Phil Gould questioned whether it's a mis-step to throw that much money at a forward. "If you're going to pay $1.5 million and your marquee player is going to be a front going to be a front-rower who doesn't play 80 minutes every week," Gould said. "You've got to pay someone else to play the rest of the game that he's not going to play. "Then who do you put into the positions that actually influence the scoreboard? He's a great player. He is an outstanding front row forward. But there has to be a limit. If you can't influence the scoreboard, it doesn't matter how rough and tough your front-rower is. So I find that ridiculous."
New York Times
9 minutes ago
- New York Times
Enjoy the new Premier League season, there might not be many more like it
If, like all of my social circle, you did not follow this summer's expanded Club World Cup, you missed some decent games, a few upsets, a lot of Donald Trump and a surprise win for Chelsea. It was fine, but fine was good enough to ensure it will happen again in four years' time — perhaps sooner — and that means you also possibly missed the beginning of the end of football as most of us know it. Advertisement When the new Premier League season starts tomorrow evening, many of the world's best players will embark on an 11-month season that will finish at next summer's World Cup, the old-fashioned one but with 48 teams and 104 games, not 32 and 64, as per recent editions. This will be less than five weeks after Chelsea beat Paris Saint-Germain in New York, but only two weeks after Manchester United drew with Everton to clinch the Premier League's very own American showcase event, the Summer Series. It is not just the world's best players who are now locked into an endless content-creation cycle. The first round of Champions League qualifying took place on July 8, the same day Chelsea beat Fluminense in the semi-final of the Club World Cup, a tournament that neither brought the curtain down on 2024-25 nor raised it for 2025-26 — there is no curtain anymore. The lower leagues in Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and elsewhere in northern Europe are always early starters, but England's Leagues One and Two began their new campaigns on August 1. In fact, League Two's Barnet and Newport County had already played each other in an EFL Cup preliminary round on July 29 — in other words, before most of their fans had gone on their summer holidays, let alone taken some time off to enjoy the cricket season, the Lions tour, a music festival, a summer fete, anything other than football, basically. The English Football League had no choice but to start so early, as it is the only way to ensure there is room in the schedule to include the record nine Premier League teams who have qualified for European football this season when they join the competition in the third round. What else can the EFL do when UEFA adds a third European competition, the Conference League, in 2021, and then expands all three of its club competitions in 2024, adding extra games and teams? The Champions League leapt from 125 to 189 games last season — once that happened, every new edition of the EFL Cup is a minor miracle. Advertisement The EFL could just stop scheduling it, I suppose, but Premier League clubs appear to like winning it, as do their fans. Newcastle United's certainly did. It also makes up a big chunk of the EFL's broadcast revenues and the Premier League's participation in the competition is one of the least painful contributions the top flight makes to the rest of the professional pyramid. Take that away and Premier League boss Richard Masters is going to have an even harder time trying to convince his shareholders to send more money down the pipe before the new independent football regulator makes them. But that is not his only headache. Masters has been talking about the fact that the Premier League has been the same size and shape for more than three decades — 20 teams, 380 games — for several years now. He was at it again earlier this month, when the BBC asked him why the Premier League does not just shrink to 18 teams. After all, that was the original idea back in 1992, when the Football Association encouraged the top clubs to break away from the EFL, its ancient rival, and form the Premier League. The clubs were only half-listening, though, and having cut the top division from 22 teams to 20, decided to stop there. 'I don't think we should be forced into that decision,' said Masters. 'I am all for the growth of the game and the exciting competitions our clubs can participate in, but not at the expense of domestic football.' FIFA and UEFA have been dropping not-so-subtle hints that 18-team leagues, with a maximum of 306 games, is where everyone should have arrived by now. Germany's Bundesliga has had 18 teams since 1965, but France's Ligue 1 got the memo in 2023, having scrapped its second domestic cup competition three years earlier. This means only England, Italy and Spain still have 20-team leagues in Europe. Advertisement Italy's Serie A actually voted on whether to go to 18 teams last year, but the clubs backed the status quo by a 16-4 margin. Ominously, the less-is-more quartet were the Milan duo, Juventus and Roma. If La Liga put it to their clubs in Spain, we can be fairly sure of how Barcelona and Real Madrid would vote. For what it is worth, that French decision looks worse with every passing season, as their domestic television deal has cratered and PSG, insulated by Qatari sovereign wealth and their overseas earnings, have disappeared into the distance. Everyone apart from them could use the extra matchday revenue and broadcast inventory now. But big clubs have broad horizons, with foreign fans and global sponsors. UEFA and now FIFA have shown them the value of international competition and they want more of it, which means less time for domestic chores. Would England's aristocrats vote to cut the Premier League? Maybe, maybe not. Unlike their European peers, they can still see the benefit of domestic football in their profit and loss accounts, as the Premier League, for a variety of reasons, has become the closest thing to a European Super League since the Big Six briefly conspired with Barca, Juve, Real and Co to create a more regular and lucrative place to get together than the Champions League. A combination of crass planning, fan power and opportunistic populism on the part of the British government saw that abomination collapse inside 72 hours, but instead of being punished for their treachery, the ESL's 12 founding clubs were rewarded with an expanded Champions League and revamped Club World Cup. With the Premier League's overseas media rights still rising in value, its stadiums full (and growing) and almost half of its clubs playing in Europe this season, the status quo looks pretty good right now. But Masters can see the writing on the wall. Advertisement Entirely fed up with FIFA grabbing bigger chunks of the calendar, the Premier League has teamed up with Europe's other domestic leagues and the continent's players' unions to lodge a formal complaint against the global governing body at the European Commission. By bringing European Union competition law into football's fixture squabbles, the leagues and players are telling FIFA they believe the game has reached saturation point, the players are knackered, and there are no more cup replays to scrap. To be honest, questions could be asked as to why the leagues and players did not combine to resist UEFA's expansionism, but the European confederation at least invites representatives from the leagues and unions to its meetings before telling them it is going to create new competitions, grab more exclusive midweek slots, and maybe pinch a weekend or two. The Premier League also knows it cannot get too stroppy with an organisation that provides at least a third of its shareholders with large cheques each season, not to mention the fact that the race for European berths is a vital component of the Premier League's annual narrative. FIFA, on the other hand, consults via press release and photo opportunity, as FIFPro, the global players' union, has been pointing out of late. And, unlike UEFA, its president, Gianni Infantino, is not trying to defend a dominant position, he is attempting to disrupt it, globalise it and own it. Which brings us back to the Club World Cup that may have completely passed you by. Perhaps you did not watch any of the games, but you read about some poor attendances, extreme weather and a couple of mismatches. You may have only just seen a few memes of Cole Palmer doing something brilliant or funny or both. For the record, I did not properly watch a single moment of it live, although I did read about it and watch the best clips on social media, which is not that dissimilar to how my children follow most football. The closest I got to watching it live was on holiday in Spain, where the final was on all the TVs in all the bars and restaurants that you would expect to show live football. FIFA and its Saudi-backed streaming partner DAZN may even have counted me and thousands of other passers-by that night in their viewing statistics, which is fine, as I did notice the score and got slightly interested when PSG's players and manager Luis Enrique lost their tempers at the end. That suggests they cared about it. And Chelsea's players looked very happy afterwards, albeit a little confused as to why the U.S. president had decided to photobomb their celebrations. Advertisement But nobody looked happier than Infantino. He knew he had done enough to ensure Saudi money will continue to flow FIFA's way until 2034 at least, as the Gulf state appears to be all-in on its big bet on sport. He knew that if I had more friends in Africa, Asia or South America, my social circle would certainly have watched the tournament. And he also knew that the inaugural event's host, the aforementioned commander in chief, was so pleased with how it had gone that he joked at half-time that maybe he should scribble one of his presidential decrees to replace 'soccer' as the game's name in America. 'The jury is out about the competitiveness of the format and the scheduling and the underlying economics, but it is not my job to assess the success or otherwise of the Club World Cup,' Masters told the BBC. 'It is my job to assess whether these new competitions have an impact on the domestic calendar and domestic competitions, of which the Premier League is one. 'Since 1994, the Premier League has been 380 matches, 20 clubs. We haven't changed shape at all. Now we are starting to redesign our domestic calendar at the altar of European and global expansion. 'We are asking the players to play in more matches. There has to be, at the top of the game, a proper dialogue between FIFA and all the stakeholders about how these things go forward. That has been sadly missing.' Yep, and now the only dialogue is going to be a row about whether the Club World Cup should go to 48 teams in 2029, with more spots for Masters' shareholders, or maybe we should just let FIFA do it every two years, floating from summer to winter as it crosses the globe. If that happens, and there is no question that FIFA wants that to happen — ideally in rotation with a biennial men's World Cup — we can forget 18-team domestic top flights, with deep professional pyramids and historic national cup competitions. We will be lucky to find time for a 16-team domestic league and when that happens, we will all realise that fixture congestion was never just a problem for a handful of superstars. So, enjoy this season — cherish it, even — because there might not be many like it left. Spot the pattern. Connect the terms Find the hidden link between sports terms Play today's puzzle
