logo
Best solar panels in the UK 2025

Best solar panels in the UK 2025

Independent05-04-2025

The solar panel market is a competitive one, with plenty of unfamiliar brands offering fairly similar products. We've put together this guide to help guide you through the best choices.
We have chosen the DMEGC Infinity as our top pick because of its combination of good price and long life.
Most panels are guaranteed for 25 years and offer similar power output, size, efficiency and looks. So most of our judgement is weighted towards cost and degradation, which describes how much power the cells will provide after a number of years. The higher the percentage, the better.
Much of your decision will depend on which installers you choose to go with, as they will have brands they prefer to buy from, if only to make use of bulk purchasing.
As you do your research, you will see a lot of Chinese names you might not be familiar with. But a number of these are big brands in the clean energy world, with good track records of quality and durability, as we shall see below.
Most panels have a life span of at least 30 years, and if you are going to the trouble of putting up scaffolding and having them installed on your roof, then these are the ones to go for since installation is usually the largest part of the cost of solar panels. You won't want to have to replace them in a hurry.
A boom in commercial panels used in solar farms, which power up to five per cent of the UK grid, means that the technology has come on leaps and bounds in recent years as more money is poured into developing solar panels that are cheaper to buy.
When choosing the best solar panel, it's good to weigh up the full cost of solar panel installation as well as the panel cost itself, since you'll probably need to pay for fitting the purchase of other equipment to connect your shiny new panels to your home electricity mains.
Best solar panels at a glance
Panel
Price, installed
Efficiency
Wattage per panel
Type
Made in
Degradation
Warranty
DMEGC Infinity
£795 to £1,195 per kW
23 per cent
440-460W
N-Type
China and Indonesia
87.4 per cent after 30 years
25 years
REA Fusion2 Solar Panel
£900 - £1000 per kW
24 per cent
450W
N-Type
Australia
90.3 per cent after 30 years
25 years
Perlight Black Grid
£895 to £1,195 per kW
26 per cent
500W
N-Type
China
87.4 per cent after 30 years
30 years
Aiko Neostar
£1250 per kW
23 per cent
460W
N-Type
China
88.90 per cent after 30 years
25 years
Jinko Tiger
£1250 per kW
22 per cent
440W
N-Type
China, Malaysia, US, Vietnam
87.4 per cent after 30 years
25 years
Best solar panel overall: DMEGC Infinity
China's DMEGC, part of the Hengdian Group conglomerate, could be the biggest energy company you've never heard of. It's shipped more than 50 gigawatts of solar panels since its founding in 1980. That's a lot – the UK's average power demand last year was about 30GW.
It is one of the earliest solar panel manufacturers and this long track record means it has plenty of experience in making a quality product.
The company also walks the walk when it comes to green energy. Last year, it revealed three of its manufacturing bases in China were certified by testing firm TUV SUD as using 100 per cent green energy. DMEGC aims to be carbon neutral by 2050.
DMEGC is also considered a Tier-1 manufacturer, an industry term for the biggest and longest-running solar panel makers, which have solid financial strength. The status is not a be-all and end-all for solar panel buyers but does indicate that a company has a good chance of honouring its guarantees and that its manufacturing processes are solid, which is useful bearing in mind how long the panels need to last.
This solar panel provides a good compromise between power output, long warranty and decent power longevity, offering more than 87 per cent of its box-fresh output after 30 years.
The model can also come in at the lower end of the cost for solar panels, depending on the fitting cost. This combination of lower price and long life makes it our top pick.
Other features include anti-glare coatings, which mean the panels are less likely to annoy neighbours or passers by. This could be important if you live in a valley with roads coming in from above the property and you don't want to dazzle drivers on sunny days.
Even if this is not a concern, panels which reflect light are not using it for power, which is to be avoided.
As with other panels on the list, the manufacturer boasts they have good performance in low light conditions – useful for gloomier winter days – and a top safety record.
They can also perform well if temperatures rise above 25 degrees centigrade.
The panels have fairly typical dimensions of 1.76m by 1.13m with a depth of 3cm. They weigh 24.5kg apiece.
Pricing will vary, but as with other reviews, we include an average cost for the panels when installed. The biggest cost is for installation, so don't focus too much on the cost of panels alone. Instead, consider the overall cost.
Pros:
Cons:
There are cells with better degradation, topping 90 per cent
There are cells with better efficiency
Being able to trust in the longevity of a company that has been around as long as DMEGC, their skills in electrical manufacturing and as a Tier-1 solar manufacturer, gives us peace of mind that we are supplying our customers with quality
Paul Evans, head of renewables at solar panel fitter Glow Green
Best solar panel for quality: REA Fusion 2 Solar Panel
Price, installed: £900 - £1000 per kW
Efficiency: 24 per cent
Wattage per panel: 450W
Type: N-Type
Made in: Australia
Degradation: 90.3 per cent after 30 years
Warranty: 25 years for the product itself, 30 years for the degradation figure
This is our choice for the best solar panel for efficiency and maintaining power over the long run.
REA Power is a smaller company, based in Australia, making it an unusual entrant in a list dominated by Chinese brands.
REA panels can use micro inverters fitted to each panel. Inverters turn the direct current that the panels provide into alternating current which your home ring main uses. Many setups use one centralised inverter and they usually require a certain amount of power to get going, meaning that some setups can't make use of low light conditions to generate power.
REA says that its micro inverters, fitted to every panel, are more efficient in generating power on darker days. It also means that an inverter failure does not affect the rest of the array. The inverters will also benefit from the guarantee the panels get – 25 years.
The panels are double sided – sunlight can be absorbed on both sides. When it will be fitted to your roof, why bother? Well, some light will pass through the panel, reflect off your roof and enter through the back. Panels with this feature can generate up to 20 per cent more energy.
The company also sponsors various initiatives including a solar recycling scheme, which aims to fix old panels and keep them working rather than being sent to landfill.
If you are having solar panels fitted, they are probably going on your roof, so you will need scaffolding and specialists to come along to put them there. Therefore, you may want the best in an effort to avoid having to foot repair bills or replacement costs. You may also want the maximum power available for a smaller roof.
Engineered in Australia, the manufacturers say these cells are built to last and they top our chart for efficiency and degradation.
They also have a minimalist all-black design, which is useful if you want to keep your solar installation low-profile.
REA says its cells also have separate zones which means that less power is lost should part of the array end up in the share from trees, clouds or other buildings. And they make use of lower AC voltage for safety reasons.
Due to expense these panels do not snag the top spot in our list, but if you are happy with the price they are a good choice.
The panels measure 1.72m by 1.13m and are 3cm thick. They weigh 24kg each.
Pros:
Cons:
Expensive
REA Fusion panels combine advanced N-Type and HJT cell technologies, offering the best of both worlds: N-Type cells minimise long-term efficiency degradation, while HJT (Heterojunction Technology) enhances performance in low-light conditions. This powerful combination makes the Fusion 2 the go-to choice for the UK market – delivering maximum generation, even in our famously gloomy climate
David Simmonds, Head of Solar at solar panel fitter Heatable
Best for long warranty: Perlight Black Grid
Price, installed: £895 to £1,195 per kW
Efficiency: 26 per cent
Wattage per panel: 500W
Type: N-Type
Made in: China
Degradation: 87.4 per cent after 30 years
Warranty: 30 years
Perlight is another Chinese maker of solar panels, starting life in 2006. These panels are an excellent choice for those wanting a long warranty – the company offers 30 years compared to the usual 25.
This extended guarantee could give you more comfort if you expect to have to pay the panels off over a long period of time or you simply want to leave them there for as long as possible, which bearing in mind the fitting cost could be a good idea.
On the other hand, you could take the view that a panel lasting 25 years will probably go the extra distance without the guarantee.
The model also offers better efficiency and a higher wattage than the other panels on our list. The only thing letting it down is its somewhat pedestrian degradation figure, otherwise it would be further up our ranking.
The company is also somewhat shy about filing facts about itself compared to its competitors, although it passes all the necessary regulatory hurdles.
The panels do offer a higher wattage and will continue pumping out 87 per cent of their factory-fresh power after 30 years, making it a very good choice.
Like REA, Perlight is not a Tier-1 manufacturer. But it has a long track record, meaning you should expect good performance for years to come, and it ships to 100 countries.
The panels also have high pressure resistance, meaning the should be able to withstand the bumps, bangs and weather that 30 years on a roof will throw at them.
Like nearly every panel on this list, these are made in China. The Chinese government has thrown many subsidies at clean power companies in recent years. This means that the last 20 years has seen a boom in Chinese solar panel making. The country now has a massive technological advantage over other nations, as well as a large manufacturing base.
Panel making eats up a lot of silicon, and China has a big silicon refining industry, which also helps firms make panels cheaply there.
Since 2000, solar panels themselves have fallen in price per unit of power output by about 90 per cent because of technological leaps in their efficiency, largely in China. But fitting costs have risen in line with wages and other inflationary pressures since then, so bear this in mind when looking at prices. The panels will be cheaper, but labour and scaffolding less so.
Cons:
A 30-year product warranty is hard to come by in any product but Perlight offers one of the longest warranties available in the market
Paul Evans, head of renewables at solar panel fitter Glow Green
Best for higher wattage per panel: Aiko Neostar
China has invested billions of pounds into making cheap solar cells, and the country's Aiko Neostar range offers amongst the best power output, as well as a long warranty and very respectable efficiency.
Aiko is another of those Tier-1 manufacturers we heard about earlier. Being Tier-1 means that Bloomberg New Energy Finance has determined that a company's longevity, financial ,strength and manufacturing processes make it a good financial bet.
For consumers, this suggests that the company you are buying from is likely to be a quality one, but it doesn't mean you should ignore other manufacturers who may have newer products or simply don't belong to a public company.
Aiko was founded in 2009 and has six manufacturing plants in China as well as a research and development hub in Freiberg in Germany. It has shipped more than 150 gigawatts of panels since it was founded. It is a big supplier to China's large domestic solar industry, having this year snagged a 1 gigawatt contract to build three solar farms in the south, east and north of the country.
The Neostar also has the best output in our test, which makes the panels a good choice if roof space is at a premium.
Like the other panels in this list, the product uses N-type cells, which offer very slow degradation, and thus a nice long life.
The company claims that its cells have something called cell-level partial shade optimisation in order to deliver more power in partially shaded conditions. This, or a similar technology, is useful even if no trees are near your house – over the course of 30 years you can never be quite sure how your local skyline will change.
The company also says they have micro-crack resistance. In other words, they are tough. Over their lives, small branches from trees, hail and other detritus will strike the panels, together with the regular wind and rain Britain endures, so durability is important.
With an all-black design, they are also among the most aesthetically pleasing solar panels and maintain 89 per cent of their power after 30 years, which is towards the top of our list.
As with the other panels we reviewed, a 25 year guarantee is the standard.
These panels are somewhat lighter than the others, at 21.5kg each, which may appeal if you have a more fragile roof. They measure 1.76m by 1.13m and are 3cm thick.
Cons:
With new generation ABC (All Back Contact) technology, Aiko Neostar panels supply excellent efficiency, and their entirely black design is aesthetically pleasing and looks great on any rooftop. They represent a premium option built for homeowners in search of the latest in tech and the best performance from a small-scale system
Edward McKay at fitter Solar4Good
Best for high output in weak light conditions: Jinko Tiger
Founded in 2006, Jinko has grown to be another vast Chinese player in solar panels, with a decent track record of success.
Again, the long warranty, slow ageing rate and good power output make this a good all-round choice.
Jinko is a Tier-1 manufacturer, meaning it has been around for more than five years, it is in a strong financial position, and it automates its panel making. This is a useful guide on a company's financial strength, but as a consumer rather than an investor, you may have other priorities.
The company is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, which means it publishes quite a bit more about itself than the other firms.
It also invests in solar projects themselves, owning a 20 per cent stake in a 2 gigawatt solar project in the United Arab Emirates, one of the world's largest plants.
Jinko is also part of the so-called Solar Module Super League, a group of seven firms which made up about half the world's solar panel making capacity.
For the panels themselves, the stats are fairly middle of the road compared to others on our list, but as you can see from the summary towards the top of the page, all our featured panels have good warranties, power output, efficiency and useable lifespan.
You can take a lot of comfort from Jinko's huge size and comparably long track record, approaching 20 years in the market.
So if your favourite fitting firm only stocks these panels, fear not, you are still likely to have lower bills for years to come.
A bit like flat panel TVs, intense competition in the solar panel market means the products are getting cheaper, but with high standards in manufacturing among the biggest players, of which Jinko is one.
The manufacturer says that the panels offer good output in weak light conditions, which is a key feature in the UK, not just for gloomy days but also dawn and dusk.
It uses N-type cells, which offer slow degradation, which is important if you want to fit cells to a roof and not have to replace them for a very long time.
The panels also feature good resistance to salt, which could be important if you live near the coast and need that extra protection.
The panels weigh in at 22kg, a shade lighter than most, and measure 1.76m by 1.13m. They are 3cm thick.
Pros:
Cons:
Jinko Tiger panels deliver reliability and performance with robustness and high energy output in weak light conditions. They're a great choice for customers who want quality, affordability, and performance from one of the best solar manufacturers in the world
Edward McKay at fitter Solar4Good
Methodology
We based our judgement on a number of factors largely weighted towards price and lifespan. We spoke to solar fitters and UK experts to draw our conclusions. The efficiency of most of the panels is very similar and they tend to come in similar sizes and with similar warranties, apart from the 30 years offered by Perlight.
Longevity is our top concern. The outlay to install the panels is large, so they must last. The cells' longevity can be measured in two ways: the expected lifespan, which is often 25-30 years, and the degradation figure, which tells us how much power we get as the cells age.
After longevity, price is a key metric: the lower, the better
Then, we look at warranty and efficiency, which can often be similar, together with power output
After that, we weigh concerns such as looks, how long the manufacturer has existed and other matters
Our top choice is the DMEGC Infinity for its balance of price and performance. Many of the Chinese brands are similarly priced with similar lifespan characteristics.
Why trust us
The Independent has been reporting on green energy and climate matters since it was founded in 1986. Since then, we have written hundreds of reviews and news stories on energy matters, including the best solar panels, the best solar installers and various other guides on green power.
What happens when you get a quote through us
After you have filled out our form above, you will receive three quotes from solar fitting companies local to you.
They may be able to quote based on the information you have given them, or they may need more information, or to visit your home.
Once you have these quotes, you can decide if you wish to proceed.
FAQs
Which type of solar panels are the best?
For most buyers fitting the panels to a roof, the most modern type of panel, N-Type, is a good bet since it will last a long time. PERC solar panels, an older design, will be cheaper but may be guaranteed for just 10 years. That makes them suitable for easier installations, such as ground level or accessible roofs, but not installations which require expensive fitting.
What are Tier 1 solar panels?
You may have read the phrase Tier 1 associated with solar panels. It refers to tiers of manufacturers, based on their financial stability and their track record of making high-quality panels. To be seen as a Tier 1 manufacturer, panels should be made in-house and a track record of at least five years is generally needed.
It is a good indicator that a panel maker is high quality, but it is not the be-all and end-all since factors which matter little to buyers such as the quality of a manufacturer's accounting practices form part of the criteria. Aiko, Jinko and DMEGC are all Tier-1 firms.
Yes and no. There are big brands in solar panel making such as Sharp, but it stopped selling panels to European countries this year. The most important thing is to choose a brand with a good history. All our makers featured in this guide have been around for at least 15 years and up to 45 years.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Scots pay half billion in subsidies while China build the buses
Scots pay half billion in subsidies while China build the buses

Scotsman

time17 hours ago

  • Scotsman

Scots pay half billion in subsidies while China build the buses

Alexander Dennis has announced it plans to close down its Falkirk area operations to relocate to one single base in Scarborough (Picture: Michael Gillen, National World) Ministers should have been using their leverage over the big operators to keep Falkirk afloat Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... One way and another, the Scottish Government subsidises bus services by more than half a billion pounds a year. There would hardly be a bus on a Scottish road without subsidy which accounts for well over half of total revenue. There has been another £150 million for the ScotZEB programme 'to deliver zero-emission buses to Scotland's roads', the latest in a series of capital funds without which there would be precious few new or refurbished buses on our highways and by-ways. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Put these two facts together and the prospective loss of a bus manufacturing industry in Scotland borders on the incomprehensible. Beyond buses, if a 'procure in Scotland' strategy cannot be applied in this case, what hope is there of enforcing local content provisions in other sectors, notably renewable energy? Without political backbone, it won't happen. Ensuring the survival of Scotland's bus network is a good use of public funds. Equally, for any government to invest this kind of money and then claim it has no leverage over where it is spent is preposterous – and that should be the starting point in addressing the future of Alexander Dennis Ltd and maintaining a proud, skilled industry. While the Scottish Government pours money into our bus network, of more than 250 buses ordered under ScotZEB, 44 will be built in Falkirk. In the second phase of this scheme, two thirds of orders went to a single Chinese company where Scotland is doubtless the boardroom toast. There is something far, far wrong – and avoidable - about that outcome. I saw a sound-bite from Kate Forbes, the deputy first minister, in which her priority was to transfer political responsibility. Her own administration, she said sweetly, was unable to specify 'local content' because of UK legislation and, she claimed, the Scottish Government's pleas for relief from this constraint had been in vain. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Even by SNP standards, it sounded a rather premature piece of blame shifting since every sinew of current effort should surely be devoted to saving these 400 jobs in Falkirk and Larbert, not explaining them away. Ms Forbes' attempt at self-exoneration also failed the credibility test on multiple grounds. Most obviously, the publicly owned Greater Manchester Bees Network has purchased 160 state of the art buses from Falkirk and is delighted with the product. Somehow, the office of Andy Burnham found a way through challenges which Ms Forbes portrays as show-stoppers. Did she or her civil servants ever pick up the phone to Manchester? In the last few days, in an effort to head off redundancies, the Secretary of State for Scotland, Ian Murray, has written to all the Metro Mayors in England, who will soon be ordering buses, asking them to follow Manchester's example. Meanwhile, the Scottish Government claims to be helpless while the orders it funds flow out to China. The legislation which supposedly presents such an obstacle to the Scottish Government is the Subsidy Control Act of 2022 which replaced what existed pre-Brexit. It was needed to keep the UK inside the terms and conditions of the World Trade Organisation and the General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs (GATT). Dry but necessary stuff. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It is disputed whether the ScotZEB scheme counts as subsidy for the purposes of the Act. Even if it does, the job of Ministers and civil servants in these circumstances should be to put together a case, based on exemptions available, which allows direct awards to be made. At the same time, Ministers should have been using their leverage over the big operators to keep Falkirk afloat. Neither is it true to claim that this is something which has crept up on the Scottish Government without prior notice. Last September, the company started a consultation process about 160 redundancies for exactly the same reasons they are now citing. They needed more buses to build. At that point, every stop should have been pulled out to ensure the ScotZEB orders were going to Falkirk and not to China. Any Minister worth his or her salt looks for deals to make in these circumstances which are not necessarily underpinned by formal agreements. I did it back in my own Ministerial days in not dissimilar circumstances but this is not party political. I have no doubt Michael Forsyth knew how to apply a bit of friendly pressure and I am absolutely certain Alex Salmond would have told a couple of bus operators exactly what was expected from them, or else. If the Scottish Government cannot use its leverage to fight for jobs, it is entirely due to the absence of competence or creativity within its current ranks. John Swinney's plaintive plea that he 'cannot act in a fashion outwith the provisions of the law' is the language of a bureaucrat whose obligation is to find a rationalisation for inactivity. The possibility always exists, of course, that a company has decided on a course of action for its own reasons and has no interest in being dissuaded from it. The only way to find that out is to make an offer which they would, if goodwill exists, be unlikely to refuse. In this case, a decent order for buses, underwritten by the Scottish Government, might, for example, be enough to buy a stay of execution – and would certainly test the bona fides of the Canadian owners. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad

Can you pass the toughest tests in the world?
Can you pass the toughest tests in the world?

Economist

timea day ago

  • Economist

Can you pass the toughest tests in the world?

Civil-service exams in China and India are notoriously difficult. But they shape their countries' societies Max Weber, sensible German intellectual that he was, considered bureaucracy the best way to organise large societies. And societies don't come any larger than China and India, where the decisions of bureaucrats shape the lives of more than a quarter of the world's people. Even as the countries' private sectors have grown in recent decades, jobs in their civil services remain deeply coveted. Government jobs in India, especially in the federal services that run the country, remain a ticket to prosperity, prestige and better marriage prospects. In China, where the economy has slowed, securing a top-tier state job (known locally as 'landing ashore') is back in fashion—quite literally. Young people sometimes don 'cadre-style' attire—windbreakers in muted colours and high-waisted suit trousers—in order to emulate officials. But perhaps the biggest similarity between the two bureaucracies is the brutality of their selection processes, which hinge on a gruelling set of examinations. To give you a taste of the difficulty, The Economist has chosen some questions from the first part of recent exams. Have a go: Such questions are only a small part of a much larger process. In India those who pass the first exam in May or June must sit a second later in the year. This features nine papers taken over 27 hours. In China the written test takes place on one day in late November or early December. Candidates do a multiple-choice exam and then write a series of essays testing their understanding of policy, as well as their writing skills. Both countries hold in-person interviews as a final filter. Only a fraction survive the ordeal. Last year 1.1m people applied to join the top tier of India's civil service, but around 1,000 (0.2% of those who actually sat the first exam) were offered a spot. In China a record 3.41m people registered and passed the initial screening for the national civil-service exam last year—well over twice the number who did so in 2014. Just over 39,700 (1.5% of those who sat the exam) secured a job. In both countries the exams are considered the fairest way to filter candidates. Indeed, in India they were introduced by British colonial masters after Indians complained about the previous patronage-based system. In China, the guokao, as the exam is called, is modelled on the keju, which was instituted in 587 and was lauded for being relatively corruption-free and meritocratic. Candidates' ability to leapfrog social classes was so cherished that, say some academics, the riots that followed the exam's abolition in 1905 contributed to the toppling of the Qing dynasty, China's last imperial rulers, a few years later. The civil-service exam in China has shaped the country's evolution. The keju was the 'anchor of Chinese autocracy', according to Yasheng Huang, who has written a book about it. Mind-bogglingly difficult, it required total intellectual commitment, sometimes from the age of five, leaving the most talented and ambitious members of society no time to foment new ideas. Gui Youguang, a 16th-century writer, passed the exam's final stage aged 59, after decades of failed attempts, and died shortly after. The guokao, which can only be taken by those aged 35 or under, remains an important tool for the state. After China embarked on market reforms in the 1970s, the bureaucracy took on a more important role in a complex, open society. As a result, the guokao was tweaked to examine candidates' knowledge of laws and regulations. Over time the questions became more practical, testing common sense and numeracy. But in recent years the exam has also become a test of party loyalty, with ever more questions dedicated to Xi Jinping Thought. Chinese essay questions 'Dedicate yourself to your field, constantly 'refine' and 'repair', and silently contribute to a warm and steadfast order of life for the people, while progressing steadily.' Based on your understanding of this sentence, draw on real-life examples and experiences, choose your own angle and title, and write an essay. Write a report on the achievements, shortcomings and suggestions for improvement regarding the implementation of the Intangible Cultural Heritage Law. Conduct an in-depth analysis of the three dimensions of administrative law enforcement—'power' (力), 'reason' (理) and 'interest' (利). Draw on real-life examples and experiences, choose your own angle and title, and write an essay. India's civil service, in contrast, has remained relatively apolitical. After independence in 1947, leaders chose to retain the 'steel frame' of the Imperial Civil Service, but changed the role of the bureaucrats it hired from upholding colonial rule to ensuring development. By 1979 competition to enter the service was so fierce that a second set of exams was introduced to test candidates' breadth of knowledge. In 2012 a paper on ethics was added. India's civil service is associated with prestige—but also corruption. In a recent high-profile example, a young civil servant in the eastern state of Odisha was accused of accepting a bribe of 1m rupees ($11,683) from a businessman. Indian essay questions Is conscience a more reliable guide when compared to laws, rules and regulations in the context of ethical decision-making? Discuss. Child cuddling is now being replaced by mobile phones. Discuss its impact on the socialization of children. Thinking is like a game, it does not begin unless there is an opposite team. Discuss. Success in both exams requires immense toil. Many examinees do not work in the year, even years, leading up to the test; those holding down jobs end up studying early in the morning or late at night. Thousands seek the help of coaching centres; the best ones offer full-time training and board. Shikha Singh, for example, moved from a small town in central India to Delhi just to prepare for the exam surrounded by fellow aspirants. She has failed the test three times, but ramped up her efforts with each attempt. Ahead of her recent fourth try, Ms Singh put in ten-hour days, but worries that still might not be enough to cover the wide variety of subjects. In south-eastern China, Ms Zhong, a prospective civil servant from Jiangxi province, has put in similar shifts since quitting her job in 2023 and moving back in with her parents. Her concern is that preparation alone may not be enough in an exam that tests 'innate ability'. Even if they succeed, will their effort be worth it? Those who pass the exams reap instant and long-term benefits, such as housing and a pension (and often a job) for life. Once in their roles they are treated like royalty, with an army of staff to do their bidding and a special chair marked with a white towel. Research from India suggests some correlation between exam performance and effectiveness as a civil servant. But in both countries critics believe the exams filter candidates according to the wrong criteria. By screening for rote-learning and test-taking, they neglect to assess actual public-policy skills such as management, teamwork and communication. This contributes to the poor performance of the bureaucracy. On a measure of government effectiveness calculated by the World Bank, China and India rank in the 74th and 68th percentiles globally. In both countries efforts are under way to recruit people in other ways. China is experimenting with hiring some candidates for fixed terms according to their experience, rather than their exam performance. Similarly India has introduced a 'lateral-entry' scheme to allow private-sector specialists to join the public workforce. But these remain nascent initiatives. Exams will remain the backbone of public-sector recruitment. If the merits of this selection process are debatable, the costs—both human and economic—are more easily quantified. Aspirants who fail to meet the mark tend to try again. A cycle of application and rejection has an effect on morale: exam failure often pushes candidates to suicide in both countries. Ms Singh, the Indian candidate, feels she has lost social status because of her failed attempts. Her Chinese counterpart, Ms Zhong, is also weighed down by anxiety. 'Only a few people pass the exam,' she says. 'I wonder what those who fail do.' It is an important question. Years of youth spent in study, instead of work, are an economic loss. The exams force college graduates to delay employment, reducing their long-term consumption. And the subjects so feverishly swotted up late at night are not necessarily of use once the exams are over. Knowing big cats' biological intricacies or the details of Xi Jinping Thought might help candidates earn a civil servant's towel-covered chair—but perhaps not a place in the private sector.

Inter Milan set to early repay bond as plans new debt deal
Inter Milan set to early repay bond as plans new debt deal

Reuters

timea day ago

  • Reuters

Inter Milan set to early repay bond as plans new debt deal

MILAN, June 13 (Reuters) - Champions League finalist Inter Milan is set to repay early a 415 million euro ($479.57 million) high-yield bond this month as the Italian soccer club prepares to secure funds from a new debt deal, it said in a statement on Friday. Inter Milan paid a 6.75% coupon to place a five-year bond in 2022 to refinance Italy's top-flight soccer club's debt. The debt facility was issued by the Serie A club's media company, which manages the broadcast and sponsorship business of Inter Milan. The company plans to redeem the bond on June 26, subject to securing funds from a debt financing transaction by the business day before the redemption date, it said in a statement. Companies typically repay debt early to secure better financial conditions. Controlled by U.S. investment fund Oaktree (OAK_pa.N), opens new tab, Inter Milan was reportedly tapping private debt investors to refinance the debt facility. Oaktree took over the club last year after a missed 395 million euro payment from the then majority shareholder, Chinese conglomerate Suning ( opens new tab. ($1 = 0.8654 euros) (This story has been refiled to fix typos in paragraphs 1 and 5)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store