logo
Brad Lander, NYC comptroller and mayoral candidate, is arrested outside immigration court

Brad Lander, NYC comptroller and mayoral candidate, is arrested outside immigration court

Yahoo4 hours ago

NEW YORK (AP) — New York City comptroller and Democratic mayoral candidate Brad Lander was arrested by federal agents at an immigration court Tuesday as he was trying to accompany a person out of a courtroom.
A reporter with The Associated Press witnessed Lander's arrest at a federal building in Manhattan. The person Lander was walking out of the courtroom was also arrested.
Lander had spent the morning observing immigration court hearings and told an AP reporter that he was there to 'accompany' some immigrants out of the building.
At a press conference following the arrest, Lander's wife, Meg Barnette, said her husband had tried to link arms with a man following his immigration court hearing when 'we were swarmed by a number of federal agents.'
'They said, 'You're obstructing,'' Barnette said. 'I was shoved out of the way.'
'What I saw was shocking and unacceptable,' she added. 'What I saw today was not the rule of law.'
A video of the arrest, captured by an AP reporter, shows an agent telling Lander, 'You're obstructing."
In the moments before Lander was handcuffed, agents could be seen trying to physically separate Lander from the man they had come to detain. Lander briefly struggled to stay close to the detainee before he was pulled away.
'I'm not obstructing, I'm standing right here in the hallway," Lander said as he was being handcuffed.
'You don't have the authority to arrest U.S. citizens asking for a judicial warrant,' Lander said as he was led away down a hallway and into an elevator.
One of the officers who led Lander away wore a tactical vest labeled 'federal agent.' Others were in plainclothes, with surgical masks over their faces.
The episode occurred as federal immigration officials are conducting large-scale arrests outside immigration courtrooms across the country.
In many cases, immigrants are arrested after a judge grants a government request to dismiss their case, making them eligible for expedited removal.
'They remove any opportunity for due process,' Lander had told reporters earlier in the day after witnessing another person's hearing.
Lander's detainment comes a little more than a month after Newark, New Jersey, Mayor Ras Baraka was arrested on a trespassing charge outside a federal immigration detention center in his city.
The charge was later dropped by interim U.S. Attorney for New Jersey Alina Habba, and Baraka's fellow Democrat, Rep. LaMonica McIver, was charged with assaulting and impeding federal agents stemming from her role at the same visit as the mayor. A federal indictment charges she grabbed, pushed and blocked officers from arresting the mayor. She's denied the charges and said she plans to fight them. Baraka filed a federal lawsuit against Habba alleging false arrest and malicious prosecution.
A spokesperson for the FBI deferred comment to the Department of Homeland Security, which did not respond to an emailed inquiry.
Lander is a candidate in the city's Democratic mayoral primary. Early voting in the contest is underway and the election is next week.
In a statement, Lander's campaign said, "While escorting a defendant out of immigration court at 26 Federal Plaza, Brad was taken by masked agents and detained by ICE.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'It just baffles me': Senate Republicans sound alarm over Medicaid changes, spending in Trump megabill
'It just baffles me': Senate Republicans sound alarm over Medicaid changes, spending in Trump megabill

Fox News

time23 minutes ago

  • Fox News

'It just baffles me': Senate Republicans sound alarm over Medicaid changes, spending in Trump megabill

Senate Republicans are steadily moving along in their quest to advance President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill," but some remain dissatisfied with one of the most crucial portions of the package. The Senate Finance Committee unveiled its portion of the budget reconciliation package Monday night that deals directly with making the president's first-term tax cuts permanent and the more controversial proposed changes to Medicaid, niche tax issues and Biden-era green energy subsidies. Senate Republicans met behind closed doors to get a crash course on the bill, and some left distraught over provisions they hoped they would see on the cutting room floor. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., can only afford to lose three votes in the upper chamber. And due to the nature of budget reconciliation, which allows lawmakers to skirt the filibuster, he can't count on Democrats, who would demand serious changes to the broader legislation, to help get the package across the line. The changes to the Medicaid provider tax rate, which were a stark departure from the House GOP's version of the bill, particularly ruffled feathers among Republicans who have warned not to make revisions to the healthcare program that could shut down rural hospitals and boot working Americans from their benefits. "I want changes," Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, said. "I'm still not satisfied with where we are on Medicaid." The Senate Finance Committee went further than the House's freeze of the provider tax rate, or the amount that state Medicaid programs pay to healthcare providers on behalf of Medicaid beneficiaries, for non-Affordable Care Act expansion states, and included a provision that lowers the rate in expansion states annually until it hits 3.5 percent. To date, 41 states and Washington, D.C., have opted into the Medicaid expansion program. The idea behind the changes to the provider rate taxes was to help pay for Trump's mammoth bill in part and discourage the remaining states from opting into Medicaid expansion. Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., argued, for a state like his dotted with rural hospitals, that the bill "is not a good development" for their survival. "I mean, it's really not," he said. "And in order to pay for increased subsidies for the Green New Deal? I mean, it just baffles me." The Senate's version of the tax package does add more flexibility to green energy tax credits than the House's, an issue pushed for by a handful of Senate Republicans who wanted to see the truncated phase-out of the credits in the House bill slowed down. Senate Republicans met with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz Tuesday afternoon to discuss the Medicaid tweaks in the bill. Oz said the White House did "not believe" changing the provider tax would influence the ability of hospitals to stay viable. "In fact, the provider tax and the state-directed payments are often used to pay institutions that have the best connections to the government of the state, not necessarily the hospitals that need the help the most," he said. "It is important that we clean up this system." Sen. John Hoeven, R-N.D., sought to extinguish anger among his colleagues, noting that Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, and Senate leaders were still working on what the final product would look like. "Everybody's got an opinion, and I think it's gonna be that way right up until we vote," he said. Fiscal hawks were not pleased with the bill, either. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., has stumped for a return to pre-COVID-19 pandemic era spending, a gouge to federal spending that would be trillions of dollars more than the rough goal of $2 trillion in spending cuts that some Senate Republicans are eying. He believed there was "no way" that the current parts of the broader reconciliation package could be fixed and stitched together by the Senate GOP's self-imposed July 4 deadline. "The problem is it just simply doesn't meet the moment," he said. But Crapo cautioned he and lawmakers were still working out the kinks and that a resolution to his colleagues' issues could still be found. "All I can say is that we will work it out," Crapo said. "We have to work that out, not only among our colleagues in the Senate, but with the House and with the White House."

Appeals court hears arguments in National Guard deployment in Los Angeles
Appeals court hears arguments in National Guard deployment in Los Angeles

Hamilton Spectator

time24 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Appeals court hears arguments in National Guard deployment in Los Angeles

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — A federal appeals court in San Francisco heard arguments Tuesday afternoon on whether the Trump administration should return control of National Guard troops to California after they were deployed following protests in Los Angeles over immigration raids. The hearing comes after the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted a request by the administration last week to temporarily pause a lower court order that directed President Donald Trump to return control of the soldiers to Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, who filed a lawsuit over the deployment. Judge Mark Bennett, who was appointed by Trump, started the hearing held via video by asking the federal government's attorney, Brett Shumate, whether the Department of Justice's position is that the courts have no role in reviewing the president's decision to call the National Guard. 'No, there's no role for the court to play in reviewing that decision,' Shumate answered. 'The statute says the president may call on federal service members and units of the Guard of any state in such numbers that he considers necessary,' Shumate said, adding that 'couldn't be any more clear.' Shumate pointed out the ongoing protests in Los Angeles and said the Guard is necessary to protect federal officers and buildings. U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco ruled last week that the Guard deployment was illegal and exceeded Trump's authority. He granted Newsom a temporary restraining order to take control of the Guard while his lawsuit proceeds. It applied only to the National Guard troops and not the Marines, who were also deployed to LA but had not been sent to the streets at the time of the ruling. The Trump administration argued the deployment was necessary to restore order and protect federal buildings and officers. In his lawsuit, Newsom accused the president of inflaming tensions, breaching state sovereignty and wasting resources. The governor calls the federal government's decision to take command of the state's National Guard 'illegal and immoral.' Newsom filed the suit following days of unrest as demonstrators protested against federal immigration raids across the city. Newsom said ahead of the hearing that he was confident in the rule of law and encouraged by a federal judge's order last week that Trump return control of the National Guard to California, before that ruling was halted. 'I'm confident that common sense will prevail here: The U.S. military belongs on the battlefield, not on American streets,' Newsom said in a statement. Breyer ruled the Trump violated the use of Title 10, which allows the president to call the National Guard into federal service when the country 'is invaded,' when 'there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government,' or when the president is unable 'to execute the laws of the United States.' Breyer, an appointee of former President Bill Clinton, said in his ruling that what has been happening in Los Angeles does not meet the definition of a rebellion. 'The protests in Los Angeles fall far short of 'rebellion,'' he wrote. 'Individuals' right to protest the government is one of the fundamental rights protected by the First Amendment, and just because some stray bad actors go too far does not wipe out that right for everyone.' The National Guard hasn't been activated without a governor's permission since 1965, when President Lyndon B. Johnson sent troops to protect a civil rights march in Alabama, according to the Brennan Center for Justice. ___ This story has been updated to correct the spelling of the judge's last name to Bennett, not Benett. ___ Associated Press writer Sophie Austin contributed from Sacramento, California. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Club World Cup gets massive security upgrade after chaotic incident that led to dozens of arrests
Club World Cup gets massive security upgrade after chaotic incident that led to dozens of arrests

Fox News

time28 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Club World Cup gets massive security upgrade after chaotic incident that led to dozens of arrests

Hard Rock Stadium in Miami Gardens, Florida, will have a massive police presence throughout the remainder of the Club World Cup this month, as the city looks to avoid a repeat of the near-deadly incident that resulted in 26 arrests last year. The 2024 Copa America final saw a swarm of ticketless fans rush the gates for a match between Argentina and Colombia, leaving fans terrified and bloodied as security struggled to contain the crush, as they attempted to break in. Videos showed some fans trying to climb through air vents to gain entry. Police had to lift distressed children over barriers to avoid them being crushed, while elsewhere officers tackled to the ground the ticketless fans they could catch in a forlorn attempt to keep the hoards at bay. But things are different this summer. "We've put extensive measures in place to protect fans, players and staff," Miami-Dade Sheriff Rosie Cordero-Stutz said before the tournament. "The Miami-Dade Sheriff's Office is leading all security efforts for this global event." Changes made over the past year mean fans for this tournament must pass through three separate checkpoints that enclose the entire campus before getting close to the stadium. Steel fencing is set up around the perimeter. First up is a ticket check at temporary gates, taking up large parts of the parking lot where tailgate parties might usually take place. Then comes another airport-style screening under tents where bags are checked by X-ray machines. Even flags need to be approved. Fans were able to get much closer to the stadium before checkpoints at the Copa America. "When I was at the final, the security guards just opened the gate and started letting people through," Edison Negron, a Boca Juniors fan from Puerto Rico, told The Associated Press when describing the scenes as fans crushed against the barriers last year. Miami-Dade County said at the time that a full review would be conducted and that the scenes "cannot happen again." "There will be a significant law enforcement and security footprint in and around the stadium to ensure public safety for all the events," Det. Argemis Colome told the AP, while adding that social media was being monitored prior to matches. Preparations have included special training for a rapid-deployment force as part of a multi-agency response to potential crowd trouble. "If things go south, we get ready for civil unrest and unruly fans," the sheriff's office said in a social media post. A large police presence has been evident at both games played at Hard Rock so far — Saturday's tournament opener when a crowd of more than 60,000 watched Inter Miami vs. Al Ahly and Monday's match between Boca Juniors and Benfica in front of nearly 56,000. Patrol cars have been stationed along the interstate outside of the stadium and, within the grounds, officers equipped with face shields and protective clothing are on patrol. FIFA said it had worked closely with stadium officials, state and federal agencies "to ensure a robust security presence." Follow Fox News Digital's sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store