'Postcode healthcare' persists - new report by government watchdog
Photo:
UnSplash/ Marcelo Leal
Where you live (rather than how sick you are) is still a major factor in how quickly you get elective surgery - or whether you get it at all, according to a new report by the government watchdog.
The report, Providing equitable access to planned care, which has just been tabled in Parliament by the Auditor-General John Ryan, showed elective services in the public system were often "not equitable or timely", with people with the same level of clinical need qualifying for treatment in some districts, but not others.
"As a result, a person's ability to access treatment is, to a significant extent, determined by where they live," the report noted.
"Some clinical staff we spoke with were of the view that a lack of capacity to provide treatment had led to some thresholds that no longer reflect clinical need."
The Pae Ora (Healthy Futures) Act 2022 required Health New Zealand to ensure access to treatment (such as operations to remove cataracts or tonsils, joint replacements and hernia repairs) was based on people's clinical need - not their background, circumstances, or where they live.
However, the audit found Māori, Pacific peoples, people with disabilities, those living in rural areas or in poverty had worse access to planned care.
Health NZ was gradually introducing nationally consistent thresholds for ranking access to planned care.
"It has introduced a national threshold for cataract treatment. Work is under way to align other thresholds for orthopaedics, otorhinolaryngology (ear, nose, and throat conditions), and cardiology."
RNZ reported on Thursday, the
long wait times for ear, nose and throat services
in Tairāwhiti, which had less than a quarter of the specialist capacity needed.
Introducing a national threshold for cataract treatment had led to about 1800 people added to the waiting list in the Southern District and about 900 more people put on the waiting list in Counties Manukau, the new report found.
In orthopaedics, threshold "scores" for orthopaedic treatment range from 50 in Auckland and Canterbury to 80 in Wairarapa.
"This means that a person's condition needs to be significantly worse in Wairarapa than Canterbury or Auckland to qualify for treatment."
District-specific thresholds still in place were also "obscuring the extent of unmet need for treatment in some districts".
"Significant work will be required to deal with the changes in demand that will result from the introduction of nationally consistent thresholds across all specialities."
The true level of unmet need was unknown, the report continued.
"One possible measure of unmet need is the number of people who are assessed by a specialist but do not meet the threshold for treatment.
"However, we also heard some clinicians will not refer a person for specialist assessment if they are considered unlikely to meet the treatment threshold.
"Media reports during our audit suggested that specialities in some districts were not accepting referrals because they did not have the resources and would be
unable to meet target time frames for assessing or treating people."
Meeting the government's target for 95 percent of people receiving planned care treatment within four months by 2030 was going to require "significant improvement".
"During our audit, the latest available reporting (for October to December 2024) showed that about 59 percent of planned care patients received treatment within four months of being placed on a waiting list.
"The proportion of people receiving planned care treatment within four months has been in decline since 2017."
However, the focus on improving wait times should go hand-in-hand with a focus on equitable access, the report writers urged.
"Equity also needs to be a central consideration in Health NZ's work to improve timely provision of treatment. If this does not happen, there is a risk that
strategies to improve timeliness could cause further inequities."
Health was so interconnected, that too much focus in one area inevitably put pressure on the system elsewhere.
For instance, the number of patients waiting longer than one year for treatment was cut from more than 4000 in October 2023, to 1916 by July 2024, although it rose again to 2630 by December 2024.
However, in the same period, the waiting list for first specialist assessments nearly doubled, from 5000 to 9936, the auditors found.
Health Minister Simeon Brown's push for more outsourcing to private providers needed to be carefully managed so it did not lead to greater inequities, the Auditor-General said.
"Access to the private hospitals that provide outsourced treatment is not equally distributed across the country. This means that some districts can
outsource patients more easily and at shorter notice than others.
"In addition, not all patients can be outsourced for treatment. The people selected for outsourcing to private facilities are generally determined to be non-complex patients."
Māori and Pacific peoples and people living in socially deprived areas were also more likely to have complications, which would bar them from treatment in a private hospital.
"Health NZ needs to manage and monitor the outsourcing of treatment so that it does not compromise its focus on the treatment of patients in priority order or otherwise increase inequity in planned care."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
Southern's Access And Choice Programme Celebrates Five Years Of Free Mental Health Support
Since it began in August 2020, the programme has delivered more than 175,000 sessions to over 56,000 people, making mental health and wellbeing support more accessible to individuals and whnau across Otago and Southland. This month marks five years since the launch of Access and Choice in the Southern region, a free mental health and wellbeing support programme delivered in general practices and known locally as Tōku Oranga. Since it began in August 2020, the programme has delivered more than 175,000 sessions to over 56,000 people, making mental health and wellbeing support more accessible to individuals and whānau across Otago and Southland. Funded by Te Whatu Ora and delivered by WellSouth, Access and Choice embeds Health Improvement Practitioners (HIPs), Health Coaches, and Support Workers into general practices, offering 20-30-minute sessions at no cost. The service now operates in 52 general practices, reaching 76% of the enrolled population in the Southern region. 'This milestone is about more than numbers,' says Genevieve Obbeek, Programme Lead. 'Access and Choice has changed the way we respond to mental health and wellbeing in primary care. People can get support early, in the places they already trust, without long waits or unnecessary barriers. There's no wrong reason to come and see one of our team – any door is the right door, and it's free. Being named a finalist in this year's Primary Care Awards is a tribute to the excellent work our team is doing across the Southern community.' Tōku Oranga has helped bridge critical gaps in the health system by offering timely, practical support for people experiencing mental distress, stress, or life challenges. It has also played a key role in improving equity, with services tailored to better meet the needs of Māori, Pacific, youth, and other underserved populations. Patients can access the service directly – without needing a GP referral – and choose the kind of support that best suits them. Practitioners are available both in general practice and in the community, making care more accessible and less intimidating. In addition to individual sessions, Access and Choice has introduced group workshops and proactive wellbeing initiatives that help people learn practical skills, connect with others, and stay well. These include activities like walking and aqua-walking groups, as well as education sessions that help people understand health conditions and build tools to manage both mental and physical health. WellSouth has been named a finalist in the 2025 New Zealand Primary Healthcare Awards | He Tohu Mauri Ora for Best Mental Health Programme for its Access and Choice initiative. 'The team has made a huge difference – it's changed the landscape for general practice,' says WellSouth CEO Andrew Swanson-Dobbs. Five years on, Access and Choice has become an essential part of how we respond to mental health and wellbeing in primary care – providing not only easier access but also real choice.
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
Southern's Access And Choice Programme Celebrates Five Years Of Free Mental Health Support
This month marks five years since the launch of Access and Choice in the Southern region, a free mental health and wellbeing support programme delivered in general practices and known locally as Tōku Oranga. Since it began in August 2020, the programme has delivered more than 175,000 sessions to over 56,000 people, making mental health and wellbeing support more accessible to individuals and whānau across Otago and Southland. Funded by Te Whatu Ora and delivered by WellSouth, Access and Choice embeds Health Improvement Practitioners (HIPs), Health Coaches, and Support Workers into general practices, offering 20-30-minute sessions at no cost. The service now operates in 52 general practices, reaching 76% of the enrolled population in the Southern region. 'This milestone is about more than numbers,' says Genevieve Obbeek, Programme Lead. 'Access and Choice has changed the way we respond to mental health and wellbeing in primary care. People can get support early, in the places they already trust, without long waits or unnecessary barriers. There's no wrong reason to come and see one of our team - any door is the right door, and it's free. Being named a finalist in this year's Primary Care Awards is a tribute to the excellent work our team is doing across the Southern community.' Tōku Oranga has helped bridge critical gaps in the health system by offering timely, practical support for people experiencing mental distress, stress, or life challenges. It has also played a key role in improving equity, with services tailored to better meet the needs of Māori, Pacific, youth, and other underserved populations. Patients can access the service directly - without needing a GP referral - and choose the kind of support that best suits them. Practitioners are available both in general practice and in the community, making care more accessible and less intimidating. In addition to individual sessions, Access and Choice has introduced group workshops and proactive wellbeing initiatives that help people learn practical skills, connect with others, and stay well. These include activities like walking and aqua-walking groups, as well as education sessions that help people understand health conditions and build tools to manage both mental and physical health. WellSouth has been named a finalist in the 2025 New Zealand Primary Healthcare Awards | He Tohu Mauri Ora for Best Mental Health Programme for its Access and Choice initiative. 'The team has made a huge difference - it's changed the landscape for general practice,' says WellSouth CEO Andrew Swanson-Dobbs. Five years on, Access and Choice has become an essential part of how we respond to mental health and wellbeing in primary care - providing not only easier access but also real choice.
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
Māori Almost Twice As Likely To Die After Bowel Cancer Surgery
Confronting research data reveals Māori almost twice as likely to die after bowel cancer surgery Māori are almost twice as likely as Pākehā to die from complications following bowel cancer surgery, new research shows. The study, just published in the British Journal of Surgery, found that Māori patients having bowel or gut cancer surgery were slightly more likely to experience complications, such as infections, bleeding, or organ failure. However, the more concerning finding was that Māori were significantly less likely than Pākehā patients to survive those complications. 'That tells us something is going wrong with how our hospital systems respond to Māori patients with problems after surgery,' says lead author Dr Cameron Wells, a doctoral candidate in surgery at Waipapa Taumata Rau, University of Auckland. 'It's not just whether complications happen, but how quickly and effectively they're picked up and treated. Our study shows that for Māori patients, those crucial steps often come too late,' says Wells. The research team included Māori and Pākehā doctors from several hospitals and the universities of Otago and Auckland. They analysed hospital records and data from the New Zealand Cancer Registry for more than 31,000 patients between 2005 and 2020. During this period, hospital teams improved at identifying and treating complications in Pākehā patients, with deaths approximately halving. However, survival rates for Māori showed negligible improvement, widening the mortality gap over the 16 years. 'This is very concerning and confronting data,' says Wells. The study points to structural racism in the healthcare system, unconscious bias, and poor communication as key contributors to the disparity. It highlights that Māori patients with early symptoms of complications may be taken less seriously, causing harmful delays in diagnosis and treatment. Dr Jonathan Koea (Ngāti Mutunga, Ngāti Tama), a professor of surgery in the Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences at Waipapa Taumata Rau, University of Auckland, says this study builds on earlier research. A 2023 paper, also led by Wells, found Māori are proportionally more likely to be treated at hospitals with higher rates of post-surgical deaths. These hospitals often have fewer resources to recognise and respond to complications after surgery. (See Annals of Surgery ' Failure to rescue following colorectal cancer resection'.) Koea also referenced earlier research he was involved with, led by University of Otago Māori epidemiologist Professor Jason Gurney, which found Māori were more likely to die after elective surgery than Pākehā. Contributing factors included communication issues and assumptions about health literacy. (See NZMJ 17 September 2021.) 'This latest study is complex, because it's about something that doesn't happen, a patient's life is not saved when they experience a complication, which makes it hard to measure,' Koea says. 'The research sits within the broader context of the Māori patient journey with cancer. From the outset, Māori are less likely to be screened, less likely to have a GP, more likely to require emergency surgery, and less likely to be referred to an oncologist. 'It's a pattern of multiple slippage points, which is why Māori are more likely to die six or seven years earlier than Pākehā,' Koea says. 'Māori are more likely to experience complications and less likely to be rescued. It aligns with what we already know. 'It shows that treating everyone equally results in unequal outcomes – you have to treat Māori differently to achieve the same outcomes.' Recommendations for improvements The paper recommends identifying and removing barriers to equitable care by embedding cultural safety and anti-racism training for all clinical staff to improve post-surgical outcomes. Strengthening Māori-led models of care and incorporating whānau perspectives into surgical pathways may also improve trust, responsiveness, and outcomes. Wells says the next step is to move from research describing inequities to actually doing something about them. 'We already know where many of the problems lie – the focus now must be on partnering with Māori communities to co-design solutions. That means listening, acting, and making sure the health system delivers care that is culturally safe, equitable, and accountable,' Wells says. There are a range of initiatives under way across New Zealand, he adds. 'One initiative I think has potential is called Kōrero Mai, which enables patients and their families to speak up and request a review by more senior staff in hospital when they are worried about something going wrong. 'We know that for Māori patients, there are significant cultural barriers – this is a broader issue, not limited to surgery.' While hospitals are taking steps to improve monitoring and treatment after surgery, this research suggests current efforts are benefiting some patients but not others. 'We need to be very careful about what we do next, because the gap is getting wider.'
