Fewer Americans sought unemployment benefits last week as layoffs remain low
The number of Americans applying for unemployment benefits fell last week, the Labor Department said Thursday, a sign that companies aren't cutting many jobs.
Jobless claims for the week ended June 21 dropped 10,000 to 236,000, a historically-low level. The four-week average of claims, which smooths out weekly volatility, dipped 750 to 245,000.
Applications for unemployment aid are a proxy for layoffs, and so the decline is evidence that businesses are mostly holding onto their employees. Yet separate data suggests hiring also remains cool, in what economists are referring to as a 'no hire, no fire' job market.
The unemployment rate remains low, though there are signs that the economy is slowing. So far this year, employers have added a solid but unspectacular 124,000 jobs a month, down from an average 168,000 last year. Most of the hiring has been concentrated in a few industries, specifically health care, restaurants and hotels, and government. Layoffs have mostly remained low, but hiring has also been weak.
Yet for many job-seekers, the sluggish creation of new jobs has been a challenge. Recent college graduates are facing the toughest job market in more than a decade. The unemployment rate for grads aged 22 to 27 is now higher than the overall jobless rate, and the gap between the two is the widest it has been in more than 30 years.
The difficulty many of the unemployed are having in finding work can be seen in the number of people continuing to claim unemployment aid, which rose 37,000 to 1.97 million for the week ending June 14. That is the most since November 2021.
Separately, the economy shrank 0.5% at an annual rate in the first three months of the year, the Commerce Department said Thursday, a worse showing than its previous estimate of a 0.2% decline. A flood of imports swamped the economy as companies rushed to bring in foreign goods before the Trump administration's tariffs took effect.
A category within the GDP data that measures the economy's underlying strength rose at a 1.9% annual rate from January through March, down from 2.9% in the fourth quarter of 2024. This category includes consumer spending and private investment but excludes volatile items like exports, inventories and government spending.
Rugaber writes for the Associated Press.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
27 minutes ago
- Forbes
LGBTQ-Friendly Policies Bolster Corporate Innovation, New Study Shows
WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 7: Participants from Delta Airlines walk in the WorldPride Parade on June 7, ... More 2025 in Washington, DC. This year marks the 50th Anniversary of Pride celebrations in Washington, DC and is host to WorldPride 2025. (Photo by) Companies that have policies designed to ensure their workplaces are LGBTQ-friendly are more likely to be innovative that those who don't according to a new study that draws on almost a decade and a half of data. The research, done by academics at Finland's Aalto University and the University of Vaasa, is based on data from the Corporate Equality Index—a benchmarking tool on corporate policies, practices, and benefits pertinent to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer employees—as well as figures from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and other public sources. It established that for every standard deviation increase in a company's CEI, the number of patents increased by 20 percent. The academics also found that LGBTQ-friendly firms demonstrated an almost 25 percent increase in the number of patent citations, which is broadly considered an indication of how other companies value the innovativeness of a particular patent. Other studies in the past have determined a link between profitability and workplace diversity more generally. This, however, is the first to specifically examine sexuality and gender-inclusivity as it relates to innovation. 'Our results demonstrate that firms with progressive LGBTQ policies produce more patents, have more patent citations, and have higher innovation quality as measured by patent originality, generality, and internationality,' commented Jukka Sihvonen, from Aalto University School of Business. 'Innovation is the fuel that drives both growth and profitability. Companies need innovation,' he added. 'The magnitudes of impact linked to LGBTQ-friendliness are big — and that means that the economic significance is too.' These latest findings are particularly timely considering the widespread rollback of corporate diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives in response to the Trump administration's executive orders. In January, almost immediately after taking office, President Donald Trump issued a slew of orders targeting DEI programs both in the public and private sector. In response, many companies across the U.S. and beyond, announced that they were rolling back such initiatives or pausing programs. References to diversity, equity and inclusion in Fortune 100 company reports have also dropped. According to an analysis by Gravity Research, they declined by 72% between 2024 and 2025. But surveys of corporate leaders show that a sizable contingent of managers still see the value of DEI initiatives. One example: A national survey—conducted by Catalyst, a consultancy focused on creating inclusive workspaces, in conjunction with the NYU School of Law's Meltzer Center for Diversity, Inclusion, and Belonging—recently found that 83% of C-suite leaders and 88% of legal leaders said that they believe maintaining or expanding DEI is essential to mitigating legal risk. That survey also showed that 77% of the executives believe DEI initiatives are positively correlated with improved financial performance, and 81% think that a focus on DEI was likely to bolster customer loyalty. The new research out of Finland used analytical methods to control for bias, and found that the link between inclusivity and innovation existed regardless of the political context. 'The results get marginally stronger when most conservative states are excluded, but the difference is really minor, and the findings remain largely the same when the most liberal states are left out,' explained Sami Vähämaa from the University of Vaasa, who also led the research. And Veda Fatmy, a co-author from the University of Vaasa, noted that although the research drew on data collected between 2003 and 2017, extrapolating beyond that time frame suggests that the positive trend might actually be getting stronger over time.
CNBC
28 minutes ago
- CNBC
Trump's mega bill hits roadblock. Here's what we know
CNBC's Emily Wilkins joins 'The Exchange' to discuss the uphill battle President Trump's mega bill faces to get senate approval.
Business Insider
28 minutes ago
- Business Insider
The clock's ticking on codifying DOGE cuts into law
Congress has until July 18 to pass a $9.4 billion DOGE cuts package. That includes cuts to foreign aid and public broadcasting. It's running into resistance from GOP senators. With just over three weeks to go before a critical deadline, the push to codify DOGE cuts is hitting resistance on Capitol Hill. Several GOP senators sound skeptical about the $9.4 billion in cuts to foreign aid and public broadcasting funding that the Trump administration is asking Congress to approve, raising the prospect of a high-profile setback for the DOGE project just weeks after Elon Musk and President Donald Trump's public feud. The House narrowly approved the cuts, in part identified by Musk and the White House DOGE Office, earlier this month. The administration's troubles were evident at a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing on Wednesday. Lawmakers in both parties highlighted the potential negative impacts of clawing back the funding as they heard testimony from Russell Vought, the director of the White House Office of Management and Budget. "We have Native American radio stations in South Dakota. They get their funding through NPR, 90-some percent of what they use," Republican Sen. Mike Rounds of South Dakota said at the hearing. "They will not continue to exist if we don't find a way to take care of their needs." Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, the committee chair, also raised concerns about the $1.1 billion in public broadcasting cuts. Another moderate Republican, Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, has previously said that she's opposed to the cuts because rural Alaskan communities depend on the funding. Several GOP lawmakers are also concerned about the $8.3 billion in foreign aid cuts. Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the former Senate GOP leader, broadly criticized DOGE efforts to cut wasteful foreign aid spending during his remarks at the hearing. "There's plenty of absolute nonsense masquerading as American aid that shouldn't receive another bit of taxpayer funding," McConnell said. "But the administration's attempt to root it out has been unnecessarily chaotic." Several of them have raised concerns in particular about cuts to PEPFAR, a global program to combat and treat HIV/AIDS, though the administration has insisted that life-saving programs will continue to receive funding. 'My biggest concern is that the appropriations process work' Democratic senators are expected to unanimously oppose the cuts, just as their counterparts did in the House. With the Senate divided 53-47, that means Republicans can only afford to lose three votes. The administration is using a process known as "rescission" to pursue the cuts, which allows the White House to ask Congress to claw back money it has already approved. The process has not been successfully used in over two decades, and the Senate rejected a rescission request in 2018, during Trump's first term. Lawmakers must approve the cuts within 45 days of the request — July 18 — or Trump is required by law to spend the money. The administration has said that this could be the first of several rescission requests. Democrats have argued that the prospect of constant rescissions threatens to undermine the bipartisan government funding process, where both parties agree to provisions in funding bills that they may not support in order to get enough votes to clear the 60-vote filibuster threshold in the Senate. Rescissions only require 51 votes in the Senate, raising the prospect that Republicans, led by the White House, could unilaterally strip out Democratic priorities after funding bills are passed. At least one Republican senator appeared to be listening to those arguments on Thursday. "My biggest concern is that the appropriations process work, and that Republicans and Democrats agree that the process will end up in a negotiated settlement," Rounds said. "If we get to the point where the Democrats look at this and say, 'We can put it in the bill, but they're not going to fund it, or they're not going to use it,' then there's no reason for them to work with us to get to 60 votes." Rounds said that he would "try to negotiate" with the administration about preserving public broadcasting funding, while Collins told reporters after the hearing that she wanted to see "fundamental changes" to the bill and was working on an amended version. If the Senate passes an amended version of the bill, the House would have to pass the measure again before the July 18 deadline.
