
Who are the US federal workers at risk of losing their jobs and what do they do?
Tens of thousands of US federal employees could lose their jobs after the Trump administration moves to reduce the size of the federal workforce dramatically.
With Elon Musk at the helm of the so-called 'department of government efficiency' (Doge), which is overseeing efforts to cull federal employment, the White House has embarked on multiple plans to cut down on virtually all areas of federal employment. There are no official numbers of how many federal employees will be affected, and many of Donald Trump and Musk's efforts have been stalled in court, but the impact could be big and long-lasting.
To understand what the cuts will do to federal operations, we first have to understand who works for the federal government and what they do. Here's what we know about the federal workforce.
There are about 3 million federal employees in the US, about 2% of the entire US workforce, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), the data division of the Department of Labor.
Much of the federal workforce falls under the executive departments, the leaders of which make up the president's cabinet. The Department of Defense is the largest employer, as it houses the US military, which includes the army, navy and air force, and has more than 750,000 employees. This figure encompasses the civil workforce within the defense department. There's an additional 1.3 million active-duty US military personnel that BLS does not include when counting the federal workforce.
The Department of Veterans Affairs is the next largest employer, with approximately 480,000 employees.
The number of federal workers has largely remained unchanged over the last 50 years, with exceptions every 10 years for when there's an influx of employees working on the US Census.
When compared with the overall employed workforce, federal workers skew slightly older. More than 50% of federal workers are over 45, compared with 43% of the overall workforce.
Meanwhile, the racial demographics of the federal workforce largely reflect the demographics of the country as a whole, with one key exception: the federal government has a higher percentage of Black employees than the private sector.
This is likely because the federal government implemented laws after the civil rights era to prevent bias in workplace hiring, allowing more Black workers to enter the federal workforce.
In January, Donald Trump signed two sweeping executive orders that ended diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs inside the federal government. He overturned multiple executive orders, including one from the civil rights era that required private contractors to practice equal employment opportunity when hiring.
While the federal layoffs are separate from Trump's DEI actions, they both encompass dramatic efforts from the Trump administration to curtail the federal government's role as an employer.
It's a common misconception that most federal workers live in Washington DC. While federal workers make up a huge chunk of Washington's population, the vast majority of federal workers live in other states across the country. They range from a national parks ranger in Montana to an infectious disease researcher in Georgia to a doctor working at a hospital run by the veterans affairs department. The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) alone has more than 100,000 employees across 4,500 offices nationwide.
Federal employees make up just a small fraction of all government employees in the US. The vast majority of government workers, about 15 million, work for local governments, while nearly 6 million work for state governments.
Local governments manage police and fire departments, parks and recreation and housing services. State governments often work with local governments to help with things such as regulating highways and education.
BLS does not consider those who work for federal contractors, or private companies that have agreements to do work for the federal government, as federal government employees. There is no official number for how many private contractors there are for the federal government, but a recent Brookings Institution analysis estimated that there were approximately 5.2 million private contractor employees in 2023.
Musk is leading the White House's efforts to downsize the federal government, all supposedly for the sake of saving money. Musk said in October 2024 at a campaign event for Trump in New York City that he wants to cut the federal government budget by $2tn. Keep in mind that discretionary spending, or the amount that Congress has control over, was $1.7tn in 2023.
In February, Musk said from the Oval Office: 'The people voted for major government reform, and that's what the people are going to get.'
There are two main initiatives that Musk's Doge is trying to carry out. The first is offering federal employees buyouts for voluntarily leaving their jobs, and the second is laying off probationary employees, or employees who have been in their job for less than a year and don't have civil service protection.
It is unclear how many employees these initiatives will affect. The White House has said about 75,000 employees accepted buyouts, which will give workers a few months of pay and benefits if they leave their jobs imminently, what is known as 'deferred resignation'. A federal judge temporarily blocked the program, which the Trump administration will now have to defend in court.
Meanwhile, the layoffs of probationary employees appears to have caused chaos across many parts of the federal government. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Department of Health and Human Services and Department of Defense all said they each had more than 5,000 employees on probation who could be laid off.
The White House said that military service members, postal service workers and those whose positions relate to national security, immigration and public safety would be exempt from the buyout and layoff programs.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
18 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump warns China ‘not easy' as trade talks enter second day
7:34AM Good morning Thanks for joining me. Donald Trump said it was 'not easy' dealing with China but insisted he had received 'good reports' about trade negotiations between Washington and Beijing officials in London. Here is what you need to know as talks enter a second day. 5 things to start your day Apple's AI event falls flat as iPhone maker struggles | Investors sent shares downwards as Apple unveiled minor upgrades Thames Water lenders demand reprieve on fines in £17bn rescue deal | Ofwat urged to consider 'regulatory reset' after struggling utility giant hit with record penalty Nervous families freeze spending in blow to growth hopes | Fresh pressure on Rachel Reeves as retail sales rise just 1pc Miliband warned carbon capture project faces collapse without £4bn injection | Fledgling green tech has already received almost £22bn in public subsidies SNP ferry scheme suffers fresh blow after rain causes ship to flood | Glen Rosa is already behind schedule and £100m over budget What happened overnight Asian shares were mixed on Tuesday as investors kept an eye on the China-US trade talks that might help stave off a recession. A second day of talks was planned after US and Chinese officials met in London for negotiations over various issues. The hope is that they can eventually reach a deal to reduce painfully high tariffs against each other. Most of the tariff hikes imposed since Donald Trump escalated his trade war are paused to allow trade in everything from tiny tech gadgets to enormous machinery to continue. In Asian trading, Tokyo's Nikkei 225 gained 0.2pc to 38,177.71, while the Kospi in South Korea jumped 0.3pc to 2,865.24. Hong Kong's Hang Seng fell 0.2pc to 24,127.30 and the Shanghai Composite index was down 0.5pc to 3,384.47. In Taiwan, the Taiex surged 2.1pc to 22,242.14. Australia's S&P/ASX 200 advanced 0.8pc to 8,587.20. On Wall Street, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was flat, at 42,761.76, the S&P 500 rose 0.1pc, to 6,005.88. and the Nasdaq rose 0.3pc, to 19,591.24. In the bond market, the yield on benchmark 10-year US Treasury notes fell to 4.478pc from 4.494pc late on Sunday.


Telegraph
19 minutes ago
- Telegraph
California is losing the court of public opinion
In the on-going Battle of Los Angeles, California governor Gavin Newsom may have the law on his side – but his adversary president Donald Trump has the most powerful imagery. The conflict began in Los Angeles on Friday, when mobs of protestors attacked agents of the US Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE), who were trying to serve warrants on specific illegal immigrants at a Home Depot and also at a clothing store. On Saturday, during a protest in front of a nearby Department of Homeland Security (DHS) office, members of the crowd lit fires and threw rocks at federal officers, who defended themselves with tear gas and non-lethal ammunition. Later that day, president Trump authorised the deployment of 2000 members of the National Guard to protect the federal ICE agents; since then 700 American Marines have been added to the federal force. Governor Newsom and other leaders of the Democratic-dominated California have claimed that Trump's actions were not needed because local and state authorities had the situation under control. And yet on Sunday, following three days of violence and arrests, the Los Angeles Police Department declared downtown Los Angeles an 'unlawful assembly' area. And on Monday the state of California sued the Trump administration, claiming that Trump 'illegally acted to federalise the National Guard,' in the words of Newsom. Typically a governor requests a president to federalise and mobilise the National Guard to deal with riots or natural disasters. For example, consider the Los Angeles riots of 1992. It was sparked by the acquittal of four white police officers who beat a black motorist named Rodney King and it led to more than fifty deaths and a billion dollars of damage; in response a Republican California governor Pete Wilson asked a Republican president George HW Bush to federalise the National Guard. Not since 1965, when president Lyndon B. Johnson sent the National Guard to Alabama to protect civil rights demonstrators, has a president sent troops without a governor's request. While California officials might be able to make a legal case against the Trump administration, the state and the Democratic party risk losing in the court of public opinion. Viral photographs show masked rioters waving Mexican flags in front of burning cars and debris, supporting the Trump White House's inflammatory claims about an immigrant invasion. In a shrewd public relations move, the federal Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has released mug shots under the heading: 'ICE Captures Worst of the Worst Illegal Alien Criminals in Los Angeles Including Murderers, Sex Offenders, and Other Violent Criminals.' The rogues' gallery contains illegal immigrants from a number of countries including Vietnam, the Philippines, and Mexico, charged with offenses including attempted rape, assault with a deadly weapon, grand theft larceny, distribution of heroin and cocaine, wilful cruelty to a child and other serious crimes. Democrats recently succeeded in reversing the allegedly unlawful deportation to El Salvador of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, an illegal immigrant from El Salvador who was granted the right to remain in the US by a federal immigration judge. But on his return he was indicted by a federal grand jury on charges of being an MS-13 gang member who has smuggled thousands of illegal immigrants, drugs, and firearms in the US. Democratic strategists might ask whether someone like Abrego Garcia should be the face of the Democratic party. At least, unlike some of the rioters cavorting in front of burning wreckage in LA, he does not wear a mask.


ITV News
22 minutes ago
- ITV News
Trump sends thousands more troops to LA as unrest continues into fourth day
US President Donald Trump has deployed a further 2,000 National Guard troops as well as 700 US Marines to LA, escalating a military presence local officials describe as unhelpful and "sowing terror." An initial 2,000 troops began arriving on Sunday, which saw the most violence out of three days, with Governor Gavin Newsom claiming only 300 troops were actually used. "The first 2,000? Given no food or water. Only approx. 300 are deployed - the rest are sitting, unused, in federal buildings without orders," Newsom posted on X. Despite Monday's protests being less violent, Trump has continued to describe Los Angeles in dire terms that Mayor Karen Bass and Newsom say are nowhere close to the truth. They say he is putting public safety at risk by adding military personnel, even though police say they don't need the help. Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell said in a statement he was confident in the police department's ability to handle large-scale demonstrations and that the Marines' arrival without coordinating with the police department presented a 'significant logistical and operational challenge' for them. Newsom called the deployments reckless and 'disrespectful to our troops' in a post on X. The protests began Friday in downtown Los Angeles after federal immigration authorities arrested more than 40 people across the city. The smell of smoke hung in the air downtown Monday, one day after crowds blocked a major road and set self-driving cars on fire as police responded with tear gas, rubber bullets and flash-bang grenades. Additional protests against immigration raids continued into the evening on Monday in several other cities, including San Francisco and Santa Ana in California and Dallas and Austin in Texas. Local officials have pushed back against the president's orders, with California Attorney General Rob Bonta filing a lawsuit over the use of National Guard troops. He told reporters in his announcement Monday that Trump had 'trampled' the state's sovereignty. 'We don't take lightly to the president abusing his authority and unlawfully mobilising California National Guard troops,' Bonta said. He sought a court order declaring Trump's use of the Guard unlawful and asking for a restraining order to halt the deployment. Trump said Monday that the city would have been 'completely obliterated' if he had not deployed the Guard. Despite their presence, there has been limited engagement so far between the Guard and protesters while local law enforcement implements crowd control. The deployment appeared to be the first time in decades that a state's National Guard was activated without a request from its governor, a significant escalation against those who have sought to hinder the administration's mass deportation efforts. The last time the National Guard was activated without a governor's permission was in 1965, when President Lyndon B Johnson sent troops to protect a civil rights march in Alabama, according to the Brennan Centre for Justice. In a directive Saturday, Trump invoked a legal provision allowing him to deploy federal service members when there is 'a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States.'