U.S. revokes visas from 15 international students at UCF, detains one
Courtney Gilmartin, a UCF spokesperson, confirmed the revocations, saying the 15 students in the United States on F-1 student visas have had their visas revoked since March 25 based on records from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
They were flagged for criminal records or 'otherwise failing to maintain' their visa status but no additional information was available on their cases, including why the one student was detained, Gilmartin said.
UCF notified each student of their visa termination and advised them to leave the country, she added.
The university, Florida's largest by enrollment, enrolls about 5,000 international students, according to its website.
The Trump administration's crackdown on illegal immigration has led to the revocation of thousands of international students' visas nationwide, apparently in some cases because students took part in campus protests against the war in Gaza or in others because of minor run-ins with law enforcement, including traffic infractions.
As of Thursday, more than 1,700 international students nationwide have had their visas revoked, according to Inside Higher Ed, including eight at the University of Florida, three at Florida State University and 18 at Florida International University.
At UF, Felipe Zapata Velázquez was deported to Colombia following a traffic stop where police found he was driving with a suspended license and registration, according to the student news publication Fresh Take Florida. His family said at the time he was renewing his student visa, but it was not clear he had a currently valid one.
Talat Rahman, UCF's faculty union president and trustee chair, said a student in her department was notified of their visa termination and has already returned to India.
Rahman, who came from Pakistan to study in the U.S. on a student visa, said the visa cancellations have 'never been done before' on this scale. Now a U.S. citizen, Rahman said the revocations worry her since students had no due process and might be forced to leave the country because of a traffic ticket or for exercising their First Amendment rights.
And it makes all international students fearful, she said.
'It's essentially saying, 'Hey, you're not welcome,'' Rahman said.
This is a developing story, check back for updates.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fifth Circuit blocks WT drag show ban, citing First Amendment
A federal appeals court has ruled that West Texas A&M University President Walter Wendler cannot bar student drag shows on campus, finding the performances are protected under the First Amendment. In a 2-1 decision Monday, Aug. 18, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed a ruling from U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk in Amarillo, who had previously declined to block Wendler's cancellation of a student-organized drag show. The panel imposed a preliminary injunction, ensuring students may stage drag shows while the case continues in trial court. The case stems from Spectrum WT, an LGBTQ+ student group that planned 'A Fool's Drag Race' in March 2023 to raise money for The Trevor Project. Students promoted the show as PG-13, with restrictions on profanity and lewd conduct. Eleven days before the event, Wendler canceled it, writing in a campus-wide email that drag 'stereotypes women in cartoon-like extremes' and comparing the performances to blackface. Court's reasoning Judge Leslie Southwick, a George W. Bush appointee writing for the majority, said the context of Spectrum WT's event made its expressive message clear. 'Against this backdrop, the message sent by parading on a theater stage in attire of the opposite sex would have been unmistakable,' he wrote. The court emphasized that the constitutional principle at stake reached beyond this single event. 'Because theatrical performances plainly involve expressive conduct within the protection of the First Amendment, and because we find the plaintiffs' drag show is protected expression,' Southwick wrote, 'Wendler's censorship failed to pass constitutional muster.' From the archives: Lawsuit filed against WT and Texas A&M University System over canceled drag show Judge James Dennis, a Clinton appointee, joined Southwick's opinion. The panel also ruled that Legacy Hall, where the drag show was scheduled, is a designated public forum used by churches, political candidates and student groups. By barring drag performances, the majority concluded, Wendler engaged in impermissible viewpoint discrimination. The majority also cited Wendler's cancellation of another Spectrum WT drag show in 2024 and his repeated declarations that no such shows would be allowed on campus, finding students faced ongoing irreparable harm to their speech rights. Judge James Ho dissented, arguing drag is 'not inherently expressive' and that Spectrum WT had not shown it was entitled to such an 'extraordinary remedy.' Reaction from FIRE The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, which represents Spectrum WT, hailed the decision as a reaffirmation of student rights. 'FIRE is pleased that the Fifth Circuit has halted President Wendler's unconstitutional censorship and restored the First Amendment at West Texas A&M,' said FIRE Supervising Senior Attorney JT Morris. 'This is a victory not just for Spectrum WT, but for any public university students at risk of being silenced by campus censors.' Speaking Monday evening with the Amarillo Globe-News, Morris said the ruling underscored a broader point. 'This decision makes clear that President Wendler cannot impose his personal views on students' expressive rights. The First Amendment protects drag shows just like it protects political rallies, concerts or theater.' Student pushback Even before the lawsuit, Wendler's ban ignited protests on campus. Students and alumni rallied outside the university, accusing administrators of censorship and discrimination. At one demonstration, WT alumna Coco Dietz said Wendler's reasoning was rooted in bias. 'We have never come into other's organizations to shut them down because of a personal bias or prejudice, so you cannot come here and shut ours down and not expect pushback,' she said, adding that Wendler was 'acting like this is a private Christian university, when we are a public university.' From the archives: WT student organizations' drag show raises $10,000 for Trevor Project amid controversy Lauren Stovall, vice president of Spectrum WT, framed the controversy as a fight for core freedoms. 'This is not an issue just about drag; we are protesting for freedom of speech,' she said. 'The First Amendment is what our country is built on: freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and freedom of petition. Walter Wendler is trying to take that away from us.' Wider drag debate in Texas The Fifth Circuit's ruling is part of a larger battle over drag in Texas. In 2023, lawmakers passed Senate Bill 12, which sought to restrict drag performances in public spaces. A federal judge later struck it down as unconstitutional, but the state has appealed, and litigation is ongoing. At the same time, the Texas A&M University System, along with the University of Texas and University of North Texas, adopted bans after pressure from conservative officials. Earlier this year, another federal court blocked the A&M System's prohibition, allowing the 'Draggieland' event to proceed in College Station. That case, like WT's, remains active. What's next The WT case now returns to federal district court in Amarillo. The university could appeal to the full Fifth Circuit or ask the U.S. Supreme Court to review the injunction. For now, the decision ensures Spectrum WT can move forward with drag performances on campus while the constitutional fight continues. Supporters see the outcome as part of a broader warning to officials tempted to silence unpopular expression. As Morris put it, 'Students don't give up their rights when they enroll in a taxpayer-funded university.' On Aug. 19, West Texas A&M University said it does not comment on pending litigation. This article originally appeared on Amarillo Globe-News: Fifth Circuit blocks WT drag show ban on First Amendment grounds Solve the daily Crossword
Associated Press
an hour ago
- Associated Press
Fifth Circuit halts West Texas A&M drag show ban as free speech lawsuit continues
A federal appeals court Monday blocked West Texas A&M University President Walter Wendler from enforcing a campus drag show ban, ruling that the performances are likely protected under the First Amendment. The 2-1 ruling from the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reverses a lower court's decision upholding Wendler's 2023 cancellation of a drag show, which he argued was demeaning to women and compared to blackface. The decision means Spectrum WT, the student group that brought the lawsuit, can produce drag shows on campus while its lawsuit continues in a lower court. Judge Leslie H. Southwick, who wrote for the majority, said the context of the students' event made its message of supporting the queer community clear. 'The viewers of the drag show would have been ticketed audience members attending a performance sponsored by LGBT+ student organizations and designed to raise funds for LGBT+ suicide-prevention charity, ' wrote Southwick, who was appointed by George W. Bush. 'Against this backdrop, the message sent by parading on a theater stage in attire of the opposite sex would have been unmistakable.' The court concluded that Legacy Hall, where the drag show was scheduled to take place, was a designated public forum open to a variety of groups, including churches and political candidates. That meant banning drag shows targeted the content of the event, something the Constitution allows only in the rarest cases. Finally, the court found that students faced ongoing irreparable harm to their speech rights, noting Wendler had canceled another drag show planned for 2024 and declared that no drag shows would ever be allowed on campus. That conclusion gave the judges another reason to block the ban for now, since courts only grant such relief when plaintiffs have a strong case and risk being harmed without it. In March 2023, Wendler canceled Spectrum WT's drag show intended to raise money for the Trevor Project, a nonprofit that works to reduce suicides in the LGBTQ+ community. He explained in a letter to the campus community that he thought drag shows — where participants often use exaggerated clothing and makeup to explore, celebrate or parody gender roles — were misogynistic. 'As a university president, I would not support 'blackface' performances on our campus, even if told the performance is a form of free speech or intended as humor. It is wrong. I do not support any show, performance or artistic expression which denigrates – in this case, women – for any reason,' he wrote. In September 2023, U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, a President Donald Trump appointee and former attorney for a conservative legal group that opposed LGBTQ rights, sided with Wendler. The case arose as Texas lawmakers were also targeting drag more broadly. The same year, they passed a law restricting some drag performances in public spaces, but a federal judge later struck it down as unconstitutional under the First Amendment. West Texas A&M isn't the only campus to ban drag shows. This year, the Texas A&M System adopted a systemwide prohibition, and the University of Texas and University of North Texas systems enacted similar restrictions following pressure from conservative officials, including Tarrant County Judge Tim O'Hare. In March, however, a federal judge temporarily blocked the Texas A&M System's ban, allowing the 'Draggieland' event at the flagship campus to proceed, also finding that students were likely to succeed on their First Amendment claims. That lawsuit is also still working its way through the courts. Judge James C. Ho dissented in the West Texas A&M case. 'Drag is not inherently expressive,' wrote Ho, who was appointed to the 5th Circuit by Trump and is the former Solicitor General of Texas. He argued that whether a particular performance conveys a protected message depends on the specific show, performers and audience. He said Spectrum WT had not shown it was entitled to such an 'extraordinary remedy' as a court order blocking the drag show ban. The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, which represents Spectrum WT in the West Texas A&M case and the Queer Empowerment Council in the Texas A&M System lawsuit, hailed the ruling as a major victory for student speech. 'We're overjoyed that our clients will now be able to express themselves freely, and we'll be watching to make sure that President Wendler obeys the laws of the land while the case proceeds,' FIRE Attorney Adam Steinbaugh said in a statement. A spokesperson for West Texas A&M could not immediately be reached for comment, so it's unclear how the university will respond to the ruling. The case now returns to district court in Amarillo, where the fight over whether West Texas A&M's drag ban is constitutional will continue. ___ This story was originally published by The Texas Tribune and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Judge freezes Beto O'Rourke's ability to send money, property outside of Texas
Democratic activist Beto O'Rourke and his nonprofit Powered by People are no longer allowed to send money out of Texas, a Tarrant County district judge ruled on Friday. 348th District Court Judge Megan Fahey issued the freeze as an expansion of an original restraining order filed against O'Rourke on Aug. 8 as the result of a lawsuit filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, according to court documents. Fahey's ruling came one day after lawyers for O'Rourke argued in a downtown Fort Worth courtroom that the funds are a form of free speech protected under the First Amendment. The dispute stems from O'Rourke and his organization's effort to fund Texas Democrats who fled the state to deny the legislature a chance to vote on redistricting legislation, the Star-Telegram previously reported. Fahey also denied O'Rourke's motion to move the proceedings to El Paso County, according to court documents. O'Rourke's attorneys argued that El Paso County was the proper venue because it is where the activist and former congressman lives and where his nonprofit does business. In a Sept. 2 hearing, Fahey will decide whether to issue an injunction against O'Rourke, according to court documents. 🚨 More top stories from our newsroom: → See how your child's school rates in new Texas A-F grades → Jury hears of woman's grave under house at Fort Worth death penalty trial → North Texas Powerball player just misses $531 million jackpot [Get our breaking news alerts.] 'In Texas, lawless actions have consequences, and Beto's finding that out the hard way,' Paxton said in a statement on Saturday. 'His fraudulent attempt to pad the pockets of the rogue cowards abandoning Texas has been stopped, and now the court has rightly frozen his ability to continue to send money outside of Texas.' Neither O'Rourke nor his lawyers could immediately be reached for comment on Saturday. In a post on X, O'Rourke wrote, 'Thanks to everyone who has joined us in this fight for Texas, we've been able to donate over $1 MILLION to the Texas Legislative Black Caucus, the Texas House Democratic Caucus, and the Mexican American Legislative Caucus during the special session.' Solve the daily Crossword
