B.C. court rejects challenge of Mount Polley dam, says consultation was 'deep'
The Xatsull First Nation claimed the province's approval of the plan to raise the level of the dam in B.C.'s Interior by four metres was improper and done without 'meaningful' consultation with the nation.
4:31
Will charges ever be laid in the Mt. Polley mine disaster?
But Justice Michael Tammen ruled Wednesday that the provincial government's consultation with the Xatsull was proper.
Story continues below advertisement
'I view the consultation here as deep and, importantly, the process employed by the province provided Xatsull with ample opportunity to present their perspective,' Tammen said.
The First Nation said in a statement it was disappointed in the ruling.
'This is the same facility that breached and devastated Xatsull's territory in 2014 — the worst mining disaster on record. Its impacts are still harming our nation's rights, culture and way of life today,' it said.
'We will be reviewing the decision as well as exploring our options to determine next steps.'
Imperial Metals president Bryan Kynoch told reporters in a conference call Wednesday that the court's finding was an 'important decision for the mine.'
'Being able to move ahead with the raise helps us keep operations stable and avoid unnecessary interruptions and disruptions,' he said.
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
Raising the dam would allow the mine to continue depositing tailings, but Kynock said they're still awaiting another permit amendment that would extend the life of the mine significantly.
'If that doesn't come soon, we may be put in jeopardy of significantly revising operational plans or even ceasing operation if the amendment process is not expedited,' he said. 'While today's decision gives us some clarity, we're clearly not out of the woods yet.'
Story continues below advertisement
He said the company has the support of the Williams Lake First Nation, and it's 'worked hard' to negotiate and co-operate with the Xatsull First Nation in the past.
Tammen found the province fulfilled its duty to consult, and said that had he found otherwise, he would not have hesitated to grant the Xatsull's wishes to have the decision approving the plan reconsidered.
2:11
Mt. Polley mine reopens after tailings pond spill
Tammen said Mount Polley Mining Corp.'s plan to raise the tailings storage level was 'comparatively modest,' and the rationale for provincial approval 'readily apparent.'
The court had been expected to rule on an application for an injunction Wednesday with a decision on the nation's judicial review to follow, but Tammen dismissed the Xatsull's legal challenge outright and found no basis to grant an injunction to stop the plan from moving ahead.
Story continues below advertisement
Tammen said raising the dam as proposed 'does not increase the scope of operations at the mine, nor does it increase the ecological footprint of ongoing mining operations.'
The judge said the tailings dam failed 'catastrophically' in 2014, which 'has in turn caused widespread and long-lasting environmental damage and corresponding impacts to Xatsull's Aboriginal title, rights, culture, and way of life.'
'Xatsull is obviously and understandably extremely concerned with the potential for a further failure and thus has a corresponding interest in ensuring that the mine is being operated in an environmentally responsible and safe manner,' he said.
The judge said he didn't want to dismiss, diminish or minimize the 'deleterious' effects of the tailings dam failure, which is still the subject of civil litigation and Fisheries Act charges against the company.
2:09
Aerials of destruction caused by Mount Polley Mine tailings pond breach
Lawyers for Mount Polley and the provincial government claimed the risk of a future tailings dam failure was 'speculative,' while the judge characterized 'it as remote and incapable of even approximate quantification.'
Story continues below advertisement
The judge ruled that the province's duty to consult relates to only 'current government conduct' rather than any past wrongs or failings, and must focus on 'adverse impacts' from a specific proposal and not 'larger adverse impacts of the project of which it is a part.'
Tammen said it was reasonable for B.C.'s environmental assessment office to consider impacts on the First Nation's constitutional rights as a 'starting point' during the consultations that happened during the permitting process.
'That process was aimed at the overarching safety and design issues that were at the heart of Xatsull's concerns,' the judge said. 'If Xatsull asserted other impacts … beyond the risk of further failure of the (tailings storage facility), they had ample opportunity to make those known to the (environmental assessment office), but did not do so.'
Chief Rhonda Phillips said earlier this year that the province was allowing the work to proceed without a valid environmental assessment certificate at the site of the spill that sent millions of tonnes of water and tailings into the environment on the nation's territory in B.C.'s Cariboo region.
Phillips had said 'meaningful' reform is needed in the aftermath of the 2014 spill because the provincial government is still approving 'risky storage methods' while failing to adequately consult the nation.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Global News
26 minutes ago
- Global News
Trump and Putin agree to meeting in coming days, Kremlin says
A meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump has been agreed, a Kremlin official said Thursday, the eve of a White House deadline for Moscow to show progress toward ending the three-year-old war in Ukraine. Putin's foreign affairs adviser Yuri Ushakov said a summit could possibly take place next week at a venue that has been decided 'in principle.' He brushed aside the possibility of Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy joining the summit, something the White House had said Trump was ready to consider. Putin has spurned Zelenskyy's previous offers of a meeting to clinch a breakthrough. 'We propose, first of all, to focus on preparing a bilateral meeting with Trump, and we consider it most important that this meeting be successful and productive,' Ushakov said, adding that U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff's suggestion of a meeting including Ukraine's leader 'was not specifically discussed.' Story continues below advertisement It was not clear how the announcement of the meeting would affect Trump's Friday deadline for Russia to stop the killing or face heavy economic sanctions. 1:19 Kremlin slams Trump tariff threat on India over buying Russian oil The meeting would be the first U.S.-Russia summit since 2021, when former President Joe Biden met Putin in Geneva. It would be a significant milestone toward Trump's effort to end the war, although there's no guarantee it would stop the fighting since Moscow and Kyiv remain far apart on their conditions for peace. Next week is the target date for a summit, Ushakov said, while noting that such events take time to organize and no date is confirmed. The possible venue will be announced 'a little later,' he said. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Months of U.S.-led efforts have yielded no progress on stopping Russia's invasion of its neighbor. The war has killed tens of thousands of troops on both sides as well as more than 12,000 Ukrainian civilians, according to the United Nations. Story continues below advertisement Western officials have repeatedly accused Putin of stalling for time in peace negotiations to allow Russian forces time to capture more Ukrainian land. Putin previously has offered no concessions and will only accept a settlement on his terms. A meeting between Putin and Trump on the war would be a departure from the Biden administration's policy of 'nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine' — a key demand from Kyiv. At the start of his second term, Trump was conciliatory toward Putin, for whom he has long shown admiration, and even echoed some of his talking points on the war. But he recently has expressed increasing exasperation with Putin, criticizing the Kremlin leader for his unyielding stance on U.S.-led peace efforts, and has threatened Moscow with new sanctions. Zelenskyy focuses on the details Zelenskyy said he planned calls with European leaders Thursday to discuss the latest developments. Story continues below advertisement A ceasefire and long-term security guarantees are priorities in potential negotiation with Russia, he said on social media. Securing a truce, deciding a format for a summit and providing assurances for Ukraine's future protection from invasion — a consideration that must involve the U.S. and Europe — are crucial aspects to address, Zelenskyy said. He noted that Russian strikes on civilians haven't eased off despite Trump publicly urging Putin to relent. A Russian attack Wednesday in the central Dnipro region killed four people and injured eight others, he said. Poll shows support for continuing the fight waning in Ukraine A new Gallup poll published Thursday found that Ukrainians are increasingly eager for a settlement that ends the fight against Russia's invasion. The enthusiasm for a negotiated deal is a sharp reversal from 2022 — the year the war began — when Gallup found that about three-quarters of Ukrainians wanted to keep fighting until victory. Now only about one-quarter hold that view, with support for continuing the war declining steadily across all regions and demographic groups. Story continues below advertisement The findings were based on samples of 1,000 or more respondents ages 15 and older living in Ukraine. Some territories under entrenched Russian control, representing about 10 per cent of the population, were excluded from surveys conducted after 2022 due to lack of access. 9:32 Russia-Ukraine: Putin claims he's open to peace talks, but battlefield tells different story Since the start of the full-scale war, Russia's relentless pounding of urban areas behind the front line has killed more than 12,000 Ukrainian civilians, according to the United Nations. On the 1,000-kilometre (620-mile) front line snaking from northeast to southeast Ukraine, where tens of thousands of troops on both sides have died, Russia's bigger army is slowly capturing more land. In the new Gallup survey, conducted in early July, about seven in 10 Ukrainians say their country should seek to negotiate a settlement as soon as possible. Zelenskyy last month renewed his offer to meet with Putin, but his overture was rebuffed. Story continues below advertisement Most Ukrainians do not expect a lasting peace anytime soon, the poll found. Only about one-quarter say it's 'very' or 'somewhat' likely that active fighting will end within the next 12 months, while about seven in 10 think it's 'somewhat' or 'very' unlikely that active fighting will be over in the next year. —Hatton reported from Lisbon, Portugal. Amelia Thomson-Deveaux contributed from Washington.


CBC
7 hours ago
- CBC
B.C. Supreme Court decision allows Imperial Mines to raise Mt. Polley dam height
B.C's Xatsull First Nation says it is disappointed in a B.C. Supreme Court decision that allows the owners of the Mount Polley mine to raise the height of their tailings dam in B.C.'s Interior. In 2014, the mine site suffered a catastrophic dam collapse that spilled millions of litres of waste and water. CBC 's Marcella Bernardo reports on the details.


Global News
10 hours ago
- Global News
Kinew accuses group of Republicans of pitching ‘timber tantrum' over wildfire smoke
Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew accused a group of Republicans of throwing a 'timber tantrum' and playing 'political games' after they called out Canada over wildfires sending smoke billowing across the international border into their states. 'These are attention-seekers who can't come up with a good idea on health care or on making life more affordable,' Kinew told The Canadian Press. 'So they're playing games with something that's very serious.' Kinew said he doesn't 'generalize these attention-seekers' misguided words to all Americans.' He noted that American firefighters have been helping to fight Canada's wildfires and Canadian firefighters were on the ground and in the air during California's devastating wildfire season. 'I've thanked them and I thanked folks in the Trump administration who sent some of the federal firefighting resources up to Canada and to Manitoba,' the premier said. 'So we're going to have a continued relationship and an ability to support each other through wildfires going forward.' Story continues below advertisement In a Wednesday news release, Wisconsin state Rep. Calvin Callahan joined other Republican state lawmakers from Iowa, Minnesota and North Dakota in filing a formal complaint against Canada to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin and the International Joint Commission, a binational organization that resolves disputes on shared water and air quality. The Republican lawmakers called for an investigation of Canada's wildfire management practices and for potential remedies under international law. 'If Canada can't get these wildfires under control, they need to face real consequences,' Callahan said in the news release. 'We won't sit back while our air becomes a health hazard.' Callahan joins a chorus of Republican politicians at other levels of government who have been voicing concerns about Canada's wildfires. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Michigan Rep. Jack Bergman sent a letter to Canadian Sen. Michael MacDonald on Monday calling for stronger forest management policies and more accountability from Canadian officials. Both are members of the Canada—United States Inter-Parliamentary Group. Michigan Rep. John James sent a letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney last week saying his constituents are choking on toxic wildfire smoke. Citing a letter other Republican members of Congress sent to Canada's Ambassador to the U.S. Kirsten Hillman in July, James said that 'since then, rather than progress, we have seen escalation.' Story continues below advertisement James said Kinew's declaration of a second state of emergency in Manitoba 'confirmed what many Americans have feared: that Canada is not doing nearly enough to stop these fires before they start.' The American lawmaker also criticized Kinew's comments in response to the initial letter. Kinew in July said it turns people off politics 'when you have got a group of congresspeople trying to trivialize and make hay out of a wildfire season where we've lost lives in our province.' A husband and wife were killed by a fast-moving wildfire northeast of Winnipeg in May and thousands have been evacuated from their communities. James said Kinew's comments dismissed the health impacts the wildfire smoke has on neighbouring states. The Republican said the smoke amounts to a public health emergency 'and it is actively damaging the U.S.-Canada relationship.' The increasing pressure from Republicans comes as the bilateral relationship between the two countries remains tense. On Aug. 1, U.S. President Donald Trump boosted tariffs on Canadian goods to 35 per cent after a new security and economic agreement failed to materialize ahead of the president's deadline. The duties do not apply to goods compliant with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade. Canada is also being hit with Trump's steel, aluminum, copper and automobile tariffs. Natural Resources Canada said in July that wildfires are a global problem caused by the effects of climate change, including prolonged drought. Story continues below advertisement Trump has called climate change a 'hoax' and his administration dismissed all of the scientists working on a flagship climate report. Many Republicans point to the 2023 Canadian wildfire season, which was the worst on record. Fires blazing across the country that year sent thick smoke into the United States and even across the Atlantic Ocean to northern Europe. Canadian officials have warned that this year's wildfire season could shape up to be the second-worst on record. The Canadian Interagency Forest Fire Centre, a non-profit owned and operated by federal, provincial and territorial wildland fire management agencies, said on its website that 744 active wildfires were burning across Canada on Wednesday. U.S. Ambassador to Canada Pete Hoekstra said Tuesday that Canada's recent wildfires offer a 'stark reminder' of the countries' shared challenges. In a statement shared by the U.S. Embassy, Hoekstra said the United States and Canada have 'a long history' of supporting one another in times of crisis. 'Canadians stood with us during the tragic California wildfires earlier this year, and we are committed to standing with Canada now,' he said. Wildfires burning across multiple American states, including California, have been sending smoke into nearby communities.