Mayors write to Yorkshire Water with ‘serious concerns' over undisclosed CEO pay
The Government recently barred six water companies from paying bonuses to executives because of failings over pollution as part of its response to public fury at widespread sewage spills, crumbling infrastructure and rising bills.
Yorkshire Water, which was recently given the green light to raise average annual household bills by 41% to £607 by 2030, was among six companies banned from paying bonuses.
Yorkshire's four metro mayors – Tracy Brabin, Luke Campbell, Oliver Coppard and David Skaith – alongside the co-chairs of the Yorkshire Leaders Board asked chair of Yorkshire Water Vanda Murray for an urgent meeting to discuss the undisclosed payments to Ms Shaw, first reported by the Guardian.
In the letter, they called payments 'wholly unacceptable' and demanded 'clear answers' on behalf of Yorkshire's customers and communities.
'As elected representatives of Yorkshire's communities, we share the public dismay at these revelations,' they wrote.
'The additional payments to Ms Shaw must be viewed against Yorkshire Water's consistent pattern of poor performance.'
The mayors said the concealment of payments to Ms Shaw from annual reports and her own public statements that she would decline bonuses demonstrate a 'fundamental breach of trust'.
'This contradiction between public statements and hidden payments is especially galling for customers who are being asked to pay more,' they wrote.
The letter went on to cite the company being ordered pay £40 million for excessive sewage spills, while not one river in the region is considered to be in good overall health by regulators – and customers are set to see bills hiked.
At a time when Yorkshire Water customers are facing a 41% increase in bills alongside environmental failures and customer service shortcomings, the news that the Chief Executive has received additional payments is wholly unacceptable.
As Yorkshire mayors, we have requested an… pic.twitter.com/Kzt0dquyL7
— Tracy Brabin, Mayor of West Yorkshire (@MayorOfWY) August 8, 2025
Last week, Yorkshire Water was also fined £865,000 at Sheffield Magistrates' Court for illegally discharging chlorinated water resulting in the death of local wildlife.
Elsewhere, the mayors told Ms Murray that they wish to discuss the board's strategy for rebuilding public trust and its commitment to transparent reporting of all executive pay.
'We believe Yorkshire Water's customers and communities deserve clear answers about how their money is being spent, why executive rewards continue to rise, and how this aligns with the sharp increase in bills and declining service standards,' they wrote.
On the payments, Yorkshire Water said it complied fully with Ofwat's requirements on pay disclosure and bonus payments – and that the Kelda Holdings payments were paid by shareholders rather than bill payers.
A spokesperson said: 'We understand the strength of feeling on the items outlined in their letter and welcome the opportunity to meet with the local mayors and council leaders to discuss these in more detail.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
10 hours ago
- BBC News
Scrutiny panel questions extra Jersey Battle of Flowers grant
A scrutiny panel said it wanted to "better understand" why an extra £121,000 grant was given for the recent Battle of Flowers Chief Minister and Economic Development Minister signed off the additional grant at the beginning of August, saying the decision would allow groups to put on a scaled-down parade and future letter also said the £90,000 top-up grant, which was given out in 2024, was not required to be recovered - it saw an overspend of more than £150, of the Panel Deputy Montfort Tadier said the event had been a highlight in Jersey's calendar but there were "questions around process and due governance" it wanted the ministers to explain. He said: "The panel understands that the decision to award these grants may not fully comply with the Public Finances Manual. "If this is the case, then it is important that the reasoning behind these decisions is outlined in a clear and transparent way."Mr Tadier said it was "important that all organisations applying for and receiving grants feel that they are on a level playing field".The panel said it understood funding awarded would be deducted from future grants, but requested more details about how the arrangement would be managed to "avoid placing undue financial strain on the event's organisers". It also requested Deputy Kirsten Morel outline any arrangements which had been made regarding the 2024 top-up grant.
Daily Mail
11 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Government hires advisers to plan for potential Thames Water collapse
Ministers have reportedly appointed advisers to prepare for the potential collapse of Thames Water. Environment Secretary Steve Reed has lined up FTI Consulting to advise on contingency plans which would involve Thames Water being placed into a special administration regime, according to Sky News. The embattled water company has been at threat of both nationalisation and collapse as its investors and creditors scramble to keep the group afloat. It has been in talks with its largest group of creditors and the water regulator Ofwat over a rescue plan that would see lenders inject £5billion of new capital. However, its creditors warned it has a 'very short and closing window' to ensure its survival as a private business. If the utility giant were to be placed into a special administration regime, customers would continue to receive water and sewage services, but it would be paid for by taxpayers. It can only be used once a company becomes insolvent, can no longer fulfil its statutory duties, or breaches an enforcement order, according to Sky News. Last month, Thames Water reported a £1.65 billion pre-tax loss in 2024, which has driven up net debts to around £16.8billion, up from just over £15.2billion last year.
Sky News
17 hours ago
- Sky News
Thames Water crisis: Ministers line up administrator for utility giant
Why you can trust Sky News Ministers have lined up insolvency practitioners to prepare for the potential collapse of Thames Water, Britain's biggest water utility. Sky News can exclusively reveal that Steve Reed, the environment secretary, has signed off the appointment of FTI Consulting to advise on contingency plans for Thames Water to be placed into a Special Administration regime (SAR). Sources said on Tuesday that the advisory role established FTI Consulting as the frontrunner to act as the company's administrator if it fails to secure a private sector bailout - although approval of such an appointment would be decided in court. Thames Water, its largest group of creditors and Ofwat, the industry regulator, have been locked in talks for months about a deal that would see its lenders injecting about £5bn of new capital and writing off roughly £12bn of value across its capital structure. The discussions are said to be progressing constructively, although they appear to rely in part on the prospect of the company being granted forbearance on hundreds of millions of pounds of regulatory fines. "The company remains financially stable, but we have stepped up our preparations and stand ready for all eventualities, including applying for a Special Administration Regime if that were to become necessary." Insiders stressed that FTI Consulting's engagement by the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) did not signal that Thames Water was about to collapse into insolvency proceedings. A SAR would ensure that customers would continue to receive water and sewage services if Thames Water collapsed, while putting taxpayers on the hook for billions of pounds in bailout costs - a scenario the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, is keen to avoid at a time when the public finances are already severely constrained. The SAR process can only be instigated in the event that a company becomes insolvent, can no longer fulfil its statutory duties or breaches an enforcement order, according to insiders. Mr Reed has repeatedly stressed the government's desire to avoid taking Thames Water into temporary public ownership, but that it was ready to deal with "all eventualities". "Thames Water must meet its statutory and regulatory obligations to its customers and to the environment--it is only right that the company is subject to the same consequences as any other water company. The company remains financially stable, but we have stepped up our preparations and stand ready for all eventualities," he told the House of Commons in June. Thames Water, which has about 16m customers, serves about a quarter of the UK's population. It is drowning under close to £20bn of debt, and was previously owned by Macquarie, the Australian infrastructure and banking behemoth. Its most recent consortium of shareholders, which included the Universities Superannuation Scheme and an Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth fund, have written off the value of their investments in the company. The government's SAR process has only been tested once before, when the energy retailer Bulb failed in 2021. Bulb was ultimately sold to Octopus Energy with the taxpayer funding used to save and run the company since having been repaid. Thames Water is racing to secure a rescue plan involving funds such as Elliott Management and Silver Point Capital, with a deadline of late October to appeal to the Competition and Markets Authority against Ofwat's final determination on its next five-year spending plan. Ofwat has ruled that Thames Water can spend £20.5bn during the period from 2026, with the company arguing that it requires a further sum of approximately £4bn. Mike McTighe, a veteran corporate troubleshooter who chairs BT Group's Openreach division, has been parachuted in to work with the funds. The company said in its accounts last month that there was "material uncertainty" over whether it could be solvently recapitalised. Earlier this year, Thames Water was fined a record £123m over sewage leaks and the payment of dividends, with Ofwat lambasting the company over its performance and governance. In recent weeks, Thames Water has been engulfed in a row over the legitimacy of bonuses paid to chief executive Chris Weston and other bosses, even as it attempts to secure its survival. Under new laws, Thames Water is among half a dozen water companies which have been barred from paying bonuses this year because of their poor environmental records. The creditor group was effectively left as the sole bidder for Thames Water after the private equity firm KKR withdrew from the process, citing political and reputational risks. The Hong Kong-based investor CK Infrastructure Holdings (CKI), which already owns Northumbrian Water, has sought to re-engage in talks about a rescue deal but has gained little traction in doing so. News of FTI Consulting's appointment also comes on the same day as a "nationally significant" water shortfall was declared across swathes of the country. Last week, Sky News revealed that David Black, the Ofwat chief executive, was to step down following the publication of a government-commissioned review which recommended the regulator's abolition. He has been replaced by Chris Walters, another Ofwat executive, on an interim basis.
