logo
SC seeks Karnataka govt reply on plea seeking release of 'Thug life' film in state

SC seeks Karnataka govt reply on plea seeking release of 'Thug life' film in state

Hindustan Times2 days ago

New Delhi, The Supreme Court on Friday sought the Karnataka government's response on a plea seeking protection against alleged threats over the screening of Kamal Haasan's film "Thug Life" in Karnataka theatres.
A bench of justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Manmohan issued notice on M Mahesh Reddy's plea challenging the ban on the screening of the Tamil feature film, starring Haasan and directed by Mani Ratnam, in Karnataka.
It listed the matter for hearing next Tuesday.
Reddy in his plea filed through advocate A Velan contended that despite the movie being granted certification by the Central Board of Film Certification , the Karnataka government has allegedly prevented its theatrical release through oral instructions and police interference, without issuing any official prohibitory order or any registration of an FIR qua the same.
Velan argued that such actions by the state amount to an unconstitutional restriction on free speech and expression under Article 19 of the Constitution.
The bench recorded his argument that the so-called ban under threat of violence stems not from any lawful process but from a deliberate campaign of terror, including explicit threat of arson against cinema halls, incitement of large-scale violence targeting linguistic minorities.
The plea said, "This reign of intimidation is a direct, flagrant violation of the Fundamental Rights to Freedom of Speech and Expression ) and to Practice any Profession ). More seriously, it is a calculated attack on the secular fabric and public order of the State."
It added that the Karnataka government through its authorities concerned has become a silent party to this undermining of the Constitution and its failure to use the full force of the law against those openly issuing threats of death, arson, and communal warfare is not just negligence; it is a surrender that effectively hands control to violent non-state actors.
"This constitutes a profound and flagrant failure of the law and order machinery in the state, signifying a dangerous weakening of the constitutional machinery's ability to function and protect its citizens," it said.
The plea sought direction declaring that the de facto ban on the screening of "Thug Life" in Karnataka, is illegal, unconstitutional, and void ab initio, being violative of Articles 14, 19, 19 and 21 of the Constitution.
It also sought directions to the authorities including police to ensure the safe, secure, and unimpeded exhibition of the film in all cinema theatres and multiplexes across Karnataka , that are willing to screen it, and to take all necessary steps to prevent any recurrence of such intimidation for this or any other lawfully certified film.
The plea further sought direction to initiate and pursue with utmost diligence, accountability, and transparency, appropriate legal proceedings, including criminal prosecution, against all individuals and office bearers of organizations who have issued threats of violence, arson, or incited communal hatred/violence in connection with the release of the film.
On June 9, the top court refused to grant an urgent hearing on a plea filed by a theatre association seeking protection against alleged threats over the screening of the film in Karnataka theatres.
It had asked the theatre association from Karnataka to approach the Karnataka High Court instead.
"Thug Life" released in cinema halls across the country on June 5.
The Tamil movie, which reunites Haasan with filmmaker Mani Ratnam after 1987's "Nayakan", could not be released in Karnataka after the 70-year-old's comments about Kannada language sparked a major controversy.
It was also released in Telugu, Hindi and Malayalam.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Amit Shah in Lucknow: Under Yogi govt, goons no longer rule; fir to verdict within 3 years
Amit Shah in Lucknow: Under Yogi govt, goons no longer rule; fir to verdict within 3 years

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Amit Shah in Lucknow: Under Yogi govt, goons no longer rule; fir to verdict within 3 years

LUCKNOW: In address to 60,244 newly appointed police constables at the Defence Expo Ground in Vrindavan Yojna area of Lucknow, Home Minister Amit Shah on Saturday asserted that under the leadership of Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath , Uttar Pradesh has shed its legacy of lawlessness and entered an era of law and order. Speaking at what he termed a 'historic ceremony' for Uttar Pradesh Police, Shah said, 'Goons no longer dictate terms in the state. The rule of law has been established. It is now our mission that within the next five years, we will create a system where an FIR is followed by a verdict from the Supreme Court within three years.' Shah, flanked by CM Yogi Adityanath, Deputy CMs Keshav Prasad Maurya and Brajesh Pathak, and BJP state president Bhupendra Chaudhary, handed over appointment letters to 15 recruits, while thousands of others received theirs at the venue. The recruits, 60,244 in total, were brought to Lucknow in over 1,300 buses from all corners of the state. The Home Minister highlighted the transparency of the recruitment process. 'No bribes, no recommendations, no caste-based favoritism — each of you was selected purely on merit from 48 lakh applications,' he declared, addressing the recruits directly. He also lauded the state's decision to reserve 20% of posts for women, noting that over 12,000 of the recruits were female. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Scam Exposed: What They Won't Tell You about zero trust! Expertinspector Undo 'When I met some of the young women today, their confidence and determination were written all over their faces,' he said. Shah said that Uttar Pradesh now boasts the largest police force in India and is being equipped with modern infrastructure, including command and control centers, PCR vans, surveillance units, and AI-based policing tools. He urged the new recruits to uphold the three tenets of modern policing: security, service, and sensitivity. Referring to the broader vision of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Shah said the country is progressing toward becoming the third-largest economy by 2027. 'Under Modi's leadership, we have already risen from the 11th to the 4th position. And by 2047, when we celebrate 100 years of independence, India will be number one globally — and UP will be a key contributor to that journey.' The Home Minister also reiterated the Centre's resolve to eradicate Naxalism by March 31, 2026. 'Where there were once 11 Naxal-affected states, today it's down to just three districts,' he said. Addressing issues of national security, Shah pointed to surgical strikes and counter-terror operations carried out under Modi's leadership. 'The world now knows that Indian blood cannot be spilled without consequence,' he said. He concluded by invoking the spirit of national duty: 'You are not just joining the police force — you are becoming guardians of India's progress, discipline, and justice. Let your service be guided by justice and integrity.' Follow more information on Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad here . Get real-time live updates on rescue operations and check full list of passengers onboard AI 171 .

'RJD has non-constitutional ideology, insults Babasaheb Ambedkar': BJP
'RJD has non-constitutional ideology, insults Babasaheb Ambedkar': BJP

India Gazette

time2 hours ago

  • India Gazette

'RJD has non-constitutional ideology, insults Babasaheb Ambedkar': BJP

New Delhi [India], June 15 (ANI): Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) national spokesperson Shahzad Poonawalla on Sunday accused the RJD of repeatedly insulting Babasaheb Ambedkar and said that the party has a 'non-constitutional ideology'. On RJD chief Lalu Yadav, Poonawala told ANI, 'The insult to Scheduled Castes and Dalits represents the real identity of the RJD and its allies, Congress and the INDI Alliance. The way BR Ambedkar's picture was placed under the feet of Lalu Prasad Yadav and the indecency shown with the image of Ambedkar, this is the original character of RJD' The BJP spokesperson further alleged that the rules of the Constitution are 'not important' for the party. 'RJD has a non-constitutional ideology. For them, the son is very important, not Baba Saheb. 'Jungle raj' and 'Pariwar raj' are important for RJD, but not the rules of the constitution. Again and again, the RJD insults Babasaheb Ambedkar and the people of Scheduled Caste communities...'. Meanwhile, on Saturday, Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader Tejashwi Yadav launched a scathing attack on the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), accusing its leaders of having no connection with BR Ambedkar, the Constitution, or reservation policies, while defending his father and RJD supremo Lalu Prasad Yadav. 'These (BJP) people have nothing to do with Baba Saheb, the Constitution, and Reservation. Lalu Yadav has installed many statues of Baba Saheb Ambedkar in Bihar. We are the people who believe in Ambedkar's ideology. The BJP only spread lies,' Tejashwi asserted. 'Lalu Yadav works for 10 hours at the age of 78 and meets people. He is ill, but still they accuse him of such things,' he further highlighted. Speaking to ANI, Bihar Deputy CM Samrat Choudhary said, 'It is clearly visible that Lalu Prasad Yadav is trying to become a king and murder democracy. The way Babasaheb Ambedkar's photo was insulted clearly indicates that Lalu Yadav is trying to insult Babasaheb Ambedkar.' Commenting on the sword used during the cake-cutting, Choudhary added, 'This is criminal mentality. Today, he cut his cake with a sword; when he comes into power, he will cut it with an AK-47.' The controversy erupted after Lalu Prasad Yadav was seen cutting his 78th birthday cake with a sword, drawing criticism from BJP leaders who claimed it symbolised disregard for democratic values and Ambedkar's legacy. These political developments come while the Assembly Elections are expected in Bihar later this year. However, the Election Commission has not announced the official dates. (ANI)

Despite SC nod, HCs not keen on appointing retired judges to tackle backlog
Despite SC nod, HCs not keen on appointing retired judges to tackle backlog

Hindustan Times

time2 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Despite SC nod, HCs not keen on appointing retired judges to tackle backlog

New Delhi, Despite the Supreme Court clearing the idea nearly five months ago, the high courts seem not to be keen on appointing ad-hoc judges to tackle pending criminal cases, details available with the government showed. According to people aware of the procedure to appoint Supreme Court and high court judges, none of the high court collegiums have so far recommended names of retired judges to be appointed as ad-hoc judges. There are 25 high courts in the country. Till June 11, no high court collegiums sent any such proposal to the Union Law Ministry. Considering a backlog of over 18 lakh criminal cases, the Supreme Court on January 30 allowed the high courts to appoint ad-hoc judges, not exceeding 10 per cent of the court's total sanctioned strength. Article 224A of the Constitution allows the appointment of retired judges as ad-hoc judges in high courts to help deal with pendency. According to the laid down procedure, the respective high court collegiums send recommendations or names of candidates to be appointed as HC judges to the Department of Justice in the law ministry. The department then adds inputs and details of the candidates before forwarding the same to the Supreme Court Collegium. The SC Collegium then takes a final call and recommends to the government to appoint the selected persons as judges. The president signs the 'warrant of appointment' of the newly-appointed judge. The procedure to appoint ad-hoc judges will be the same except that the president will not sign the warrant of appointment. But the assent of the president will be sought for appointing ad-hoc judges. Except in one case, there is no precedence of appointing retired judges as ad-hoc HC judges, officials had earlier pointed out. In a judgement dated April 20, 2021, on the appointment of ad-hoc judges in the high courts, the top court imposed certain conditions. However, later a special Supreme Court bench comprising then Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Justices B R Gavai and Surya Kant relaxed certain conditions and kept some in abeyance. The verdict, which was authored by former chief justice S A Bobde, directed retired high court judges to be appointed as ad-hoc ones for a period of two to three years to clear the backlog. While one condition said that ad-hoc judges cannot be appointed if a high court was working with 80 per cent of its sanctioned strength, the other said ad-hoc judges could sit separately on benches to deal with cases. Relaxing the conditions, the court said the requirement that vacancies should not be more than 20 per cent of the sanctioned strength for the time being shall be kept in abeyance. The bench also said each high court should keep the appointment to two to five ad-hoc judges and not exceed 10 per cent of the total sanctioned strength. "The ad-hoc judges will sit in a bench presided over by a sitting judge of the high court and decide pending criminal appeals," the apex court's order said. The rarely used Article 224A of the Constitution deals with the appointment of ad-hoc judges in high courts. "The chief justice of a high court for any state may at any time, with the previous consent of the president, request any person who has held the office of a judge of that court or of any other high court to sit and act as a judge of the high court for that state," it says.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store