Spain's leader sticks by decision to break with Nato on defence spending
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez walked away from this week's Nato summit with an opt-out from spending more on defence as well as fresh threats of tariffs from US President Donald Trump.
On Thursday, the progressive Spanish leader stuck by his decision to break with Nato allies and responded to Mr Trump's comments by pointing out that the European Commission — and not Spain — was who decided the bloc's trade policy.
Advertisement
Spain's Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez (Omar Havana/AP)
'What is clear is that trade policy is a policy directed from here, from Brussels,' Mr Sanchez said. 'Spain is an open country. It is a country that is friendly to its friends, and we consider the United States a friend of Spain.'
At the military alliance's summit on Wednesday, members agreed to raise their defence spending to 5% of GDP. But Mr Sanchez secured a last-minute exemption, saying that Spain will only spend up to 2.1%, which he called 'sufficient and realistic'.
Mr Trump criticised the country after the summit, saying Spain wanted 'a little bit of a free ride,' and that it would 'have to pay it back to us on trade' through higher tariffs.
How Mr Sanchez's gamble could play out was up for debate on Thursday.
Advertisement
'It is not always easy to interpret exactly what Mr Trump means,' Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever told reporters at an EU summit.
'How he wants to impose import tariffs on Spain separately is a mystery to everyone. Could this perhaps concern specific products from Spain? We will have to wait and see.'
Spain's move on the international stage comes at a complex moment for Mr Sanchez at home as corruption cases involving his inner circle have ensnared his Socialist party and resulted in louder calls — even from some left-wing allies — to announce early elections. So far, Mr Sanchez has refused.
'To Trump's theatre, Mr Sanchez responds with something similar,' said Montserrat Nebrera, political analyst and professor of constitutional law at the International University of Catalonia. 'Domestic problems are piling up, and this resistance to meeting the arbitrary 5% target also seeks to wink at his partners most critical of defence spending.'
Advertisement
Spain is Nato's lowest spender, with just 1.28% of its GDP spent on defence (Omar Havana/AP)
Spain was Nato's lowest spender last year, according to the alliance's estimates, spending around 1.28% of its GDP on defence expenditure.
In April, Mr Sanchez announced that the country would reach 2% this year, for which he was criticised by some left-wing allies.
On Thursday, Antonio Garamendi, president of the Spanish Confederation of Business Organisations, criticised Mr Sanchez for the spending opt-out.
'We have to stick with our allies and not going along with the other Europeans is an error, and even more so if that increases the chance we will be punished,' Mr Garamendi said.
Advertisement
While Spain is under the umbrella of the European Union, which negotiates trade deals on behalf of all 27 member countries, it could still be targeted by tariffs that hit its most vulnerable industries, Mr Garamendi said.
He specifically pointed to Spanish steel, cars and olive oil sectors.
'There are industries that can be impacted, and that has to concern us,' he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
39 minutes ago
- Reuters
US House committee subpoenas Harvard over tuition costs
June 26 (Reuters) - The U.S. House Judiciary Committee sent a subpoena to Harvard University on Thursday seeking documents and communications for its probe into tuition costs and financial aid for Ivy League students. A letter to Harvard President Alan Garber, signed by committee chairman Jim Jordan and U.S. Representative Scott Fitzgerald, both Republicans, described Harvard's response to previous requests for documents as inadequate and said the committee needs the documents "to fulfill its oversight and legislative responsibilities." A spokesperson for Harvard said in a statement: "We are disappointed that the Committee has chosen to issue a subpoena and believe it is unwarranted, unfair and unnecessary." It added: "There is no basis for an allegation of collusion in Harvard's setting of tuition and financial aid." The investigation into tuition is part of a larger fight between Harvard and the White House and Congress, including over cuts to federal funding and efforts to block foreign students from attending the university. President Donald Trump has said he is trying to force change at Harvard - and other top-level universities across the U.S. - because in his view they have been captured by leftist "woke" thought and become bastions of antisemitism. The subpoena comes as part of an investigation by the Republican-controlled U.S. House Judiciary Committee into whether Harvard and other Ivy League schools broke antitrust laws by raising tuition costs. "We are concerned that Ivy League member institutions appear to be collectively raising tuition prices while engaging in perfect price discrimination by offering selective financial aid packages to maximize profits," the letter to Harvard's Garber said. U.S. Representative Jamie Raskin, a Democratic member of the Judiciary Committee, called the investigation "plainly ridiculous" and "based on pathetically weak allegations." The Harvard spokesperson said the school has produced thousands of pages of documents on its tuition-setting process and financial aid. While the Judiciary Committee said it had received hundreds of requested documents, it added that some of them contained publicly available facts and lacked specific information that was desired.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Pedro Sánchez ‘has no power' and should quit, says Spanish ex-PM
The Spanish prime minister should step down amid growing allegations of corruption against his government, one of his predecessors said on Thursday. Felipe González, who played a key role in Spain's transition to democracy in the 1980s, said that Pedro Sánchez 'no longer has a political life'. González, 83, who was prime minister from 1982 to 1996, added: 'Sánchez should call elections and make way for another Socialist candidate. He has a level of authority unmatched by any prime minister … he has no power at all.' Felipe González played a key role in Spain's transition to democracy in the 1980s PATRICIA DE MELO MOREIRA/AFP He singled out Sánchez's concessions to his ally Bildu — a Basque separatist party that was formerly the political wing of the defunct terrorist group ETA — and an amnesty given to Catalan separatists who took part in an illegal, failed independence attempt in 2017. To retain power after inconclusive elections in 2023, Sánchez agreed to the amnesty in return for the seven votes of the right-wing Junts party of the Catalan separatist leader Carles Puigdemont, a fugitive from Spanish justice.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Nato flatters ‘Daddy' Trump but Ukraine can't be forgotten
Mark Rutte, the Nato secretary-general, paid gushing compliments to President Trump PIROSCHKA VAN DE WOUW/POOL/AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES T he sycophancy was as extraordinary as it was effective. The gushing compliments paid by Mark Rutte, the Nato secretary-general, to President Trump for his 'big win' in securing agreement — almost unanimous — at the Nato summit to raise the defence spending of each member to 5 per cent of GDP raised smiles, eyebrows and high hopes that America would not, after all, turn its back on its allies. Hailing him as the 'Daddy', the former Dutch prime minister told Mr Trump that he had achieved something 'no American president in decades could get done'. A glowing Mr Trump left the Hague noting that 'these people' really loved their countries and that America was there to protect them. The 'big win' was that Nato explicitly recognised the threat from Russia and that Europe was ready to pay a larger — and long overdue — share of the huge sums now needed to increase its defence and resilience. Mr Trump, basking in the adulation he received for the US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, seemed to put behind him past denunciations of European freeloading and all talk of turning his back on Nato. That will be a huge relief to nervous European leaders — as least as long as the mercurial president does not change his mind. And it will thwart any hopes in Moscow of widening a transatlantic split. • Donald Trump 'sees Vladimir Putin as obstacle to Ukraine peace talks' There was a price to pay, however. There was no time to discuss other issues, such as a common procurement policy, regional stability or any offer of further reassurance to frontline states such as the Baltics. Most regrettable of all, the summit did not discuss the urgent need for continuing military support for Ukraine. Nor, for the first time since the Russian invasion more than three years ago, did the final communiqué condemn Vladimir Putin's aggression. This was a serious omission. Russia's steady advance along much of the front line, coupled with the relentless bombardment of Ukrainian civilians, underlines the determination of the Kremlin to seize control of all Ukraine and the utter cynicism of President Putin in his talks with Mr Trump and his emissaries in suggesting he might contemplate a ceasefire and negotiations. He will not. And at last the US president seems disabused of his naive fantasy that he can win over Mr Putin by his indulgence of the Russian leader. Russia's dictator, he said, was 'misguided' — a notable presidential understatement. At least this time Mr Trump made space for private talks with President Zelensky, with some words of encouragement that avoided the earlier rancour. Mr Trump still shows no sign of being ready to increase military pressure on Russia or give Ukraine the arms it needs to prevail. But there may be a way forward in suggestions that the United States could sell Kyiv the Patriot air defence missiles so desperately needed — a transactional deal that would suit Mr Trump's outlook. For that, Ukraine just needs money. Other weapons, notably drones, it is manufacturing itself in large quantities. Nato, apart from Spain, has rediscovered the need for collective security and mutual obligations. Madrid, disgracefully, thinks it can remain an outlier (even Hungary is ready to pay 5 per cent). Domestic politics is the reason, as well as Spain's distance from the front line. This may change. More than ever, Nato needs unity.
