Most of world's colourful corals go white in record-breaking bleaching
The "most intense global coral bleaching event ever" has so far struck 84 per cent of the world's reefs and is ongoing, the International Coral Reef Initiative (ICRI) — a global partnership between nations and non-governmental and international organizations focused on sustainable management of coral reefs — reported on Wednesday.
The new figure is far worse than previous events that hit 21 to 68 per cent of reefs.
But scientists say the reefs and the corals are not all dead yet and could still bounce back if people take the right steps, including conservation and cutting greenhouse gas emissions.
Corals are small marine animals that live in colonies with colourful symbiotic algae that give them their rainbow hues and supply them with most of their food. But when the water gets too warm for too long, the algae release toxic compounds, and the corals expel them, leaving behind a white skeleton — causing "bleaching."
The current global bleaching event, the fourth since 1998, started in January 2023, hitting different parts of the world at different times over the past two years, amid record-breaking ocean temperatures.
It was officially declared a global coral bleaching event in April 2024. Last year, the Earth's hottest on record, the oceans also broke a record, hitting an average annual sea surface temperature of 20.87 C away from the poles.
WATCH | Coral reefs experiencing mass bleaching event:
No end in sight?
The fact that it's ongoing two years later takes the world's reefs "into uncharted waters," Britta Schaffelke, a researcher with the Australian Institute of Marine Science and co-ordinator of the Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network, said in a statement accompanying ICRI's news release.
"In the past, many coral reefs around the world were able to recover from severe events like bleaching or storms," she said.
But the length of this bleaching event and the fact that it is getting longer by the day worries coral scientists.
Mark Eakin, corresponding secretary of the International Coral Reef Society and retired chief of the Coral Reef Watch program of the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, said it's an open question when — and even if — the current bleaching will end.
"We may never see the heat stress that causes bleaching dropping below the threshold that triggers a global event," he told The Associated Press.
WATCH | Coral reefs in Florida are hurting, but this may be the way to save them:
Valeria Pizarro, a researcher with the non-profit Perry Institute for Marine Science who studies corals in the Caribbean, said bleaching used to sometimes happen at the end of summer, when the waters are at their warmest.
But the current event started in her region in July, and temperatures are already 30 C to 32 C, when they're usually 28 C at this time of year.
It has also damaged even very common species, she said, adding, "That is shocking."
Nicola Smith, an assistant professor of biology at Montreal's Concordia University who also studies coral reefs in the Caribbean, noted that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has projected that coral reefs will decline 70 to 90 per cent if the global temperature warms to 1.5 C above pre-industrial temperatures.
"We're seeing it play out before our eyes," she said. "This is what it's going to look like, not just in summer during bleaching, but year-round."
Smith said the loss of coral reefs could harm many fish and other marine creatures.
A report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change projected that if the world warms 1.5 C, there will be a 70 to 90 per cent decline in coral reefs. (CBC)
"They provide literally thousands of other species with habitat as well as food, as well as shelter and sites for reproduction."
The ICRI said not only does a third of marine life rely on coral reefs, but also a billion people — both directly and indirectly — for things like food, tourism and protection from storms. It estimates they contribute $10 trillion to the global economy.
Not dead yet
Still, the ICRI thinks corals can still survive this century if people take conservation measures and cut greenhouse gas emissions to slow ocean warming. And other scientists say despite the grim news, corals can often withstand and bounce back from bleaching.
Melanie McField, founder and director of the Florida-based non-profit Healthy Reefs for Healthy People, said even without their food-supplying symbiotic algae, corals starve to death very slowly.
"It ... takes months usually," she said. "They're kind of hanging on. Part of it is alive, it's partly dead."
And even if the coral dies, other reef organisms such as sponges and crusty, pink coralline algae live on.
WATCH | Our oceans are warming. What does that mean for the ecosystem?:
"The Australians call it living dead. So you've still got a reef, you've still got some fish around," McField said. "Everything is kind of brown and grey."
But the reef is vulnerable at that point, as sponges, worms and other creatures eat into the coral that is no longer rebuilding itself.
"And then when that hurricane comes, it turns into rubble," McField said.
She said that can be scary for people living on coasts protected by the coral reefs: "It's life and security."
WATCH | Reef Rescue: Coral Atlas:
The ICRI estimates that to save coral reefs and the people who rely on them, spending on solutions needs to increase sevenfold. Things that could help include selective breeding, coral restoration, reducing pollution and stopping overfishing.
McField said that so far, a lot of those strategies are "very small little efforts at this time" and more of them are needed.
Tiny fish hover over bleached corals in Ningaloo, Western Australia, in a February 2025 photo. Sponges and other marine creatures may still remain, and the corals may not be dead yet. (Daniel Nicholson/Ocean Image Bank)
But keeping the global temperature as little above 1.5 C as possible is "necessary to give these coral conservation measures a chance to work," the ICRI said.
McField agrees. "You can have all these efforts at 1.5 or 1.6 or 1.7, but probably not 2.... Don't go above that [or] I'm not sure we're going to be able to save them."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
X-ray telescope finds something unexpected with the 'heartbeat black hole'
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. A black hole's bizarre "heartbeat" is forcing astronomers to reconsider how these cosmic heavyweights behave. Observations of IGR J17091-3624 — a black hole in a binary system roughly 28,000 light-years from Earth — were taken using NASA's Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE). Nicknamed the "heartbeat" black hole for its dramatic, rhythmic pulses in brightness, the object feeds on matter stolen from a companion star. The black hole's pulses are the result of fluctuations in the superheated plasma swirling around it (also known as the accretion disk) and the inner region called the corona, which can reach extreme temperatures and radiate incredibly luminous X-rays. IXPE measured the polarization — the direction of the black hole's X-rays — to determine the alignment of its vibrations. The space probe recorded a surprising 9.1% polarization degree, which is much higher than theoretical models predicted, according to a statement from NASA. Studying the polarization degree offers insight about the geometry of the black hole and motion of matter nearby. Typically, such high readings suggest the corona is viewed almost edge-on, where its structure appears highly ordered. However, other observations of IGR J17091-3624 don't seem to match that picture, leaving scientists with a puzzling contradiction. Astronomers tested two different models to help explain the recent observations of IGR J17091-3624. One posits that powerful winds are being launched from the accretion disk, scattering X-rays into a more polarized state even without an edge-on perspective. The other suggests the corona itself is moving outward at extraordinary speeds, causing relativistic effects that amplify polarization. Simulations of both scenarios reproduce the IXPE results, but each model challenges long-held assumptions about black hole environments. "These winds are one of the most critical missing pieces to understand the growth of all types of black holes," Maxime Parra, co-author of the study from Ehime University in Matsuyama, Japan, said in the statement. "Astronomers could expect future observations to yield even more surprising polarization degree measurements." Their findings were published May 27 in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
A braided stream, not a family tree: How new evidence upends our understanding of how humans evolved
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Our species is the last living member of the human family tree. But just 40,000 years ago, Neanderthals walked the Earth, and hundreds of thousands of years before then, our ancestors overlapped with many other hominins — two-legged primate species. This raises several questions: Which other populations and species did our ancestors mate with, and when? And how did this ancient mingling shape who we are today? "Everywhere we've got hominins in the same place, we should assume there's the potential that there's a genetic interaction," Adam Van Arsdale, a biological anthropologist at Wellesley College in Massachusetts, told Live Science. In other words, different hominin species were having sex — and babies — together. This means our evolutionary family tree is tangled, with still-unknown relatives possibly hiding in the branches. Emerging DNA evidence suggests this "genetic interaction" resulted in the diversity and new combinations of traits that helped ancient humans — including our ancestors — thrive in different environments around the globe. "It's all about variation," Rebecca Ackermann, a biological anthropologist at the University of Cape Town in South Africa, told Live Science. "More variation in humans allows us to be more flexible as a species and, as a result, be more successful as a species because of all the diversity." Cutting-edge techniques may illuminate the crucial periods deeper in our evolutionary past that led to Homo sapiens evolving in Africa, or even shed light on periods before the Homo genus existed. That knowledge, in turn, could improve our understanding of exactly what makes us human. Related: Lucy's last day: What the iconic fossil reveals about our ancient ancestor's last hours A braided stream In the early 20th century, scientists thought there was a clear evolutionary line between our ancestors and us, with one species sequentially evolving into another and no contribution from "outside" populations, like the branches on a tree. But 21st-century advances in ancient DNA analysis techniques have revealed that our origins are more like a braided stream — an idea borrowed from geology, where shallow channels branch off and rejoin a stream like a network. "It becomes very hard when you think about things in more of a braided stream model to divide [populations] into discrete groups," Ackermann said. "There are not, by definition, any discrete groups; they have contributed to each other's evolution." Ackermann studies variation and hybridization — the exchange of genes between different groups — across the evolutionary history of hominins, to better understand how genetic and cultural exchange made us human. And she thinks hybridization both within and outside Africa played a significant role in our origins. Evidence of such hybridization has come out in a steady stream since the first Neanderthal genome was sequenced in 2010. That research program, which earned geneticist Svante Pääbo a Nobel Prize in 2022, revealed that H. sapiens and Neanderthals regularly had sex. It also led to the discovery of the Denisovans, a previously unknown population that ranged across Asia from about 200,000 to 30,000 years ago and that also had offspring with both Neanderthals and H. sapiens. "You have so much complexity that it makes no sense to say there was only one origin of sapiens. There can't be one universal model that explains literally every human on Earth." Sheela Athreya, Texas A&M University When species share genes with one another through hybridization, the process is known as introgression, and when those shared genes are beneficial to a population, it's known as adaptive introgression. Emerging from two decades of gene studies of humans and our extinct relatives is the understanding that we may be who we are thanks to a proclivity to pair off with anyone — including other species. Connecting with other groups — socially and sexually — was an important part of human evolution. "For us to survive and become human probably really depended on that," Van Arsdale said. Benefits of hybridization Since the first Neanderthal genome was sequenced, researchers have attempted to identify when and how often our H. sapiens ancestors mated with other species and groups. They've also investigated how Neanderthal and Denisovan genes affect us today. Many of these studies rely on large datasets of genomes from humans living today and tie them back to ancient DNA extracted from the bones of extinct humans and their relatives who lived tens of thousands of years ago. These analyses show that many genes that originated in now-extinct groups may confer advantages to us today. For instance, modern Tibetans have a unique gene variant for high-altitude living that they likely inherited from the Denisovans, while different versions of Neanderthal skin pigment genes may have helped some populations adapt to less-sunny climates while protecting others from UV radiation. There is also evidence that Neanderthal genes helped early members of our species adapt quickly to life in Europe. Given their long history in Europe prior to the arrival of H. sapiens, Neanderthals had built up a suite of genetic variations to deal with diseases unique to the area. H. sapiens encountered these novel diseases when they spread into areas where Neanderthals lived. But, by mating with Neanderthals, they also got genes that protected them from those viruses. Beyond specific traits that may confer advantages in humans today, these episodes of mating diversified the human gene pool, which may have helped our ancestors weather varied environments. The importance of modern genetic diversity can be illustrated with human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes, which are critical to the human immune system's ability to recognize pathogens. Humans today have a dizzying array of these genes, especially in eastern Asia. This area of the world is a "hotspot" for emerging infectious diseases due to a combination of biological, ecological and social factors, so this diversity may provide advantages in an area where new diseases are frequently emerging. When genetic diversity is lost through population isolation and decline, groups may become particularly susceptible to new infections or unable to adapt to new ecological circumstances. For instance, one theory holds that Neanderthal populations declined and eventually went extinct around 40,000 years ago because they lacked genetic diversity due to inbreeding and isolation. Related: Did we kill the Neanderthals? New research may finally answer an age-old question. Discovery of "ghost populations" Some of the newest research goes deeper into evolutionary time, identifying "ghost populations" — human groups that went extinct after contributing genes to our species. Often, archaeologists have no skeletal remains from these populations, but their echoes linger in our genome, and their existence can be gleaned by modeling how genes change over time. For instance, a "mystery population" of up to 50,000 individuals that interbred with our ancestors 300,000 years ago passed along genes that created more connections between brain cells, which may have boosted our brain functioning. The population that hybridized with H. sapiens and helped boost our brains may have been a lineage of Homo erectus. This species was once thought to have disappeared after evolving into H. sapiens in Africa, but anthropologists now think H. erectus survived in parts of Asia until 115,000 years ago. In fact, our evolutionary history may include the mating of populations that had been separated for up to a million years, Van Arsdale said. These "superarchaic" populations are increasingly being discovered as we mine our own genomes and those of our close relatives, Neanderthals and Denisovans. For instance, a genetic study published in 2020 identified a superarchaic population that separated from other human ancestors about 2 million years ago but then interbred with the ancestors of Neanderthals and Denisovans around 700,000 years ago. Experts don't know exactly what genes this superarchaic ghost population shared with our ancestors or who it was, but it may have been a lineage of H. erectus. Evolutionary blank space But there's a large, unmapped region of human evolutionary history — and it's crucial for our identity as a species. The period when H. sapiens was first evolving in Africa, and the more distant period of human evolutionary history on the continent that predates the Homo genus, remains a huge knowledge gap. That's in part because DNA preserves well in caves and other stable environments in frigid areas of the world, like those found in areas of Europe and Asia, while Africa's warmer conditions usually degrade DNA. As a result, the most ancient complete human DNA sequence from Africa is just 18,000 years old. By contrast, a skeleton discovered in northern Spain produced a full mitochondrial genome from a human relative, H. heidelbergensis, who lived more than 300,000 years ago. "Maps of human ancient DNA are overwhelmingly Eurasian data," Van Arsdale said. "And the reality is that's a marginal place in our evolutionary past. So to understand what was happening in the core of Africa would be potentially transformative." This is where current DNA technology falls short. Small hominins that walked on two legs, called australopithecines, evolved around 4.4 million years ago in Africa. And between 3 million and 2 million years ago, our genus, Homo, likely evolved from them. H. sapiens evolved around 300,000 years ago in Africa and then traveled around the world. But given the scarcity of ancient DNA from Africa, it is difficult to figure out which groups were mating and hybridizing in that vast time span, or how the fossil skeletons of human relatives from the continent were related. Related: 'It makes no sense to say there was only one origin of Homo sapiens': How the evolutionary record of Asia is complicating what we know about our species A new technique called paleoproteomics could help shed light on our African origin as a species and even reveal clues about the genetic makeup of australopithecines and other related hominins. Because genes are the instructions that code for proteins, identifying ancient proteins trapped in tooth enamel and fossil skeletons can help scientists determine some of the genes that were present in populations that lived millions of years ago. Still, it's a very new technique. To date, paleoproteomic analysis has identified only a handful of incomplete protein sequences in ancient human relatives and has thus far been able to glean only a small amount of genetic information from those. But in a landmark study published this year, researchers used proteins in tooth enamel to figure out the biological sex of a 3.5 million-year-old Australopithecus africanus individual from South Africa. And in another study, also published this year, scientists used tooth enamel from a 2 million-year-old human relative, Paranthropus robustus, to identify genetic variability among four fossil skeletons — a finding that suggests they may have been from different groups, or even different species. Paleoproteomics is still pretty limited, though. In a recent study, scientists analyzed a dozen ancient proteins found in fossils of Neanderthals, Denisovans, H. sapiens and chimpanzees. They found that these proteins could help reconstruct a family tree down to the genus level, but were not useful at the species level. Still, the fact that protein data can be used to reconstruct part of the braided stream of early humans and to identify the chromosomal sex of human relatives is encouraging, and further research along these lines is needed, experts told Live Science. Some are confident new approaches could help us unpack these early interactions. "I think we're going to learn a lot more about Africa's ancient past in the next two decades than we have so far," Van Arsdale said. Ackermann is more cautious. To really understand when, where and with whom our human ancestors mated and how that made us who we are, "we need to have a whole genome" from these ancient human relatives, she said. "With proteins, you just don't get that." Sheela Athreya, a biological anthropologist at Texas A&M University, is optimistic that we can use these new techniques to tease apart our more distant evolutionary past — and that it will yield surprises. For instance, she thinks what we now call Denisovans may actually have been H. erectus. RELATED STORIES —DNA has an expiration date. But proteins are revealing secrets about our ancient ancestors we never thought possible. —28,000-year-old Neanderthal-and-human 'Lapedo child' lived tens of thousands of years after our closest relatives went extinct —Never-before-seen cousin of Lucy might have lived at the same site as the oldest known human species, new study suggests "Absolutely in my lifetime, someone will be able to get a Homo erectus genome," Athreya said, likely from colder areas of Asia. "I'm excited. I think it'll look Denisovan." Either way, it's clear that a whole lot of mixing made us human. The Homo lineage may have first evolved in Africa, Athreya said. "But once it left Africa, you have so much complexity that it makes no sense to say there was only one origin of sapiens. There can't be one universal model that explains literally every human on Earth."
CBS News
10 hours ago
- CBS News
How certain kinds of clouds can help predict the weather
Did you know that certain kinds of clouds can help predict the weather? I love answering questions about weather and science, and I got a great question from Brent. He saw some strange looking clouds and asked, "What does this?" This is a really cool picture, and you may not often see clouds that almost seem to have tentacles like these clouds do. The first thing to remember is the weather down here at Earth's surface is much different than the weather 20 thousand to more than 30 thousand feet high! That high up the temperatures are different, the humidity is different and the winds are different. This obviously leads to different weather outcomes, like the clouds. So, the generic classification is that Brent sent us a picture of cirrus clouds. Cirrus clouds are those thin, wispy clouds. They are composed of ice crystals and are usually the sign of an approaching warm front. These cirrus clouds become a little thicker as the warm front gets closer. Obviously, the picture that Brent sent us shows thinner clouds, so the actual front is still a ways off. You will notice that these clouds sort of look like jellyfish because of the streaks behind them. Those streaks and the upward curl toward the front of the cloud classifies these as Cirrus Uncinus Clouds. The National Weather Service says in Latin this type of cloud is simply translated into "a curl or tuft of hair with a hook." These usually happen at 25 to 30 thousand feet high. OK, so that is what these clouds are, and I know I haven't yet answered what causes these, so here we go. Warm air usually arrives in the upper levels of the atmosphere before it arrives at the surface. Also with height, winds change and pick up speed. The ice crystals the winds interact with get stretched out into these curly, wispy formations. They are also known as "mare's tails." There is an old saying that comes along with these clouds, "Mares tails and mackerel scales make lofty ships carry low sails" . "Mackerel scales" are a type of mid level cloud. Both of these usually appear before a front moves into the area. The National Parks Service says neither of these cloud types will bring rain or snow themselves. They do, however, precede an approaching front by a day or two. So, you have a cool cloud that can sometimes predict the weather -- at least part of the weather.
