Intel beats shareholder lawsuit over $32 billion stock plunge
While saying she "understands plaintiffs' frustrations," U.S. District Judge Trina Thompson in San Francisco ruled on Wednesday that Intel did not wait too long to reveal a $7 billion fiscal 2023 operating loss in its foundry business.
Intel's stock price sank 26% last August 2, one day after the chipmaker announced more than 15,000 layoffs and suspended its dividend, hoping to save $10 billion in 2025.
The Santa Clara, California-based company created the foundry business in 2021 to serve customers including Amazon.com and Qualcomm, while still making chips and wafers for internal use.
In a 21-page decision, Thompson said Intel made clear that foundry results would be "obscured" until 2024, meaning its earlier financial reporting was not false and misleading.
Thompson also cited an "overarching policy consideration" that because Intel's public statements suggested a "trial-and-error" approach to the foundry business, the company could have faced risks from reporting preliminary, unaudited data.
The judge dismissed an earlier version of the lawsuit in March. Wednesday's dismissal was with prejudice, meaning the shareholders cannot sue again. A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit accusing Intel of defrauding shareholders by concealing problems in a business where it manufactured chips for outside customers, leading to a $32 billion one-day plunge in its market value.
While saying she "understands plaintiffs' frustrations," U.S. District Judge Trina Thompson in San Francisco ruled on Wednesday that Intel did not wait too long to reveal a $7 billion fiscal 2023 operating loss in its foundry business.
Intel's stock price sank 26% last August 2, one day after the chipmaker announced more than 15,000 layoffs and suspended its dividend, hoping to save $10 billion in 2025.
The Santa Clara, California-based company created the foundry business in 2021 to serve customers including Amazon.com and Qualcomm, while still making chips and wafers for internal use.
In a 21-page decision, Thompson said Intel made clear that foundry results would be "obscured" until 2024, meaning its earlier financial reporting was not false and misleading.
Thompson also cited an "overarching policy consideration" that because Intel's public statements suggested a "trial-and-error" approach to the foundry business, the company could have faced risks from reporting preliminary, unaudited data.
The judge dismissed an earlier version of the lawsuit in March. Wednesday's dismissal was with prejudice, meaning the shareholders cannot sue again. A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit accusing Intel of defrauding shareholders by concealing problems in a business where it manufactured chips for outside customers, leading to a $32 billion one-day plunge in its market value.
While saying she "understands plaintiffs' frustrations," U.S. District Judge Trina Thompson in San Francisco ruled on Wednesday that Intel did not wait too long to reveal a $7 billion fiscal 2023 operating loss in its foundry business.
Intel's stock price sank 26% last August 2, one day after the chipmaker announced more than 15,000 layoffs and suspended its dividend, hoping to save $10 billion in 2025.
The Santa Clara, California-based company created the foundry business in 2021 to serve customers including Amazon.com and Qualcomm, while still making chips and wafers for internal use.
In a 21-page decision, Thompson said Intel made clear that foundry results would be "obscured" until 2024, meaning its earlier financial reporting was not false and misleading.
Thompson also cited an "overarching policy consideration" that because Intel's public statements suggested a "trial-and-error" approach to the foundry business, the company could have faced risks from reporting preliminary, unaudited data.
The judge dismissed an earlier version of the lawsuit in March. Wednesday's dismissal was with prejudice, meaning the shareholders cannot sue again.
Intel had been accused of inflating its stock price from January 25 to August 1, 2024.
Lawyers for the shareholders did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Thursday. Intel and its lawyers did not immediately respond to similar requests.
Intel has struggled to compete with rival chipmakers such as Nvidia, Advanced Micro Devices, Samsung Electronics and Taiwan's TSMC. and benefit from growth in artificial intelligence.
The company lost $18.8 billion in 2024, its first annual loss since 1986.
The case is In re Intel Corp Securities Litigation, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 24-02683.
Lawyers for the shareholders did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Thursday. Intel and its lawyers did not immediately respond to similar requests.
Intel has struggled to compete with rival chipmakers such as Nvidia, Advanced Micro Devices, Samsung Electronics and Taiwan's TSMC. and benefit from growth in artificial intelligence.
The company lost $18.8 billion in 2024, its first annual loss since 1986.
The case is In re Intel Corp Securities Litigation, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 24-02683.
Lawyers for the shareholders did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Thursday. Intel and its lawyers did not immediately respond to similar requests.
Intel has struggled to compete with rival chipmakers such as Nvidia, Advanced Micro Devices, Samsung Electronics and Taiwan's TSMC, and benefit from growth in artificial intelligence.
The company lost $18.8 billion in 2024, its first annual loss since 1986.
The case is In re Intel Corp Securities Litigation, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 24-02683.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New YorkEditing by Nick Zieminski)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
42 minutes ago
- The Star
Trading ideas: PTT, Azam Jaya, Harvest Miracle, AmFIRST REIT, Citaglobal, Pharmaniaga, Saliran, Pentamaster, Magma
KUALA LUMPUR: Here is a recap of the announcements that made headlines in Corporate Malaysia. PTT Synergy Group Bhd has allocated RM2.3bn in capital expenditure over the next two years for its automated warehouse business, which will cover the development of four new automated warehouses. Azam Jaya Bhd's unit Pembinaan Azam Jaya Sdn Bhd has bagged a RM120.9mn contract from the Transport Ministry for upgrading works at Tawau Airport in Sabah. Harvest Miracle Capital Bhd is formally diversifying into construction materials trading after successfully dipping its toes into the segment. AmFIRST Real Estate Investment Trust has appointed Mana Mana Holdings Sdn Bhd, a subsidiary of Exsim Hospitality Bhd, as the project manager of the refurbishment and rebranding of the Summit Hotel Subang USJ in Selangor. The Sultan of Pahang, Al-Sultan Abdullah Ri'ayatuddin Al-Mustafa Billah Shah, has increased his stake in Citaglobal Bhd to 13.3% following the off-market acquisition of 15mn shares. Pharmaniaga Bhd has completed its regularisation plan, with the completion of RM520mn capital reduction that trimmed the pharmaceutical group's issued share capital to RM249.6mn, as well as wipe out its accumulated losses. Saliran Group Bhd inked a MoU with China-based Maoming Port Group Co Ltd and Malaysia's PCA Group Sdn Bhd to establish a framework for cooperation in the oil and gas sector. Pentamaster Corp Bhd 's net profit for 2QFY25 declined 41.7% YoY to RM11.6mn from RM19.9mn previously, dragged down by lower contribution from its factory automation segment and unfavourable foreign exchange losses. Magma Group Bhd former executive chairman Datuk Seri Ismail @ Farouk Abdullah has ceased to be a substantial shareholder in the hotel management and property development company, following a 0.24% stake trim to 4.9%.
New Straits Times
42 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
The risks of corporate mergers and acquisitions
Bumi Armada Bhd and Petronas-linked MISC Bhd have mutually called off their proposed merger, ahead of the lapse of their memorandum of understanding on Aug 14. In a filing, MISC said its board was of the view that the proposed merger "would not fully achieve the intended strategic objectives" following evaluation and discussions. When announcing the proposal in November, the companies said the merger "will establish a Malaysian-based sector-focused entity which leverages the combined talent pool, project development and engineering capability, and know-how" of both firms Mergers and acquisitions Corporate mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are often portrayed as strategic moves that create synergies, improve efficiency, and enhance shareholder value. In theory, synergy implies that the combined value of two companies is greater than the sum of their parts. This can result from cost savings, increased market share, improved technology, or enhanced capabilities. However, in practice, M&As are not always synergistic. While some mergers do result in measurable benefits, many fail to deliver the promised value, and some even destroy it. The risks associated with M&A are numerous and complex, affecting financial performance, organisational culture, and strategic direction. Synergy: Myth or Reality? The idea of synergy is one of the primary justifications for M&A. There are generally two types of synergies companies aim for: cost synergies and revenue synergies. Cost synergies arise from eliminating redundancies, such as overlapping departments or operations, which leads to reduced expenses. Revenue synergies come from cross-selling products, expanding into new markets, or leveraging combined R&D. While these potential benefits are attractive, achieving them is far from guaranteed. Studies have shown that more than half of all M&A deals fail to deliver expected synergies. One of the main reasons is overestimation of benefits and underestimation of costs. Executives may become overly optimistic, miscalculating the challenges of integration or the real value of the target company. This leads to overpaying for the acquisition and realising too late that the expected gains are unattainable. Key Risks of Mergers and Acquisitions Cultural Misalignment One of the most underestimated risks in M&A is cultural incompatibility. Each company has its own set of values, communication styles, management practices, and workplace norms. When these differ significantly, integrating the two can be extremely difficult. A clash in corporate cultures can lead to employee dissatisfaction, increased turnover, and reduced productivity. For example, if a risk-taking startup is acquired by a conservative, bureaucratic corporation, innovation may stall, and key employees may leave. Integration Challenges The integration process involves aligning systems, processes, human resources, supply chains, and more. Failure to integrate effectively can lead to operational disruptions, delays, and customer dissatisfaction. Integration complexity increases with the size and geographic spread of the companies. IT systems, in particular, are often difficult to merge and can be a source of costly errors. Loss of Talent M&As can create uncertainty among employees, leading to fear of job losses, demotivation, or voluntary departures of key personnel. If critical leaders or innovators exit during or after the acquisition, the organisation can lose institutional knowledge and leadership, diminishing the long-term value of the deal. Regulatory and Legal Hurdles Mergers can attract the attention of regulatory bodies, especially in industries with limited competition. Antitrust investigations and approval processes can delay or even block a deal. Additionally, unforeseen legal liabilities from the target company, such as pending lawsuits or compliance issues, can negatively impact the acquirer post-merger. Financial Risk Many M&A deals are financed through debt. Over-leveraging can burden the newly combined entity with high interest payments and limited financial flexibility. If the anticipated revenue growth does not materialise, the company might struggle to meet its debt obligations, risking financial instability. Strategic Drift Companies often engage in acquisitions to pursue new strategic directions. However, if the acquisition does not align well with the company's core competencies, it may dilute focus and hinder overall performance. This is especially true when companies expand into unfamiliar industries or markets without adequate understanding. Market Reaction Investor sentiment can be unpredictable. If stakeholders perceive the acquisition as overpriced or strategically unsound, the acquiring company's stock price may fall. In some cases, the market reacts negatively even before synergies are evaluated, based purely on perception or scepticism. While mergers and acquisitions offer the potential for synergy and growth, they are not inherently beneficial or risk-free. The promise of synergy is often overhyped, while the risks—especially around cultural fit, integration, and financial strain—are downplayed. Successful M&A requires thorough due diligence, realistic assessments of value, and well-executed integration strategies. Companies that approach M&A with caution, transparency, and a clear strategic rationale are more likely to realise lasting benefits. However, without these, the likelihood of value destruction is high.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Private prison profits surge under Trump immigration crackdown
NEW YORK: One of America's largest private prison operators has capitalised on President Donald Trump's immigration enforcement policies through soaring profits and expanded detention facilities. Geo Group announced a $300 million share repurchase programme following a $29.1 million quarterly profit, reversing last year's $32.5 million loss. Revenue grew 4.8% to $636.2 million as the company added thousands of detention beds nationwide to meet ICE demand. Executive Chairman George Zoley acknowledged logistical hurdles in ICE's plan to hire 10,000 staff, calling it 'very expensive and very complicated.' The Florida-based firm expects four new facilities to generate $240 million annually when fully operational in 2026. Another 5,900 idle beds across six locations could produce $310 million yearly if utilised by immigration authorities. Zoley noted Republican-led states like Florida and Texas are cooperating to address ICE's projected need for 100,000 detention beds. Congress recently tripled ICE's four-year detention budget to $45 billion under Trump's fiscal package. CoreCivic, another major prison operator, also raised financial targets after quarterly profits more than doubled to $38.5 million. Geo Group shares closed 2.6% higher following the earnings report. - AFP
