Purple Heart Army Veteran Forced To Self-Deport Under ICE Order
A Purple Heart Army veteran who said he took two bullets in the back while serving the U.S. during the invasion of Panama self-deported on Monday after receiving an order by immigration officials earlier this month.
Sae Joon Park, 55, who has lived in the U.S. since age 7, reportedly returned to his birth country of South Korea after being given an order related to drug and bail offenses from more than 15 years ago that he says were tied to PTSD.
'I get it. I broke the law and everything, but I think this is a little severe what they're doing to me after I paid my dues, after I did my time for the offense that I did,' he told Hawaii News Now before leaving. 'I thought I was doing my part to do whatever I have to do to be a good citizen and do everything right to stay in this country.'
Park confirmed his arrival in South Korea to HuffPost in a short message sent early Wednesday, local time. In it, he blamed President Donald Trump for his removal and said he 'will try and start a new life here.'
'My ICE officer told me last year, if Trump gets elected, there's a good chance I'll get deported,' he added.
A spokesperson for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement referred questions to the Department of Homeland Security, which did not immediately respond to HuffPost's request for comment Tuesday.
Park, speaking with reporters before his deportation, said he secured legal permanent residency under a green card as a child and at 19 enlisted in the Army. It was while fighting in Panama during the Noriega war in 1989 that he was shot twice and awarded a Purple Heart, which is awarded to any service member who is wounded in defense of the nation.
'In my mind, I'm going, 'Oh my god, I'm shot in the back. I can't feel my legs. I must be paralyzed,'' he told Hawaii News Now, while showing the scars on his back and his medal.
He was honorably discharged and returned to his then-home in Los Angeles where he turned to drugs as a coping mechanism while suffering from PTSD.
'I was suffering from PTSD severely,' he told NPR. 'From sleeping nightmares to like, having just fearful thoughts all the time. Couldn't watch horror movies, couldn't hear loud noises.'
He said he was arrested while meeting up with a dealer and was ordered by a judge to get clean before his next court hearing, which he said he knew he couldn't do.
'So finally when the judge told me, 'Don't come back into my court with the dirty urine,' which I knew I would, I got scared and I jumped bail,' he told NPR.
In addition to the possession of a controlled substance charge, he was consequently convicted in 2009 with bail jumping and served three years in prison. When he got out, he was detained by ICE agents and had his green card revoked.
He was allowed to stay in the U.S. under deferred action, however, with an agreement that he would check in each year and stay clean and out of trouble, which he said he did.
He moved to Hawaii to be closer to family and raised two children, now in their 20s, while also caring for his aging parents and aunts.
'These last 14 years have been great, like really proud of myself, proud of my kids, how I've been acting and how I've been living my life,' he told Hawaii News Now.
His deferred action abruptly ended earlier this month, however. He was given an ankle monitor and three weeks to leave the U.S. or face forcible deportation.
'I was just very lucky to deport myself, remove myself, because they were ready to lock me up,' he told Honolulu station KITV. 'And that is so unfair, and so many people are getting locked up.'
Park said he spent his last three weeks in the U.S. with his family, including his mother who's in her 80s and in the early stages of dementia. He doesn't expect to see her again.
'I won't be there for a funeral, like my daughter getting married, just there's a lot of things connected with it. I definitely know that,' he told the station.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Most nabbed in L.A. raids were men with no criminal conviction, picked up off the street
As Los Angeles became the epicenter of President Trump's crackdown on undocumented immigrants, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem flew to the city and held a news conference, saying the government's objective was to "bring in criminals that have been out on our street far too long." But data from the days leading up to that June 12 appearance suggest a majority of those who were arrested were not convicted criminals. Most were working-age men, nearly half Mexican. From June 1 to 10, Immigration and Customs Enforcement data show that early in the crackdown 722 were arrested in the Los Angeles region. The figures were obtained by the Deportation Data Project, a repository of enforcement data at UC Berkeley Law. A Times analysis found that 69% of those arrested during that period had no criminal conviction and 58% had never been charged with a crime. The median age of someone arrested was 38, and that person was likely to be a man. Nearly 48% were Mexican, 16% were from Guatemala and 8% from El Salvador. "They're not going after drug kingpins, they're chasing hardworking people through swap meets and Home Depot parking lots," Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass told The Times. "You can see the impact of these random raids everywhere in our city — families are scared to go eat at restaurants, kids are scared their parents aren't going to return from the store — the fear is there because they've seen videos of people being shoved into unmarked vans by masked men refusing to identify themselves." While the Trump administration has been pounding the point that they are targeting the "worst of the worst," several data sets released by Immigration and Customs Enforcement in recent days show that percentage of people picked up without a criminal conviction is growing as sweeps become the norm in Los Angeles. The data cover a seven-county area from San Luis Obispo in the north to Orange County in the south. Experts told The Times the data confirm what many advocates and officials say: that most of the arrests carried out are on the street. Many were executed in open air locations, like car washes, Home Depot parking lots and street vending spots. Immigrant advocates and local officials say the lack of named targets shows the federal agents are simply racially profiling, allegations that Los Angeles officials are using to lay the groundwork for a lawsuit. Department of Homeland Security officials say the efforts are targeted. 'DHS enforcement operations are highly targeted, and officers do their due diligence," said DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin. "We know who we are targeting ahead of time. If and when we do encounter individuals subject to arrest, our law enforcement is trained to ask a series of well-determined questions to determine status and removability.' Nationally, the number of people arrested without criminal convictions has jumped significantly and many of those with convictions are nonviolent offenders, according to nonpublic data obtained by the Cato Institute that covers the 2025 fiscal year beginning in Oct. 1 and ending June 15. "ICE is not primarily detaining people who are public safety threats," said David Bier, director of immigration studies at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank. "Serious violent offenders are a very small minority, just 7% of the people that it's taking into custody." ICE has not released data on criminal records of detainees booked into its custody. But Cato's nonpublic data showed about 9 out of 10 had never been convicted of a violent or property crime and 30% have no criminal record. The most frequent crimes are immigration and traffic offenses. "That's important because the Department of Homeland Security has made such a big deal about its deportation efforts being focused on people with serious criminal histories," he said. He also analyzed the UC Berkeley Law data that reflects ICE arrests and found that nationally, five times the number of immigrants without criminal convictions were arrested in the last fiscal year compared with the same period in 2017. He called the figure "staggering." For June alone, he noted that the agency arrested 6,000 people without criminal convictions. McLaughlin said Monday that "75% of those arrests under this Administration have been of illegal aliens with criminal convictions or pending charges." The public data reveal that figure is 70% over the course of Trump's second term, but lower in recent weeks. That data show ICE has booked 204,297 people into detention facilities over the last fiscal year. The figure is considered a good approximation for arrests. Of those, a week before Trump took office for the second time, 38% of those booked had not been convicted of a crime. Five months into his term, that number had grown to 63%. Cato's nonpublic data show that the top criminal conviction is immigration followed by a traffic offenses, assaults and drug charges. Bier pins the shift to White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, who in May reportedly directed top ICE officials to go beyond target lists and begin arresting people at Home Depots or 7-Eleven convenience stores. The wider sweeps are stressing the capacity of the detention system, where detainees have reported moldy food, dirty towels and no changes of clothes for more than a week at a time. A week before Trump took office, there were about 39,000 people held in detention. By June 15, that figure had grown 42% to 56,397. "It's nearing a historical high," said Austin Kocher, an assistant professor at Syracuse University who tracks immigration data. And that figure could grow. The administration has asked Congress to fund 100,000 detention beds. Times staff writer Andrea Castillo and data and graphics journalists Lorena Elebee and Sean Greene contributed to this report. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Washington Post
38 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Amid ICE sweeps, judges are protecting the rights of immigrants
The Trumpian vision of the U.S. immigration system is dramatic and nightmarish: clots of agents showing up at schools, government offices, courthouses, workplaces and homes, dressed in the jackets of an alphabet soup of agencies, sometimes masked, often armed. They scoop up undocumented immigrants and ship them off to wherever they came from — or to whatever godforsaken place will take them, if for a price. But the federal government is a hulking iceberg of bureaucracy, and deep inside its wounded guts, a quieter force persists: Even with the layoffs, buyouts, cutbacks and frequent storms of executive commands, the machine grinds on, dispensing something closer to justice. In Hyattsville, Maryland, about 12 miles from Immigration and Customs Enforcement headquarters in D.C., on the sixth floor of a largely unmarked federal office building in the middle of a struggling suburban retail development, the U.S. immigration apparatus is still accepting and protecting newcomers from the chaos created by the president and his SWAT-team-wannabe acolytes. Across the Potomac River in Virginia, Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R) ordered state law enforcement to cooperate with the feds, leading to raids on hundreds of immigrants. In the District, Mayor Muriel E. Bowser (D), who often spoke of Washington as a 'proud sanctuary city,' has done a 180 and is cooperating with the president's enforcement efforts because there's little she can do to stop ICE, and, as she put it last month, 'this is Donald Trump's America.' But here in Hyattsville, 16 immigration judges churn through their endless dockets — hundreds of people, handing over reams of paperwork, speaking through tears to emotionless translators and empathetic judges, searching for some way to get legal status, some way to stay in the country that, even now, offers them their best shot. These immigrants, the great majority of whom arrived illegally, have hit the lottery: They've landed in a courthouse where judges actually seem inclined to help them find a way to stay. Let's visit Judge Rebecca Niburg's courtroom. Niburg denied asylum to only 35 percent of the people who came before her between 2019 and 2024, which is pretty much on par with her colleagues in Hyattsville but way below the national average of 58 percent. As the cases flit by, each taking only a few minutes, the stories blur: Yudy Estrada, a Bolivian woman here with her toddler, is having trouble getting records from her hometown that might convince a judge that she would face bodily harm if she went back. When the judge asks Breyser Medina Gutierrez, a refugee from Colombia who said he illegally crossed the U.S.-Mexico border in September, what country he should be sent to if he's found ineligible for asylum, the man says, 'I don't have any country I would feel safe in except this country.' Too bad, the judge rules seconds later: 'I will designate Colombia as the country you'll be sent to if you're found to be removable.' The people coming before Niburg this day are mostly from Venezuela or Colombia. (The only English-speaking immigrant to appear is from Nigeria.) Dirimo Marin has brought a huge stack of documents to court. It's his application for asylum. The judge leafs through the pile and asks who helped put it together. 'An attorney,' Marin says. 'Probably not an attorney,' Niburg replies. There's no signature on the line where the attorney is supposed to sign — a mistake a legit lawyer probably wouldn't make. 'It's a guy,' Marin concedes. 'He's in Venezuela.' Marin's next stop is a final hearing on whether he may remain in this country, but Niburg offers to let Marin postpone that day of reckoning. 'How much time do you need?' she asks. 'As much time as you can give me,' Marin replies. Time for a helpful leading question: 'Is that because you are trying to gather evidence?' Oh, yeah, that, Marin says. He tells the judge about being struck in the back by authorities back home. The doctor who treated him was in hiding, so there are no records of his injury. He takes a deep breath and tries for a big extension: 'November?' Granted. Next case. Over and over, the same routine, the same stretching out of cases well into next year. The overall vibe here is kindly: The judge patiently explains each step, dispensing advice on how to get asylum applications in order, repeatedly offering to extend the time before their final hearing. Although these judges work for Attorney General Pam Bondi, their demeanor and approach couldn't be more different. For all the damage Elon Musk's minions have done to the government's ability to serve taxpayers, it marches on, doing its work, if fitfully at times. Down in the guts of the system, you see how much of the Trump assault is show. He and his devout MAGA appointees would have you believe they are tossing immigrants out of the country at record levels. False. The reigning champion of deportations remains President Barack Obama. The Trump administration would like us to think it pioneered the push to get undocumented immigrants to self-deport. False. As immigrants await hearings in Hyattsville, they're offered a 'self-help guide' titled 'Do You Just Want to Go Home?' It's a handy packet with instructions on how to self-deport — published by the Biden administration. This is not to say Trump and de facto immigration czar Stephen Miller are playacting. No, Miller has been pushing since his teens to clean foreigners out of the country. He and his fellow policymakers are gleefully stretching the limits of the law, fighting to expand the president's power, skirting due process and putting people on outbound planes. In response, some immigrants are lying low and some are leaving the country. Among politicians, some erstwhile supporters of newcomers have gone silent and some are groveling before Trump. But even as ICE agents show up at immigration courts and whisk people into vans that take them to who knows where, the 'deep state' can still push back. Simply by doing their job, feds who know and respect the law can mitigate Trump's lunge for authority and chaos. In federal offices across the country, largely shielded from public view, that's exactly what they're doing.
Time Magazine
44 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
Did a Tourist Get Blocked From the U.S. Over a J.D. Vance Meme?
'Two pictures spoiled Mads' dream vacation,' read a headline from Norwegian newspaper Nordlys on Monday, which was amplified by British tabloid the Daily Mail on Tuesday. Mads Mikkelsen—not the Danish actor but a 21-year-old tourist from Norway—told his hometown outlet that he was denied entry to the U.S. at Newark Liberty International Airport on June 11 after handing over his phone to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials who came across a meme of U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance. Mikkelsen claimed the officials threatened him with a $5,000 fine or five years in prison if he refused to give the password to his mobile device and that, after he relented and it was scrutinized, he was sent back to Norway. On social media, anti-Trump influencers including former Republican congressman Adam Kinzinger and #Resistance movement activist Brian Krassenstein, among others, shared reports of the denial of entry and encouraged the spreading of more Vance memes, which became popular after President Donald Trump's explosive meeting with Volodomyr Zelensky in the Oval Office in February, when Vance demanded the Ukrainian President say 'thank you' to Trump. 'These are the same people who blame Europe for a lack of free speech,' disinformation researcher Pekka Kallioniemi posted on X about the Trump Administration in relation to the story. Tricia McLaughlin, a spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees ICE and Customs and Border Protection (CBP), called the claims of Mikkelsen's denied entry over the Vance meme 'FALSE' and 'BS.' CBP said in a post on X that 'Mads Mikkelsen was not denied entry for any memes or political reasons, it was for his admitted drug use.' The second photo seen by the ICE officials, by Mikkelsen's own admission, was a wooden pipe he'd made himself a few years ago. He also told Nordlys that the officials asked him 'direct questions about drug smuggling, terrorist plots, and right-wing extremism' and that he had been forced to give a blood sample. It remains unclear why Mikkelsen was subjected to heightened scrutiny. CBP did not answer TIME's requests for comment. The bigger picture Tighter immigration controls, however, have become a cornerstone of Trump's second term. Besides an outright ban on nationals from certain countries and heightened vigilance on nationals from others, the Trump Administration has required immigration officials to improve vetting procedures for some non-immigrant visas, including social media screening of international student visa applicants. DHS also announced in April that authorities would begin screening the social media accounts of undocumented immigrants in the U.S. for 'antisemitic activity.' While border agents have long been empowered to deny entry on a case-by-case basis, reports of increased scrutiny, detentions, and denials of tourists have proliferated in recent months. Some incidents have sparked concerns about border agents' discretion becoming politicized. In March, a French minister deplored how a researcher for the French National Center for Scientific Research was denied entry to the U.S. after authorities found 'personal opinion on the Trump administration's research policy' on his phone. And just last week, border agents reportedly sent back an Australian writer to Melbourne from Los Angeles after they interrogated him about his views on the conflict in Gaza. Some countries, including China, Denmark, and Finland, have issued travel advisories to their citizens about heading to the U.S. in response to various Trump policies. Amid all this, travelers are increasingly turning away from the U.S., and the World Travel & Tourism Council said the U.S. economy is set to lose $12.5 billion in international traveler spending this year. There's not much visitors can do if border officials want to deny them entry. You have the right to remain silent, an immigration lawyer told the New York Times, but a border officer is likely to deny you entry as a result. And if they detain you instead of sending you back right away, they can hold you for up to 90 days. Nate Freed Wessler, a lawyer at the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), told the Guardian that after landing on an international flight but before clearing customs, you have fewer civil rights than you do elsewhere in the U.S. 'The normal Fourth Amendment requirement of a warrant or individualized suspicion doesn't apply,' he said. 'The only minimal protection CBP has in their policy is distinguishing between manual and forensic searches,' he added, explaining that a forensic search of a mobile phone, for example, involves plugging it into another device to analyze it, while a manual search includes scrolling through its contents. 'For a forensic search, they say they need reasonable suspicion, but they don't define what that means. For a manual search, there are no guardrails. They argue it's less invasive, but that's just not true. They can still do keyword searches and spend hours combing through your device.' 'Keep calm (but delete your nudes)' advised the Guardian's headline for tourists headed to the U.S. WIRED has advised traveling with a separate phone altogether—though a phone that appears 'too squeaky clean,' it warns, 'can arouse suspicion'—or at the very least minimizing risk by printing your boarding pass and any other documents you may need to present so you can avoid taking your phone out of your pocket. Noor Zafar, a senior staff attorney with the ACLU's Immigrants' Rights Project, told the Washington Post that travelers should keep the contact information of an immigration attorney in case they run into complications at the border. 'The stories are definitely concerning,' Zafar said in March. 'I think we're just in a period of more aggressive policies being implemented at the border. And I think that requires people to take extra precautionary measures.'
