Kennedy's advisers endorse flu vaccines — except for a few targeted by antivaccine activists
By MIKE STOBBE and LAURAN NEERGAARD
The Trump administration's new vaccine advisers on Thursday endorsed this fall's flu vaccinations for just about every American but threw in a twist: Only use certain shots free of an ingredient antivaccine groups have falsely tied to autism.
What is normally a routine step in preparing for the upcoming flu season drew intense scrutiny after U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. abruptly fired the influential 17-member Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and handpicked replacements that include several vaccine skeptics.
That seven-member panel bucked another norm Thursday: It deliberated the safety of a preservative used in less than 5% of U.S. flu vaccinations based on a presentation from an antivaccine group's former leader — without allowing the usual public airing of scientific data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The preservative, thimerosal, has long been used in certain vaccines that come in multi-dose vials, to prevent contamination as each dose is withdrawn. But it has been controversial because it contains a small amount of a particular form of mercury.
Study after study has found no evidence that it causes autism or other harm. Yet since 2001, all vaccines routinely used for U.S. children age 6 years or younger have come in thimerosal-free formulas — including single-dose flu shots that account for the vast majority of influenza vaccinations.
The advisory panel first voted, with one abstention, to back the usual U.S. recommendation that nearly everyone age 6 months and older get an annual flu vaccination. Then the advisers decided people should only be given thimerosal-free single-dose formulations, voting 5-1 with one abstention.
That would include single-dose shots that already are the most common type of flu vaccination as well as the nasal spray FluMist. It would rule out the subset of flu vaccine that is dispensed in multi-dose vials.
'There is still no demonstrable evidence of harm,' one panelist, Dr. Joseph Hibbeln, a psychiatrist formerly with the National Institutes of Health, said in acknowledging the committee wasn't following its usual practice of acting on evidence.
But he added that 'whether the actual molecule is a risk or not, we have to respect the fear of mercury' that might dissuade some people from getting vaccinated.
Normally the CDC's director would decide whether to accept ACIP's recommendation, but the Senate has not yet confirmed nominee Susan Monarez. Administration officials said Kennedy would make that decision.
While Thursday's debate involved only a small fraction of flu vaccines, some public health experts contend the discussion unnecessarily raised doubt about vaccine safety. Already, fewer than half of Americans get their yearly flu vaccinations, and mistrust in vaccines overall is growing.
'What should have been a rigorous, evidence-based discussion on the national vaccine schedule instead appeared to be a predetermined exercise orchestrated to undermine the well-established safety and efficacy of vaccines and fundamental basics of science,' said Dr. Jason Goldman of the American College of Physicians.
Public health experts decried the panel's lack of transparency in blocking the presentation of CDC's analysis of thimerosal that concluded there was no link between the preservative and neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism. The data had been posted on the ACIP's website Tuesday, but was later removed — because, according to ACIP member Dr. Robert Malone, the report hadn't been authorized by Kennedy's office. Committee members said they had read it.
The ACIP, created more than 60 years ago, helps the CDC determine who should be vaccinated against a long list of diseases, and when. Those recommendations have a big impact on whether insurance covers vaccinations and where they're available.
Kennedy has long held there was a tie between thimerosal and autism, and also accused the government of hiding the danger. Thimerosal was placed on the meeting agenda shortly after Kennedy's new vaccine advisers were named last week.
© Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Today
14 hours ago
- Japan Today
At least 600 CDC employees are getting final termination notices, union says
FILE - The campus of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is seen in Atlanta, on Wednesday, June 25, 2025. (AP Photo/Mike Stewart, File) By MIKE STOBBE At least 600 employees of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are receiving permanent termination notices in the wake of a recent court decision that protected some CDC employees from layoffs but not others. The notices went out this week and many people have not yet received them, according to the American Federation of Government Employees, which represents more than 2,000 dues-paying members at CDC. Officials with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services did not immediately respond to a request for comment. AFGE officials said they are aware of at least 600 employees being cut. But 'due to a staggering lack of transparency from HHS," the union hasn't received formal notices of who is being laid off,' the federation said in a statement on Wednesday. The permanent cuts include about 100 people who worked in violence prevention. Some employees noted those cuts come less than two weeks after a man fired at least 180 bullets into the CDC's campus and killed a police officer. 'The irony is devastating: The very experts trained to understand, interrupt and prevent this kind of violence were among those whose jobs were eliminated,' some of the affected employees wrote in a blog post last week. On April 1, the HHS officials sent layoff notices to thousands of employees at the CDC and other federal health agencies, part of a sweeping overhaul designed to vastly shrink the agencies responsible for protecting and promoting Americans' health. Many have been on administrative leave since then — paid but not allowed to work — as lawsuits played out. A federal judge in Rhode Island last week issued a preliminary ruling that protected employees in several parts of the CDC, including groups dealing with smoking, reproductive health, environmental health, workplace safety, birth defects and sexually transmitted diseases. But the ruling did not protect other CDC employees, and layoffs are being finalized across other parts of the agency, including in the freedom of information office. The terminations were effective as of Monday, employees were told. Affected projects included work to prevent rape, child abuse and teen dating violence. The laid-off staff included people who have helped other countries to track violence against children — an effort that helped give rise to an international conference in November at which countries talked about setting violence-reduction goals. 'There are nationally and internationally recognized experts that will be impossible to replace,' said Tom Simon, the retired senior director for scientific programs at the CDC's Division of Violence Prevention. © Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
Japan Today
3 days ago
- Japan Today
Loneliness, isolation growing problems, but there's another side to it
By Michael Hoffman Community? Or solitude? Each has its claims. We need togetherness and apartness, to be with others and to be away from others. We love each other and can't stand the sight of each other. We're a difficult species. We don't know our own minds – or hearts. The women's weekly Josei Jishin (Aug 12) cites alarming research. Living alone carries with it a health risk equivalent to smoking 15 cigarettes a day. Cancer, heart disease, diabetes, dementia, depression, alcoholism and early death prey on the solitary as on smokers. And Japan, smoking less, is increasingly solitary. All developed countries are. Solitude – inevitable byproduct of rising wealth, shrinking families, greater personal independence, better education, soaring longevity and other fruits of progress. There's nothing so good it's not bad. Worldwide, says the World Health Organization (WHO), one person in six is chronically lonely. Japan's loneliness troubles the government so much it appointed in 2021 – following a precedent set by Britain in 2018 – a 'minister of loneliness' (officially a Minister for Promoting Dynamic Engagement of all Citizens), to perform a role no government any time anywhere had ever dreamed of performing before. Rapidly aging, Japan is especially vulnerable. The health ministry counts 17.2 million elderly householders, 9 million of them living alone, 5.77 million of them women. The research Josei Jishin cites is by American psychologist Julianne Holt-Lunstad. Her team's meta-analysis tracked the social habits of more than 300,000 people worldwide, yielding numbers claiming the authority only numbers can claim. Social isolation raises the chance of premature death by 26 to 32 percent; of heart disease 1.3-fold; of depression 2- to 3-fold; of dementia by 20 percent; and so on. The solitary soul balks. It feels threatened, guilty, defensive and angry all at once. Is there no research in defense of solitude, of solitary souls who need solitude as the social need society? 'Loneliness and isolation are indeed social problems that warrant serious attention,' writes another American psychologist, Virginia Thomas, on The Conversation website – 'especially since chronic states of loneliness are linked with poor outcomes such as depression and a shortened lifespan. 'But,' she continues, 'there is another side to this story, one that deserves a closer look. For some people, the shift towards aloneness represents a desire for what researchers call 'positive solitude,' a state that is associated with well-being, not loneliness. Statistics show that we're choosing to be solitary for more of our waking hours than ever before, tucked away at home rather than mingling in public. Increasing numbers of us are dining alone and traveling solo, and rates of living alone have nearly doubled in 50 years.' There's moral support for solitude. Take note, solitaries. Society frowns on solitude. It distrusts it, wonders what it's up to, suspects it's no good whatever it is, something it doesn't understand anyway, which is bad enough.' Why,' Thomas asks, 'does (solitude's) side of the story often get lost amid the warnings about social isolation? I suspect it has to do with a collective anxiety about being alone. This anxiety stems in large part from our culture's deficit view of solitude. In this type of thinking, the desire to be alone is seen as unnatural and unhealthy, something to be pitied or feared rather than valued or encouraged.' In other words, whose problem is it – the solitary's, or society's? As usual – as always maybe – the problem is balance, so hard to strike in almost every lifestyle choice. Too much society is as bad as too little. Too much society is as bad as too much solitude. Might it not reasonably be argued that Holt-Lunstad's dire conclusions apply not to solitude per se but to too much solitude? That said, the problem is real, and not confined to the elderly. It wasn't even before COVID shut down so much social life for young, middle-aged and old alike, and kept it shut down for nearly three years. It's very much less so now. COVID is over and yet it's not. Isolation is easier to impose than to lift. It lingers. Nor is it confined to people living alone. Isolation within a family grown cold is no less isolation for being populated. Loneliness is pain. It means having no one to talk to, feeling no one needs you, growing old alone, possibly dying alone. Society – 'the world' – goes its way, leaving you behind. Alone, you're free; alone you can do whatever you please whenever you please in whatever manner pleases you – do nothing at all if that's your fancy. Who'll notice? Who'll care? No one. Does that matter? To most, yes. Even the most temperamentally solitary are not total loners – the human genome doesn't permit it. The loneliness ministry's signature success to date, Josei Jishin reports, is Oita, the least lonely of Japan's 47 prefectures, measured in terms of the number of people dying alone and unnoticed. With ministry support the prefecture sponsors exercise classes, tea parties, hobby groups and so on. The underlying idea is that everybody should have a place to go. A prefecture-wide participation rate of 14 percent suggests progress indeed. Some cultures prepare us better than others for solitude. Japan and the U.S. represent two opposite extremes, rugged American individualism versus Japan which knew no word for privacy until the mid-19th century, when it acquired puraibashi, which still serves. Yet Japan has always revered its religious and poetic recluses, crediting them with an enlightenment inaccessible to those engaged in, engulfed in, fulfilled by, mired in, fettered by – take your pick – society. Among the most appealing of Japan's hermits of old is Kamo no Chomei (c.1153-1216), who bequeathed to posterity a charming little memoir known as the Hojoki (The Ten Foot Square Hut). Fed up with the crooked ways of 'the world,' he retired from it deep into the forested mountains near Kyoto. There for 30 years he lived alone in a succession of rude huts, each smaller than the one before, discovering in the process how little a person needs in order to enjoy the serene tranquility whose joys only poverty can reveal. 'With this lonely cottage of mine, this hut of one room,' said Chomei, 'I am quite content…. If your food is scanty, it will have the better relish… My only luxury is a sound sleep, and all I look forward to is the beauty of the changing seasons.' Isn't that enough? Is not less more? No, say most of us most of the time. Too bad. Michael Hoffman is the author of 'Arimasen.' © Japan Today
Japan Today
5 days ago
- Japan Today
Bad diets, too many meds, no exercise: A look inside the latest 'Make America Healthy Again' report
By AMANDA SEITZ A report that U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr has promised will improve the health of America's children does not call on the government to make significant changes to its food or farming policies, according to a draft document obtained by The Associated Press. The 'Make America Healthy Again' strategy report is supposed to be one of Kennedy's signature achievements as the nation's health secretary, giving the government a roadmap to help its citizens lose weight, reduce chronic diseases and exercise more. Before coming to Washington, Kennedy had spent much of his career decrying the harms of chemicals sprayed on crops, prescription drugs, ultraprocessed foods, and vaccines. His coalition, then, has expected him to take bold action as the nation's top health leader. But a draft of the so-called 'MAHA' report, first reported by The New York Times on Aug 14, mostly calls on the government to further study chronic diseases, bad air quality, Americans' diets and prescription drug use. The report lays out four problem areas – poor diet, chemical exposure, lack of physical activity and overuse of medications -- that are to blame for chronic diseases in the U.S. The White House has held off on publicly releasing the report, which was submitted to President Donald Trump on Aug 12. The latest report is the policy companion to a 'MAHA' report released in May, which was found to have several errors in it. White House spokesman Kush Desai refused to confirm whether the copy obtained by the Associated Press was a final version, though HHS officials have insisted the report has been finalized. 'President Trump pledged to Make America Healthy Again, and the Administration is committed to delivering on that pledge with Gold Standard Science,' Desai said. 'Until officially released by the White House and MAHA Commission, however, any documents purporting to be the second MAHA Report should be considered as nothing more than speculative literature.' Some in the agricultural industry had warily anticipated the report, fearing it would call for bans or investigations into the use of pesticides and herbicides that farmers in the U.S. regularly spray on crops to control weeds and enhance yields. Other farmers were concerned about how the report may target the use of corn syrup, a common sweetener, in American foods. Both products have been a central talking point in Kennedy's 'MAHA' movement, which has attracted a diverse coalition of suburban and rural moms, Trump supporters and liberals concerned about the nation's food supply. Instead, the report calls for an 'awareness' campaign to raise confidence in pesticides. Concerns from the agricultural industry waned as the report hit the president's desk, with one of Kennedy's closest advisers, Calley Means, calling for MAHA supporters to work with major farm companies on Tuesday. Means also acknowledged that the 'pace of political change' can be frustrating. 'We need to build bridges,' Means said, adding that: 'We are not going to win if the soybean farmers and the corn growers are our enemy.' Means did not respond to a request for comment on Friday. A spokesman for Kennedy also declined to comment. The report urges the National Institutes of Health – which is facing a 40% cut to its budget under the Trump administration – to undertake several studies on Americans' health, including research on vaccine injury, autism, air quality, water quality, prescription drugs, and nutrition. The report also calls for changes to the foods served in schools and hospitals, something that will be hard to deliver with the Trump administration's funding cuts, said Kari Hamerschlag, the deputy director of the food and agriculture at the nonprofit Friends of the Earth. Earlier this year, the Republican-led administration wiped out $1 billion set aside that helped food banks and schools procure food directly from local farmers. 'This is not going to transform our food and farming system,' Hamerschlag said. 'This is not going to make people healthier. They need to put resources behind their recommendations.' © Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
