
Google Pixel 10 vs Pixel 9: 5 upcoming upgrades
Google Pixel 10 vs Pixel 9: 5 upcoming upgrades
By Unnati Gusain
While the Google Pixel 10 launch is a few months away, the rumours have started churning up. Here is how it is anticipated to be better than its predecessor, Pixel 9.
Google Pixel 10 vs Pixel 9
If rumours are to be believed, the Pixel 10 series will closely resemble last year's Pixel 9 lineup.
Goolge Pixel 10 design
The Pixel 10 series is expected to be powered by Google's new Tensor G5 chipset, which — for the first time — is reportedly being manufactured by TSMC.
Pixel 10 Processor
In the heart, the Pixel 9 is powered by Google's Tensor G4 processor, paired with the Titan M2 security coprocessor.
Pixel 9 processor
Another big change could be the inclusion of a telephoto lens on the base Pixel 10 model — a first for a non-Pro Pixel.
Pixel 10 camera
For photography, the Pixel 9 smartphone houses a dual-rear camera setup, consisting of a 50-megapixel main camera with OIS and a 48-megapixel ultrawide lens.
Pixel 9 Camera
Pixel 10 will arrive with the final version of Android 16.
Pixel 10 OS
Pixel 9 runs on Android 14 and promises 7 years of Android OS and security updates, so you are getting long-term software support.
Pixel 9 OS

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
26 minutes ago
- Mint
Is Google preparing to bring Pixel Call Screening to India after 7 years? Know what report suggests
Published 27 Jun 2025, 04:21 PM IST Google appears to be preparing to launch its Call Screening feature for Pixel smartphones in India, nearly seven years after the AI-powered tool debuted in the United States. According to a new report, the company is working behind the scenes to introduce the much-anticipated functionality, though Indian users may initially receive only a limited version. Call Screening, which allows users to screen incoming calls with the help of artificial intelligence, has been a popular feature on Pixel devices in select countries. It can identify callers and display on-screen suggestions to respond, helping users manage spam or unknown numbers more effectively. However, a recent APK teardown of the Google Phone app by Android Authority suggests that Indian users might not get the full automated experience just yet. The app's internal code reportedly contains references such as 'hi_in', which likely points to support for Hindi language and Indian localisation. Another string uncovered, 'enableIndiaManualScreeningOnlyMode', hints at a manual-only version of the tool for India. This would mean that users would need to tap a 'Screen call' button when receiving a call, and then select from suggested replies, rather than relying on Google's Assistant to automatically screen and respond on their behalf, as it does in the US. Notably, the limited functionality could be due to regulatory constraints, and Google is believed to be awaiting approval before officially rolling out the feature. There is no confirmation yet on whether the service will launch in multiple Indian languages or remain restricted to English and Hindi initially. Interestingly, this is not the first indication of Google's interest in expanding Call Screening in India. Earlier in January 2024, a tech enthusiast reportedly enabled the feature on a rooted OnePlus 7 running AOSPA (a custom Android build), by installing a Hindi language pack, suggesting that backend support for Indian users has been under development for some time. While an official timeline from Google remains unannounced, the latest findings strongly indicate that Indian Pixel users may not have to wait much longer to access at least a version of the Call Screening feature, albeit in a more hands-on format.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Why did Japan ban Google's Pixel 7 phones? Could more models follow?
Google's Pixel 7 and 7 Pro have been banned in Japan after a court ruled they infringed on patented 4G technology owned by Korea's Pantech. The decision, spurred by Google's 'insincere' conduct in court, could soon extend to Pixel 8 and 9 models — threatening Google's rise in one of its strongest international markets read more The new Pixel 9 smart phone series is displayed at a Made by Google event in Mountain View, California, US, August 13, 2024. File Image/Reuters Japan's Tokyo District Court has ordered a ban on the sale, import, advertisement and even public exhibition of Google's Pixel 7 and Pixel 7 Pro smartphones. The court found that the devices infringed on a patented communication method used in 4G LTE networks — a judgment that poses broader implications for Google's hardware future in one of its most promising international markets. The lawsuit, initially filed by South Korean company Pantech, centres around a patent related to how mobile phones interact with base stations by sending and receiving 'acknowledgement signals' (also referred to as ACK) — a mechanism essential to ensuring stable data transmission in 4G environments. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This highly specific functionality is integrated deeply into the internal operation of smartphones that utilise LTE connectivity. Pantech, though no longer a player in the global smartphone hardware business, still holds a portfolio of active standard-essential patents (SEPs). More from Explainers Best True Wireless (TWS) Earbuds under Rs 12,000 in India on World Music Day 2025 The firm claims that Google implemented its technology in the Pixel 7 and Pixel 7 Pro without acquiring the necessary license to do so. The Tokyo court agreed, concluding that Google's actions were in violation of Japanese patent law. The ruling affects not only commercial sales but also bans the advertising, importation, transfer, and public display of the Pixel 7 and Pixel 7 Pro. The devices can no longer be distributed through retail channels or showcased by Google and its partners within Japan. Google's courtroom conduct criticised by judge Beyond the technical patent issue, the court's judgement was shaped by its assessment of Google's demeanour during the legal process. The presiding judge issued a sharp critique of the company's behavior, describing its approach as 'insincere.' This characterisation reportedly influenced the severity of the court's response, leading to an outright ban rather than a financial penalty or mediated settlement. The allegation of insincerity carries significant weight in Japanese legal culture, where cooperation and transparency are highly valued during litigation. According to ET News, this might have set the tone for a far more restrictive ruling than initially anticipated. Patent holder Pantech no longer makes phones, but it's not out of the game Pantech was once a relatively well-known South Korean smartphone brand in the late 2000s and early 2010s. However, as brands like Samsung and LG dominated the market, Pantech eventually exited the mobile handset space. Despite this, it retained its intellectual property, including patents integral to wireless communication technologies. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In recent years, Pantech has transformed into what is often described as a 'patent monetisation business.' It is now focused on enforcing its existing intellectual property rights through the courts, often targeting major players in the tech industry. The company's legal campaign is being supported by IdeaHub, a firm that specialises in identifying, acquiring, and monetising valuable technology patents. Previous legal actions by Pantech and IdeaHub have been brought against several companies, including OnePlus, Niantic (the developer behind Pokémon Go) and smartphone manufacturer BLU. In some of those cases, settlements were reached; in others, court victories were secured. The Japan ruling against Google marks one of the more high-profile outcomes of this strategy. Pixel 8 and Pixel 9 could be next in line While the immediate ruling applies only to the Pixel 7 and Pixel 7 Pro, both Pantech and IdeaHub have already moved to initiate further legal proceedings targeting the newer Pixel 8 line and the Pixel 9 series. Though the Japanese courts have yet to issue a verdict on those models, legal filings indicate that the same patent is being cited as the basis for the expanded injunction request. If the ban extends to these newer models — which are actively being marketed or are expected to be launched later this year — the consequences could be significantly more damaging for Google. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Unlike the Pixel 7 series, which is approaching three years since its release, the Pixel 8 is still part of Google's current product lineup. The Pixel 9, meanwhile, is expected to be the centerpiece of the company's upcoming product cycle. For now, Google has not confirmed its next steps. The company could appeal the decision, negotiate a licensing agreement with Pantech and IdeaHub, or design future devices in a way that avoids the patented technology altogether. Why this ruling matters in Japan matters to Google Japan is not just any market for Google. Over the past few years, it has emerged as one of the few countries outside of North America where Pixel smartphones have made significant inroads. The Pixel 7 and Pixel 7a, in particular, were instrumental in helping Google gain market share in Japan. According to data from Counterpoint Research, Japan surpassed the United States in Pixel shipments during the first quarter of 2023. The popularity of Google's smartphones in Japan has even allowed the company to briefly overtake Apple and become the second-largest smartphone brand in the country. This success was largely fuelled by the reception of the Pixel 7 series and the mid-tier Pixel 7a, which appealed to Japanese consumers through factors like price, camera capabilities and Google-exclusive software features. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With this sales momentum now threatened by ongoing legal uncertainty, analysts warn that even the perception of instability around the Pixel brand could cause a decline in consumer trust and purchasing behaviour — regardless of whether the newer models eventually face a formal ban. How dormant patents are creating new challenges for tech giants The Google-Pantech dispute is part of a growing trend across the tech industry — where older, dormant patents are being resurrected and enforced, often by companies that no longer play a direct role in the production of devices or services. Legal experts suggest that this tactic, while controversial, is becoming increasingly common as former hardware firms seek new ways to profit from their IP portfolios. The enforcement of standard-essential patents (SEPs) is particularly contentious. These patents relate to fundamental technologies — such as 4G/LTE protocols — that are critical for interoperability. Because of this, such patents are typically expected to be licensed under FRAND (Fair, Reasonable, and Non-Discriminatory) terms. However, when a licensing deal fails or is not sought at all, it can open the door to litigation and potential sales bans. In the case of Google, Pantech alleges that the company never acquired a proper license for the patented LTE communication technique. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The Tokyo District Court's agreement with this claim, paired with its criticism of Google's courtroom behaviour, indicates that Japanese courts are taking such IP matters seriously — and are willing to issue sweeping bans even when the claimant no longer actively produces related products. Also Watch: With inputs from agencies
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Now, Google lets users customise Top Stories with their preferred websites
Google is testing a Labs feature that lets users customise their Top Stories feed by selecting favourite websites, starting in the US and India New Delhi Google has announced that it is rolling out a new experiment in Search Labs called Preferred Sources, allowing users to prioritise specific websites in the Top Stories section of Search results. Available in English for users in India and the US, this feature gives individuals more control over the news sources they frequently see, provided those sites are actively publishing new content. Once opted in, users can tap a star icon next to the 'Top Stories' header to pick their preferred websites. When relevant, updates from those sites will start appearing more often in your Top Stories section, alongside regular algorithm-selected content. These chosen sources will also be clearly labelled, and in some cases, users may see a separate 'From your sources' carousel below the main Top Stories section. What else is new in Google Search In addition to Preferred Sources, Google also outlined a handful of other features that aim to make Search more relevant and tailored to your needs, all of which can be managed through personalisation settings. Automatic content refresh: If you have searched a topic before, Google will now automatically show you new content since your last visit in sections like Top Stories or What People Are Saying. Your recent searches may also be flagged with a 'New update' tag to indicate fresh results. Quicker access to frequent sites: When personalisation is turned on, Search will promote websites you visit often higher in your results, if relevant to your query. Smarter sports tracking in Discover: Sports fans can choose their favourite teams, and Discover will show live scores, game highlights, and more. Personalised shopping: Search will let you save your favourite fashion styles during apparel or accessory searches, and Google Shopping will deliver a customised feed of products and deals based on your selected interests. Users can manage or disable all personalisation features at any time through their Google account settings.