
Philippines midterm vote begins as Marcos-Duterte feud and China row flare
The Philippines began voting on Monday in midterm elections that could decide the fate of impeached Vice President Sara Duterte, whose feud with President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. comes as the Southeast Asian nation grapples with both the global trade war and growing tensions with China.
Over 18,000 national and local positions are up for grabs, though the spotlight is on the Senate race, where the 12 winners — half of the 24-seat chamber — will be jurors in Duterte's impeachment trial, set for July when the new Congress convenes. Markets are closed for the voting holiday.
The trial's outcome may reshape the political landscape at a time when the strategically located archipelago is at the frontline of U.S. efforts to deter China's assertiveness in the region. Duterte, whose father oversaw a pro-Beijing foreign policy stance during his 2016-2022 presidency, denies accusations of plotting to assassinate Marcos and misusing public funds, which led to her impeachment.
"These midterm elections can be interpreted to some degree as a proxy battle between Duterte and Marcos as the two families vie for control at the top of Philippine politics,' said Dean Dulay, assistant professor of political science at Singapore Management University.
The vice president, daughter of detained former President Rodrigo Duterte, is among the top contenders for the 2028 presidential election, based on surveys conducted by pollsters. But she may be ousted and barred from holding public office if at least two-thirds of the Senate vote to convict her, pushing her out of contention to succeed Marcos when his single, six-year term ends in 2028.
Supporters cheer while holding promotional materials during a campaign rally attended by Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. in Manila on Friday. |
Bloomberg
"We see the upcoming midterm elections to be quite pivotal and will shape the political landscape for the next decade,' Maybank Securities analysts, including Kervin Sisayan, said in a note on May 7.
Marcos and Duterte have endorsed competing Senate tickets in monthslong campaign rallies across the country.
"There is still much that needs to be done,' Marcos said during his slate's rally in the capital Friday. "We have united the best Senate candidates to continue our progress, to continue our development.'
Sara Duterte has maintained relentless criticism of Marcos, with whom she ran on a joint ticket in the 2022 presidential election. At her own rally Thursday, she tried to convince supporters to pick what she calls her "DuterTEN' Senate slate.
"What we are witnessing is a systematic demolition job against political opponents that once dared to put the country first,' she said. "Again, Filipinos deserve better.'
Her father, ex-President Rodrigo Duterte, is running to be mayor of Davao even as he languishes in the Netherlands, awaiting trial by the International Criminal Court for alleged crimes against humanity during his deadly war on drugs. His youngest son and incumbent Davao mayor, Sebastian, is running to be his father's deputy, while his eldest son, Paolo, is seeking to keep his congressional seat.
Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte arrives to file her counter affidavit in response to the National Bureau of Investigation complaint over her alleged threat to Marcos, at the Department of Justice in Manila on Friday. |
AFP-JIJI
Should he win, the former leader can be proclaimed as mayor, in absentia, but the government will need to decide whether the winning vice mayor takes over, according to Commission on Elections Chairman George Garcia.
A strong showing is important for Marcos, who has overseen a dramatic shift in the Philippines' foreign policy. He has deepened a military alliance with the U.S. and confronted Beijing over its expansive South China Sea claims, which led to clashes between Philippine and Chinese ships. In contrast, Rodrigo Duterte had warm ties with Beijing during his rule and was critical of Washington.
Around 68.4 million people are eligible to vote. Voting runs from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. local time, but the election agency said persons with disability, pregnant women and those aged 60 years old and above can cast their ballot from 5 a.m.
The winning senators — picked via a nationwide vote — may emerge within hours after voting ends, although it may take days for the poll body to proclaim the victors.
Marcos during a campaign rally in Manila on Friday |
Bloomberg
Food security and job issues are also on top of voters' minds. The nation of more than 7,000 islands — a global call center hub that's also reliant on $38 billion worth of remittances from millions of citizens working overseas — last week reported its economy grew 5.4% in the first quarter. While that's faster than many countries in the region, it missed analyst estimates amid U.S. tariff-fueled global uncertainties.
Ahead of the voting, there has been suspicion that Beijing is trying to influence the elections. Philippine authorities last month arrested a Chinese national with a suspected spy device near the election commission's headquarters in Manila, amid a crackdown on alleged Chinese espionage operations targeting the military and Marcos' office.
China has denied allegations of election meddling and espionage.
The rival campaigns have underscored the end of what was once an election-winning Marcos-Duterte alliance. The break-up occurred after Marcos allies proposed to change the constitution, which the Dutertes saw as a strategy to keep Marcos — the son of the late dictator Ferdinand Marcos — in office.
Supporters shine light from their mobile phones during a campaign event attended by Duterte (not pictured), in Manila on Thursday. |
Bloomberg
Relations reached a low point when Marcos allowed Rodrigo Duterte's arrest and transfer to the International Criminal Court in March.
Senate candidates backed by the president have dominated preelection surveys. But two politicians originally supported by Marcos — including his sister Imee Marcos — publicly sought the endorsement of Duterte, who remains popular despite her impeachment.
Even if many Marcos-endorsed candidates end up securing Senate seats, lawmakers may shift alliances with an eye on the 2028 presidential race.
"The makeup of the Senate will really determine whether or not the impeachment will be successful,' said Leo Camacho, a constitutional expert and lecturer at the Ateneo School of Law in Manila. "Even before the new senators are sworn in, it will be the first order of business.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NHK
20 minutes ago
- NHK
S.Korean court postpones President Lee's trial, citing constitutional immunity
A high court in South Korea has said it will postpone the retrial of President Lee Jae-myung on charges of violating election law. Local media have reported that it is very unlikely the retrial will go ahead while Lee remains in power. South Korea's Supreme Court ruled in May, before Lee's victory, that he had violated election law by making false statements during his failed 2022 presidential bid. It sent the case back to the Seoul High Court after overturning an earlier ruling clearing him. The high court announced on Monday it will indefinitely postpone the first hearing, which was scheduled for June 18. The court said the move was based on the Constitution, which basically exempts sitting presidents from criminal prosecution. Legal experts are divided over whether a sitting president's immunity extends to trials already underway. Neither the Constitution nor the law address the matter. But South Korean media have reported the high court appears to have decided to shield Lee from standing trial during his term. Lee is facing other criminal trials that some say put him at judicial risk. The ruling Democratic Party is reportedly pushing for legal revisions that halt trials while Lee is in office.


Japan Times
an hour ago
- Japan Times
Trump vs. a united ASEAN
U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs — especially the ultrahigh 'reciprocal tariffs' that he says will be reintroduced on July 8 for any country that has not struck a trade deal with his administration — have sent countries around the world scrambling to respond, adapt and limit the fallout. ASEAN's 10 members — Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam — have been among the most proactive. Their leaders quickly recognized that, after decades of spectacular gross domestic product growth, ASEAN is an economic force that the Trump administration would have to reckon with in a serious way. In 2000, Japan was the world's second-largest economy, some eight times larger than ASEAN; today, it is only 1.1 times larger, and by 2030, ASEAN's economy will overtake it. In 2010-20, ASEAN contributed more to global economic growth than the European Union did. ASEAN owes much of this progress to open trade. Between 2003 and 2023, its trade with the rest of the world exploded, from $618 billion to $2.8 trillion. But the real secret to ASEAN's success is strong and competent leadership, exemplified, in the grouping's early years, by Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew, a Cambridge-educated lawyer, and Indonesian President Suharto, a Javanese military leader and mystic. It was their unlikely partnership that kept ASEAN together. Today, such leadership is exemplified by another group of seeming political opposites: Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto, Vietnamese General Secretary To Lam and Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong. Anwar and Prabowo both experienced prolonged periods in the political wilderness and became friends during this time. ASEAN's leaders have upheld relative peace and stability in their countries, while cultivating a culture of consultation and consensus (musyawarah and mufakat in Indonesian) in guiding regional relations. This stands in stark contrast to the experiences of many other developing countries and regions. Just a few weeks ago, neighboring India and Pakistan narrowly avoided full-scale war. The Middle East remains gripped by instability and violence, with Israel winning wars and losing the peace. The leaders of Latin America's two largest economies, Brazil and Argentina, are barely on speaking terms. After 48 years of regular ASEAN meetings — with over 1,000 ministerial and lower-level meetings taking place annually — constructive engagement is a deeply engrained habit in the region. To be sure, ASEAN is often accused of lowest-common-denominator cooperation. But without such a measured approach, one guided by pragmatism, consensus-building and compromise, ASEAN's member countries would not have managed to remain united through multiple shocks, including the Asian financial crisis of 1997-98 and the global financial crisis a decade later. ASEAN is now bringing these strengths to bear in its response to Trump's tariffs. To be sure, the individualized nature of the tariffs — which vary widely within ASEAN, from 49% on Cambodia to 10% on Singapore — limits countries' prospects for true collective bargaining. But ASEAN's member states are well aware that they are stronger together. That is why, at the just-concluded ASEAN summit in Kuala Lumpur, hosted by Anwar Ibrahim, the group proposed a summit attended by Trump and ASEAN's 10 national leaders. This builds on ASEAN's April declaration that it would develop 'an enhanced, robust and forward-looking ASEAN-U.S. economic cooperation framework,' which strengthens 'constructive engagement' and drives 'innovative initiatives' to deliver a 'mutually beneficial economic relationship,' with 'particular focus on high-value sectors.' The statement reflects ASEAN's awareness of its value to the U.S., which runs a significant trade surplus in services with the region. It is no coincidence that the U.S. invests heavily there — nearly $500 million in 2023. ASEAN's value is set only to grow, owing not least to its efforts to deepen its ties with other regional organizations and economic powers. Its just-concluded summit with China and the Gulf Cooperation Council — the first of its kind — sent a clear message: ASEAN is not pinning its future on its relationship with the U.S., but it is not turning its back on open trade. This aligns with the global mood: while Trump continues to brandish tariffs as a weapon against America's trade partners, other countries have refrained from raising tariffs unilaterally. ASEAN is also seeking to boost internal resilience by strengthening trade among its member countries. While intra-ASEAN trade has been declining as a share of total trade, from 25% in 2003 to 21.5% in 2023, this is only because trade with the rest of the world grew so rapidly. In any case, the group is now seeking to dismantle nontariff barriers — more than 99% of goods already flow through ASEAN tariff-free — and exploring other measures to boost trade within the bloc. The U.S. economy is formidable and Trump's tariffs may well undermine ASEAN's growth in the short term. But, by spurring the ASEAN countries to deepen cooperation with one another and with others, U.S. tariffs could bring about an even more prosperous — and, crucially, resilient — grouping. This is especially likely if ASEAN makes the most of existing arrangements — for example, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership and the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, which could seek to negotiate a new partnership with the EU. Fortunately, ASEAN has the kinds of leaders who can spearhead such an effort, beginning with the bloc's current leader, Anwar Ibrahim. Kishore Mahbubani, a distinguished fellow at the Asia Research Institute of the National University of Singapore, is the author of many books, including "The ASEAN Miracle: A Catalyst for Peace" (NUS Press, 2017). © Project Syndicate, 2025


Japan Times
2 hours ago
- Japan Times
Whose side is the U.S. on? Doubts strain alliances
Winston Churchill told a story of an 1895 encounter, as a young cavalry officer, with the statesman William Harcourt. After some discussion of great issues, Churchill asked eagerly: "What will happen then?' Harcourt replied, with Victorian complacency: "My dear Winston, the experiences of a long life have convinced me that nothing ever happens.' Few people 130 years later could succumb to any similar delusion in a world that seems to have consigned itself to perpetual turmoil. Most recently, Poland has frightened European capitals by electing a right-wing, anti-European Union president. The British government published a long-awaited strategic defense review, which proposes rearmament to bring about "war-fighting readiness,' according to U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer, as Ukraine launched stunning drone strikes against bomber bases deep inside Russia. There is more. At a conference in Singapore recently, France's president warned of dire consequences for democracies if Russia prevails in Ukraine. U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth urged Asian nations to stand up tall against Chinese aggression as Australia's defense minister challenged China to justify its huge military and naval buildup. His Philippines counterpart said China has been "absolutely irresponsible and reckless in appropriating most, if not all of the South China Sea, and the world cannot tolerate this.'