Record renewables capacity falls short of global target, REN21 says
LONDON, June 24 (Reuters) - A record 740 gigawatts of renewable energy capacity was added worldwide last year, still not enough to meet a global goal to triple renewable capacity by 2030, a report by the Paris-based thinktank REN21 showed on Tuesday.
A target was set at the COP28 U.N. climate conference in 2023 to triple the amount of renewables such as wind and solar to keep a 1.5 degree Celsius (2.7 Fahrenheit) warming limit this century within reach.
Analysts tracking progress have said the world is not on course to triple capacity. The 1.5C limit also appears out of reach, they say.
Trajectories show a shortfall of 6.2 terawatts towards the goal, which is more than all renewables deployed to date, the REN21 report showed.
Solar photovoltaic accounted for 81% of new renewable power capacity last year as rooftop solar increased in developing countries and technology costs continued to fall. Solar PV is the only renewables technology on track to deliver its contribution to the global tripling capacity target.
Last year and in early 2025 many countries rolled back or delayed climate change measures as the U.S. withdrew from the Paris Agremeent and New Zealand reversed its ban on offshore oil and gas exploration.
Oil and gas companies and banks have also scaled back investments in the energy transition. Trade measures, even before U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff action this year, also limited renewable development in 2024 as the West protected its industries against cheap Chinese competition.
"We are deploying renewables in record numbers, but we are not building the systems needed to transition to a renewables-based economy," said Rana Adib, executive director of REN21.
"Without coherent policies, coordinated planning, and resilient infrastructure including grids and storage, even record deployment cannot deliver speedy and lasting transformation," she added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
24 minutes ago
- The National
Iran denies launching missiles at Israel after IDF claims
Shortly after 8.30am UK-time on Tuesday, the Israel Defence Force (IDF) claimed it had identified missiles which had been launched from Iran. It said that air defence systems are "operating to intercept the threat" and that air raid alerts had been activated in the north of Israel following the detection of missiles. READ MORE: Will bombing Iranian uranium stores trigger a nuclear blast? An expert explains However, Iran has denied firing missiles at Israel, according to Iranian state media. It comes just hours after a ceasefire deal was reportedly reached between Iran and Israel. US president Donald Trump announced a deal had been agreed on his social media platform Truth Social overnight, although it took some time for both Israel and Iran to confirm. Earlier, Iran's foreign minister had said it would only stop its attacks if Israel did the same. The chief of the general staff of the IDF said the military will "respond with force" to which it called Iran's "severe violation". "In light of the severe violation of the ceasefire carried out by the Iranian regime, we will respond with force," Eyal Zamir is quoted as saying in a post on Twitter/X by the IDF. This is a breaking news story. We will bring you more as we have it.
Daily Mail
40 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Keir Starmer heads for crucial Nato summit TODAY vowing to hit new target for spending 3.5% of GDP on defence... but ministers refuse to say where the extra £30BILLION is coming from
Keir Starmer is heading for a crucial Nato summit today vowing to hit a new target for defence budgets. The PM will join fellow leaders from the military alliance in The Hague after signing up to the goal of spending 3.5 per cent of GDP on defence. Another 1.5 per cent will be committed to related measures such as cyber security, under the package demanded by Donald Trump. However, ministers have refused to say where the UK will find the extra money - around £30billion on top of existing plans - with Rachel Reeves already scrambling to balance the books. There are also claims that the figures are being fiddled and countries are watering down the pledges. A draft communique appears to have pushed back the timetable for hitting the level from 2032 to 2035. The language has also reportedly been watered down from 'we commit' to 'allies commit', with Spain flatly dismissing the idea of meeting the goal. Mr Trump himself has said America is not bound by it. 'We've been supporting NATO so long… So I don't think we should, but I think that the NATO countries should, absolutely,' he said on Friday. By contrast, Germany has said it will accelerate its spending to hit the core defence target by 2029 – six years early – amid growing global instability and the prospect of a war in the Middle East. That involves Berlin finding upwards of $60billion a year more for the military. The summit comes after Sir Keir's meeting yesterday with Volodymyr Zelensky at No10. The Ukrainian president will also be at the summit. The increase to 3.5 per cent in Italy would be equivalent to around $46billion a year, Canada $45billion, France £44billion and the UK roughly $40billion. Spain allocated just 1.24 per cent of GDP on defence in 2024. That could have left it facing funding a $36billion boost despite having a relatively small economy. But left-wing PM Pedro Sanchez said on Sunday that it was only looking to hit 2.1 per cent of GDP. 'We fully respect the legitimate desire of other countries to increase their defence investment, but we are not going to do so,' he said in a TV address. The cash cost of the goal for each country have been estimated by comparing the Nato figures for spending levels in 2024 to World Bank figures for the size of GDP. The current target is 2 per cent, which has not been met by all states. Only Poland currently tops the 3.5 per cent level. The US itself spent 3.38 per cent on defence in 2024, although the sheer size of its economy meant that dwarfed contributions from the rest of the alliance. Britain allocated 2.33 per cent of GDP to defence last year, and Keir Starmer has committed to reaching 2.5 per cent by April 2027. There is an 'ambition' of increasing that to 3 per cent at some stage in the next parliament - likely to run to 2034. Nato members effectively decide themselves whether they're hitting the 1.5 per cent element of the target, and there are fears Labour will try to include items not strictly related to defence. Downing Street sources said, for example, that it could include spending on beefing up energy security amid the switch to NetZero and fighting migrant-smuggling gangs. Former defence secretary Sir Ben Wallace posted on X: 'Tomorrow at the Nato summit we will witness the UK Government trying to con the US and Nato with spin on defence spending. 'By folding in other departments' spending and with no real defence £ increases, the PM will claim 5 per cent. 'The threat to our country is real not spin. This Government thinks it can use smoke and mirrors to deceive the public and Donald Trump. 'This is an insult to our troops who will see no significant new money. It fools no one.'
BBC News
43 minutes ago
- BBC News
Broadway House flats in Bradford approved despite 'flood risk'
Part of a Bradford office building is set to be converted into flats despite a warning that it is unsuitable for residential use due to a "high risk of flooding".Broadway House, on the newly-pedestrianised area of Bank Street, is made up of ground-floor businesses and office spaces on its first, second and third this year, property developer Springer revealed plans to convert the upper floors into 28 works have now been approved by Bradford Council despite an objection from the Environment Agency, which said residential use of the building should be avoided because the site was within a flood plain. The agency told the Local Democracy Reporting Service the building's location meant there was a "high risk of flooding". "We recommend that planning permission is refused on this basis."We continue to urge planning authorities to follow national guidance to reduce flood risk and protect communities."When asked why the flats were approved despite the objection, a Bradford Council spokesperson said a flood risk assessment (FRA) had found the proposal "does not introduce unacceptable flood risks".They added: "The upper-floor location of the residential units significantly reduces vulnerability, and the development does not increase flood risk to the site or wider area."The FRA also sets out a number of flood risk mitigation measures that are to be implemented in order to ensure the impacts of any potential flooding are minimised. "Given these considerations, the proposal can be deemed acceptable in terms of flood risk." Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
