Dunedin hospital construction timeline revealed
A six-month job capping piles and pouring concrete will kick off the resumption of work this month on the new Dunedin Hospital inpatient building.
Health Minister Simeon Brown announced the work this afternoon after the Otago Daily Times earlier revealed a letter of intent to build the project had been signed with Australian construction giant CPB.
The agreement followed years of fraught negotiations and government dithering.
Mr Brown also announced the formation of a local engagement group to "strengthen communication with the local community".
The group would bring together Health New Zealand leaders and local stakeholders, including representatives from local government, infrastructure partners, and tertiary institutions.
It would not provide advice on "the building's design scope, clinical models of care, or procurement decisions".
The early construction phase would see 134 pile caps installed, made from steel-reinforced concrete, Mr Brown said in a statement.
Around 4,300 cubic metres of concrete will be poured across the site, with approximately 490 tonnes of reinforcing steel used in total.
'This work will take about six months and includes detailed inspections of every pile to ensure the facility is built to the highest design and safety standards.'
The next major construction phase was the substructure expected to begin in early 2026.
'This phase will prepare the site for base isolators and IL4 foundations – ensuring the hospital can keep functioning after a major earthquake or natural disaster. That's essential for the people of Dunedin and the wider region.'
The 70,000 square metre inpatient building is due to open in 2031.
Timeline
July 2025 – January 2026 (6 months): Pile caps and remedial works
January 2026 – July 2026 (6 months): Substructure works, including installation of lower slab, concreting, and plinths for base isolators
July 2026: Base isolators installed
August 2026: Steel structure construction commences - APL
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Wood smoke, traffic fumes polluting Christchurch's air
Professor Simon Hales (left) says much of Christchurch's air pollution problem, particularly in winter, can be traced back to home heating. Photo: RNZ / Nate McKinnon Recently the air quality in parts of Canterbury has been rated 'unhealthy' using the air quality index (AQI), which measures high levels of particulate matter in the air. But what does poor air quality actually mean for our health? University of Otago environmental epidemiologist Professor Simon Hales told RNZ's Nights the source of the pollution, particularly in winter, is generally home heating. "The reason why it's a problem in winter is because in Christchurch there is a kind of, the city is somewhat bowl-shaped with the Port Hills on one side, and there tends to be sort of a very calm night with the temperature inversion, which is a bit like having a lid on the city. So all the smoke that comes out of people's chimneys is trapped, and that's what leads to the very high level." Hales said Christchurch's air quality had improved since he lived there 30 years ago, but still needed to improve further. "The World Health Organization (WHO) has a guideline level for the daily level of PM2.5 fine particle pollution, and that's 15 micrograms per cubic metre," he said. "About 15 percent of the days over the past five years have been over that guideline level. And in the last three months, about 43 days." That means, in the last three months, Christchurch's air has had over the WHO-recommended daily level of particle matter in its air about 47 percent of the time. "There is also an annual guideline which is five micrograms per cubic meter. And in fact the annual average PM 2.5 in Christchurch has been about nine micrograms per cubic meter, so nearly double the WHO guidelines," Hales said. While polluted air was unlikely to noticeably affect young and fit people, those with chronic diseases, particularly heart and lung related, might notice their symptoms getting worse temporarily. However, the short-term effects were only part of health impact, he said. "Over weeks and months of exposure, it's making people who are currently healthy gradually less healthy. So it's actually inducing disease or worsening disease in people who otherwise would would have been healthy. And this relates particularly to heart disease and lung disease, but there's an increasing number of different diseases that we're realising are related to air pollution exposure." And it's not just woodsmoke leading to the poor air quality. Nitrogen dioxide, which comes mainly from road traffic, is also a big issue, Hales said. "In fact, we recently did a study which suggested that the N-O-2 was actually more of a problem in terms of its overall health impact, causing over 2000 premature deaths per year." The same study, published in 2021, revealed about 1000 deaths relating to particles mainly from home heating. The main solution was to switch to cleaner fuels, Hales said. That should not be a problem for a wealthy country like New Zealand, which had abundant hydropower resources, he said. A similar shift was needed in regards to transport. "We need to change the modes by which we get about mostly. "We still use personal cars, mostly fossil fuel-powered cars, and we need to switch both to clean vehicles, EVs for example, but also we need to switch the mode so that people are not relying so much on personal cars, but also using public transport and active transport, so walking and cycling." New Zealand had mixed results when it came to the WHO's guidelines, Hales said. "If you look in global terms, then New Zealand is doing pretty well. We're not meeting all of the guidelines all of the time, but we are getting close and in many places we do meet the guidelines for most of the time, so that's something that many countries can't say. "On the other hand, I think we need to be doing more. We need to have more incentives for the kind of policies that I was suggesting before." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Unlabelled GE Food Leaves Consumers In The Dark
Aotearoa New Zealand – Consumers have just lost a fundamental right to informed choice about the food they're eating, says the Soil & Health Association. New Zealand Food Safety Minister Andrew Hoggard and his eight Australian state counterparts have approved a decision to allow genetically engineered food ingredients to enter unlabelled into the food chain of both countries. 'This is an alarming and unscientific move that removes our right to know what's in our food,' says Charles Hyland, chair of the Soil & Health Association. 'New Zealanders want to know what they're eating, and be able to avoid things they don't want.' 'Allowing unlabelled GE ingredients that have no novel DNA ignores the fact that changes can and do occur as a result of all types of genetic engineering – whether it introduces novel DNA or not.' Gene edited cattle in the USA were heralded as a success and claimed to have no novel DNA. However it was then found that bacterial DNA had been introduced, conferring antibiotic resistance, and the cattle were withdrawn from the market. Similar situations could happen with food that supposedly has no novel DNA. Our knowledge of the risks to health from GE foods is still very limited, and there is very little long-term independent research to draw from. 'What happens if there is a health issue from GE food? How could we pinpoint it to that GE food? If it's unlabelled, authorities won't be able to trace it or issue a food recall.' The onus will now be on consumers to ask retailers and food companies whether there are any GE ingredients in their food. 'The best ways to avoid GE food ingredients are to eat organic food, grow your own, favour whole foods and avoid ultra-processed foods.'
Otago Daily Times
3 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Shuffles continue at top of hospital project
A fast-rising bureaucrat brought in to helm the government's reset of the new Dunedin hospital project has been dumped from the inpatient build, the Otago Daily Times understands. Health New Zealand Te Whatu Ora (HNZ) head of infrastructure delivery Blake Lepper had fronted the $1.88 billion Dunedin hospital project for HNZ, including standing alongside ministers at press briefings and being described as ''senior responsible officer''. Mr Lepper arrived at HNZ last March from a management role at the Infrastructure Commission, but after repeated questions to HNZ from the Otago Daily Times about whether Mr Lepper was still senior responsible officer for the inpatient build, the agency admitted he is not. Tony Lloyd, who was removed as the build's programme director in November, has been confirmed as project director for the build. HNZ said Mr Lepper, who has a law and physics degree from the University of Otago, retained responsibilities for completion of Dunedin's outpatient building, and workforce and data and digital work streams, as well as other infrastructure projects. The period of Mr Lepper's leadership of the inpatient build was fraught. After piles were driven, no contract was awarded to build the inpatients building and ministers claimed a project blowout, and sought a reset. Meanwhile, sources moaned about HNZ leadership prevarication causing delays. The option of refurbishing the existing ward block, rather than constructing a new inpatient building, had been previously considered and ditched, but was reconsidered under Mr Lepper and dismissed again. Mr Lepper's departure from the inpatient building comes hot on the heels of other senior personnel changes and announcements relating to how the project is staffed, delivered and governed. Last month, corporate boss Evan Davies — group chief executive of gas and property company Todd and member of a new HNZ health infrastructure committee — was appointed as crown manager of the inpatient building project by Health Minister Simeon Brown. When announcing the appointment, Mr Brown said HNZ had ''struggled to maintain momentum on the project and identify a path forward''. Mr Brown, who had spoken in January alongside Mr Lepper at a press conference announcing the inpatient build would go ahead, has repeatedly stressed that Mr Davies now has authority to make appointments to run the project. In the press conference, Mr Brown said the focus was ''cracking on'' with the build. Mr Lepper's messaging in the conference was less clear. He said HNZ was committed to leading the project, but was also ''looking across government to get the support we need to make sure we can move''. He was ''really grateful'' for support that was being provided by Crown Infrastructure Delivery (CID), a crown agency tasked with helping government departments manage infrastructure builds. Subsequent to Mr Davies becoming crown manager, HNZ sent Australian construction giant CPB a ''letter of intent'' to hire the firm to deliver the inpatient building. CID, which has no hospital-building experience, will not be project managing CPB's work. A question mark also hovers over the future and role of the project's governance committee, the Project Steering Group (PSG), which is meant to oversee the build. Rebecca Wark, the former head of health construction for New South Wales, was the most recent independent chairwoman of the PSG, but HNZ said her contract ended last month and it was ''currently reviewing the structure of the group''.
