Syrian minister says lifting of economic sanctions offers hope for recovery
Kabawat is the only woman and the only Christian in the 23-member cabinet formed in March to steer the country during a transitional period after the ouster of former President Bashar Assad in December.
Her portfolio will be one of the most important as the country begins rebuilding after nearly 14 years of civil war.
She said moves by the US and the EU in the past week to at least temporarily lift most of the sanctions that had been imposed on Syria over the decades will allow that work to get started.
Before, she said, 'we would talk, we would make plans, but nothing could happen on the ground because sanctions were holding everything up and restricting our work.'
With the lifting of sanctions, they can move to 'implementation.'
One of the first programs the new government is planning to launch is 'temporary schools' for the children of refugees and internally displaced people returning to their home areas.
Kabawat said that it will take time for the easing of sanctions to show effects on the ground, particularly since unwinding some of the financial restrictions will involve complicated bureaucracy.
'We are going step by step,' she said.
'We are not saying that anything is easy — we have many challenges — but we can't be pessimistic. We need to be optimistic.'
The new government's vision is 'that we don't want either food baskets or tents after five years,' Kabawat said, referring to the country's dependence on humanitarian aid and many displacement camps.
That may be an ambitious target, given that 90 percent of the country's population currently lives below the poverty line, according to the UN.
The civil war that began in 2011 also displaced half the country's pre-war population of 23 million people.
The UN's refugee agency, UNHCR, estimates that about half a million have returned to Syria since Assad was ousted.
But the dire economic situation and battered infrastructure have also dissuaded many refugees from coming back.
The widespread poverty also fed into a culture of public corruption that developed in the Assad era, including solicitation of bribes by public employees and shakedowns by security forces at checkpoints.
Syria's new leaders have pledged to end corruption, but they face an uphill battle. Public employees make salaries far below the cost of living, and the new government has so far been unable to make good on a promise to hike public sector wages by 400 percent.
'How can I fight corruption if the monthly salary is $40 and that is not enough to buy food for 10 days?' Kabawat asked.
Syria's new rulers, led by President Ahmad Al-Sharaa, have been under scrutiny by Western countries over the treatment of Syrian women and religious minorities.
In March, clashes between government security forces and pro-Assad armed groups spiraled into sectarian revenge attacks on members of the Alawite sect to which Assad belongs. Hundreds of civilians were killed.
The government formed a committee to investigate the attacks, which has not yet reported its findings.
Many also criticized the transitional government as giving only token representation to women and minorities.
Apart from Kabawat, the Cabinet includes only one member each from the Druze and Alawite sects and one Kurd.
'Everywhere I travel … the first and last question is, 'What is the situation of the minorities?'' Kabawat said.
'I can understand the worries of the West about the minorities, but they should also be worried about Syrian men and women as a whole.'
She said the international community's priority should be to help Syria build its economy and avoid the country falling into 'chaos.'
Despite being the only woman in the Cabinet, Kabawat said 'now there is a greater opportunity for women' than under Assad and that 'today there is no committee being formed that does not have women in it.'
'Syrian women have suffered a lot in these 14 years and worked in all areas,' she said.
'All Syrian men and women need to have a role in rebuilding our institutions.'
She called for those wary of President Al-Sharaa to give him a chance.
The West has warmed to the new president — particularly after his recent high-profile meeting with US President Donald Trump.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
Qur'an competition participants praise visit to Makkah Clock Tower Museum
MAKKAH: Participants in the 45th King Abdulaziz International Competition for the Memorization, Recitation and Interpretation of the Holy Qur'an visited the Makkah Clock Tower Museum, the Saudi Press Agency reported on Saturday. Organized by the Ministry of Islamic Affairs, Dawah and Guidance, the visit was part of the cultural program prepared for 179 contestants from 128 countries. During the tour, the contestants explored the museum's sections and exhibits. The site is on the terrace of the tower adjacent to the Grand Mosque. The contestants expressed their admiration for the museum, appreciating the Kingdom's commitment to spreading knowledge in various fields and its dedication to serving Islam and Muslims. They prayed to Allah to protect the Kingdom, its leadership and its people, and to grant it continued progress and prosperity. This year's contest, which concluded last week, featured intense competition marked by exceptional recitation quality, precise memorization, eloquent delivery and melodious voices. The high level of performance reflected a deep global reverence for the Qur'an and signaled the emergence of a promising new generation of Qur'an memorizers worldwide, the SPA added. The competition included five categories with total prizes exceeding SR4 million ($1 million), reaffirming its status as one of the most prestigious and well-established Qur'anic competitions in the world. The event also featured an upgraded electronic judging system to ensure fairness and accuracy in scoring. Large audiences at the Grand Mosque engaged warmly with the recitations and praised Saudi Arabia's unwavering support for Qur'anic competitions and its dedication to serving Qur'an reciters. Participants in the competition extended their heartfelt gratitude to King Salman and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman for their continuous support of the Qur'an and its memorizers around the world.
Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
Why food security in the Middle East is slipping even as global numbers improve
DUBAI: Global hunger edged down last year, but not in the Middle East. That divergence — driven by conflict, inflation, currency stress, and a heavy reliance on imports — is reshaping food security across Western Asia and North Africa, even as other regions recover. According to 'The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World' report published recently by five UN agencies, 8.2 percent of the global population experienced hunger in 2024, down from 8.5 percent in 2023. But the headline hides widening regional gaps. In Africa, more than 20 percent of people — 307 million — faced hunger in 2024. In Western Asia, which includes several Middle Eastern countries, 12.7 percent of the population, or more than 39 million people, were affected. The contrast with other parts of Asia is striking. 'Improvements in South-Eastern and Southern Asia were largely driven by economic recovery, better affordability of healthy diets, and stronger social protection systems,' David Laborde, director of the Agrifood Economics Division at the UN's Food and Agriculture Organization, told Arab News. That rebound has not reached the Middle East evenly. He noted that while 'high income countries' like the UAE or Saudi Arabia are exempt from any major food insecurities, 'the rest of the region and particularly conflict-affected countries (like Lebanon and Syria) are contributors to the rising hunger trend due to displacement, disrupted supply chains, and economic vulnerability.' Nowhere is the food crisis more acute than Gaza, where war has devastated basic systems. A recent assessment by FAO and the UN Satellite Centre found that only 1.5 percent of cropland is currently available for cultivation, down from 4.6 percent in April 2025. Put differently, 98.5 percent of cropland is damaged, inaccessible, or both — a staggering figure in a territory of more than 2 million people. The data, published in July, landed amid warnings from UN agencies of an impending famine. The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification reported that two of the three official indicators used to determine famine conditions were present in parts of the strip. FAO, the World Food Programme, and UNICEF have cautioned that time is rapidly running out to mount a full-scale response, as nearly a quarter of Gaza's population is enduring famine-like conditions, while the remainder face emergency levels of hunger. The report does not break down the impact of individual conflicts, but Laborde is blunt about the drivers. Conditions are getting worse because of 'persistent structural vulnerabilities, which include conflict, economic instability, and limited access to affordable food.' He added: 'This region has seen a continued rise in hunger, with the prevalence of undernourishment increasing to 12.7 in 2024, up from previous years.' Those structural weaknesses — exposure to war, import dependence, currency fragility — collided with a series of global shocks. The report cites the COVID‑19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine as major triggers of global food commodity price spikes in 2021-22. Some pressures have eased, but inflation's aftershocks persist, especially where budgets and safety nets are already thin. According to Laborde, the countries struggling most are those where 'real wages have declined the most, food price inflation has surged, and access to healthy diets have deteriorated.' He added: 'Low-income and lower-middle-income countries, many of which are in the MENA region, have experienced food price inflation above 10 percent, which is strongly associated with rising food insecurity and child malnutrition.' For Middle Eastern economies that import a large share of their food, price spikes hit with particular force. Beyond war and pandemic disruptions, Laborde points to 'climate shocks in key bread baskets have led to higher food prices. 'For countries that were able to compensate for this food price increase through higher revenue from energy product sales, also impacted by the same crisis, the blow was limited. 'However, for the countries with more limited revenue' from exports of oil and natural gas, 'the situation was more difficult to handle.' If the region's import bill is the first vulnerability, exchange rates are the second. The report highlights exchange-rate fluctuations and local currency depreciation as critical, non‑commodity drivers of food inflation. This is especially relevant for 'import-dependent economies (such as Western Asia) where a weaker local currency increases the cost of imported food and agricultural inputs,' said Laborde. 'When local currencies depreciate, the cost of these imports rises, directly affecting consumer prices and worsening food insecurity.' Egypt offers a case study. Heavy reliance on wheat imports from Russia and Ukraine, combined with a severe foreign currency shortage, has driven food prices far beyond wage growth since mid‑2022. In practical terms, 'a shortage of foreign currency has made it more difficult to pay for imports, leading to higher import costs in local currency terms, rising consumer food prices, and reduced affordability of healthy diets for households,' Laborde said. The result: Egyptians' food purchasing power fell by 30 percent between the third quarter of 2022 and the last quarter of 2024. Similar pressures are visible elsewhere. Syria, Yemen, and Iraq have recorded significant declines in real food wages since 2020, with unskilled wages still below early‑2020 levels — a reflection of persistent instability and the difficulty of rebuilding labor markets amid conflict. Even when global prices cool, the Middle East does not always feel the relief. The region's supply chains remain vulnerable to disrupted trade routes, heightened uncertainty in grain markets linked to the war in Ukraine, and hostilities in the Red Sea. For countries like Egypt, these pressures feed directly into the food import bill, particularly for wheat — a staple with no easy substitute. In an import‑dependent context, each additional week of shipping delays, insurance surcharges, or currency slippage translates into higher prices for bread, cooking oil, and other essentials. The report also flags a quieter, but consequential, problem: market power. In theory, competitive markets transmit falling global prices quickly to consumers. In practice, market power — the ability of firms to influence prices or supply — can mute or delay those benefits. Since 2022, many low- and lower‑middle‑income countries have experienced persistent inflation even as world prices cooled, suggesting domestic frictions at play. These 'distortions have been observed since 2022' and are 'especially relevant in import-dependent regions like Western Asia and North Africa, where currency depreciation, limited competition, and supply chain bottlenecks can further entrench inflation,' Laborde said. Beyond statistics, the social toll is mounting. Rising food prices hit the poorest households first, forcing trade‑offs between calories and quality — cheaper, less nutritious staples displacing diverse diets rich in protein and micronutrients. That is why sustained double‑digit food inflation correlates with child malnutrition and worsens long‑term health outcomes, from anemia to stunting. The consequences can also be gendered. In many Middle Eastern and North African contexts, women — who often manage household food budgets — absorb inflation by skipping meals or cutting their own portions to feed children. When real wages drop and informal work dries up, coping strategies erode quickly. All of this threatens the UN's 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, especially its aims to end hunger, achieve food security and improve nutrition, and promote sustainable agriculture. With the deadline fast approaching, Laborde urges governments to 'stabilize food prices and protect vulnerable populations' by prioritizing 'integrated fiscal and trade policy reforms,' delivered through 'time-bound, targeted fiscal measures.' These include 'temporary tax relief on essential foods, scaled-up social protection (e.g. cash transfers) indexed to inflation and ensuring benefits reach consumers through transparent monitoring.'
Arab News
3 hours ago
- Arab News
Tech leaders should focus on job creation, not displacement
When ChatGPT stormed onto the scene in late 2022, the alarm bells rang loud. Philosophers and futurists demanded new rules to prevent humanity from sliding into chaos, wars and disorder. Since then, a string of large language models and apps — Gemini, Grok, Perplexity, Meta AI — have caused fresh anxieties. Two years on, true artificial general intelligence is still a distant goal but the mixed results of widespread adoption of AI are already plain to see. Change that was happening gradually is now happening swiftly. As veteran Wall Street Journal commentator Peggy Noonan wrote in a recent column, 'The story is no longer 'AI in coming decades will take a lot of jobs' or 'AI will take jobs sooner than we think.' It is 'AI is here and a quiet havoc has begun.' Yet, for America's AI titans, the motivation today seems less about building tools that create new jobs and more about accelerating human displacement while envisioning a vast social safety net as compensation. A recent article in the Wall Street Journal titled 'What Musk, Altman and Others Say About AI-Funded 'Universal Basic Income'' stated: 'Suddenly, an idea once seen as a socialist policy that would reward idleness is one of the AI boom's hottest acronyms.' According to the article, the consensus in Silicon Valley is that automation driven by AI is going to replace a lot of factory jobs and white-collar roles while generating billions in profits for AI companies. What tech leaders and gurus seem divided over is whether AI-funded universal basic income is the answer to the challenge of mass unemployment. Of course, as the popular 1956 Doris Day song 'Que Sera, Sera (Whatever Will Be, Will Be)' reminds us: 'The future's not ours to see … what will be, will be.' Perhaps there is no need to worry excessively, as many a bleak prophecy in the past (for example, 'The Population Bomb,' a book by Paul R. Ehrlich about the looming danger of overpopulation) failed to come to pass. High-quality jobs give young people a reason to get up in the morning, a sense of fulfillment and a feeling of progress in their lives. We risk losing the essence of this in an idle society with universal basic income. Arnab Neil Sengupta Perhaps the 'quiet havoc' of which Noonan spoke is a temporary phenomenon and US employment numbers will pick up, similar to the way in which the development of mainframe computers in the 1950s created entirely new occupations. In any case, AI tycoons such as Elon Musk, Sam Altman and Marc Benioff ought to be thinking of ways in which AI can be used to create plentiful, professionally rewarding jobs instead of touting the introduction of universal basic income as inevitable. Not only would such income for Americans made redundant by AI be of little use to the rest of the world, it could be a recipe for trouble in the long term. Jobs do not just pay wages, as the Silicon Valley titans surely know. Jobs circulate money throughout the economy, creating demand for goods and services, generating tax revenues and nurturing communities. A purely passive income scheme will not generate the same level of productive economic activity. For many people, especially young adults, meaningful work is a core part of their identity. For young people in the Arab world, it is not an exaggeration to say a job equals purpose, self-worth and hope. Employment in challenging roles builds skills, creativity and problem-solving capacities that are essential for adapting to future changes. High-quality jobs in particular give educated young people a sense of fulfillment and progress in their lives. This satisfaction would be at risk of being lost in an idle society. The workplace is a powerful training ground. Before the advent of remote working, conversation and competition made busy offices incubators of great ideas. In his memoir 'City Room,' Arthur Gelb, the late American journalist, described the New York Times newsroom of the 1940s this way: 'There was an overwhelming sense of purpose, fire and life: the clacking rhythm of typewriters, the throbbing of great machines in the composing room on the floor above, reporters shouting for copy boys to pick up their stories.' Employment creates networks, encourages teamwork and accountability, and strengthens civic engagement. On the other hand, large-scale joblessness, especially among young people, produces social drift, weakens bonds, increases division, feeds unrest and erodes hope. AI tycoons such as Elon Musk, Sam Altman and Marc Benioff ought to be thinking of ways in which AI can be used to generate plentiful, professionally rewarding jobs instead of touting the introduction of universal basic income as inevitable. Arnab Neil Sengupta No matter what term tech tycoons choose to apply to it — 'universal extreme wealth,' 'universal high income' or 'universal basic income' — the dangers of financially rewarding idleness can scarcely be overstated. In addition to the erosion of motivation and the work ethic, a guaranteed income without the expectation of contribution might lead to disconnection from skills-building and long-term planning. There is also the risk of social fragmentation and alienation. Without shared daily activities like work, people living off AI profits could become more isolated, lose touch with community norms, and fall into destructive habits or radicalized echo chambers. None of this is an argument for a Luddite agenda resisting the adoption of a technology whose time has come. Even California socialists do not advocate turning back the clock — although, ultimately, robots rather than American workers might end up doing the heavy lifting of President Trump's planned manufacturing renaissance. If the technological displacement of human workers proves unstoppable, the pace and scale of AI-driven automation will undoubtedly make job creation in some sectors unviable. A universal basic income could at least ensure that people's basic needs are met in a fully automated economy. A guaranteed supplemental income could also reduce some of the economic insecurity and stress. It could provide a safety net that allows people to take entrepreneurial risks, retrain or transition to new industries without fear of destitution, potentially prompting innovation from the ground up. In theory, the recipients of universal basic income would have the freedom to pursue non-market value creation. Thus, with their basic needs covered, people could focus on care-giving, volunteering, education, the creative arts or environmental projects that existing markets do not adequately reward, even though the wider society still benefits from them. If the pros and cons of an AI-funded 'universal high income' make it sound like a quixotic experiment in wealth generation — lowering costs for companies and then handing out part of the profits in a post-work future — that is because it indeed would be if tried. Job-loss fears are real, but the remedy should not be worse than the disease. Ultimately, the responsibility of tech leaders is not to make mass idleness the new normal, but to harness AI in ways that expand human opportunity. • Arnab Neil Sengupta is a senior editor at Arab News.
