Germany's support for Israel's far-right alliance shatters its 'denazified' facade
Germany prides itself on being a denazified liberal democracy.
Yet its unconditional support for Israel is not merely a political position but the core principle of its Staatsrason - a national doctrine holding that support for Israel is central to post-Holocaust Germany, and thus the very foundation of the German state's legitimacy.
This position is inherently contradictory, as liberal democracy, by definition, cannot be reconciled with support for genocide carried out by a fascist apartheid state - let alone one openly aligned with far-right regimes. It demands a serious reality check.
The reality became glaringly evident when the German Commissioner for Jewish Affairs, Felix Klein, withdrew from an upcoming conference set to be held in Jerusalem on combating antisemitism, upon discovering that fascist figures were among the guests.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
"Mr Klein accepted the invitation months ago, unaware of who else would be attending," his office explained.
Klein's withdrawal serves as an implicit admission by the German state that Israel maintains alliances with white supremacists, fascists, Nazis and Holocaust deniers.
This, in fact, reveals the core contradiction of Germany's posture: far-right politics are not only tolerated but directly supported - so long as the facade of a liberal, democratic, and denazified Germany is upheld.
Old foundations
After World War Two, the US swiftly reintegrated former Nazis into West Germany's government to counter the Soviet Union, despite the USSR playing the decisive role in defeating Hitler. Fear of communism led the West to rehabilitate ex-Nazis, who seamlessly rebranded themselves within the new West German state.
West German Chancellor Kurt Georg Kiesinger (1966-69) exemplified this continuity. Exposed by journalist Beate Klarsfeld, he had deep ties to top Nazis like Joachim von Ribbentrop and Joseph Goebbels, actively engaging in Nazi propaganda and collaborating closely with the SS.
By 1957, a staggering 77 percent of senior officials in West Germany's Justice Ministry were former Nazi Party members
But Kiesinger was far from an anomaly - many of West Germany's postwar institutions were built on Nazi foundations.
The country's intelligence service, the Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND), was led by Reinhard Gehlen, Hitler's former head of anti-Soviet intelligence. With CIA backing, Gehlen ran the Gehlen Organisation, an anti-communist espionage network composed of former Nazis, which was officially transformed into the BND in 1956.
After the fall of the Nazi regime, the number of former party members in the West German justice ministry did not decline. On the contrary, their presence increased throughout the 1950s - culminating in 1957, when a staggering 77 percent of senior officials were former Nazi Party members.
Given this deep institutional continuity, it is unsurprising that West Germany actively allied itself with white supremacist, fascist, and Nazi-linked regimes.
Beyond mere complicity, Germany played a direct role in supporting fascist regimes worldwide - an involvement that persists to this day.
West Germany backed apartheid-era South Africa, military dictatorships in Argentina and Chile, and Portugal's brutal colonial wars in Africa. It maintained close ties with Francisco Franco's fascist regime in Spain, offering it significant support.
Moreover, West German mercenaries fought alongside Rhodesia's white supremacist military, further entrenching the country's role in upholding global fascism.
Strategic alliances
A unified Germany continued this legacy, with Angela Merkel openly supporting Aleksandar Vucic's authoritarian, fascist regime in Serbia - despite full knowledge of his long record of genocide denial and glorification of the 1990s atrocities and apartheid-like ideologies, in which he was directly involved.
During the Srebrenica Genocide on 20 July 1995, Vucic - then a member of parliament - stood in the Serbian national assembly and issued a chilling threat to deter international intervention:
"If you bomb, if you kill one Serb, we will kill a hundred Muslims. Let's see if anyone in the international community dares to attack Serbian positions," he said.
What is behind Germany's complicity in Israel's Gaza genocide? Read More »
Another figure Serbia has not only rehabilitated but actively glorified is Dragoljub Draza Mihailovic, a convicted war criminal and Nazi collaborator responsible for the mass slaughter of tens of thousands of Bosniaks during the Second World War.
In addition, the country is now in the process of rehabilitating Milan Nedic, who served as prime minister from 1941 to 1944, overseeing a regime that played a direct role in the Holocaust.
Under Nedic's rule, Belgrade became the first city in Europe to be declared Judenfrei - free of Jews. At the time, Serbian authorities proudly boasted of their "achievement" to the Nazis, seeking to elevate their status.
By the end of the war, approximately 90 percent of Serbia's Jewish population had been eradicated.
Germany's unwavering support for both Israel and Serbia reveals its entrenched complicity in global authoritarian and racist alliances. This alliance was made public when Serbian police allegedly deployed a sonic weapon - reportedly supplied by Israel - against peaceful anti-corruption protesters in Belgrade in blatant violation of Serbian law.
Further underscoring this partnership, Serbian arms exports to Israel soared in 2024.
Inviting fascism
One of the most revealing recent examples of these alliances is the invitation of Milorad Dodik to a state-sponsored Israeli conference on combating antisemitism.
Dodik, president of Republika Srpska, is best known for his repeated denial of the Obmana - the genocide of Bosniaks between 1992 and 1995.
On 14 March, Bosnia's state prosecutors issued arrest warrants for three top Bosnian Serb officials, including Dodik himself. Despite this, Dodik is listed as a speaker on the Israeli conference's official website.
Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage for all the latest on the Israel-Palestine war
The two-day event, scheduled for 26-27 March and organised by Israel's Ministry of Diaspora Affairs, aims to bring together hundreds of experts, activists, government officials, civil society organisations, Jewish community representatives, researchers, and students from Israel and abroad to discuss contemporary antisemitism.
Eli Tauber, a historian and member of the Jewish community in Bosnia and Herzegovina, criticised Dodik's invitation: "What is he doing there? Those who invited him should have known who he is and what he stands for. Whether they overlooked this intentionally or by accident, the responsibility lies entirely with them."
Tauber further argued that Dodik's participation serves to push Islamophobic narratives about Bosnia. "Dodik has no place at a conference on antisemitism," Tauber concluded.
Tauber's critique, however, misses a deeper historical reality: Israel's invitation of fascist figures like Dodik is not a mistake, but a continuation of a political strategy rooted in the very foundations of Zionism.
Weaponising antisemitism
Theodor Herzl, the founding figure of political Zionism, famously wrote in his diaries: "The antisemites will become our most dependable friends, the antisemitic countries our allies."
This was not a moment of cynicism or despair, but a clear articulation of Zionism's strategic logic.
Herzl understood that the very forces seeking to expel Jews from Europe could be leveraged to support the Zionist project of Jewish colonisation in Palestine.
The Balfour Declaration was never an act of humanitarianism - it was a colonial project rooted in imperial interests and antisemitic logic
By aligning with antisemites who wanted Jews out of Europe, Zionism positioned itself as a "solution" to the so-called "Jewish Question" - not by demanding equality within Europe, but by facilitating Jewish removal and resettlement elsewhere.
Arthur Balfour, the British statesman behind the infamous Balfour Declaration of 1917, exemplifies this dynamic.
A known antisemite, Balfour had earlier sponsored the 1905 Aliens Act - the first British law explicitly aimed at restricting Jewish immigration, particularly of Eastern European Jews fleeing pogroms in the Russian Empire.
Seeing these Jews as a destabilising presence, Balfour sought to exclude them from Britain. Yet it was precisely this exclusionary mindset that made him a natural ally of the Zionist movement.
By backing a Jewish homeland in Palestine, Balfour could rid Britain of unwanted refugees while appearing to champion Jewish self-determination.
The Zionist movement embraced Balfour - and the British Empire - not despite his antisemitism, but because of it. The Balfour Declaration was never an act of humanitarianism - it was a colonial project rooted in imperial interests and antisemitic logic.
Far-right friends
This historical pattern did not end with Herzl or Balfour. To this day, the Zionist movement and the Israeli state have consistently aligned themselves with far-right and antisemitic forces to advance their geopolitical goals.
Israel's far-right "friends" have included former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte, infamous for his racist, homophobic, and antisemitic remarks - among them favourable comparisons to Hitler and mockery of Holocaust victims.
Despite this, he visited Israel, participated in a memorial at Yad Vashem with Netanyahu, and signed new oil and arms deals. On 14 March, he made his first appearance at the International Criminal Court to face charges of crimes against humanity over his deadly war on drugs.
Furthering the 'far-right international': Likud joins the Patriots for Europe Read More »
Across the world, right-wing movements idolise Israel as a model of European domination over indigenous populations. They view its demographic policies - from deportations and incarceration to apartheid walls - as a blueprint for their own nationalist agendas.
In Europe, far-right parties like Austria's FPO and Germany's AfD incorporate Zionism into their racist ideologies while glorifying Nazi collaborators.
The FPO uses Zionism as a concealment strategy for being "antisemitic to its core", yet its true character repeatedly surfaces - from torchlight processions and Nazi songs to leader Herbert Kickl downplaying SS crimes and styling himself as "Volkskanzler" in imitation of Hitler, to members giving Nazi salutes.
Germany's AfD is not far behind: leaders like Bjorn Hocke and Alexander Gauland have mocked Holocaust remembrance, praised German soldiers in both world wars, and dismissed Nazi atrocities as a "speck of bird poop" in German history.
Party members were also caught attending secret meetings with extremists to plan mass deportations.
Figures like Dutch Islamophobe Geert Wilders and Sweden's far-right Democrats champion Israel's illegal West Bank settlements as the vanguard of western Judeo-Christian civilisation and frame Islam as a shared enemy.
Wilders has even publicly advocated for the expulsion of Palestinians.
No anomaly
Herzl's chilling prediction that antisemites would become Zionism's "most dependable friends" was not an anomaly.
It remains a core strategy of Zionism today. From Balfour to Orban, from Duterte to Dodik, Israel's alliances with the far right continue to support its colonial domination over Palestinians - all while claiming to represent global Jewish safety.
By supporting Israel unconditionally, Germany does not merely tolerate its far-right alliances - it helps legitimise them on the world stage
At their core, critiques like Tauber's, which suggest that such alliances are aberrations or mistakes, fail to understand Israel and overlook the deliberate logic behind its invitation to Dodik.
Dodik fits seamlessly into the mould of Islamophobic fascists, white supremacists, and Holocaust revisionists whom the Israeli state has openly embraced.
His presence at the conference only reinforces a deeper truth: Germany is not denazified.
The Nunzis - the Nazi grandchildren who claim to uphold liberal democracy while preserving the ideological legacy of their forebears - merely maintain the illusion of a transformed state.
By supporting Israel unconditionally, Germany does not merely tolerate its far-right alliances - it helps legitimise them on the world stage. In doing so, it embraces - whether it admits it or not - the very fascist forces it once claimed to oppose.
The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Azerbaijan maintains oil sales to Israel despite Turkish backlash, says report
Azerbaijan has vowed to Israel that it will continue supplying the country with oil, despite officially halting oil sales last year, according to a report in Haaretz. Baku recently removed oil sales to Israel from its customs records, after steady year-on-year increases in exports to the country which had reached over a million tons in 2024. According to the records, exports to Israel stopped in October amid the war on Gaza. However, Israeli sources told Haaretz that the sales have continued, and that the change in customs records may be due to the transactions being made to traders registered in third countries. "We received a promise from the Azerbaijanis that the strategic relations will continue, including in the energy sector, and we have nothing to worry about," one source said. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Two Israeli sources said that the halt on sales in October was driven by pressure from Turkey, Baku's most important political and military ally. Azerbaijan's state oil company to invest $7bn in Turkey Read More » The Turkish pressure, Haaretz reported, is partly due to the fact that Azerbaijani oil exported to Israel is carried by the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) pipeline, running through Turkey. Ankara cut trade ties with Israel in May last year over the war on Gaza and Israeli refusal to allow Turkey to airdrop humanitarian aid to the besieged Palestinian enclave. Several Turkish opposition parties and voices have protested against President Recep Tayyip Erdogan's government, accusing it of continuing to supply Israel with Azerbaijani oil. Protests have also taken place outside the Istanbul office of Socar, Azerbaijan's state oil company. The Israeli source told Haaretz: "Even if Azerbaijan stops exporting oil to Israel, we will not collapse. We will bring it from somewhere else. "But they want to balance the situation in which they are dependent only on us, from a security perspective.' Tankers turning off tracking signal Israel provided military and diplomatic assistance to Azerbaijan in its offensive against Armenia in September 2023, which resulted in an Azerbaijani takeover of the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh region. Ilham Shaban, the chairman of the Azerbaijani Caspian Barrel Oil Research Centre, told Haaretz that by selling oil through individuals, it can avoid publicising that the exports eventually end up in Israel. He said that Baku could then claim that the sales do 'not fuel the planes that annihilate Palestinian children'. Analysis in November found evidence of 'systemised trade' in crude oil between Turkey and Israel, despite Ankara's trade embargo over the war. The Stop Fuelling Genocide campaign released evidence that suggested that the Seavigour tanker shipped crude oil from Turkey's Ceyhan port to a pipeline near Ashkelon in Israel. Cop29 turns heat up on Turkey and Azerbaijan over oil exports to Israel Read More » The port is the last stop on the BP-owned Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline. The oil is then shipped from the Heydar Aliyev Terminal at Ceyhan to Israel, accounting for almost 30 percent of its crude oil imports. The researchers tracked 10 journeys made in 2024 by the Kimolos tanker between Ceyhan and Ashkelon, with eight of them occurring after Turkey announced its embargo in May. Despite the ship turning off its tracking signal for several days in the Eastern Mediterranean to mask its route, the researchers managed to identify it as docking in Israel 10 times using satellite imagery. Port logs for the Kimolos reveal that on a typical trip to Israel, the tanker is registered as being bound for Egypt, leaving with a full load of oil. But the tanker does not dock in Egypt, instead 'disappearing' for a few days in the Eastern Mediterranean. This strategy follows a similar pattern to that of the Seavigour, which also turned off its location transponder and reappeared in Sicily days later. The Turkish energy ministry has repeatedly denied that any oil tankers bound for Israel have left Ceyhan since May, stating that 'companies transporting oil through the BTC pipeline for export to global markets from Haydar Aliyev Terminal have respected Turkiye's recent decision not to engage in trade with Israel'. Middle East Eye previously reported that the advocacy group Oil Change International, which authored a report tracking oil shipments to Israel up until July 2024, said its data sources showed multiple shipments from Ceyhan since May. A Turkish official previously told MEE that BP sells oil to intermediary companies, which Ankara cannot control, and tankers pick up the oil "without declaring their final destination".
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Exclusive: David Cameron threatened to withdraw UK from ICC over Israel war crimes probe
The British government privately threatened to defund and withdraw from the International Criminal Court if it issued arrest warrants for Israeli leaders, Middle East Eye can reveal. David Cameron, then foreign secretary in Rishi Sunak's Conservative government, made the threat last April in a heated phone call with Karim Khan, the British chief prosecutor of the court. Less than a month later, Khan announced that he was seeking arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his then-defence minister, Yoav Gallant, as well as for Hamas leaders Yahya Sinwar, Ismail Haniyeh and Mohammed Deif. In a statement at the time, Khan called for his office and the court to be allowed to carry out their work with 'full independence and impartiality'. 'I insist that all attempts to impede, intimidate or improperly influence the officials of this Court must cease immediately,' he said. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters MEE understands that on 16 March 2024, Khan's extensive team of lawyers and researchers had decided they would be in a position to apply for warrants by the end of April. On 25 March, Khan informed the US administration of his decision and forewarned them the warrants would be applied for by the end of April. Then on 15 April in London, the prosecutor told British Justice Secretary Alex Chalk that he would apply for the warrants. Khan had asked to meet the foreign secretary, but Cameron was out of the country. Exclusive: UK believes Trump may sanction Amal Clooney over ICC Palestine role Read More » Cameron, a former British prime minister who was appointed foreign secretary by Sunak in November 2023, phoned Khan while the prosecutor was on an official visit to Venezuela on 23 April. MEE can reveal details of the call based on information from a number of sources – including former staff in Khan's office familiar with the conversation and who have seen the minutes of the meeting. Cameron told Khan that applying for warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant would be 'like dropping a hydrogen bomb'. Cameron said it was one thing to investigate and prosecute Russia for a 'war of aggression' on Ukraine, but quite another to prosecute Israel when it was 'defending itself from the attacks of 7 October'. He claimed the warrants would have 'profound implications' in Britain and within his own Conservative Party. Cameron then said that if the ICC issued warrants for Israeli leaders, the UK would 'defund the court and withdraw from the Rome Statute'. Article 127 of the Rome Statute, the ICC's founding charter, allows countries to withdraw by written notification to the secretary-general of the UN. 'Lose the dressing room' Cameron, who currently sits as a Conservative peer in the House of Lords, the upper house of the UK parliament, accused the prosecutor of singling Israel out. He asked why Khan's office had not 'prosecuted Iran for its attacks on Israel'. He told the prosecutor he would 'lose the dressing room' and be seen by many states including the US as 'losing the plot'. 'If [the UK] were to [withdraw from the ICC], we would have to accept that the rules-based system would be dead' - ICC Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan Cameron further said that if the ICC issued the warrants, the UK would be 'required to arrest' Netanyahu if he travelled to the country. Khan told Cameron that his office had engaged with Israel for the past three years, but it had 'not resulted in any meaningful exchange of material relevant to investigations'. According to MEE's sources, the foreign secretary spoke aggressively and repeatedly shouted over Khan, who had to ask to be able to complete his points. The prosecutor noted that his office was investigating crimes committed by Hamas as well as Israel, but Cameron said this was drawing a 'moral equivalence' between the two. He stated again that the UK would withdraw from the Rome Statute. Khan replied that 'if this were to occur then we would have to accept that the rules-based system would be dead'. Cameron insisted that 'the world is not ready for this'. He told Khan he was 'on the brink of making a huge mistake. You sometimes need to take a step back and consider things'. But Khan refused to back down and continued defending his position. He said there was a 'serious risk' that many in the world would view the rules-based order as 'not being applied equally'. Khan thanked the foreign secretary for his call and the conversation ended without the two reaching any resolution. Approached by MEE for a response to the exchange with Cameron, Khan said: 'I have no comment to make at this time.' MEE has asked Cameron and the British Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office for comment. Cameron: Warrants 'a mistake' When Khan announced he was applying for the warrants on 20 May, Cameron publicly called the decision 'a mistake' and accused the ICC of drawing a 'moral equivalence' between Israeli and Hamas leaders. He claimed that 'no one, I think, has been tougher on the Israelis than me in direct call after call, and message after message, about having to meet their obligations'. On 10 June the Conservative government filed an objection to Khan's application to the ICC, arguing that the court did not have jurisdiction over Israeli nationals – a position the Israeli government has held for years. The next month, Keir Starmer's newly elected Labour government announced it would drop the objection. 'We're very clear about the importance of the rule of law and the independence of the court both domestically and internationally,' a spokesperson for Starmer said. Palestine was accepted into the ICC in 2015, and in 2021 the court said it had the power to investigate war crimes in the occupied territories. 'I don't like being threatened' Sources Khan spoke to in the hours following his phone call with Cameron told MEE he seemed surprised and upset by the exchange. 'I don't like being pressurised,' Khan said, according to sources present at the time. 'I don't like being - I won't say if it rises to blackmail - I don't like being threatened.' ICC Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan attends a UN Security Council meeting on Sudan and South Sudan at the UN headquarters on 27 January 2025 (AFP) Khan added that 'the sentiment is not unexpected". 'The gall of articulating it so bluntly and candidly I think was a surprise and a disappointment… countries that you love, that deserve better, how on earth can leaders that have held such high office, that are so well known, think you can get away with that?' The British prosecutor added that 'if you did that to a director of public prosecutions… it would be a criminal offence, potentially'. He said he was 'disappointed that a country like that and leaders that are so senior would debase themselves and their nation. 'They have no right to debase a nation… they're debasing something they have no right to debase, which is a people.' 'I don't like being threatened... How on earth can leaders that have held such high office, that are so well known, think you can get away with that?' - Karim Khan Sunak's government firmly supported Israel's war on Gaza and consistently resisted calls to restrict arms sales to Israel. In a session of parliament's foreign affairs select committee in January 2024, its chair Alicia Kearns, a Conservative MP, asked Cameron whether 'you have never had a piece of paper put in front of you by a Foreign Office lawyer that says that Israel is in breach of its international humanitarian commitments under international humanitarian law'. Cameron replied that 'I cannot recall every single bit of paper that has been put in front of me … I don't want to answer that question.' He added that 'if you are asking me whether I am worried that Israel has taken action that might be in breach of international law … yes, of course I am worried about that.' In March the Guardian reported that Kearns said she believed the government had received advice from its own lawyers saying Israel had breached international law in Gaza. 'I remain convinced the government has completed its updated assessment on whether Israel is demonstrating a commitment to international humanitarian law, and that it has concluded that Israel is not demonstrating this commitment, which is the legal determination it has to make,' Kearns said at a fundraising event on 13 March. Khan sanctioned by US The Labour government, elected in July, imposed a partial arms embargo on Israel that September and suspended free trade agreement talks with the country last month. Speaking during Prime Minister's Questions last week, Starmer described Israel's actions in Gaza as 'appalling... counterproductive and intolerable,' and said the government would keep looking at further action including sanctions. But it has stopped short of accusing Israel of breaking international law in Gaza. After the ICC issued the arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant in November, the government refused to explicitly confirm it would arrest the politicians if they came to the country, although a spokesperson for Starmer said the government would 'fulfil its legal obligations'. Other Israeli officials, who are not subject to arrest warrants, have since visited the UK. In April, MEE reported that Foreign Minister Gideon Saar made a secret trip to London and met British Foreign Secretary David Lammy. After the report, the attorney general's office confirmed to MEE that it had blocked an arrest warrant request made to the Metropolitan Police by legal groups alleging Saar had aided and abetted breaches of international law in Gaza. Exclusive: US warns UK and France not to recognise Palestinian state Read More » Khan is currently on leave after attempts to suspend him failed, and pending a UN investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct towards a colleague. He denies the allegations, which have not been referred to Dutch police. In 2022 the Russian Federation issued a warrant for Khan's arrest in response to ICC warrants issued against Russian President Vladimir Putin and his minister for children. As of February, Khan has also been sanctioned by US President Donald Trump because of the arrest warrants issued for Netanyahu and Gallant. He has had his US visa revoked and his wife and children have been banned from travelling to the US. His bank accounts have been frozen in the UK. The warrants for Israeli leaders are currently in the hands of two deputy prosecutors. Last Thursday, the US imposed further sanctions on four ICC judges whom it accused of being involved in 'illegitimate actions targeting the United States and Israel'. Neither the US nor Israel are parties to the Rome Statute and have long rejected the authority of the court. In a statement, the ICC said it deplored the sanctions against Khan and the four judges. It said it stood fully behind its personnel and would continue its work undeterred. 'These measures are a clear attempt to undermine the independence of an international judicial institution which operates under the mandate from 125 States Parties from all corners of the globe,' it said. The court recently ordered that any further warrants issued in relation to its Palestine investigation cannot be publicised.
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Israel's war on Palestinians will not end until the apartheid system is dismantled
More than 600 days into what many now call a "genocide war" in Gaza, even staunch supporters of Israel are beginning to question its motives. Some have started using the term "genocide" to describe Israel's actions. Yet focusing solely on Gaza obscures a broader, long-standing strategy - one targeting the Occupied West Bank, East Jerusalem, and Palestinians inside Israel's pre-1967 borders. To oppose genocide effectively, it is not enough to condemn what is happening in Gaza. We must also reject the systematic dehumanisation, dispossession and legal discrimination that Israel enforces against Palestinians everywhere. Western commentators such as Piers Morgan and former White House spokesperson Matthew Miller were slow to criticise Israel's conduct in Gaza, even as their platforms helped justify it for months. Their delayed condemnation reveals a deeply entrenched presumption: Israel is "right until proven wrong", while Palestinians are "wrong until proven otherwise". This imbalance stems from colonial privilege and Israel's near-total control over Palestinian life - from the river to the sea. By controlling every aspect of life, including electricity, water, movement and economic access, Israel reshapes Palestinian communities to serve its own interests and directly manipulates Palestinian politics. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters And in this regard, it is crucial to return to the beginning. Blueprint for control The term "Gaza Strip" only emerged after the Nakba of 1948. Before that, there was the Gaza District, which covered approximately 1,196 sq km. After the Nakba, it was reduced to just 365 sq km - less than one-quarter of its original size. The model of siege, deprivation and periodic warfare has been viewed as a blueprint for civilian control, and it drew virtually no meaningful international sanctions Before 1948, the Gaza District was home to 150,000 Palestinians. Following the Nakba, the population of the newly formed Gaza Strip swelled to 280,000 - 80,000 of them original residents, and another 200,000 refugees who had fled from elsewhere. For Israel, Gaza came to represent the logic of "minimum land with maximum Arabs", in order to secure "maximum land for minimum Jews". In the decades that followed - especially after the Oslo Accords - Gaza was transformed into a closed system. Calorie rations were kept at subsistence levels, electricity and water were tightly controlled, and movement was heavily restricted. From 2008 through to September 2023, Israel launched four major military assaults on Gaza, killing around 6,300 Palestinians. Despite the scale of destruction, no senior Israeli political or military official has ever been held accountable. This model of siege, deprivation and periodic warfare has been viewed as a blueprint for civilian control, and it drew virtually no meaningful international sanctions. Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war The architect of this strategy was then-Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon. His 2005 Disengagement Plan was rooted in demographic calculations. With more than one million Palestinians and just 9,000 settlers in Gaza, the economic and political cost of direct military rule had become untenable. During meetings with US officials in 2004, Sharon made clear that he expected American backing for expanding settlements in the West Bank in exchange for withdrawal from Gaza. And that is precisely what happened. The number of settlers in the West Bank increased from 250,000 to 500,000, not including those in East Jerusalem. Legislated supremacy At the same time, under successive Likud governments, a raft of legislation was passed to erode the civil rights of Palestinian citizens of Israel. The 2011 Nakba Law authorised the finance minister to withhold public funds from institutions that commemorate the Nakba. The 2017 Kaminitz Law gave the state sweeping powers to demolish "unauthorised" structures - disproportionately impacting Palestinian towns. The 2018 Nation-State Law made Hebrew Israel's sole official language, downgraded Arabic to a "special status", and affirmed that only Jewish settlements merit state support. More recent laws have empowered Israeli authorities to deport the family members of alleged "terrorists" without due process, and to criminalise any public expression deemed sympathetic to Palestinian resistance. Cumulatively, these laws entrench a racialised hierarchy of citizenship that privileges Jewish lives over Palestinian ones. Expanding conquest In late 2024 and early 2025, the Knesset approved a wave of building permits that enabled the seizure of both state-owned and privately held Palestinian land around Hebron - a scale of expansion not seen since 2007. In Hebron alone, around 5,000 olive trees were uprooted. Jenin and Nur Shams refugee camps were razed. Between October 2023 and mid-2025, Israeli forces killed roughly 900 Palestinians and arrested nearly 14,000 in the West Bank - many held without charge under sweeping administrative detention orders. Why Israel is accelerating its expansionist plan in the Naqab Read More » Israeli authorities also demolished at least 227 Palestinian homes in East Jerusalem and other Palestinian towns inside Israel during that same period, citing minor zoning violations to justify large-scale demolitions. Meanwhile, under the pretext of "developing the Negev (Naqab)", Israel revived the 2011 Mokedim ("Focal Points") plan in 2024. Tens of thousands of dunams have since been slated for confiscation, threatening the homes of around 85,000 Bedouin citizens. The plan seeks to forcibly concentrate Bedouin communities into state-recognised townships while bulldozing so-called "unrecognised villages". Israel's current posture is not merely a reaction to the events of 7 October 2023. It is the latest expression of a century-long campaign to dehumanise and criminalise Palestinians. This narrative has been widely accepted in western media and politics, conditioning global audiences to side with Israel regardless of its actions. It took almost two years of daily images documenting Gaza's devastation for the world to finally shift its stance. But Gaza is not a "bug" in Israel's system - it is a feature. It is a demonstration of the extreme measures Israel is willing to deploy against any Palestinian population. Designed brutality The genocide in Gaza is not an aberration - it is the logic of the system laid bare. One cannot condemn what is happening in Gaza while ignoring everything else Israel has done to the Palestinian people. Some Israeli political factions, and their international allies, now realise the scale of the disaster can no longer go unnoticed - that accountability may be inevitable. And so they have moved to the damage-control phase. This is not about fits of rage but a system built to distort reality and preserve Israeli and Jewish supremacy Precisely for this reason, it is more urgent than ever to remind the world that this system will continue unless it is dismantled. Anyone who truly opposes genocide must also oppose the structures of Israeli control over Palestinians everywhere. This is not about "fits of rage" or temporary moments of excess. It is about a system designed to distort and forcibly reshape reality in order to preserve Israeli and Jewish supremacy over Palestinians. Now, as during the Second Intifada, with elections on the horizon, more Israeli voices will speak out against Netanyahu - not out of opposition to the war itself, but because the international backlash has grown too costly. Fearing sanctions and international boycotts, they will try to engineer an "Oslo 2.0" - a "peace process" filled with promises, yet like its predecessor, ultimately designed to entrench control after the genocide in Gaza. And so, the next Palestinian disaster becomes only a matter of time. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
