Cruelty returns to haunt me in the dead of night

The Advertiser

27-05-2025

This is a sample of The Echidna newsletter sent out each weekday morning. To sign up for FREE, go to theechidna.com.au
The ghosts arrive when all else is quiet and the mind, awake for no reason, has no choice but to listen to them. Sunday night, early Monday morning they were particularly loud.
First to invade the consciousness were the phantoms of the Holocaust, stirred by reading a few hours earlier Jack Fairweather's book The Prosecutor. It's the story of German Jewish lawyer Fritz Bauer and his mission to bring to justice the functionaries of the Final Solution who had somehow escaped conviction as World War II ended and segued into the Cold War. Bauer was determined that Germany as a whole should confront its recent past.
A particularly harrowing chapter recounted witness testimony in the trial of Adolf Eichmann, lodging its grim details in the back of my mind. Rivka Yoselevska told the Israeli court how she'd survived a massacre near Pinsk in Belarus in 1941 after seeing her entire family shot in front of her.
When it was Rivka and her sister's turn, one of the guards asked who he should shoot first. He shot Rivka's sister and then turned the gun on her. She toppled into the pit and was soon buried by the bodies which followed. Somehow she survived.
Lying awake in the dark, I tried to shut the horror out of my mind. But the ghost was insistent. It demanded thought be given to the cruelty, that imagination at least try to comprehend what it would be like to endure it and then have to remember it for the rest of your life. And then the phantom introduced more ghosts, these from a news report I'd watched that night.
These were the siblings killed in an Israeli airstrike in Khan Younis in Gaza. Their suffering had ended in an instant with the blinding flash of the missile which struck their home. But their mother, a paediatrician working at Nasser hospital, endured the sight of her dead children as they were rushed charred and lifeless into the emergency room. Her one remaining child and husband were critically injured. Yet she somehow finished her shift.
Like Rivka more than 80 years ago, Alaa al-Najjar will live with the horror for the rest of her life.
It's estimated 16,500 children have been killed in the Gaza war. Many more have sustained terrible physical injuries while an entire generation will bear the psychological scars for years to come.
The toll exacted in response to the terrible massacres of October 7 perpetrated by Hamas is now stirring grave misgivings in Israel. The Times of Israel reports that a growing number of fierce advocates for the tough response are now questioning it. These include Elana Sztokman, an American-born Israeli writer, who used the word "genocide" to describe what's happening in Gaza, prompting a vicious response on social media.
"Right now, We, Israel, are starving and bombing a nation to death," she wrote. "Genocide. This is genocide. This is purposeful, deliberate, unrestrained killing of a people."
Last week, a former deputy chief of the Israeli Defence Force turned opposition politician Yair Golan told an interviewer: "A sane country does not fight against civilians, does not kill babies as a hobby, and does not give itself the aim of expelling populations."
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu predictably condemned the comments as "blood libel" against the IDF, even though Golan said his complaint was directed not at the armed forces but at the government directing them.
Knowing there is a conscience in Israel that is finding its voice, that protestors are prepared to take to the streets of Tel Aviv holding photographs of some of the children killed in Gaza, is reassuring.
It won't settle the ghosts. They'll probably never be silenced, nor should they be. It's important we all confront the cruelty us humans dish out to each other, even if it means losing sleep.
HAVE YOUR SAY: If the Gaza does end, should the Israeli government and remaining Hamas commanders face an international court to answer charges of war crimes? Do you avoid news from Gaza after 19 months of horror? Email us: [e-mail]
SHARE THE LOVE: If you enjoy The Echidna, forward it to a friend so they can sign up, too.
IN CASE YOU MISSED IT:
- A ban on the sale of machetes has been fast-tracked in Victoria after a vicious gang brawl in a shopping centre. Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan said the ban, originally intended to start on September 1, would now come into effect at midday on May 28.
- The future of dozens of healthcare facilities hangs in the balance as one of Australia's largest private hospital operators, Healthscope, collapses into receivership.
- Electricity prices are set to rise in some locations in Australia by nearly 10 per cent from July 1. The Australian Energy Regulator (AER) confirmed increases on May 26 of up to 9.7 per cent for some residential customers.
THEY SAID IT: "When genocide is committed, it must be seen. People must look at it with open eyes, not minimise its impact." - Nadia Murad
YOU SAID IT: Some marriages are meant to end. The Coalition's should be one of them.
Christopher writes: "They'd be much better off separated and learning to be independent, to be who they are. Then they could find out whether they are even friends. I very much doubt they would be. And it would allow them to deal with the anxiety behind their co-dependency. And I am bamboozled by the idea that Zoe McKenzie is the future of the the Liberal Party... Matt Kean was quoted in The Saturday Paper as saying a similar thing. I would love an explanation."
"Not that I support either party, but a government needs a viable opposition and as the Coalition is unlikely to provide one, divorce is the best option," writes Sue. "Alone, the Libs have a chance of putting together a new right-wing party but in their uneasy-at-best alliance with the Nats they are hamstrung. The past week has demonstrated the ineffectiveness of future togetherness. I suspect the Nats will continue to have a revolving door leadership situation. This probably isn't fair but then, a lot isn't in politics. I doubt Sussan Ley will survive for long. She will probably get things running better then be challenged because she hasn't improved things well enough, or quickly enough or because they don't like what she wore on the opening day of Parliament and decide a man can do it better. I doubt that is fair either."
Murray writes: "It is always encouraging when you see someone else has the exact same take on something. When I saw Michael McCormack swear he was not after the leadership, and 'fully supported' Littleproud, I called out to my wife, 'He's gone!' In politics a sincere denial of something can usually be taken as an admission that it ranges from being at least a possibility to a dead certainty. As John says, the knives are not drawn, but thumbs have been run over blades in readiness. Sussan Ley is described here as a moderate. Moderate what? If she is a moderate leader of a conservative party we should shortly see some clear points of difference from the Labor left. That will be the test. If she can do that the Liberal Party will have some purpose again and the Nationals can return to their proper place, being the minor partner and adding the numbers. McCormack or Littleproud, Makes little difference."
"The marriage of convenience will eventually rehappen," writes Old Donald. "Why? Because it is the only way Lib and Nat will ever assume their rightful place (i.e. in charge of us poor sods - divine right and all that Louis XIV stuff). Anybody who believes there is sincere principle or moral honour involved at the core is just not with it."
Phil C writes: "In trying to gaslight the CSIRO and AEMO over the viability of current nuclear power options in Australia, the Coalition proved it has a problem understanding commerce, science, and statistics. You would think that catastrophic electoral failure might have taught them something about objectivity, but apparently not. The Liberal senator Sarah Henderson says the answer is not to move to the centre. It's a simple observation that the Millennials and Gen X constitute a rapidly increasing majority of Australian voters, but just 22 per cent of them vote for the Coalition. Henderson's call for an ongoing right-wing stance won't attract young voters or bring back the teal vote. But it will absolutely guarantee ongoing atrophy of the Liberal Party. Our Parliament needs a strong opposition to work as it should. Country people need a prominent voice to advocate for better phones, roads, medical care, and schools. It is everyone's interest that Sussan Ley's moderation plans prevail, and the Nats come on board with that."
"Sussan Ley wants to take the Liberals forward but is being pulled back by the old guard Liberals past their use-by date and the out-of-touch Nationals attempts to bully her," writes Jennifer. "Getting together and compromising the future direction for the sole purpose of regaining power will lead to destruction. Whilst I dislike the policies and much of the ideology of both parties, I don't want to see Labor without effective opposition to hold them to account. Looks like we'll have to rely on independents for that, again."
Mick writes: "No marriage will work when both participants are suffering from an existential identity crisis. A Liberal Party abandoned by its corporate father that doesn't know if it's Right or Left. A National Party that used to be Country but is now transitioning to Mining/Outer Urban. God knows what the offspring will be like."
"I think you nailed it, Echidna," writes Robin. "There was hope for a renewed Liberal Party sans the Nationals. But now we are back to having the tail wag the dog again. As for Littleproud, as impossible as it is for an invertebrate to grow a spine, you don't lead by blaming your poor decisions on the team standing behind you."
Ian writes: "It would be interesting to see the Clampetts (the Nats) and the Liberals come out publicly with separate competing policies, and see how these resonate with the electorate. Then they can undertake a negotiation to 'marry' them together. However, it seems like the Libs are still quite internally polarised, having lost a lot of their moderates in 2022, so the differences within the Libs is probably not much different to the differences between the Libs and the Clampetts. There seems to be plenty of overlap with the right-wing extremists of both parties, who think the electorate 'doesn't know what's good for 'em' (to be fair, sometimes I agree). They also both keep blathering about 'values'. They are right in needing to better articulate what those are, because I don't know. But, they also need to better understand the difference between values and ideology, because values should be universal, not political."
"It is despicable that the Coalition and more specifically the Nationals are fighting amongst themselves in Canberra professing to fight and represent the bush and regional areas while their constituents are inundated with the floods," writes John from Mentone. "They should have been in their local areas helping people stay safe and survive. Transparency is certainly not the Nationals strong point. If we knew their recent voting numbers for their leadership we could see how precarious Littleproud's situation is."
This is a sample of The Echidna newsletter sent out each weekday morning. To sign up for FREE, go to theechidna.com.au
The ghosts arrive when all else is quiet and the mind, awake for no reason, has no choice but to listen to them. Sunday night, early Monday morning they were particularly loud.
First to invade the consciousness were the phantoms of the Holocaust, stirred by reading a few hours earlier Jack Fairweather's book The Prosecutor. It's the story of German Jewish lawyer Fritz Bauer and his mission to bring to justice the functionaries of the Final Solution who had somehow escaped conviction as World War II ended and segued into the Cold War. Bauer was determined that Germany as a whole should confront its recent past.
A particularly harrowing chapter recounted witness testimony in the trial of Adolf Eichmann, lodging its grim details in the back of my mind. Rivka Yoselevska told the Israeli court how she'd survived a massacre near Pinsk in Belarus in 1941 after seeing her entire family shot in front of her.
When it was Rivka and her sister's turn, one of the guards asked who he should shoot first. He shot Rivka's sister and then turned the gun on her. She toppled into the pit and was soon buried by the bodies which followed. Somehow she survived.
Lying awake in the dark, I tried to shut the horror out of my mind. But the ghost was insistent. It demanded thought be given to the cruelty, that imagination at least try to comprehend what it would be like to endure it and then have to remember it for the rest of your life. And then the phantom introduced more ghosts, these from a news report I'd watched that night.
These were the siblings killed in an Israeli airstrike in Khan Younis in Gaza. Their suffering had ended in an instant with the blinding flash of the missile which struck their home. But their mother, a paediatrician working at Nasser hospital, endured the sight of her dead children as they were rushed charred and lifeless into the emergency room. Her one remaining child and husband were critically injured. Yet she somehow finished her shift.
Like Rivka more than 80 years ago, Alaa al-Najjar will live with the horror for the rest of her life.
It's estimated 16,500 children have been killed in the Gaza war. Many more have sustained terrible physical injuries while an entire generation will bear the psychological scars for years to come.
The toll exacted in response to the terrible massacres of October 7 perpetrated by Hamas is now stirring grave misgivings in Israel. The Times of Israel reports that a growing number of fierce advocates for the tough response are now questioning it. These include Elana Sztokman, an American-born Israeli writer, who used the word "genocide" to describe what's happening in Gaza, prompting a vicious response on social media.
"Right now, We, Israel, are starving and bombing a nation to death," she wrote. "Genocide. This is genocide. This is purposeful, deliberate, unrestrained killing of a people."
Last week, a former deputy chief of the Israeli Defence Force turned opposition politician Yair Golan told an interviewer: "A sane country does not fight against civilians, does not kill babies as a hobby, and does not give itself the aim of expelling populations."
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu predictably condemned the comments as "blood libel" against the IDF, even though Golan said his complaint was directed not at the armed forces but at the government directing them.
Knowing there is a conscience in Israel that is finding its voice, that protestors are prepared to take to the streets of Tel Aviv holding photographs of some of the children killed in Gaza, is reassuring.
It won't settle the ghosts. They'll probably never be silenced, nor should they be. It's important we all confront the cruelty us humans dish out to each other, even if it means losing sleep.
HAVE YOUR SAY: If the Gaza does end, should the Israeli government and remaining Hamas commanders face an international court to answer charges of war crimes? Do you avoid news from Gaza after 19 months of horror? Email us: [e-mail]
SHARE THE LOVE: If you enjoy The Echidna, forward it to a friend so they can sign up, too.
IN CASE YOU MISSED IT:
- A ban on the sale of machetes has been fast-tracked in Victoria after a vicious gang brawl in a shopping centre. Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan said the ban, originally intended to start on September 1, would now come into effect at midday on May 28.
- The future of dozens of healthcare facilities hangs in the balance as one of Australia's largest private hospital operators, Healthscope, collapses into receivership.
- Electricity prices are set to rise in some locations in Australia by nearly 10 per cent from July 1. The Australian Energy Regulator (AER) confirmed increases on May 26 of up to 9.7 per cent for some residential customers.
THEY SAID IT: "When genocide is committed, it must be seen. People must look at it with open eyes, not minimise its impact." - Nadia Murad
YOU SAID IT: Some marriages are meant to end. The Coalition's should be one of them.
Christopher writes: "They'd be much better off separated and learning to be independent, to be who they are. Then they could find out whether they are even friends. I very much doubt they would be. And it would allow them to deal with the anxiety behind their co-dependency. And I am bamboozled by the idea that Zoe McKenzie is the future of the the Liberal Party... Matt Kean was quoted in The Saturday Paper as saying a similar thing. I would love an explanation."
"Not that I support either party, but a government needs a viable opposition and as the Coalition is unlikely to provide one, divorce is the best option," writes Sue. "Alone, the Libs have a chance of putting together a new right-wing party but in their uneasy-at-best alliance with the Nats they are hamstrung. The past week has demonstrated the ineffectiveness of future togetherness. I suspect the Nats will continue to have a revolving door leadership situation. This probably isn't fair but then, a lot isn't in politics. I doubt Sussan Ley will survive for long. She will probably get things running better then be challenged because she hasn't improved things well enough, or quickly enough or because they don't like what she wore on the opening day of Parliament and decide a man can do it better. I doubt that is fair either."
Murray writes: "It is always encouraging when you see someone else has the exact same take on something. When I saw Michael McCormack swear he was not after the leadership, and 'fully supported' Littleproud, I called out to my wife, 'He's gone!' In politics a sincere denial of something can usually be taken as an admission that it ranges from being at least a possibility to a dead certainty. As John says, the knives are not drawn, but thumbs have been run over blades in readiness. Sussan Ley is described here as a moderate. Moderate what? If she is a moderate leader of a conservative party we should shortly see some clear points of difference from the Labor left. That will be the test. If she can do that the Liberal Party will have some purpose again and the Nationals can return to their proper place, being the minor partner and adding the numbers. McCormack or Littleproud, Makes little difference."
"The marriage of convenience will eventually rehappen," writes Old Donald. "Why? Because it is the only way Lib and Nat will ever assume their rightful place (i.e. in charge of us poor sods - divine right and all that Louis XIV stuff). Anybody who believes there is sincere principle or moral honour involved at the core is just not with it."
Phil C writes: "In trying to gaslight the CSIRO and AEMO over the viability of current nuclear power options in Australia, the Coalition proved it has a problem understanding commerce, science, and statistics. You would think that catastrophic electoral failure might have taught them something about objectivity, but apparently not. The Liberal senator Sarah Henderson says the answer is not to move to the centre. It's a simple observation that the Millennials and Gen X constitute a rapidly increasing majority of Australian voters, but just 22 per cent of them vote for the Coalition. Henderson's call for an ongoing right-wing stance won't attract young voters or bring back the teal vote. But it will absolutely guarantee ongoing atrophy of the Liberal Party. Our Parliament needs a strong opposition to work as it should. Country people need a prominent voice to advocate for better phones, roads, medical care, and schools. It is everyone's interest that Sussan Ley's moderation plans prevail, and the Nats come on board with that."
"Sussan Ley wants to take the Liberals forward but is being pulled back by the old guard Liberals past their use-by date and the out-of-touch Nationals attempts to bully her," writes Jennifer. "Getting together and compromising the future direction for the sole purpose of regaining power will lead to destruction. Whilst I dislike the policies and much of the ideology of both parties, I don't want to see Labor without effective opposition to hold them to account. Looks like we'll have to rely on independents for that, again."
Mick writes: "No marriage will work when both participants are suffering from an existential identity crisis. A Liberal Party abandoned by its corporate father that doesn't know if it's Right or Left. A National Party that used to be Country but is now transitioning to Mining/Outer Urban. God knows what the offspring will be like."
"I think you nailed it, Echidna," writes Robin. "There was hope for a renewed Liberal Party sans the Nationals. But now we are back to having the tail wag the dog again. As for Littleproud, as impossible as it is for an invertebrate to grow a spine, you don't lead by blaming your poor decisions on the team standing behind you."
Ian writes: "It would be interesting to see the Clampetts (the Nats) and the Liberals come out publicly with separate competing policies, and see how these resonate with the electorate. Then they can undertake a negotiation to 'marry' them together. However, it seems like the Libs are still quite internally polarised, having lost a lot of their moderates in 2022, so the differences within the Libs is probably not much different to the differences between the Libs and the Clampetts. There seems to be plenty of overlap with the right-wing extremists of both parties, who think the electorate 'doesn't know what's good for 'em' (to be fair, sometimes I agree). They also both keep blathering about 'values'. They are right in needing to better articulate what those are, because I don't know. But, they also need to better understand the difference between values and ideology, because values should be universal, not political."
"It is despicable that the Coalition and more specifically the Nationals are fighting amongst themselves in Canberra professing to fight and represent the bush and regional areas while their constituents are inundated with the floods," writes John from Mentone. "They should have been in their local areas helping people stay safe and survive. Transparency is certainly not the Nationals strong point. If we knew their recent voting numbers for their leadership we could see how precarious Littleproud's situation is."
This is a sample of The Echidna newsletter sent out each weekday morning. To sign up for FREE, go to theechidna.com.au
The ghosts arrive when all else is quiet and the mind, awake for no reason, has no choice but to listen to them. Sunday night, early Monday morning they were particularly loud.
First to invade the consciousness were the phantoms of the Holocaust, stirred by reading a few hours earlier Jack Fairweather's book The Prosecutor. It's the story of German Jewish lawyer Fritz Bauer and his mission to bring to justice the functionaries of the Final Solution who had somehow escaped conviction as World War II ended and segued into the Cold War. Bauer was determined that Germany as a whole should confront its recent past.
A particularly harrowing chapter recounted witness testimony in the trial of Adolf Eichmann, lodging its grim details in the back of my mind. Rivka Yoselevska told the Israeli court how she'd survived a massacre near Pinsk in Belarus in 1941 after seeing her entire family shot in front of her.
When it was Rivka and her sister's turn, one of the guards asked who he should shoot first. He shot Rivka's sister and then turned the gun on her. She toppled into the pit and was soon buried by the bodies which followed. Somehow she survived.
Lying awake in the dark, I tried to shut the horror out of my mind. But the ghost was insistent. It demanded thought be given to the cruelty, that imagination at least try to comprehend what it would be like to endure it and then have to remember it for the rest of your life. And then the phantom introduced more ghosts, these from a news report I'd watched that night.
These were the siblings killed in an Israeli airstrike in Khan Younis in Gaza. Their suffering had ended in an instant with the blinding flash of the missile which struck their home. But their mother, a paediatrician working at Nasser hospital, endured the sight of her dead children as they were rushed charred and lifeless into the emergency room. Her one remaining child and husband were critically injured. Yet she somehow finished her shift.
Like Rivka more than 80 years ago, Alaa al-Najjar will live with the horror for the rest of her life.
It's estimated 16,500 children have been killed in the Gaza war. Many more have sustained terrible physical injuries while an entire generation will bear the psychological scars for years to come.
The toll exacted in response to the terrible massacres of October 7 perpetrated by Hamas is now stirring grave misgivings in Israel. The Times of Israel reports that a growing number of fierce advocates for the tough response are now questioning it. These include Elana Sztokman, an American-born Israeli writer, who used the word "genocide" to describe what's happening in Gaza, prompting a vicious response on social media.
"Right now, We, Israel, are starving and bombing a nation to death," she wrote. "Genocide. This is genocide. This is purposeful, deliberate, unrestrained killing of a people."
Last week, a former deputy chief of the Israeli Defence Force turned opposition politician Yair Golan told an interviewer: "A sane country does not fight against civilians, does not kill babies as a hobby, and does not give itself the aim of expelling populations."
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu predictably condemned the comments as "blood libel" against the IDF, even though Golan said his complaint was directed not at the armed forces but at the government directing them.
Knowing there is a conscience in Israel that is finding its voice, that protestors are prepared to take to the streets of Tel Aviv holding photographs of some of the children killed in Gaza, is reassuring.
It won't settle the ghosts. They'll probably never be silenced, nor should they be. It's important we all confront the cruelty us humans dish out to each other, even if it means losing sleep.
HAVE YOUR SAY: If the Gaza does end, should the Israeli government and remaining Hamas commanders face an international court to answer charges of war crimes? Do you avoid news from Gaza after 19 months of horror? Email us: [e-mail]
SHARE THE LOVE: If you enjoy The Echidna, forward it to a friend so they can sign up, too.
IN CASE YOU MISSED IT:
- A ban on the sale of machetes has been fast-tracked in Victoria after a vicious gang brawl in a shopping centre. Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan said the ban, originally intended to start on September 1, would now come into effect at midday on May 28.
- The future of dozens of healthcare facilities hangs in the balance as one of Australia's largest private hospital operators, Healthscope, collapses into receivership.
- Electricity prices are set to rise in some locations in Australia by nearly 10 per cent from July 1. The Australian Energy Regulator (AER) confirmed increases on May 26 of up to 9.7 per cent for some residential customers.
THEY SAID IT: "When genocide is committed, it must be seen. People must look at it with open eyes, not minimise its impact." - Nadia Murad
YOU SAID IT: Some marriages are meant to end. The Coalition's should be one of them.
Christopher writes: "They'd be much better off separated and learning to be independent, to be who they are. Then they could find out whether they are even friends. I very much doubt they would be. And it would allow them to deal with the anxiety behind their co-dependency. And I am bamboozled by the idea that Zoe McKenzie is the future of the the Liberal Party... Matt Kean was quoted in The Saturday Paper as saying a similar thing. I would love an explanation."
"Not that I support either party, but a government needs a viable opposition and as the Coalition is unlikely to provide one, divorce is the best option," writes Sue. "Alone, the Libs have a chance of putting together a new right-wing party but in their uneasy-at-best alliance with the Nats they are hamstrung. The past week has demonstrated the ineffectiveness of future togetherness. I suspect the Nats will continue to have a revolving door leadership situation. This probably isn't fair but then, a lot isn't in politics. I doubt Sussan Ley will survive for long. She will probably get things running better then be challenged because she hasn't improved things well enough, or quickly enough or because they don't like what she wore on the opening day of Parliament and decide a man can do it better. I doubt that is fair either."
Murray writes: "It is always encouraging when you see someone else has the exact same take on something. When I saw Michael McCormack swear he was not after the leadership, and 'fully supported' Littleproud, I called out to my wife, 'He's gone!' In politics a sincere denial of something can usually be taken as an admission that it ranges from being at least a possibility to a dead certainty. As John says, the knives are not drawn, but thumbs have been run over blades in readiness. Sussan Ley is described here as a moderate. Moderate what? If she is a moderate leader of a conservative party we should shortly see some clear points of difference from the Labor left. That will be the test. If she can do that the Liberal Party will have some purpose again and the Nationals can return to their proper place, being the minor partner and adding the numbers. McCormack or Littleproud, Makes little difference."
"The marriage of convenience will eventually rehappen," writes Old Donald. "Why? Because it is the only way Lib and Nat will ever assume their rightful place (i.e. in charge of us poor sods - divine right and all that Louis XIV stuff). Anybody who believes there is sincere principle or moral honour involved at the core is just not with it."
Phil C writes: "In trying to gaslight the CSIRO and AEMO over the viability of current nuclear power options in Australia, the Coalition proved it has a problem understanding commerce, science, and statistics. You would think that catastrophic electoral failure might have taught them something about objectivity, but apparently not. The Liberal senator Sarah Henderson says the answer is not to move to the centre. It's a simple observation that the Millennials and Gen X constitute a rapidly increasing majority of Australian voters, but just 22 per cent of them vote for the Coalition. Henderson's call for an ongoing right-wing stance won't attract young voters or bring back the teal vote. But it will absolutely guarantee ongoing atrophy of the Liberal Party. Our Parliament needs a strong opposition to work as it should. Country people need a prominent voice to advocate for better phones, roads, medical care, and schools. It is everyone's interest that Sussan Ley's moderation plans prevail, and the Nats come on board with that."
"Sussan Ley wants to take the Liberals forward but is being pulled back by the old guard Liberals past their use-by date and the out-of-touch Nationals attempts to bully her," writes Jennifer. "Getting together and compromising the future direction for the sole purpose of regaining power will lead to destruction. Whilst I dislike the policies and much of the ideology of both parties, I don't want to see Labor without effective opposition to hold them to account. Looks like we'll have to rely on independents for that, again."
Mick writes: "No marriage will work when both participants are suffering from an existential identity crisis. A Liberal Party abandoned by its corporate father that doesn't know if it's Right or Left. A National Party that used to be Country but is now transitioning to Mining/Outer Urban. God knows what the offspring will be like."
"I think you nailed it, Echidna," writes Robin. "There was hope for a renewed Liberal Party sans the Nationals. But now we are back to having the tail wag the dog again. As for Littleproud, as impossible as it is for an invertebrate to grow a spine, you don't lead by blaming your poor decisions on the team standing behind you."
Ian writes: "It would be interesting to see the Clampetts (the Nats) and the Liberals come out publicly with separate competing policies, and see how these resonate with the electorate. Then they can undertake a negotiation to 'marry' them together. However, it seems like the Libs are still quite internally polarised, having lost a lot of their moderates in 2022, so the differences within the Libs is probably not much different to the differences between the Libs and the Clampetts. There seems to be plenty of overlap with the right-wing extremists of both parties, who think the electorate 'doesn't know what's good for 'em' (to be fair, sometimes I agree). They also both keep blathering about 'values'. They are right in needing to better articulate what those are, because I don't know. But, they also need to better understand the difference between values and ideology, because values should be universal, not political."
"It is despicable that the Coalition and more specifically the Nationals are fighting amongst themselves in Canberra professing to fight and represent the bush and regional areas while their constituents are inundated with the floods," writes John from Mentone. "They should have been in their local areas helping people stay safe and survive. Transparency is certainly not the Nationals strong point. If we knew their recent voting numbers for their leadership we could see how precarious Littleproud's situation is."
This is a sample of The Echidna newsletter sent out each weekday morning. To sign up for FREE, go to theechidna.com.au
The ghosts arrive when all else is quiet and the mind, awake for no reason, has no choice but to listen to them. Sunday night, early Monday morning they were particularly loud.
First to invade the consciousness were the phantoms of the Holocaust, stirred by reading a few hours earlier Jack Fairweather's book The Prosecutor. It's the story of German Jewish lawyer Fritz Bauer and his mission to bring to justice the functionaries of the Final Solution who had somehow escaped conviction as World War II ended and segued into the Cold War. Bauer was determined that Germany as a whole should confront its recent past.
A particularly harrowing chapter recounted witness testimony in the trial of Adolf Eichmann, lodging its grim details in the back of my mind. Rivka Yoselevska told the Israeli court how she'd survived a massacre near Pinsk in Belarus in 1941 after seeing her entire family shot in front of her.
When it was Rivka and her sister's turn, one of the guards asked who he should shoot first. He shot Rivka's sister and then turned the gun on her. She toppled into the pit and was soon buried by the bodies which followed. Somehow she survived.
Lying awake in the dark, I tried to shut the horror out of my mind. But the ghost was insistent. It demanded thought be given to the cruelty, that imagination at least try to comprehend what it would be like to endure it and then have to remember it for the rest of your life. And then the phantom introduced more ghosts, these from a news report I'd watched that night.
These were the siblings killed in an Israeli airstrike in Khan Younis in Gaza. Their suffering had ended in an instant with the blinding flash of the missile which struck their home. But their mother, a paediatrician working at Nasser hospital, endured the sight of her dead children as they were rushed charred and lifeless into the emergency room. Her one remaining child and husband were critically injured. Yet she somehow finished her shift.
Like Rivka more than 80 years ago, Alaa al-Najjar will live with the horror for the rest of her life.
It's estimated 16,500 children have been killed in the Gaza war. Many more have sustained terrible physical injuries while an entire generation will bear the psychological scars for years to come.
The toll exacted in response to the terrible massacres of October 7 perpetrated by Hamas is now stirring grave misgivings in Israel. The Times of Israel reports that a growing number of fierce advocates for the tough response are now questioning it. These include Elana Sztokman, an American-born Israeli writer, who used the word "genocide" to describe what's happening in Gaza, prompting a vicious response on social media.
"Right now, We, Israel, are starving and bombing a nation to death," she wrote. "Genocide. This is genocide. This is purposeful, deliberate, unrestrained killing of a people."
Last week, a former deputy chief of the Israeli Defence Force turned opposition politician Yair Golan told an interviewer: "A sane country does not fight against civilians, does not kill babies as a hobby, and does not give itself the aim of expelling populations."
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu predictably condemned the comments as "blood libel" against the IDF, even though Golan said his complaint was directed not at the armed forces but at the government directing them.
Knowing there is a conscience in Israel that is finding its voice, that protestors are prepared to take to the streets of Tel Aviv holding photographs of some of the children killed in Gaza, is reassuring.
It won't settle the ghosts. They'll probably never be silenced, nor should they be. It's important we all confront the cruelty us humans dish out to each other, even if it means losing sleep.
HAVE YOUR SAY: If the Gaza does end, should the Israeli government and remaining Hamas commanders face an international court to answer charges of war crimes? Do you avoid news from Gaza after 19 months of horror? Email us: [e-mail]
SHARE THE LOVE: If you enjoy The Echidna, forward it to a friend so they can sign up, too.
IN CASE YOU MISSED IT:
- A ban on the sale of machetes has been fast-tracked in Victoria after a vicious gang brawl in a shopping centre. Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan said the ban, originally intended to start on September 1, would now come into effect at midday on May 28.
- The future of dozens of healthcare facilities hangs in the balance as one of Australia's largest private hospital operators, Healthscope, collapses into receivership.
- Electricity prices are set to rise in some locations in Australia by nearly 10 per cent from July 1. The Australian Energy Regulator (AER) confirmed increases on May 26 of up to 9.7 per cent for some residential customers.
THEY SAID IT: "When genocide is committed, it must be seen. People must look at it with open eyes, not minimise its impact." - Nadia Murad
YOU SAID IT: Some marriages are meant to end. The Coalition's should be one of them.
Christopher writes: "They'd be much better off separated and learning to be independent, to be who they are. Then they could find out whether they are even friends. I very much doubt they would be. And it would allow them to deal with the anxiety behind their co-dependency. And I am bamboozled by the idea that Zoe McKenzie is the future of the the Liberal Party... Matt Kean was quoted in The Saturday Paper as saying a similar thing. I would love an explanation."
"Not that I support either party, but a government needs a viable opposition and as the Coalition is unlikely to provide one, divorce is the best option," writes Sue. "Alone, the Libs have a chance of putting together a new right-wing party but in their uneasy-at-best alliance with the Nats they are hamstrung. The past week has demonstrated the ineffectiveness of future togetherness. I suspect the Nats will continue to have a revolving door leadership situation. This probably isn't fair but then, a lot isn't in politics. I doubt Sussan Ley will survive for long. She will probably get things running better then be challenged because she hasn't improved things well enough, or quickly enough or because they don't like what she wore on the opening day of Parliament and decide a man can do it better. I doubt that is fair either."
Murray writes: "It is always encouraging when you see someone else has the exact same take on something. When I saw Michael McCormack swear he was not after the leadership, and 'fully supported' Littleproud, I called out to my wife, 'He's gone!' In politics a sincere denial of something can usually be taken as an admission that it ranges from being at least a possibility to a dead certainty. As John says, the knives are not drawn, but thumbs have been run over blades in readiness. Sussan Ley is described here as a moderate. Moderate what? If she is a moderate leader of a conservative party we should shortly see some clear points of difference from the Labor left. That will be the test. If she can do that the Liberal Party will have some purpose again and the Nationals can return to their proper place, being the minor partner and adding the numbers. McCormack or Littleproud, Makes little difference."
"The marriage of convenience will eventually rehappen," writes Old Donald. "Why? Because it is the only way Lib and Nat will ever assume their rightful place (i.e. in charge of us poor sods - divine right and all that Louis XIV stuff). Anybody who believes there is sincere principle or moral honour involved at the core is just not with it."
Phil C writes: "In trying to gaslight the CSIRO and AEMO over the viability of current nuclear power options in Australia, the Coalition proved it has a problem understanding commerce, science, and statistics. You would think that catastrophic electoral failure might have taught them something about objectivity, but apparently not. The Liberal senator Sarah Henderson says the answer is not to move to the centre. It's a simple observation that the Millennials and Gen X constitute a rapidly increasing majority of Australian voters, but just 22 per cent of them vote for the Coalition. Henderson's call for an ongoing right-wing stance won't attract young voters or bring back the teal vote. But it will absolutely guarantee ongoing atrophy of the Liberal Party. Our Parliament needs a strong opposition to work as it should. Country people need a prominent voice to advocate for better phones, roads, medical care, and schools. It is everyone's interest that Sussan Ley's moderation plans prevail, and the Nats come on board with that."
"Sussan Ley wants to take the Liberals forward but is being pulled back by the old guard Liberals past their use-by date and the out-of-touch Nationals attempts to bully her," writes Jennifer. "Getting together and compromising the future direction for the sole purpose of regaining power will lead to destruction. Whilst I dislike the policies and much of the ideology of both parties, I don't want to see Labor without effective opposition to hold them to account. Looks like we'll have to rely on independents for that, again."
Mick writes: "No marriage will work when both participants are suffering from an existential identity crisis. A Liberal Party abandoned by its corporate father that doesn't know if it's Right or Left. A National Party that used to be Country but is now transitioning to Mining/Outer Urban. God knows what the offspring will be like."
"I think you nailed it, Echidna," writes Robin. "There was hope for a renewed Liberal Party sans the Nationals. But now we are back to having the tail wag the dog again. As for Littleproud, as impossible as it is for an invertebrate to grow a spine, you don't lead by blaming your poor decisions on the team standing behind you."
Ian writes: "It would be interesting to see the Clampetts (the Nats) and the Liberals come out publicly with separate competing policies, and see how these resonate with the electorate. Then they can undertake a negotiation to 'marry' them together. However, it seems like the Libs are still quite internally polarised, having lost a lot of their moderates in 2022, so the differences within the Libs is probably not much different to the differences between the Libs and the Clampetts. There seems to be plenty of overlap with the right-wing extremists of both parties, who think the electorate 'doesn't know what's good for 'em' (to be fair, sometimes I agree). They also both keep blathering about 'values'. They are right in needing to better articulate what those are, because I don't know. But, they also need to better understand the difference between values and ideology, because values should be universal, not political."
"It is despicable that the Coalition and more specifically the Nationals are fighting amongst themselves in Canberra professing to fight and represent the bush and regional areas while their constituents are inundated with the floods," writes John from Mentone. "They should have been in their local areas helping people stay safe and survive. Transparency is certainly not the Nationals strong point. If we knew their recent voting numbers for their leadership we could see how precarious Littleproud's situation is."