logo
A Memorial Day Song for the Ages

A Memorial Day Song for the Ages

Newsweek7 days ago

Advocates for ideas and draws conclusions based on the interpretation of facts and data.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
It's a day Paul Monti will never forgot. The day he got the news military parents dread: His 30-year-old son, Jared, was killed in the line of duty in Afghanistan in 2006. Paul instantly joined the ranks of a club no one chooses to be a part: He was a Gold Star parent.
Paul didn't know what to do or say when he got the news, or how to process his grief. A few months later, on his first Veterans Day visit to his son's gravesite at the Massachusetts National Cemetery, he noticed something strange: There wasn't a flag on display near any of the 78,000 graves in the cemetery. Not one.
The flags weren't there because the cemetery ground crews complained the flags made it too hard to cut the cemetery's grass. Paul, upon hearing that news, did what any Gold Star parent would do: He fought the Department of Veterans Affairs until the rule was changed.
But this Gold Star dad's mission had just begun. He launched Operation Flags for Vets, an organization dedicated to placing flags on every grave at the Massachusetts National Cemetery on Memorial Day and Veterans Day. During the organization's first ceremony on Memorial Day of 2011, an army of volunteers adorned 62,000 graves with flags.
Flags fly at grave markers in Massachusetts National Cemetery in Bourne on May 24, 2014.
Flags fly at grave markers in Massachusetts National Cemetery in Bourne on May 24, 2014.
AP Photo/Michael Dwyer
Paul was interviewed later that day on the national radio show Here and Now, fighting back tears as he told stories about his deceased son, including one about a new kitchen set Jared and his Fort Bragg Army pals purchased for their home, only to give it away.
"One day his buddies came home and the kitchen set was missing," Paul recalled. "They asked him where it was, and Jared said, 'Well, I was over at one of my soldier's houses and his kids were eatin' on the floor, so I figured they needed the kitchen set more than we did.' And so the $700 kitchen set disappeared. That's what he did."
His son was a man who didn't crave attention. "All of his medals went in a sock drawer," Paul said. "No one ever saw them; he didn't want to stand out." In 2009, his son Jared posthumously received the highest commendation any American soldier can be awarded: the Congressional Medal of Honor.
But the most powerful part of Paul's story revolved around his son's truck. Why he didn't sell it. And why he still drove it. "What can I tell you? It's him," he explained. "It's got his DNA all over it. I love driving it because it reminds me of him, though I don't need the truck to remind me of him. I think about him every hour of every day."
Paul shared details of his son's Dodge 4x4 Ram 1500 truck adorned with decals, including the 10th Mountain Division, an American flag and a "Go Army" decal.
Then came the most emotional part of the interview.
"When you lose your child you've lost your future," he lamented. "And I think that's why so many Gold Star parents drive their children's trucks. Because they have to hold on."
I'll never forget that interview because I was listening to it on a sunny Memorial Day back in 2011 in a Walmart parking lot in my hometown, unable to get out of my SUV because I was crying. Crying like I used to cry when I was a child. Crying as if I'd just lost my child.
I wasn't the only one sitting alone in my car crying that Memorial Day. Nashville songwriter Connie Harrington was in her car listening to the story, too. Moved to tears, she did what writers do: She pulled over and scribbled down details of the story so she wouldn't forget them.
When she got home, one part of Paul's story kept tugging at her: the story of that truck. With the help of two songwriter friends (Jimmy Yeary and Jessi Alexander), Harrington turned Monti's story—and all of that emotion—into a song. Not long after, country singer Lee Brice recorded it, and I Drive Your Truck made its way quickly to No. 1 on Billboard's country chart. The official video has since been viewed 55 million times.
But the story didn't end there. Not long after the song became a hit, Paul was contacted by a woman he knew who'd lost her son in the same battle that took his son's life.
"She sent me a message that she'd heard the song and that I had to listen to it," Paul said. "She knew I drove Jared's truck, and she drove her son's truck, too."
He was unable to make it through the song.
"I'd get into it a few bars or so and kind of welled up," he explained.
What Paul didn't know was that it was his story that inspired the song. The writers eventually tracked him down to celebrate the song's success: It won the Country Music Association's Song of the Year in 2013.
The song did what country music does best: tell sad, beautiful stories. Here's the opening verse and chorus:
Eighty-nine cents in the ashtray Half-empty bottle of Gatorade Rollin' on the floorboard.
That dirty Braves cap on the dash Dog tags hangin' from the rearview Old Skoal can and cowboy boots And a "Go Army" shirt folded in the back.
This thing burns gas like crazy But that's all right People got their ways of copin' Oh and I've got mine.
I drive your truck I roll every window down And I burn up Every back road in this town.
I find a field, I tear it up Till all the pain is a cloud of dust Yes, sometimes I drive your truck.
The grave of Medal of Honor recipient Jared Christopher Monti is bathed in the autumn sunlight at the Massachusetts National Cemetery as the nation approaches Veterans Day weekend in Bourne on November 8, 2013.
The grave of Medal of Honor recipient Jared Christopher Monti is bathed in the autumn sunlight at the Massachusetts National Cemetery as the nation approaches Veterans Day weekend in Bourne on November 8, 2013.
AP Photo/Stephan Savoia
What we don't learn from the song were the circumstances of Jared's death. In June 21, 2006, Sergeant First Class Monti was leading a 16-man patrol in the Nuristan Province, part of the 10th Mountain Division, when his patrol was ambushed by enemy fighters. One soldier who served under him was wounded badly. Despite a wicked firefight, Jared tried three times to help his fallen comrade. The third attempt got him killed.
No one who knew Jared was surprised.
"It's what he did," Paul said of his son. "Jared didn't give up on people, and always, he tried to do the right thing."
What led Jared to become the man he was? One need not look far to figure it out. His father had the same passion for serving others, for doing the right thing—and doing hard things.
In 2022, Paul died at the age of 76 from cancer. He taught earth sciences at a local high school for 35 years and rarely talked about himself: He was too busy taking care of people around him.
Paul's daughter Niccole told reporters her dad, one of nine kids growing up, worked hard throughout his life. He delivered newspapers and worked all kinds of odd jobs growing up, and worked two and three jobs to support his family. He didn't complain about it. Or take credit for it. It was who he was.
"Paul relentlessly pursued a life of helping others, always leading by example," his colleagues wrote on the Massachusetts Fallen Heroes Facebook page. "He left us to join his son Jared in heaven."
It's a sublime final image of two lives beautifully lived, and God's just reward for doing so. It's why the story of Paul and Jared Monti is one for the ages, memorialized by a song for the ages.
A song everyone should listen to this, and every, Memorial Day.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Driving Season Starts Strongly for Oil Refiners
US Driving Season Starts Strongly for Oil Refiners

Bloomberg

time36 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

US Driving Season Starts Strongly for Oil Refiners

Welcome to our guide to the commodities markets powering the global economy. Today, Houston-based reporter Nathan Risser looks at how gasoline demand is shaping up for the key US summer months. The driving season in the US officially began Monday with the Memorial Day weekend. The initial data show more Americans hit the road compared with last year, a good sign for gasoline demand and the companies that make the fuel.

Fact Check: Barron Trump didn't marry Princess Leonor of Spain
Fact Check: Barron Trump didn't marry Princess Leonor of Spain

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Fact Check: Barron Trump didn't marry Princess Leonor of Spain

Claim: In 2025, Barron Trump married Princess Leonor of Spain in a royal wedding held at a European palace. Rating: In May 2025, a rumor spread across social media claiming that Barron Trump, the youngest son of former U.S. President Donald Trump, had married Princess Leonor of Spain. The story was pushed by several YouTube videos, one of which was titled, "Barron Trump & Princess Leonor's Grand Royal Wedding at a Magnificent Palace," and reached over 146,000 views. The video's description read: Step into a world of elegance and history as we unveil Barron Trump & Princess Leonor's Grand Royal Wedding at a Magnificent Palace. Set in a timeless European palace, this royal ceremony captures the grace, tradition, and grandeur of old-world nobility. From the majestic processional to the heartfelt vows, every moment feels like a scene from a fairytale. Witness the union of American and Spanish heritage in a wedding unlike any other. Similar videos about the alleged wedding of Barron Trump and Princess Leonor appeared in early 2025, including titles such as "Barron Trump & Princess Leonor's Singing - Double Happiness | Royal Wedding at the Royal Palace," "Barron Trump and Princess Leonor's Royal Wedding at the Spanish Royal Palace," and "Barron Trump Marries Princess Leonor – A Royal Love Story Come True." Most of these videos featured sentimental music, portraying the pair singing romantic duets. Similar clips spread on other social media platforms, including TikTok and Facebook. However, none of these videos was based in reality. First, there were no credible news reports or official announcements from either the Spanish royal family or the Trump family confirming any such relationship or marriage between the two individuals. Princess Leonor, born in 2005 and currently heir to the Spanish throne, has been the subject of significant media attention, and any real engagement or marriage would have made news headlines. Additionally, the videos spreading the claim were explicitly labeled AI-generated, and many of the clips used in these videos displayed clear signs of artificial creation, including distorted facial features, unnatural skin textures, and inconsistent lighting or backgrounds. Therefore, we have rated this claim as false. The videos seemed to originate from the Lovely Trump Family YouTube channel (archived), which featured multiple videos with the same narrative (see screenshot below): (YouTube channel Lovely Trump Family) One YouTube video that featured a romantic song and allegedly showed scenes from Barron Trump's wedding reached over 1.8 million views as of this writing. It was captioned: Experience the magical royal wedding as Barron Trump and Princess Leonor of Spain perform a series of heartfelt songs at their grand wedding celebration. With their soulful voices, they sing beautiful ballads like "Our Forever Begins," "A Love Meant to Be," and "Promise of Forever." Each song is a tribute to true love, faith, and the journey of two hearts coming together. Set against the stunning backdrop of a royal palace and a luxurious setting, their emotional performance captures the essence of a fairytale romance. The enchanting lyrics, heartfelt melodies, and the radiant smiles of Barron and Princess Leonor create an unforgettable moment, making this royal wedding a truly magical event. Witness the joy, love, and celebration of two souls united in a grand and elegant ceremony. Like the other videos, it included an "AI Disclaimer" stating, "This video was created using AI technology for entertainment purposes. The voices, visuals, and performances of Barron Trump and Princess Leonor are generated using advanced AI software and do not represent real-life events." Despite this disclaimer, many users in the comments appeared to take the content at face value, praising the supposed couple and reacting as if the wedding had genuinely taken place. Additionally, a Google search for "Barron Trump Princess Leonor wedding" returned no relevant results beyond AI-generated content. ( In addition to disclaimers labeling the videos as AI-generated, the content itself contained numerous visual cues that it was artificially created. These included distorted facial features, unnatural skin textures, and lighting inconsistencies that are common artifacts of AI. For example, in one scene, a car's license plate appeared with jumbled, nonsensical characters that did not resemble any real-world format. In another scene purportedly showing a crowd at the alleged wedding, many of the attendees' faces were blurred, asymmetrical and unnaturally rendered. (YouTube channel Lovely Trump Family) The rumor appears to have originated purely from speculative posts on social media. One of the earliest and most widely shared examples came from an X user in October 2024, who wrote, "Barron Trump and the Princess of Spain Leonor are a match made in heaven. Same age, no previous relationships, good values, good looking and with a powerful family," reaching over 7 million views. The post was not based on any confirmed relationship, interaction or credible report involving the two individuals. Snopes has previously debunked several false claims involving Barron Trump, including a viral rumor that he was rejected by Harvard University and AI-generated videos that falsely portrayed him singing on America's Got Talent.

Trump Is Turning The Border Into A Military Base. Here's What I Learned From A U.S. Army Tour.
Trump Is Turning The Border Into A Military Base. Here's What I Learned From A U.S. Army Tour.

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Is Turning The Border Into A Military Base. Here's What I Learned From A U.S. Army Tour.

EL PASO, Texas — The armored military vehicles President Donald Trump has sent to the U.S.-Mexico border weigh 50,000 pounds apiece and have thermal and infrared cameras said to be able to spot 'a little mouse up to a mile out.' That feature might appeal to Trump, who has referred to people who cross the border without authorization as 'rats' who 'infest' the nation. Last week, when a soldier emerged from one of the hulking eight-wheelers, armed with a pair of binoculars and a grimace, he briefly turned his attention away from the U.S.-Mexico border. He turned over his left shoulder, looking inward at the United States — and at me. He was one of the approximately 10,000 members of the U.S. military who are now stationed at the border, many of whom now patrol areas where, according to the president, they have the authority to detain civilians. Over the last few weeks, Trump has directed the military to take control of thousands of acres of land along the border in Texasand New Mexico, treating nearly 250 miles of the U.S.-Mexico border as de facto military installations known as 'National Defense Areas.' As a result, people who cross the border in these areas are now not only susceptible to charges of illegal entry but also of trespassing on a military installation. This escalation also purportedly gives soldiers the legal authority to detain civilians for trespassing. In short: Trump has issued a hugely significant order for troops to detain people for civilian criminal violations on American soil. At the U.S.-Mexico border last week, I saw what a national military police force might look like. On top of increased air surveillance and logistical support, there are now at least three massive, armored Stryker vehicles each in Texas and southeastern New Mexico. The Strykers themselves aren't armed, but the soldiers within them carry rifles, as do others along the border. (About 50 such vehicles arrived at the border in April; it's unclear how many are in use.) Four other journalists and I participated in a U.S. Army tour last week, being shepherded around the borderlands in a sprinter van. Beginning at Fort Bliss, we first drove through downtown El Paso, Texas, to the bollard fence that marks many urban borders with Mexico. We passed through the gate, going south, and our van lurched between sandy potholes until we stopped underneath the Bridge of the Americas. For the first time in American history, soldiers have purportedly been given the authority to detain people in the New Mexico and west Texas borderlands on the grounds that they are trespassing on a military base. Though the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act restricts the use of the military for domestic law enforcement, a loophole known as the military purpose doctrine allows exceptions where soldiers are working to further a primarily military function, like guarding a military base. Trump's recent orders take advantage of this loophole. You might be able to spot the circular logic. The hundreds of miles of new 'military installations' along the border have provided the grounds for hundreds of trespassing charges, and potentially thousands more in the future. The purpose of those charges is to protect the military bases. Those bases, according to the military, are part of an overall effort to 'seal the southern border and repel illegal activity,' as well as 'denying illegal activity along the southern border.' But the trespassing charges now central to that effort would not be legal if the bases didn't exist. According to the military, these new National Defense Areas range from 60 feet to over 3 miles deep, though the Army has not released maps to make their exact dimensions clear. Analyzing land transfer data earlier this month, a spokesperson for Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) told SourceNM the border militarization scheme has serious implications for anyone driving along New Mexico State Road 9 'who might pull over to stretch their legs and unwittingly trespass on a military base.' Dozens of migrants have already pleaded guilty to the new trespassing charges. But many others have seen their charges dismissed, with a federal judge saying earlier this month there was no reason to believe they even knew they were stepping onto a military mission. At least so far, the arrests have been carried out by Border Patrol agents, not soldiers. But that could change, especially if the number of unauthorized border crossings ticks up as temperatures cool in the fall. Also, so far, it appears no U.S. citizens have been charged with trespassing on the border installations — but there's nothing in the legal authorities cited by the Trump administration that would preclude that. These developments are just the latest in decades of border militarization. The United States, under presidents of both parties, has built hundreds of miles of fencing along the U.S.-Mexico border in recent decades. The Border Patrol recently celebrated its 100th birthday, and especially since Sept. 11, 2001, border enforcement has grown more and more aggressive, featuring high-tech surveillance equipment and thousands of armed agents, the presence of whom — especially as recent presidents have attacked asylum rights along the border — tends to push people into isolated, barren parts of the desert. In recentyears, members of the military have served in a support capacity along the border, helping with logistical tasks and surveillance. Still, Trump has accelerated this trend in his second term. Now, there are 10,000 soldiers along the border as part of the federal mission, up from 2,500 in January. And the threat of trespassing charges is palpable. Veteran border journalist Todd Miller wrote this month that on a recent trip to attempt to take photos of the new Defense Department signage, he noticed a camera system on an unmarked truck that appeared to be tracking his movements. 'What if I had missed the No Trespassing sign?' Miller wrote. 'Things began to feel creepy.' Someone exited the truck. Miller turned around. Last Thursday, I felt a similar chill when the soldier trained his binoculars on me. Was he just hamming it up for a scheduled media tour? Maybe so. But what about the thousands of Americans who live walking distance to a border National Defense Area? And what if Trump, as is expected, keeps expanding these National Defense Areas across the entire southern border? What if he starts declaring them throughout the country? Concertina wire glistened near my fingertips. The mid-May temperature crept toward 100 degrees Fahrenheit. Sweat soaked through my clothes. Pointing to the Rio Grande, I tried a joke on an Army public affairs officer, referring to the soldier with the binoculars. 'You should tell him the border is that way.' The officer didn't respond. The soldier with the binoculars dipped back inside his air-conditioned vehicle. We left, driving back under the Bridge of the Americas, waiting as a public affairs officer punched in a code that engaged a motor and opened the gates into the United States, then taking the highway to New Mexico. At the start of our four-hour tour, the three Army spokespeople tasked with escorting our group to various points along the border quickly tempered expectations. As a condition for the trip, they were not to be named or quoted, they said. The answers to some questions were self-evident. Earlier this month, for example, a federal magistrate judge dismissed trespassing charges against nearly 100 defendants who allegedly crossed the border into a National Defense Area, ruling 'the United States provides no facts from which one could reasonably conclude that the Defendant knew he was entering the [New Mexico National Defense Area].' From what I saw, that was a fair ruling. The signs warning border-crossers in English and Spanish that they were standing on military property appeared at 100-meter increments, on signposts driven into the desert sand. They're just over a foot wide and use a half-inch font, and were often positioned 30 feet or more inland from the portions of the border wall I saw. It's easy to imagine migrants standing on Mexican soil not even noticing the signs, let alone being able to make out what they say. Many questions remain unanswered. Here are a few I sent in an email this week to the U.S. Army, which has not responded: What are the rules of engagement for soldiers? When can they use lethal force? Are soldiers allowed to carry pepper spray, tear gas, 'less-than-lethal' ammunition, and/or similar arms? Do soldiers working in the National Defense Areas receive any border-specific training? Any training in crowd control or arrests? Have they trained with Border Patrol at all? Is the military authorized to do vehicle chases if someone crosses into an NDA and then flees? What about soldiers operating out of Customs and Border Protection vehicles? Can the military detain people overnight? Has that happened? Have any U.S. citizens been detained for trespassing on an NDA? 'As with any military installation, this land is under Department of Defense administrative jurisdiction,' Geoffrey A. Carmichael, a public affairs major with the U.S. Army, told HuffPost in an earlier statement, before I sent the above questions. 'This includes the authority to prevent unauthorized access and to detect and deter potential security threats to maintain security, order, and discipline, which may include apprehending those who enter without authorization. Any person apprehended for trespassing (or committing other criminal offenses) on a military installation, regardless of citizenship, will be transferred over to appropriate non-DoD law enforcement officials as promptly as practical.' Border Patrol operates in 'close proximity to our patrols,' he added, so 'law enforcement execution can be carried out rather quickly.' 'But I want to make it very clear,' Carmichael said. 'Law enforcement is not a DoD responsibility. Law enforcement and adjudication, in addition to what you've seen in reporting recently is the responsibility of CBP and the Department of Justice.' Also among the unanswered questions: Are the soldiers really helping to 'secure' the border? The administration seems to think so. 'If you see guys in camouflage now with binoculars, or in Stryker vehicles with rifles, they have the authority to detain illegals temporarily and assist Border Patrol and hand them over, and now, to be charged by the Department of Justice up to 10 years,' Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said in a video update two weeks ago. The numbers of charges, troops, barbed wire, and National Defense Areas would all continue to 'climb,' he said, because, 'we're going to get 100% operational control of the border.' Similar boasts about the military's ability to one-up Border Patrol officers are common in Operation Lone Star, the governor of Texas' parallel (but unrelated) mission to militarize that state's border using Texas National Guard soldiers, state troopers and state trespassing charges. That mission has also been marred by alleged human rights abuses and gratuitous political theater. Still, even before the declaration of National Defense Areas, crossings were already at historic lows, as they began dropping during the Biden administration due to much larger forces. Mexico, under pressure from the U.S., has for years moved aggressively to use its military and law enforcement to keep migrants away from the U.S. border. And both Trump and former President Joe Biden dramatically cracked down on asylum rights on the border, in Biden's case with a numerical cap, and in Trump's by simply declaring border crossings to be an emergency, and eliminating asylum rights almost altogether. As of last Thursday, the Army claimed it had made 190 'detections' since the New Mexico National Defense Area was first established in April — a minuscule number compared with Border Patrol's day-to-day work. Seeing the beefed-up military presence at the border made clear this is about more than 'operational control.' It's also about optics. Dispatching the military looks tough, and Trump loves to look tough. After our sprinter van left El Paso, we made our way west, into New Mexico, passing Santa Teresa Border Patrol Station and continuing until there was nothing around us but endless desert scrub. A surveillance blimp hovered nearby. We turned toward a black line on the horizon, which grew bolder until it became a 20-foot bollard wall. We disembarked onto soft sand a few steps from the wall. The sun glared overhead, and within minutes my phone shut down, overheating and displaying an error screen. Dust clung to my eyes and my boots seemed to sink into the shifting ground. We were only a couple of miles from a port of entry, but I couldn't tell. Later, I would find that the group No More Deaths, a humanitarian organization, had mapped a cluster of recorded human remains in recent years around where we stood. A few feet from an armored Stryker vehicle, a deserted, weathered backpack sat on the ground, contents spilled onto the earth — a toothbrush, ointment, deodorant, a baseball cap. The Stryker vehicle stood motionless atop a sandy hill, seeming to glare at me. This time, no one emerged from the vehicle. Since the Obama administration, many migrants have voluntarily surrendered to border agents after making the grueling trip north, opting to pursue their right to an asylum case in the United States. One major benefit of that route is the opportunity to avoid more trekking through the deadly desert. Now, given the new trespassing charges and the United States' animosity toward the asylum process itself, more people could try to avoid detection altogether. Squinting against the glaring sun and hot sand, I was overwhelmed at the thought. For dozens of migrants arrested out here under the new trespassing charges, the next stop has been local jail. For others, it might be immigration detention. For those trying to escape detection, the journey might continue through the desert, for however long they can survive. Because I happen to have been born in Maryland, the U.S. Army drove me to a gas station, then to a Fort Bliss parking lot. My trip to the border was over. Trump Is Quietly Using The U.S. Military In A Whole New Way Historians Are 'Shocked' By What They've Seen Trump Do In Just 100 Days Trump's Bid To Deport Columbia Activist Mahmoud Khalil Is Likely Unconstitutional, Judge Says Maryland Congressman Denied Access To See Man Wrongly Deported To El Salvador Trump Administration 'Unquestionably' Violated Deportation Order, Judge Says

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store