Resolution seeks ‘fair treatment' of Flathead Lake recreation
Somers Beach State Park on Flathead Lake. (Provided by Montana FWP for the Daily Montanan)
Senate President Matt Regier grew up learning to water ski on Flathead Lake — the largest freshwater lake west of the Mississippi — as did many of his constituents.
'I have friends that live there. Hopefully someday I can afford to live on it, too,' Regier told reporters during a press availability this week. 'But Flathead Lake is not just for the people around it. Tourism is a big draw for the Flathead Valley. And when you have a problem like we did two years ago with lake levels and not being able to put boats in, I mean, that's just the start of it.'
Regier presented Joint Resolution 18 to the Senate Natural Resources Committee on Wednesday, which requests that water managers consider recreation to be as important as other priorities when making decisions about Flathead Lake.
In late June 2023, water levels on Flathead Lake were historically low — nine inches below the lake's full-pool mark and a foot below the 23-year median, according to U.S. Geological Survey data — and causing problems for businesses and recreational users.
Requests to raise the lake level, made to the inter-agency team that coordinates dams across the Columbia River Basin, were denied, as water managers had to balance multiple uses including flood control, wildlife management and irrigation — not just recreation.
'I needed to do something to stand up for my constituents, especially back home, (to show) how vital having water in Flathead Lake is,' Regier told reporters. 'I always speak for my constituents, but this is special to them.'
Regier cited comments from Gov. Greg Gianforte made that year about the importance of the lake to the region's economic vitality — roughly $600 million is spent from anglers, boaters and other tourists in Flathead County alone, according to a University of Montana study.
During a normal year, the dam-controlled lake fills up during the spring runoff by mid-June and tends to stay level throughout the summer months.
In 2023, however, low snowpack and regional drought conditions prevented the lake from reaching full-pool levels.
According to the University of Montana's Flathead Lake Biological Station — which operates from a campus on the east side of the lake — snowpack the previous winter was just 80% of the long-term average, and an unusually warm May led to a rapid meltout.
Flathead Lake Biological Station Director Jim Elser said inflows from the main stem Flathead River, which is the primary source for the lake, was between 34% and 60% throughout the year.
With so little water entering the lake, levels continued to drop, ultimately reaching a full two feet below full pool, which is 2,893.
Low water levels affected boat and business owners around the lake, according to the Flathead Beacon, as many public and private boat access sites couldn't operate. Rental companies lost customers, too.
Farmers upstream of the lake saw irrigation issues, as lake water often backs up the river to an elevation high enough to divert into sloughs, and hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of crops were jeopardized.
Efforts to address the problem ran up the ladder from county officials, to the governor and Montana's Congressional delegation.
One avenue considered was a plan to release water from Hungry Horse Reservoir located upstream.
Hungry Horse Dam, along with Se̓liš Ksanka Qĺispe̓ (SKQ) Dam, operated by Energy Keepers Inc., on behalf of the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes, are part of a network of 60 dams throughout the the Columbia River Basin. Many of the dams are operated by the Army Corps of Engineers or Bureau of Reclamation, but all of them are jointly coordinated to regulate flood control, energy generation, irrigation, streamflow for fish migration and recreation.
An inter-agency Technical Management Team comprising representatives from four states, five federal agencies and six tribal nations, coordinates operations across the Columbia River Basin. A proposal by Gov. Greg Gianforte to fill Flathead Lake using water from Hungry Horse was considered, but ultimately found to be an inadequate solution, due to the risk of draining too much water from the reservoir during drought conditions. During the fall, water released from Hungry Horse augments the Flathead River to aid endangered Bull Trout.
Many elected officials, including U.S. Republican Rep. Ryan Zinke lambasted the decision, accusing the Technical Management Team of prioritizing fish over people.
Zinke later introduced legislation to Congress that would require Flathead Lake to be held at full-pool capacity through Labor Day each year, but the legislation never got out of committee.
Regier said during the committee hearing on Wednesday that he had considered similar legislation 'with a lot more teeth than just a resolution' until he researched the intricacies involved in coordinating the water system of the Pacific Northwest.
'Once we started digging into that, there were a lot more players than I realized that were involved in water levels in Flathead Lake,' Regier said.
The resolution put forward instead requests that 'all decision-making bodies with an influence on the usability of Flathead Lake ensure that recreation needs be measured fairly compared to hydropower, fish, and irrigation demands,' and also requests that Flathead Lake Recreation be 'expressly reflected' in the next iteration of the Columbia River Treaty.
Negotiations to update the 61-year old treaty between the U.S. and Canada are currently paused due to President Donald Trump's threats to Canada's sovereignty.
The committee did not take immediate action on Regier's resolution.
Management of Flathead Lake primarily rests with Energy Keepers Inc, the company that operates SKQ Dam.
Under the dam's federal license, the lake is dropped to its lowest level during the winter, and has specific flood-risk limitation on how quickly the water level can be brought up during the spring runoff.
In a February news release, Energy Keepers said that streamflow conditions in the Flathead Basin were 'similar to 2023 and 2024' and the dam was being operated to increase the likelihood of meeting refill requirements.
In both 2023 and 2024, the dam operators requested waivers from the Army Corps of Engineers to deviate from the normal process and begin filling the lake early in order to maximize capacity.
The first water level benchmark to be released won't come until mid-April, and Energy Keepers has not updated its forecast for the lake since Feb. 2.
Data from the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service show that snowpack in northwest Montana is significantly better than in recent years.
As of March 27, NRCS data indicated that snow water equivalent — the amount of moisture contained within the snowpack — across the Flathead Basin is at 96% of the 30-year median. Rain and snow are forecast during the next week in the area.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Committee starting work on ballot initiative for nonpartisan judicial elections
The door to the old Supreme Court Chamber at the Montana Capitol. (Micah Drew/Daily Montanan) A newly formed political committee is beginning a campaign to enshrine nonpartisan judicial elections in the state constitution, after a multitude of efforts by the Montana Legislature to attach party labels to judges failed. Pepper Peterson, the political director for Montanans for Fair and Impartial Judges, said the goal of putting a constitutional initiative to voters in 2026 came after watching the repeated rebuffing of those actions during the session. 'I think the people of Montana can see the system here is fair,' Peterson told the Daily Montanan. 'This is a common sense idea to have in our state constitution. Anything else is just raw partisanship, and I don't think most Montanans are on that train.' Throughout the 2025 session, legislators introduced more than a half-dozen bills aimed at allowing, or requiring, judicial candidates to declare a party label, a stated goal of Republican leaders in the Legislature and Gov. Greg Gianforte, who argue that the judicial branch is 'nonpartisan in name only.' One bill passed — House Bill 39, which allows political parties to donate to judicial candidates — but a majority failed to gain traction in at least one chamber. Five separate bills attempted to allow, or require, judges to run under a partisan label. Some bills would have only applied to the Montana Supreme Court, others would have included any judicial candidate, including district and municipal judges, and justices of the peace. Lawmakers who supported those measures said that allowing candidates to align with a political party would bring transparency to the process and help educate voters. While a majority of lawmakers didn't seem to have an appetite for changing the system, it was a point of discussion all the way until the final day, with Gianforte's office considering adding the partisan judicial issue into an amendment of a spending bill. Despite the thwarted attempts to alter the judicial selection process, Republican leaders in the Senate said they had laid a foundation for future reform. 'I think that judicial reform is critical, continuously. It's important for our judges to have accountability. It's important for preventative transparency, and what we did this session helps start that process,' said Senate Majority Leader Tom McGillvray, R-Billings, during a press conference at the end of the session. But Peterson said seeing lawmakers pushing partisan judicial elections get 'slapped down over and over and over again' set the stage for bringing the issue to the ballot box. 'That's what we anticipate the people to do as well. We're going to put this in the Constitution, and we're going to stop this,' he said. 'The people are going to have to send this message very loud and very clear so that lawmakers know this is what Montanans want.' Peterson is working with Ted Dick, a former executive director of the Montana Democratic Party more than a decade ago, on the ballot issue — the same team behind the successful ballot initiatives in 2020 designed to legalize adult use of recreational marijuana. Peterson said their experience on that campaign, as well as his decades of political work in the state on issues from coal mining to gun rights, make them the right group to bring forward the ballot initiative, despite not working on judicial issues during the session. 'My career has been nonpartisan activism for the rights of citizens. I consider myself a civil rights activist over anything, whether that's the rights of the 2nd amendment, 1st amendment, 4th amendment,' Peterson said. 'I can get signatures and get this issue across the finish line … It's a complicated process, there's only a few people who are experts, and we're some of them.' To get the issue onto the ballot as a constitutional initiative in 2026, the committee must collect valid signatures representing 10% of votes cast for governor in the last election stateside, as well as 10% in at least 40 legislative districts. If the issue makes it onto the ballot, a simple majority of votes will enshrine it as a part of the state constitution. Two new laws passed by the Legislature make changes to the process for gathering signatures for ballot initiatives. Senate Bill 226, sponsored by Sen. Mike Cuffe, R-Eureka, requires signatures be submitted incrementally, rather than by a single deadline. House Bill 201, by Rep. Braxton Mitchell, R-Columbia Falls, mandates that a paid signature gatherer must verbally disclose their first name, state where they legally reside, and position as a paid gatherer to anyone they approach. They must also wear a nametag with that information. Peterson said the committee intends to have 'thousands of conversations' during the early stages of building out their campaign with lobbyists, special interest groups, and most importantly, citizens. 'Polling done on this issue shows overwhelming support from Montanans for nonpartisan elections,' Peterson said. 'I don't think it's our uphill battle to fight at all — I think it's an uphill battle for the other side to convince people the system we have in place is flawed.'
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
New state analysis shows 2.1% biennium budget increase
The full text of Montana's biennial budget laid out on a lawmaker's desk. (Micah Drew/ Daily Montanan) An analysis of Montana's budget for the 2025-27 biennium showed a 2.1% increase over the previous biennium, the Legislative Fiscal Division reported this week. Some members of the state's legislature said during the session the increase was double-digits, focusing specifically on the general fund, which House Appropriations Chair Llew Jones said was a misrepresentation of the budget. 'Sadly, members of Montana's Freedom Caucus have been deliberately misleading constituents, citing as much as an 18% increase in our state budget by including General Fund spending from the previous session and transfers to other state funds in their calculations,' Jones said in a press release. 'Instead, the total state budget will grow by just over 2% in the next two years, which we accomplished while also giving historic income and property tax cuts to Montana families and small businesses.' Jones stated the calculations factored in 'transfer of General Fund resources to special trusts and the distribution of significant income and property tax reductions' when coming to the 2.1% number. That growth rate is less than inflation, the release noted, an often repeated goal of Montana Gov. Greg Gianforte. Some Freedom Caucus members are skeptical about the calculations. Rep. Jerry Schillinger, R-Circle, said an effort had been made to cut certain items out of the budget toward the end of the session to 'make it look better' and added that the money would still be spent anyway. 'I just haven't verified their numbers yet, but I'm highly skeptical of what Representative Jones is talking about,' Schillinger told the Daily Montanan. The fight over the budget was bitter during the session and a coalition of Democrats and Republicans pushed through the $16.6 billion spending package. Schillinger said some 'big government' Republicans, instead of working with fellow conservatives, sought out Democrats to work with instead. He said this has been happening for several sessions. 'It just came out more and more into the open this session,' Schillinger said. He added that if the legislature had done its job, Gov. Gianforte, a Republican, wouldn't have to be spending the time 'vetoing all these bills.' Not all spending bills have been signed or vetoed, meaning the calculations could change depending on spending, the Legislative Fiscal Division analysis stated. Schillinger said that it appeared likely the Governor would also be signing the mega-trust bill discussed heavily near the end of the session. HB 924, for example, was touted by Jones as critical money for housing, childcare, and disaster resiliency. It became a touch point for spending hawks in the legislature who repeatedly decried the spending. A release stated, 'these trusts will increase Montana's resources.'
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Australia is 'safe and reliable' critical minerals alternative, minister says
PARIS (Reuters) -Australia offers a secure alternative supply for critical minerals vital to industry, its trade minister Don Farrell said on Thursday, in the face of rising concerns about Beijing's dominance of the sector. China's decision in April to suspend exports of a wide range of rare earths and related magnets crucial to sectors ranging from automakers to aerospace and defence was widely seen as Beijing using that dominance for leverage in its trade war with the Trump administration. While China is a top global producer of 30 of the 50 minerals considered critical by the U.S. Geological Survey, Australia has some of the largest critical minerals deposits. "We think we can be a safe and reliable supplier into the supply chain for critical minerals around the world," Farrell told Reuters in an interview. But Australia does not want to just "dig and ship" the minerals and aims to process them as well, although that would require capital from outside such as the European Union, the United States, Japan, South Korea, Singapore and India, he said. The EU and Australia signed a partnership agreement last year to develop critical materials along the supply chain ranging from extraction to refining and processing leftover waste. Farrell said critical minerals could end up in a free trade agreement with the EU that Australia and the bloc are trying to revive after talks broke down in 2023, mainly over agriculture. Australia has sent top trade officials to Brussels this week to nail down the next steps forward as both sides seek access to alternative markets as the Trump administration aggressively builds tariff barriers to its trade partners. "I think there is now impetus on both sides to look at another crack at the agreement," Farrell said in Paris, where he met EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic on the sidelines of a meeting at the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Farrell also met U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer at the OECD and told him Australia wanted the Trump administration to remove its 10% baseline tariffs and 50% tariffs on aluminium and steel. The United States, which has had a free trade agreement with Australia for two decades, ran a $17.9 billion trade surplus with the country last year, according to Greer's office. Sign in to access your portfolio
