Sharia Court, in any name & form, has no recognition in law: SC
NEW DELHI:
In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court has held that a 'Court of Kazi,' 'Court of (Darul Kaja) Kajiyat,' 'Sharia Court,' etc., by whatever name or style, have no recognition in law. The Court made this ruling while allowing a Muslim woman's maintenance plea filed under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
The bench of the top court delivered this judgment after hearing a plea filed by a woman, Shahjahan, who was challenging the Allahabad High Court's 2018 order.
The order had dismissed her revision petition against a 2010 family court decision in Jhansi, which denied her maintenance. The family court had only allowed Rs 2,500 for her two children.
A two-judge bench of the top court, led by Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah, stated that any declaration made by such courts is not binding on anyone and is unenforceable by coercive measures.
"The only way such a declaration or decision can withstand scrutiny in the eyes of the law is when the affected parties accept such declaration/decision by acting on it or accepting it, and when such action does not conflict with any other law. Even then, such declaration/decision, at best, would only be valid inter se the parties that choose to act upon/accept it, and not a third party," the bench said.
Explaining the legal position, the top court referred to various previous judgments, including Vishwa Lochan Madan versus Union of India. It cited a case where a Muslim man initially filed a plea in a 'Court of Kazi' and 'Court of (Darul Kaja) Kajiyat' seeking divorce from his wife.
In the present case, the family court had allowed only Rs 2,500 for her two children.
As per records, the marriage between the appellant and the respondent (husband) was solemnized on September 24, 2002, according to Islamic customs, rituals, and traditions. This was the second marriage for both parties.
The top court held that maintenance could not have been denied to the appellant-wife under the prevailing circumstances. It directed the payment of Rs 4,000 per month as maintenance to her, starting from the date of filing the maintenance petition before the family court.
The top court also said, "A family court is not an institution to sermonize society on morality and ethics."
The appellant woman had claimed that her husband had caused mental harassment and cruelty to her because she was unable to fulfill his demand for a motorcycle and Rs 50,000.
On this, the family court had stated that since it was their second marriage, there was no possibility of the man demanding dowry, as he would be trying to rehabilitate his household.
The top court, after reviewing the family court's observations and order, stated that such reasoning or observations were unknown to the canons of law and were based on mere conjecture and surmise.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
Exalogic case: CM Pinarayi Vijayan files affidavit in Kerala high court opposing CBI probe
Kochi: Chief minister Pinarayi Vijayan has filed a counter-affidavit before high court opposing the public interest litigation (PIL) seeking a CBI probe into the controversial Exalogic-CMRL transaction, terming it a 'politically instigated litigation'. In his affidavit, he denied all allegations, including the claim that Exalogic Solutions, a now-defunct company owned by his daughter T Veena, is his 'benami company,' and that he received illegal gratification from CMRL. The PIL filed by senior journalist M R Ajayan alleged that Exalogic received Rs 1.72 crore from Cochin Minerals and Rutile Ltd (CMRL) as illegal gratification. He also sought an investigation into the alleged political nexus involving the CM and the companies concerned. During the last hearing, the court had directed the respondents, including the CM, to file their counter-affidavits. The matter is posted for further consideration on June 17. In his 19-page affidavit, Vijayan submitted that the petitioner had failed to produce any material to substantiate the allegations, terming the PIL a "textbook case of a fishing expedition", an attempt to prompt a roving inquiry without foundational facts. He contended that the prayer for a CBI probe was devoid of genuine public interest and was instead driven by personal and political motives, targeting him and his daughter based on a single private commercial arrangement. Vijayan stated that, as per his understanding, Exalogic was engaged to provide software and marketing consultancy services to CMRL under a legitimate agreement, and that all transactions were duly accounted for through banking channels. He disclaimed any knowledge of or involvement in his daughter's business affairs, stating that she acted independently. He also denied the allegation that he was the 'kingpin' in the transfer of Kovalam Palace to a private businessman, asserting that he had exercised no undue influence in the matter. He pointed out that he assumed office well after the transfer took place. Further, he submitted that the petitioner had neither alleged any bias or collusion on the part of the vigilance and anti-corruption bureau (VACB) nor challenged the decision of the vigilance court, which declined to direct registration of an FIR in the case. Vijayan also contended that the petitioner had failed to implead the state govt as a respondent and that entertaining a petition in the absence of any evidence of bias or inaction would undermine the constitutional framework of federalism. Additionally, he submitted that an investigation by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) is already in progress, and therefore, parallel investigations by other agencies into the same allegation cannot be undertaken.
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Temple, mosque encroachments cleared voluntarily for Sambhal road expansion project
Bareilly: A mosque and a temple built illegally along Bahjoi road near Azizpur Asadpur village in the Hayat Nagar police station area in Sambhal were voluntarily dismantled by members of both communities on Monday, a month after demolition notices were issued by the administration for a road widening project. Officials said this clearance was part of a wider anti-encroachment drive in the region, with support from the public works department (PWD). On one side of the road was an unregistered shrine and mosque, and directly opposite stood the Dharmkoop Temple, part of which also extended onto PWD land. In a show of civic cooperation, locals from both communities took down the structures themselves, assisted by bulldozers, under official supervision. Sambhal SDM Vandana Mishra and local police remained present throughout the operation to ensure security. "The shrine was given a notice by the PWD as it was obstructing the road, and people are now voluntarily removing the structure," Mishra said. A video of the voluntary demolition, shared widely on social media, showed members of both communities working side by side to remove the encroachments. An official involved in the drive said, "Road widening work is currently underway in Sambhal. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Capital Gains Exemptions for Seniors SmartAsset Learn More Undo About a month ago, Mishra visited the stretch near Azizpur Asadpur village and inspected both structures. It was found that the mosque/shrine was built on PWD land, and the front part of the temple also fell within PWD jurisdiction. After a land survey confirmed the encroachments, notices were issued to both sides." On Monday, members of the Muslim community began removing the encroached shrine and mosque. Aqeel Ahmed, the caretaker, said, "This is the shrine of Yakub Ali Shah and technically it is within the limits of Azizpur village. The shrine is in the front and the mosque is behind it. Officials instructed us to dismantle it ourselves, as road construction would require the entire front portion to be removed. Measurements were already taken by officials, who also said that some part of the temple would be razed. " Members of the Hindu community also took down a section of the Dharmkoop Temple that was identified as an encroachment. Mahavir Prasad, the caretaker, said, "I have been associated with the temple for 40 years. A notice was served to us, so we are dismantling it ourselves. A small portion, including an overhang and some steps, falls within the encroachment. This is an ancient temple, and a five-day fair is held here during Maha Shivaratri. There's also an ancient banyan tree. However, the shrine and mosque opposite our temple are completely illegal, lacking any registration."
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Encroachments along Bindal river to be cleared by June 30: U'khand govt to HC
Dehradun: Uttarakhand govt on Monday informed the high court that all encroachments along the Bindal river in Dehradun will be removed by June 30, with two illegal structures already cleared by the administration during initial action. The court, hearing three public interest litigations related to threats to rivers, water streams, and the environment, listed the matter for further hearing after four weeks. A division bench of Chief Justice G Narendar and Justice Alok Mahra held a joint hearing on three PILs filed by Dehradun residents Ajay Narayan Sharma, Renu Pal, and Urmila Thapar. The petitions raised concerns over environmental degradation due to unauthorised construction on submerged land in Sahastradhara and encroachments on natural drains and slopes in Rishikesh, including the Bindal and Rispana rivers. The court had earlier ordered the state govt to remove encroachments from rivers, streams and water channels, and to install CCTV cameras at these sites, directing that these areas be managed like accident-prone zones on roadways. The court also asked the director general of police to ensure SHOs of relevant areas register cases against encroachers and submit reports. In an affidavit submitted to the court, govt said 29.5 hectares of the total 35.7 hectares identified within Dehradun municipal limits of encroachments had been removed and the remaining 6.2 hectares would be cleared by June 30. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo A dedicated committee is overseeing the removal work. The bench instructed the secretary of urban development to issue a public message cautioning citizens against encroachments, dumping of debris, and illegal mining in rivers and streams ahead of the monsoon season to prevent accidents. "This warning must go out urgently before the rains," the court said. Environmental groups have long pointed out that unchecked settlement and construction along the Bindal and Rispana riverbanks have severely reduced the rivers' natural flow and polluted them into near-sewage channels. A 2022 report found that the average width of the Rispana had shrunk from 319 metres in 1968 to just 68 metres. The National Green Tribunal had earlier fined local officials Rs 1 lakh each, citing "administrative negligence" in failing to prevent encroachments along water bodies. In April, the high court reinforced orders for installing CCTV and managing river zones with the same urgency as road accident-prone areas. Meanwhile, activists associated with Chetna Andolan said that under the guise of complying with the court's orders, poor residents were being evicted and rendered homeless. "No action is being taken against hotels and restaurants built on riverbanks, but poor families are being targeted first," one activist said. On May 30, dozens of daily wage workers and activists protested elevated road projects and demolitions, accusing the govt of sparing commercial buildings while evicting vulnerable households. In response, the Dehradun district administration asked municipal bodies to identify affected families for rehabilitation under schemes like Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana.
