logo
Sir Keir Starmer warned he risks Brexit vote betrayal if he agrees new deal to put the UK back under EU control in new 'Surrender Summit'

Sir Keir Starmer warned he risks Brexit vote betrayal if he agrees new deal to put the UK back under EU control in new 'Surrender Summit'

Daily Mail​18-05-2025

Keir Starmer was last night warned he would betray Brexit if he agreed a deal that put the UK back under the control of the EU.
The Prime Minister is today set to sign an agreement at what has been dubbed his 'Surrender Summit' that will mean Britain must once more follow EU laws and abide by its judges' rulings.
He is also poised to hand millions of young Europeans the right to live, study and work here for up to three years, risking his pledge to cut migration. And the PM – who backed Remain then campaigned for a second referendum to undo the Leave vote – is expected to 'sell out' Britain's fishermen by allowing French boats continued access to UK coastal waters.
Talks were going down to the wire last night after the EU made surprise 11th-hour demands for the fishing rights to last a decade or more. In return, checks on lorries taking food to the continent would be lifted. Defence firms will gain access to a £126 billion EU-wide weapons fund – but British taxpayers face having to pay millions for the privilege.
As the wrangling continued over the 'reset' deal to be unveiled at London 's Lancaster House, the PM was urged not to give in to the EU's demands or give up the Brexit freedoms that 17.4 million voted for.
Shadow Foreign Secretary Dame Priti Patel told the Mail: 'Labour's great Brexit betrayal consists of them backsliding on our freedoms and hard-won sovereignty. Britain needs Starmer to hold strong against the EU's brinkmanship, grow a spine and for once, put our national interest first and not concede to the demands of Brussels.'
Writing in this newspaper, Shadow Chancellor Mel Stride said the expected agreement to abide by EU food standards 'would be a betrayal of the Brexit vote, pure and simple'.
The Tories also urged Sir Keir not to cave in to French demands for long-term access to UK waters for European trawlers, and keep an exclusive access to a zone around the coast for British fishermen.
Shadow environment secretary Victoria Atkins said: 'We are deeply concerned by the reports that Labour looks to surrender our fishing rights to the EU at their summit, and that is why we are today setting out our red lines for any deal.
'The Conservatives have always stood up for our coastal communities, and our fishing industries. Labour must not throw our fishing rights overboard in their desperation to bail out their failing fiscal policies.'
Reform leader Nigel Farage told the Mail: 'Opening up our borders to millions of people in the EU after Starmer's speech last Monday will make Red Wall voters doubt Labour even more.
It's clear Labour can't be trusted to secure our borders. The idea of British soldiers under an EU flag will be hated in the Red Wall too. This is a surrender deal by Starmer.'
Sir Keir even faced a backlash from his own MPs who fear voters in the Red Wall will be angered by the expected plan to set up a youth mobility scheme.
Jo White, MP for Bassetlaw and head of the Red Wall group of Labour MPs, told The Daily Telegraph: 'We tighten immigration with one hand and potentially loosen the strings with the other.'
Reform leader Nigel Farage told the Mail: 'Opening up our borders to millions of people in the EU after Starmer's speech last Monday will make Red Wall voters doubt Labour even more. It's clear Labour can't be trusted to secure our borders. This is a surrender deal by Starmer'
She added: 'If this just becomes a way of overseas kids filling the low-paid job vacancies in London rather than looking to see how young people from areas like mine could be opened up to opportunities and experiences that they would never have otherwise dreamed of, then I would really question the value of it.'
Veteran Labour MP Graham Stringer said accepting EU rules on food 'completely undermines the whole reason for being out' and is 'definitely a betrayal'.
In a round of interviews yesterday morning as talks continued, Britain's lead negotiator Nick Thomas-Symonds admitted the UK would have to accept EU rules on food standards as part of a deal to cut red tape for exporters.
Under so-called dynamic alignment, EU laws would have to be placed on the UK statute book again and Britain would again be placed under the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice.
Cabinet Office minister Mr Thomas-Symonds told the BBC: 'We don't come at this from an ideological perspective, we come from a practical perspective. Where it is in our national interest to align on common standards to make sure we get far easier trade... businesses that frankly have had to stop trading with the EU because of the red tape, can start trading with the EU again.'
He also failed to confirm that there would be a cap on the youth mobility scheme demanded by Brussels, raising the prospect of millions of young adults moving to Britain to flee high unemployment on the continent.
He would say only that the scheme would be 'smart and controlled', adding: 'Anything that was agreed on youth mobility – which by the way would be opportunities for young British people to experience different cultures, to travel and work – would be consistent with the objective of the migration White Paper, which is to bring the level of net migration down.'
Sources said last night that outstanding issues remained on both sides and conversations would continue overnight.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tens of thousands expected to attend Budapest Pride in defiance of ban
Tens of thousands expected to attend Budapest Pride in defiance of ban

Reuters

time40 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Tens of thousands expected to attend Budapest Pride in defiance of ban

BUDAPEST, June 28 (Reuters) - Tens of thousands of LGBTQ+ rights supporters are expected to attend the Budapest Pride march on Saturday, defying a police ban as the event has become a symbol of the years-long struggle between Hungary's nationalist government and civil society. Prime Minister Viktor Orban's government has gradually curtailed the rights of the LGBTQ+ community in the past decade, and its lawmakers passed a law in March that allows for the ban of Pride, citing the need to protect children. Opponents see the move as part of a wider crackdown on democratic freedoms ahead of a general election next year when Orban will face a strong opposition challenger. Organizers said they expect tens of thousands to attend, with participants arriving from 30 different countries, including European Commissioner for Equality Hadja Lahbib and about 70 members of the European Parliament. More than 30 embassies have expressed support for the march and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen called on Hungarian authorities to let the parade go ahead. Seventy Hungarian civil society groups, including the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union, Transparency International Hungary and the Hungarian Helsinki Commission, published an open letter on Friday in support of the march, saying the law that led to the police ban "serves to intimidate the entire society". Budapest mayor Gergely Karacsony tried to circumvent the law by organising the march as a municipal event, which he said does not need a permit. Police however banned the event, arguing that it fell under the scope of the child protection law. Orban, whose government promotes a Christian-conservative agenda, provided some clues on Friday about what participants can expect when he warned of "legal consequences" for organising and attending the march. Earlier this week Justice Minister Bence Tuzson warned in a letter sent to some foreign embassies in Budapest that organising a prohibited event is punishable by one year in jail, while attending counts as a misdemeanour. The law that allows for the ban of Pride lets police impose fines and use facial recognition cameras to identify people who attend. When asked about the threat of a one-year jail term, Karacsony said at a press briefing on Friday that such a sentence would only boost his popularity. "But I cannot take it seriously," he said. Making the march a key topic of political discourse has allowed the Orban government to take the initiative back from the opposition and mobilise its voter base, said Zoltan Novak, an analyst at the Centre for Fair Political Analysis think tank. "In the past 15 years, Fidesz decided what topics dominated the political world," he said, noting that this has become more difficult as Orban's party has faced an increasing challenge from centre-right opposition leader Peter Magyar's Tisza party, which has a 15-point lead over Orban's Fidesz in a recent poll. Tisza, which has been avoiding taking a strong position on gay rights issues, did not specify in response to Reuters questions whether it believed the Pride march was lawful, but said those attending deserved the state's protection. "Peter Magyar has called on the Hungarian authorities and police to protect the Hungarian people this Saturday, and on other days as well, even if it means standing up against the arbitrariness of power," its press office said. Magyar himself would not attend.

Berlin to simplify rules in bid to speed up defence surge, draft law says
Berlin to simplify rules in bid to speed up defence surge, draft law says

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

Berlin to simplify rules in bid to speed up defence surge, draft law says

BERLIN, June 27 (Reuters) - The German government seeks to speed up defence procurement by simplifying legal procedures, fostering European cooperation and facilitating orders to start-ups to make its military combat-ready, according to a draft law seen by Reuters late on Friday. The speedy surge of the German military's capabilities "must not fail due to overly complex procurement procedures or lengthy authorisation processes", the document said, while warning of signs that Moscow's war objectives reach beyond Ukraine. "The time factor is crucial." At a NATO summit in The Hague, leaders on Wednesday agreed to hike the alliance's defence spending target to 5% of national GDP, with 3.5% dedicated to core defence and 1.5% to related security issues. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz's government on Tuesday approved a budget framework which is expected to see Berlin's total military spending rise from 95 billion euros in 2025 to 162 billion euros in 2029, equalling 3.5% of GDP. The new defence procurement law is part of efforts to speed up military purchases that in the past have been plagued by lengthy delays, project failures and cost overshoots. The draft law determines that all procurement that contributes to Europe and NATO's military readiness inherently touches upon vital national security, which constitutes a basis to invoke an exemption under European public procurement law. That would amplify a trend that Berlin has been following for some time by more often making use of a national security clause under EU law to prioritize domestic procurement, while also seeking to minimize delays caused by legal challenges. The hurdles for cash-strapped start-ups and innovative companies to join competitions are to be lowered by enabling advance payment to these firms, according to the draft, dated June 25. The paper also makes provisions for a future simplification of European defence procurement rules, something now under discussion at the EU level, by stating that the German law should not be tougher than European law but facilitate joint European defence procurement across the board. The law will entitle contracting entities to limit tenders to bidders inside the European Union or the European Economic Area, and to determine that a certain share of the contracted goods or services must originate in the EU, according to the document. The draft law does not, however, attempt to change the rule that all defence purchases with a volume of 25 million euros or more must be approved by parliament, a requirement seen by many experts as a major hurdle against speeding up procurement. At the start of June, Defence Minister Boris Pistorius said Germany would need up to 60,000 additional troops under the new NATO targets for weapons and personnel, effectively expanding the military to some 260,000 troops. The Bundeswehr has not yet met a target of 203,000 troops set in 2018, and it is currently short-staffed by some 20,000 regular troops, according to defence ministry data.

Critics warn Sir Keir's screeching welfare U-turn will now result in a 'two-tier' benefits system and a £3billion tax bombshell to pay for it
Critics warn Sir Keir's screeching welfare U-turn will now result in a 'two-tier' benefits system and a £3billion tax bombshell to pay for it

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Critics warn Sir Keir's screeching welfare U-turn will now result in a 'two-tier' benefits system and a £3billion tax bombshell to pay for it

Sir Keir Starmer 's benefits climbdown will create a 'two-tier' benefits system with families facing a £3billion tax bombshell to pay for it, critics warned last night. And that will be on top of the £1.25billion bill caused by the Prime Minister's screeching U-turn over winter fuel payments for pensioners. Experts warned the £4.25billion black hole in the public finances caused by the backsliding will probably force Chancellor Rachel Reeves to plug it with more tax rises in her autumn Budget. The Prime Minister was humiliatingly forced to hand Labour 's welfare rebels the concessions in a bid to avoid defeat in a crunch vote on benefits cuts on Tuesday. The compromise deal last night looked like it had peeled off enough of the 126 rebels to pass the vote. However, as many as 50 were still threatening to rebel unless the vote was pulled. The reforms had originally been forecast to save the Government £5billion a year by the end of the Parliament. Charity bosses and Labour MPs still planning to rebel also warned the new proposals would create a 'two-tier' benefits system because existing Personal Independence Payment (PIP) claimants will keep their current level of disability payments. But new claimants after November 2026, when the changes are scheduled to kick in, would be entitled to as much as £4,000 a year less on average, even if they suffered from the same condition which meant they couldn't work. Before the U-turn, both existing and future claimants were facing stricter eligibility conditions for the daily living component of PIP, a working-age benefit for those whose health condition increases their living costs. The concessions on PIP alone protect some 370,000 people currently receiving the allowance who were set to lose out following reassessment. Meanwhile, existing claimants of the universal credit (UC) health element, paid to those with a condition which stops them working, will have their payments protected in real terms. However, new claimants will see it halved and frozen. According to calculations by the Resolution Foundation think tank, the PIP and UC reforms will cost £1.5billion each. Sir Keir yesterday branded his own climbdown 'common sense' and refused to rule out tax increases to pay for it in an interview. During a visit to RAF Valley in Wales, he said how the Government intended to pay for it would be revealed in the autumn Budget, adding: 'The changes still mean we can deliver the reforms that we need and that's very important because the system needs to be a system that is fit for the future. 'All colleagues are signed up to that, but having listened, we've made the adjustments. The funding will be set out in the Budget in the usual way.' Yesterday's climbdown is hugely embarrassing for Sir Keir as it highlights the scale to which he failed to read his MPs' mood over the proposed cuts, with rebels having spoken out for months. Care minister Stephen Kinnock dismissed criticism that the Government was in chaos and that Sir Keir was not 'competent', insisting that the process had been 'positive and constructive' and that the PM was someone who 'gets stuck into fixing problems'. Care minister Stephen Kinnock (pictured) dismissed criticism that the Government was in chaos and that Sir Keir was not 'competent', insisting that the process had been 'positive and constructive' and that the PM was someone who 'gets stuck into fixing problems' But Kemi Badenoch said the debacle left benefits claimants facing 'the worst of all worlds'. Speaking to reporters on a visit to North West Essex, the Tory leader said: 'I think we're seeing a government that is floundering, a government that is no longer in control despite having a huge majority. I don't see how they're going to be able to deliver any of the things they promised if they can't do something as basic as reducing an increase in spending. 'It's a real shame because what they're doing now with this U-turn is creating a two-tier system... this is the worst of all worlds.' Arch rebel Nadia Whittome, the Labour MP for Nottingham East, said: 'These revised proposals are nowhere near good enough, and frankly, are just not well thought through. It would create a two-tier system in both PIP and the Universal Credit health element based on when somebody became disabled.' Sir Mel Stride, the Shadow Chancellor, said: 'Labour promised not to raise taxes on working people, and their Jobs Tax has led to rising unemployment and growth being halved. Now the Government has been unable to rule out that taxes will go up this autumn in order to pay for Keir Starmer's latest U-turns.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store