These historic Shorewood homes sold for more than $1 million last month. They're all near Lake Michigan
The housing market in Shorewood is "very competitive," according to market analysis from real estate brokerage Redfin.
The median home price in Shorewood was up 49% year over year in February, reaching $625,000, according to Redfin's market data.
Here's a look at three Shorewood homes near the Lake Michigan that sold for seven figures last month:
This French Colonial home, in the 2500 block of East Lake Bluff Boulevard, sold for $1.36 million on March 31.
The home is just shy of 4,500 square feet, with four bedrooms and 3.5 baths. It was built in 1918.
The home features a forming living room with a fireplace and crown molding, according to the listing.
This four-bedroom, 3.5-bath home, in the 3500 block of North Shepard Avenue, sold for $1,115,000 on March 7.
The home is a Mediterranean-style Colonial, according to historic property records, and was built in 1921, according to the listing.
Inside, many traditional design features — including a grand foyer with leaded glass doors — are still intact.
This lakefront Georgian Colonial, built in 1917, sold for $2,225,000 on March 28.
The home was designed by Milwaukee architect Herman Buemming. It spans nearly 10,000 square feet — with six bedrooms and six bathrooms — and sits on a 1.16-acre lot in the 4400 block of North Lake Drive.
The backyard features a multi-level patio and a "tea room" outbuilding.This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: These historic Shorewood homes sold for more than $1 million in March
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Are You Looking for a Top Momentum Pick? Why atai Life Sciences N.V. (ATAI) is a Great Choice
Momentum investing is all about the idea of following a stock's recent trend, which can be in either direction. In the 'long' context, investors will essentially be "buying high, but hoping to sell even higher." And for investors following this methodology, taking advantage of trends in a stock's price is key; once a stock establishes a course, it is more than likely to continue moving in that direction. The goal is that once a stock heads down a fixed path, it will lead to timely and profitable trades. While many investors like to look for momentum in stocks, this can be very tough to define. There is a lot of debate surrounding which metrics are the best to focus on and which are poor quality indicators of future performance. The Zacks Momentum Style Score, part of the Zacks Style Scores, helps address this issue for us. Below, we take a look at atai Life Sciences N.V. (ATAI), which currently has a Momentum Style Score of A. We also discuss some of the main drivers of the Momentum Style Score, like price change and earnings estimate revisions. It's also important to note that Style Scores work as a complement to the Zacks Rank, our stock rating system that has an impressive track record of outperformance. Atai Life Sciences N.V. Currently has a Zacks Rank of #2 (Buy). Our research shows that stocks rated Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) and #2 (Buy) and Style Scores of A or B outperform the market over the following one-month period. You can see the current list of Zacks #1 Rank Stocks here >>> Let's discuss some of the components of the Momentum Style Score for ATAI that show why this company shows promise as a solid momentum pick. A good momentum benchmark for a stock is to look at its short-term price activity, as this can reflect both current interest and if buyers or sellers currently have the upper hand. It's also helpful to compare a security to its industry; this can show investors the best companies in a particular area. For ATAI, shares are up 4.33% over the past week while the Zacks Medical - Outpatient and Home Healthcare industry is up 2.9% over the same time period. Shares are looking quite well from a longer time frame too, as the monthly price change of 73.38% compares favorably with the industry's 3.66% performance as well. While any stock can see its price increase, it takes a real winner to consistently beat the market. That is why looking at longer term price metrics -- such as performance over the past three months or year -- can be useful as well. Shares of atai Life Sciences N.V. Have increased 62.84% over the past quarter, and have gained 73.38% in the last year. In comparison, the S&P 500 has only moved 4.9% and 13.46%, respectively. Investors should also pay attention to ATAI's average 20-day trading volume. Volume is a useful item in many ways, and the 20-day average establishes a good price-to-volume baseline; a rising stock with above average volume is generally a bullish sign, whereas a declining stock on above average volume is typically bearish. ATAI is currently averaging 2,843,733 shares for the last 20 days. The Zacks Momentum Style Score also takes into account trends in estimate revisions, in addition to price changes. Please note that estimate revision trends remain at the core of Zacks Rank as well. A nice path here can help show promise, and we have recently been seeing that with ATAI. Over the past two months, 3 earnings estimates moved higher compared to none lower for the full year. These revisions helped boost ATAI's consensus estimate, increasing from -$0.75 to -$0.60 in the past 60 days. Looking at the next fiscal year, 2 estimates have moved upwards while there have been 1 downward revision in the same time period. Given these factors, it shouldn't be surprising that ATAI is a #2 (Buy) stock and boasts a Momentum Score of A. If you're looking for a fresh pick that's set to soar in the near-term, make sure to keep atai Life Sciences N.V. On your short list. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report atai Life Sciences N.V. (ATAI) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Mortgage company Rocket is buying Redfin, the brokerage. Its CEOs talked with USA Today.
In March, Rocket, America's largest mortgage lender, announced plans to buy Redfin, a national brokerage that's spent its 20-year history trying to 'redefine' residential real estate. There are big numbers involved: Redfin's website attracts nearly 50 million views every month; Rocket says it handles more than 100,000 calls every day. The deal is worth nearly $1.75 billion. But Redfin CEO Glenn Kelman and Varun Krishna, CEO of Rocket Companies, say the consumer is at the heart of the deal. 'Homeownership is fundamentally a human business,' Krishna said during a May investor call. Still, the tie-up comes at an auspicious time. As USA TODAY has reported, there are deep fissures in the industry about how much control any one company should have over how real estate listings are shared publicly and who should represent buyers and sellers. At the same time, higher-for-longer mortgage rates and elevated home prices are fraying the American Dream, and making profits and margins challenging, as Kelman memorably noted in a 2024 call with analysts. USA TODAY sat down with Krishna and Kelman for one of their first joint appearances since the announcement. This conversation has been edited for length and clarity. USA TODAY: What does the acquisition mean for consumers in the housing market, for buyers and sellers? Varun Krishna: Today when you think about the process of buying or selling a home, the consumer sort of gets handed off from industry to industry to industry. One industry helps them with the process of searching for a home and working with a realtor, another industry helps them with the process of financing. Within that, there are industries that help them with things like title, insurance and then they get kind of handed off into the servicing business where they spend a lifetime handling things like property taxes, their monthly payments and their escrows. And the whole process is just so complicated. It takes time, it takes energy, it's expensive. What we want to do is fix that. We want to take something that is expensive, manual, and antiquated, and we just want to make it all seamless and frictionless, and ultimately create more savings and value for the Kelman: The central economic problem that people under 40 have is that they don't believe in the American Dream anymore. They can't afford a house, they get lost in the process, they get overwhelmed by the fees. They're spending half their down payment on the broker and the banker. And I do think we can fix that. USA TODAY: The start-to-finish real estate experience has been a Holy Grail for a long time. We've all been saying for decades that it's antiquated. And at this particular moment in time, there's a lot of spirited debate in the industry over how much of the process any one company should control. You have one big player in the market saying that they want to have the listings in-house and they want to be able to represent both sides of the transaction. And there have long been questions about how much any professional should be able to steer business to others. We want consumers to get professional help but how do you walk that line between wanting them to also be able to choose who represents them? Krishna: The problem with the homeownership experience is that there isn't any transparency. It's difficult to figure out whether the realtor that you work with has your best interest. It's difficult to know that you're getting the best rate. It's difficult to understand where you stand in the process, how underwriting works. It's difficult to understand how your loan gets licensed and then serviced and then passed off to another I think the fundamental issue today is there's an illusion of control, that there's any choice at all. And that the fee structures make sense, and the way that the consumers have to choose and what they get to choose… it's a little bit of a fallacy today and we want to improve that.I mean, that is our fundamental ethos is exactly that consumers deserve better. They deserve a system that is more transparent, they deserve to have better rates, they deserve to pay lower fees, they deserve to be able to get into a home faster or sell a home For me, it's really hard to give the consumer a better deal when the title company, the broker, the banker, and the servicing company are all fighting for the customer. We're going to give customers a choice. They can work with a Redfin agent, and then a different banker. They can work with a Rocket banker and then a different agent. But our hope is that by working together, we can give the consumer such a better experience and such a lower fee that what they'll want to do is work with us. But if you keep these industries at each other's throats, where we're all spending money to get the same customer, you're never going to make the industry more efficient. And that's why the consumer is still paying so much every time she moves. USA TODAY: There has been a lot of experimentation, a lot of companies spending a lot of money on big bets, you know, Redfin starting with salaried agents, the iBuyers like Opendoor that buy homes directly from owners, Zillow Offers. Why is it so hard to get the model right? Kelman: I think the consumer is really traditional. It's an infrequent purchase, so once a decade you move and usually you call on a neighbor to help you handle the sale, or you hire your uncle as a real estate agent. Also it's a cooperative industry. So anytime you have a disruptor, the consumer has to worry. When she puts a Redfin sign in her yard, will other buyer agents want to show that listing? You have to worry when you have a RE/MAX agent representing the buyer: will other listing agents really tell that agent what's going on in the deal? Any time there has been a disruptor, there has been an industry reaction and so the challenge here is finding a way to take a very fragmented industry and make it work together better. Krishna: I think part of the reason these things are hard is when you disrupt any kind of hyper-local dynamic, whether it's commerce, real estate, or financial services, you have local fragmentation, word of mouth. You have a diversity in the landscape of how people do this job, where some people sell one or two homes and others take it as a full-time profession. You have varying levels of I just think that most of the companies building technologies in this industry don't actually want to get their hands dirty and serve the customer directly. The first thing Varun and I had in common was just that we wanted to put the consumer first, but the second was that both of us have invested hundreds of millions of dollars in our people. And in most of the industry, if you build a better gadget, you sell leads to a traditional agent or to a traditional loan officer. For us, it just seems hard to build a better mousetrap, have the world beat a path to your door, and then give people the same old service at the same old TODAY: There's a lot of concern about some of the buyers who have purchased recently with rates at cycle highs and very high home prices. While the , we know that homeowners , pretty quickly. Property taxes are also likely to rise. How concerned are you about those borrowers from the perspective of the borrower? And how concerned are you, or how sanguine are you, about the mortgage servicing system being able to manage if we do see an uptick in distress? Krishna: We watch the trends like hawks and we look at everything from leading indicators to lagging indicators on how consumers are spending. Typically the mortgage is the last thing to go, so consumers will do anything and everything to make sure that they stay in their homes. I would say given everything we've seen too far, we're not worried in the sense that we see, you know, deep structural cracks in the way that the industry is developing. But at the same time, we know affordability is a challenge. Inventory is a challenge and we also know that there's still a significant amount of friction in the entire experience as well. We need to start thinking of it as a continuum, where a consumer will progress from renting to eventually ending up in a home which is still the bedrock of the American dream. And if we can help them with that from a lifetime perspective or we can help them not just search and find a home, but to be able to finance it, title it and then service it, we can take a lot of cost out of the system. Part of the problem today is that when you think about the expense, a lot of it goes into things like lead acquisition, right? Mortgage leads are one of the most expensive leads and mortgage companies spend thousands of dollars on individual leads. The margins end up being a little bit low because of that. And then there's no lifetime value because the consumer is in a different part of the funnel for servicing. We can make it faster. This is our approach to saying this is how we want to help fix the problem and to create a model that we think is more sustainable as far as homeownership is concerned. More: As real estate listings become more private, Zillow fights back This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Rocket buys Redfin. Here's what its CEOs told USA Today Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
There's a record $700 billion of homes for sale in the US. Here's why the market is still frozen.
The aggregate value of homes for sale in the US has climbed to $700 billion, an all-time high. Despite the flood of inventory, buyers haven't been lured to the market in 2025. This year was supposed to see a burst of buying activity, but macro uncertainty has kept the market frozen. 2025 was supposed to be a better year for the US housing market. But midway through, it's still stuck in low gear. After the worst year for home sales since 1995, there are scant few signs of life in the market. Even a record amount of unsold inventory hasn't lured buyers in. According to Redfin data released this month, sellers in the US are sitting on $700 billion of unsold housing stock, the highest dollar amount ever. Going by the number of homes for sale across the country, inventory is at a five-year high. Also, 44% of listings — or about $331 billion worth of homes for sale — have been on the market for over 60 days, the highest share since 2020. So, where are all the homebuyers? It's not the usual order of events. Often, with a deluge of inventory, prices edge down, but they're still creeping higher. In April, Redfin said prices rose 1.4% nationally even as the number of homes for sale jumped almost 17%. "House hunters are only buying if they absolutely have to, and even serious buyers are backing out of contracts more than they used to," a Redfin real estate agent in Denver said. Apart from prices, the other factor is mortgage rates. They're still too high for most buyers to stomach. The 30-year mortgage, which is tied to the 10-year Treasury yield, has barely budged this year. It's hovering just below 7%, and top forecasters expect the rate to end this year only slightly lower. Goldman Sachs analysts last week said they see the rate on the most popular home loan dipping to 6.75% by year-end, from 6.9% currently. After analysts initially predicted rates to cool this year as inflation ebbed and the Federal Reserve loosened monetary policy, forecasts have jumped again. That's because the uncertain impact of Donald Trump's tariff policy has led to a repricing in the bond market and scrambled predictions for the Fed to cut rates. Markets now see the first cut of 2025 coming in September, according to the CME FedWatch Tool. A gap between the "soft" and "hard" data points has been a big theme this year, with weak consumer sentiment and inflation expectations at odds with the backward-looking data that the Fed uses to inform policy. The general feeling of anxiety stemming from things like tariffs, the path of inflation, and the overall economy is fueling the weak demand in the US housing market. "In an instance like today, where markets are simply volatile, but not necessarily declining, that pure uncertainty also has a dampening effect on the housing market," Redfin's head of economic research, Chen Zhao, wrote in a separate report last month. Zhao continued: "First, bond market volatility directly increases the difference between 30-year mortgage rates and 10-year treasury yields, pushing mortgage rates up." Consumers and investors will get key updates on inflation and sentiment this week. May inflation data is due out on Wednesday, while the latest consumer sentiment reading will be published on Friday. Read the original article on Business Insider Sign in to access your portfolio
