One thing in the way of young people's happiness
The Premier told the McKell Institute panel at the NAB headquarters in Sydney's CBD on Wednesday afternoon that young people in NSW were being stopped 'from living a good life' because they could not find a 'decent home'.
It comes after the NSW government formally launched its low-rise Housing Pattern Book, a selection of eight architecturally-approved townhouses and terraces, designs for which will be sold for the first six months for $1.
The Labor government hopes the project will join other existing initiatives in boosting housing supply, a key issues Mr Minns said was standing in the way of 'fairness' and young NSW residents being able to find a home.
'If you care about fairness, you have to start with the biggest problem of all, and that is housing,' he said.
'A single problem that also undermines social mobility, makes people work longer and harder for less reward, and even in its most acute forms, can threaten faith in democracy and our system of government.'
Mr Minns said 'because of our failure on housing policy' NSW residents were being forced to move further away from friends and work. NSW Premier Chris Minns said were being stopped 'from living a good life'. NewsWire / Nikki Short Credit: News Corp Australia
He told the progressive institute Labor differed from the Greens because they 'understand the reality that there is a massive role in for the private industry, supporting government planning decisions, putting their own capital on the line, (and) building homes for the next generation.
'It's where we differ from other political parties in NSW as well, who seem to want to preserve Sydney as if it was a national museum, while also adding another street to the western fringe of Sydney every other week,' he said.
'My ultimate aim is that other political parties join us in a bipartisan change to the planning Act that we can push through the parliament.
'But, if it's only going to be us, that's fine too, because we will take it to the election campaign and earn a mandate for major change in NSW when it comes to planning for the most expensive city on Earth.'
Housing has been a key sticking point for the NSW government, with the Premier lamenting the number of young people leaving the state.
Despite defending the Commonwealth Government housing targets, which are set to missed by a considerable margin, Mr Minns 'not against picking a fight with Canberra or whoever stands in the way of it (planning reform)'. The Premier addressed McKell Institute on Labor's housing plans on Wednesday. NewsWire / Nikki Short Credit: News Corp Australia
'I just think that we had to get our own house in order before we started picking fights or two fights with everybody else about housing,' he said.
Reflecting on planning regulation under previous state governments, Mr Minns accused them of having replaced an 'an actual decision … with either blaming the Commonwealth, or immigration, in particular, Sydney's full and other rhetorical devices, or blaming councils and saying, well, not speeding up developments now.'
Mr Minns also made a gentle swipe at WA, who Treasurer Daniel Moohkey has also singled out over the GST carve up.
Speaking on WA's budget surplus, Mr Minns said the state was 'one of the richest states in the world'.
'Almost like a Petro state in the Middle East, and for largely the same reason,' he said.
'They just dig stuff out of the ground and sell it off to Asia.'
States currently receive at least 75c per dollar of GST.
WA pushed for the floor to be introduced when its GST share plummeted after the 2012 mining boom, but the economy is booming again.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
7NEWS
22 minutes ago
- 7NEWS
Polling booths open across Tasmania as signs point to another hung parliament
Polling booths have opened across Tasmania, with signs pointing to another hung parliament and further political jostling. Saturday's snap vote, triggered after minority Liberal premier Jeremy Rockliff lost a no-confidence motion in early June, is the island's second in 16 months. The 11-year Liberal government was plunged into minority in 2023 when two MPs quit the party and was returned in minority at the March 2024 poll. Polling places opened at 8am (AEDT) but more than one-quarter of Tasmania's 412,000 registered voters had cast their ballot early. Election-eve polling by YouGov has the Liberals (31 per cent) and Labor (30 per cent) neck-and-neck, with neither reaching the 18-seat mark required for majority. It represents a dip in support for Labor from YouGov polling in early July. Backing for independents (20 per cent) has risen while the Greens (16 per cent) have remained stable. In a hung parliament, Labor leader Dean Winter was backed by 55 per cent of respondents over Rockliff (45 per cent) as preferred premier. Both leaders have ruled out doing a deal with the Greens to govern, but Winter has kept the door ajar for an informal supply and confidence arrangement with the minor party. Rockliff and Winter have said they were prepared to work with 'sensible' independents. There have been no big-spending promises in a campaign held under the shadow of ballooning budget debt, forecast to more than double to $13 billion in 2028. Rockliff's final pitch to voters on Friday was hinged on his party's experience and Tasmania's 3.8 per cent unemployment rate, the lowest in Australia. 'We were elected to do a job in March 2024 ... and we've got the leadership to get on with the job,' he told reporters. Winter, whose party holds 10 seats compared to the Liberals' 14, said it was time for a fresh start. He lashed Rockliff's financial management and the botched delivery of two new Spirit of Tasmania ships, two of the reasons for the no-confidence motion. 'They've mismanaged major projects ... (and) our finances are the worst in the nation,' Winter said. Rockliff's signature campaign pledge to create a state-owned insurer on Friday copped a scathing assessment from Treasury which said it lacked detail. The Greens, who hold five seats, have vowed to 'push hard' in opposition to a new $945 million stadium in Hobart that is supported by the Liberals and Labor. The 2024 poll elected three independents. Kristie Johnston and Craig Garland, who are against the stadium and voted no-confidence against Rockliff, are expected to return.
Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
'Golden ticket' visa for the rich fails to pay its way
A special Australian visa for foreign investors who stumped up millions of dollars was scrapped because they paid less tax and added little economic benefit. Right of entry, including for one investor who intended sinking at least $2.5 million and another who had twice that amount to spend, was discarded because the applicants were "more fiscally costly and contribute less to the economy than other skilled visas", according to previously classified documents. Debate about the visa class was renewed before the federal election in May after video surfaced of then-opposition leader Peter Dutton being asked about the initiative at a fundraiser and saying, "I think we'll bring it back". Labor attacked him over plans to reinstate the visa, with Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke branding it a "cash for visa" scheme. The Business Innovation and Investment Program provides a pathway for entrepreneurs and investors to get permanent residence in Australia through several subclass visas. There are four main streams of the subclass 188 visa as part of the program. These include a significant investor stream for people planning to invest at least $5 million, an investor stream for people who can invest at least $2.5 million and an innovation stream for business owners with an annual turnover of at least $750,000 and $1.25 million in assets. Home Affairs Department documents obtained under freedom of information laws previously protected under legislative secrecy reveal those on innovation and investment program visas paid less tax than other skilled migrants. Despite the investment threshold, the average Business Innovation and Investment Program visa holder had a taxable income of just $25,000 compared to skilled migrants' $64,000, Grattan Institute analysis cited by the department determined. A government review of the program found in 2019/20, "even after considering investment income, BIIP investors and significant investors still earned less income and paid less tax than other skilled visa holders". "This level of income is less than expected given the level of investment required." The Home Affairs Department noted Australia didn't have a problem attracting foreign capital and determined the visas were unlikely to generate significant levels of additional investment. There was $5.385 billion in investment associated with more than 1000 significant investor grants from primary applications of the visa class between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2022. But this was a drop in the ocean of Australia's total foreign investment pool of more than $20 trillion. Mr Burke scrapped the program on July 31, 2024 - just days after being sworn in as home affairs and immigration minister. But 15,000 primary and secondary applications remained in the backlog as of February 9, 2025, despite more than 3000 people having withdrawn their applications after refund provisions were introduced in September 2024. Only 23 withdrawals were from the significant investor stream and 40 from their dependents, meaning the significant investor and investor subclasses accounted for more than 3700 of the total applications. Mr Burke issued a directive in February 2025 to intentionally throttle processing of the two investor visas by downgrading their priority in the line, behind the entrepreneur and business innovation streams. The department said it was considering other options to manage the significant investor, including using laws to delay processing and removing the pathway to permanent residency. But Mr Burke was warned sidelining the investor streams risked irking state and territory governments that weren't happy the visa had been scrapped because it would risk investment in key projects. The opposition hasn't ruled out bringing back an investment visa in some form as it reviews its immigration policies after its election defeat.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
ACT government backs down on proposed $11 fee for volunteer Working with Vulnerable People card
The ACT government has scrapped a plan to begin charging volunteers to register for a Working with Vulnerable People (WWVP) card following community backlash. The proposed $11 fee was set to be introduced in September, intended to offset increasing costs associated with administering the WWVP scheme. The ACT Greens, the Canberra Liberals and some community groups argued the fee could be a financial disincentive to volunteering given registering for the scheme has been free since it was first rolled out in 2011. Community consultation with groups including VolunteeringACT and the ACT Council of Social Services (ACTCOSS) convinced the government to scrap the fee, with plans to review the scheme with stakeholders. It's the second instrument the territory government has backed down on from in its 2025-26 budget since it was announced late last month. The first was a proposed $250 health levy, which was slashed to $100 for residential ratepayers after the government struck a deal with the Greens. This time the Greens put pressure on the government in the form of a community petition, sponsored by MLA Laura Nuttall two days after the budget was announced, pushing for volunteer WWVP cards to remain free. It's another example of the reality the territory government faces now it's not in a coalition with the Greens — it must negotiate with the crossbench. The Canberra Liberals also pushed for the fee to be scrapped, announcing last week that they would move a disallowance motion when the Legislative Assembly next sits in September. ACT Disability, Carers and Community Services Minister Suzanne Orr told ABC Radio Canberra the fee was proposed to address financial pressure on the WWVP scheme. "[That pressure comes] from a lot of people enrolling who don't necessarily, under the legislation, need to be getting a WWVP card," Ms Orr said. But she said what came through "loud and clear" were concerns from the community who wanted to volunteer that the fee may not be the best way to make the scheme sustainable. City and Government Services Minister Tara Cheyne said the government had invested more than $5 million in the budget to support the continued delivery of the WWVP scheme. "[On top of the people enrolled who don't need to be], we are also anticipating that there will be additional requirements under the scheme as part of national responses to concerns in both the early childhood education and care sector and the aged care sector," Ms Cheyne said. "We will continue to explore further policy improvements to ensure the scheme remains fair, effective and sustainable, while continuing to protect our community's most vulnerable members." Greens MLA Laura Nuttall said she was "stoked" the government had dropped the proposed fee, calling it a "huge win for the community". "We're really pleased as Greens, in the balance of power on the crossbench, to have negotiated another budget measure," Ms Nuttall said. Ms Nuttall said rather than passing the cost on, providing organisations better clarity around who needs a WWVP check would go a long way to reducing the financial demand on the scheme. "[What] came through to us loud and clear from so many people in the community was actually that it felt a little bit insulting, that after all of the hard work that they put in, that they would be expected to pay even more," she said. "We know that volunteers provide really valuable contributions to the Canberra community, we know that for every $1 you invest in volunteers the community gets back $5.40 in return. "And at the same time, right now cost is one of the biggest barriers to volunteering, and volunteers are already paying on average $12.76 an hour for volunteering anyway, so we were concerned [the fee] would serve as a disincentive." VolunteeringACT CEO Jean Giese called the decision "a win for the 279,000 volunteers" in Canberra. "Our joint advocacy with volunteers, community organisations and government has demonstrated the power of collective action and the value that community places on volunteering," Ms Giese said. "VolunteeringACT now renews its focus on delivering the ACT Volunteering Strategy — a roadmap to deliver safe, ethical and sustainable volunteering for all Canberrans." She said a key part of the strategy was to ensure the appropriate safeguards were in place for volunteering. "We are committed to productive conversations with government, ACTCOSS and other partners to find solutions to the systemic issues within the scheme," Ms Giese said. "The ACT has a strong volunteering legacy, and this is a clear signal that volunteering will continue to thrive now, and into the future."
