Look up tonight! Full Strawberry Moon will be the LOWEST in UK skies since 2006 - here's the best time to see the rare phenomenon
According to astronomers, the Full Strawberry Moon will be lower in the sky than any full moon since 2006.
A Strawberry Moon is simply the full moon when it appears in June.
This year, it will coincide with a rare celestial phenomenon called the 'major lunar standstill' which makes the moon appear lower.
It should be visible as long as you're in the Northern Hemisphere – but the further north you are, the closer to the horizon the moon will seem.
'The moon will appear unusually low on the southern horizon,' Dr Robert Massey, deputy executive director of the Royal Astronomical Society, told MailOnline.
'It will appear very dramatic, especially in northern parts of the UK.'
Here's everything you need to know about the rare celestial event.
What is the Strawberry Moon?
Strawberry Moon is simply the name traditionally given to the full moon when it appears in the month of June.
But it's a common misconception that the name 'Strawberry Moon' refers to the moon's colour or any kind of resemblance to the popular summer fruit.
Whenever the full moon appears, it is given a nickname depending on the month of the year – a tradition that goes back hundreds of years.
So January is Wolf Moon, February is Snow Moon, March is Worm Moon, April is Pink Moon, May is Flower Moon and so on.
June's full moon is known as Strawberry Moon because it historically appeared when the strawberry harvest first took place.
Will the moon be lower than usual?
The June full moon will be lower than usual this year due to an astronomical phenomenon called 'major lunar standstill'.
What is major lunar standstill?
Major lunar standstill is when moonrise and moonset are furthest apart along Earth's horizon.
This astronomical event occurs once every 18.6 years, last occurring in 2006.
During a major lunar standstill, the northernmost and southernmost positions of the moon are at their furthest apart along the horizon.
It is believed that these distinct lunar movements may have been observed during the early phase of Stonehenge, potentially influencing the monument's design and purpose.
Occurring about once every 18.6 years, a major lunar standstill is when moonrise and moonset are furthest apart along the horizon, as viewed from Earth.
It means the moon appears unusually low in the horizon and the sun unusually high in the Northern Hemisphere.
At the same time, the moon appears unusually high and the sun unusually low in the Southern Hemisphere.
Major lunar standstill actually lasts for a period of roughly two years, which is why we saw a very low Strawberry Moon this time last year, but this month it'll be lower.
This week marks the lowest a full moon has been in the sky since 2006 – and it won't be this low again until 2043.
According to Dr Massey, the best time to see the event is simply when the moon rises – which in London is 21:18 BST tonight and at 22:20 BST tomorrow night – meaning you won't have to camp out all night for this one.
The website Time and Date lets you search for a specific location and see exactly when the moon rises in your area.
It's worth noting the moon will be lower the further north you are – so it will be especially low in places like northern Scotland and the Shetland Islands.
How will the moon look different?
The moon will appear to take on different coloured hues, although this is a trick of the light and usually depends on how low it is on the horizon.
'A red or yellow colored moon usually indicates a moon seen near the horizon,' NASA says.
'There, some of the blue light has been scattered away by a long path through the Earth's atmosphere, sometimes laden with fine dust.
'A blue-colored moon is more rare and can indicate a moon seen through an atmosphere carrying larger dust particles.'
But the moon may also appear slightly bigger.
When the moon is especially close to the horizon, our brains experience something called the 'Moon Illusion',
The optical illusion causes the moon to appear bigger compared to when it's higher in the sky (although scientists still aren't sure why or how it works).
What's the forecast like?
According to the latest update from the Met Office, the clearest, cloud-free skies tonight will be in the north of Britain.
'It will be dry for most tonight, with variable cloud and clear spells,' Met Office spokesperson Andrea Bishop told MailOnline.
'Western parts will tend to cloud over later, with some low cloud and fog patches likely in the south where it is mild.'
if you don't get a chance to see the Strawberry Moon tonight, you'll get another chance on Wednesday night, but conditions won't be as good.
'Wednesday will be a cloudier night than Tuesday, with the east hopefully staying dry with clear spells,' said Bishop.
'Showers will affect some western and then central areas though, followed by a more organised area of thundery rain, which may be heavy, moving erratically north across western areas overnight, which may affect visibility.'
Full moon, supermoon, Strawberry moon: What's the difference?
A FULL MOON is the phase of the moon in which its whole disc is illuminated.
During the 29.5-day lunar cycle, we observe a new moon (with 0 per cent illumination), a waxing moon (when the amount of illumination on the moon is increasing), a full moon (100 per cent illumination) and then a waning moon (when its visible surface area is getting smaller).
Because our modern calendar isn't quite in line with the Moon's phases, sometimes we get more than one full Moon in a month. This is commonly known as a blue moon.
Meanwhile, a SUPERMOON is when the full moon nearly coincides with perigee – the point in the orbit of the moon at which it is nearest to the Earth.
This means a supermoon can appear as much as 14 per cent larger and 30 per cent brighter than when it's furthest away from Earth.
There are about three or four supermoons per year, most astronomy websites claim, and they happen at different times each year.
In a nutshell, a supermoon is a full moon. But it's bigger and brighter than a normal full moon.
Lastly, STRAWBERRY MOON simply refers to the time of the year the full moon is appearing.
In June, it's known as Strawberry Moon because because it historically appeared when the strawberry harvest first took place.
Other months of the year correspond to different nicknames - so January is Wolf Moon, February is Snow Moon, March is Worm Moon, April is Pink Moon, May is Flower Moon and so on.
Full moon names were historically used to track the seasons and therefore are closely related to nature.
The full list of full moon nicknames:
February: Snow Moon to coincide with heavy snow.
April: Pink Moon as it heralded the appearance of Phlox subulata or moss pink – one of spring's first flowers.
May: Flower Moon because of the abundance of blossoms.
July: Buck Moon as it arrived when a male deer's antlers were in full growth mode.
August: Sturgeon Moon after the large fish that was easily caught at this time.
September: Corn Moon because this was the time to harvest corn.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Medical News Today
an hour ago
- Medical News Today
The secret to weight loss? Opt for minimally processed foods
People whose diet contained fewer processed foods lost more weight than people who ate more ultra-processed foods, a recent study both groups lost weight, those eating less in the way of processed foods shed twice as many key to weight loss in both groups was likely that they both consumed a well-balanced diet, with the only difference being the amount of ultraprocessed foods they who ate a diet of minimally processed foods lost twice as much weight as other people consuming ultra-processed foods in a new randomized crossover groups shed pounds during the weight-loss trial, in which all participants followed a diet based on the UK Eatwell Guide. The only difference between their diets was the proportion of processed foods they people in the minimally processed foods group lost twice as much weight as those in the ultra-processed foods group, suggesting that eating less processed foods can better help one maintain a healthy on a minimally processed foods diet consumed 289.9 fewer calories per day, and lost 2% of their body weight on average. According to the study authors, this could amount to as much as a 13% weight loss for men and 9% for women over a period of 1 eating ultra-processed foods reduced their daily calorie intake by less, 119.5 calories, and lost 1% of their weight over the course of the study appears published in Nature processed foods linked to fewer cravings, more weight lossAt the outset, the authors of the study ran a battery of tests on all 55 participants, capturing measurements for a comprehensive suite of health were divided randomly into either the minimally processed or ultra-processed foods group, and followed the corresponding diet for 8 the individuals could choose what to eat, they chose from food delivered to them by the researchers that matched both the Eatwell profile and the minimally processed foods/ ultra-processed foods group to which they had been food they received contained more calories than they needed, and they were instructed to eat as much as they wanted. Participants regularly responded to questionnaires on which they reported their food Routhenstein, MS, RD, CDCES, CDN, a preventive cardiology dietitian at EntirelyNourished, who was not involved in the study, commented to Medical News Today that 'the free-living setup makes the findings more realistic but also introduces variables that are hard to control, so while the results seem compelling, they should be interpreted with caution.'Individuals on the minimally processed foods diet reported greater success at resisting cravings, although they were the group that turned out to be losing the most 8 weeks, a 4-week washout period took place, during which participants returned to their normal diet. This was followed by a 2-week baseline period in which the researchers performed additional health tests to observe the effects of individuals' 8-week minimally processed foods or ultra-processed foods this break, participants switched sides, with the individuals in the minimally processed foods group moving to the ultra-processed foods diet and vice versa for another 8 the end of those 2 months, the researchers once more assessed both groups' health metrics.'The study's crossover design and use of a washout period strengthened its internal reliability, and coaching likely improved adherence,' noted Routhenstein.'However,' she said, 'reliance on self-reported food diaries and the exclusion of certain dietary groups limit generalizability.''Unusual' finding: Ultra-processed foods may not increase bad cholesterolUnexpectedly, the researchers found that the ultra-processed foods diet was associated with a lower LDL ('bad') cholesterol level. Ultra-processed foods are often criticized for adding unhealthy elements into a person's described this finding as 'unusual,' saying that it 'doesn't align with most existing research.' She noted, however, that 'it may reflect the specific types of ultra-processed foods consumed, such as those lower in saturated fat or fortified with cholesterol-lowering ingredients.''This underscores the importance of considering the full dietary context rather than judging foods by broad categories alone,' Routhenstein a balanced diet can aid weight lossIt is likely that the reason both groups lost weight is that they both ate to Routhenstein, 'a balanced, nutrient-dense diet, such as the one outlined in [United Kingdom] guidelines, helps to support weight management, metabolic function, heart health, and healthy aging by providing the essential nutrients the body needs.''While ultraprocessed foods are often linked to poor outcomes,' she said, 'what we choose to include in our diet may matter even more than what we avoid.'MNT also spoke with Mir Ali, MD, medical director of MemorialCare Surgical Weight Loss Center at Orange Coast Medical Center in Fountain Valley, CA, who was not involved in this told us that:'What we recommend to our patients, and what is the basis for most successful diets, is reducing carbohydrate and sugar intake and emphasizing protein and non-starchy vegetables in the diet. Minimizing carbohydrates and sugars helps direct the body towards burning fat.''Ultraprocessed foods,' he cautioned, 'tend to have additional additives that can be detrimental, so it is better to minimize these foods as well. Therefore, having the proper nutrients and a good source are both important.''It's also,' added Routhenstein, 'important to consider the nutritional quality of individual foods, as not all [ultra-processed foods] are the same, and broad labels can miss meaningful differences in the nutritional composition, and therefore health impact.'How do ultra-processed foods affect weight loss?'While ultra-processed foods may not directly hinder weight loss, prior research has linked them to poor metabolic health, increased cardiovascular risk, higher mortality, and negative impacts on gut health,' Routhenstein told us.'Their engineered flavors, low satiety, and high palatability can lead to overeating, and they often contain additives, preservatives, or contaminants with unknown long-term effects,' she ultra-processed foods still afforded study participants a measure of weight loss, the trial 'did show a benefit of minimally processed foods over ultra-processed foods,' Ali further shakes are one type of processed food that may be of value in healthy dieting — with some caveats — said Ali. They 'can be helpful for weight loss, provided they have the right ingredients.' He cited 'smoothies with a lot of fruit, though not ultraprocessed.''Low-sugar shakes that are high in protein can be beneficial, but not ultraprocessed [shakes, which] will not help weight loss due to sugar content,' he added.
Daily Mail
8 hours ago
- Daily Mail
'Forever toxins' found in everything from cosmetics to waterproof clothing linked to weight struggle
Toxins found in everything from cosmetics to waterproof clothing could hinder weight loss, a study has shown. Researchers have discovered that levels of so-called 'forever' chemicals in the blood may, in the long term, lead to people piling the pounds back on after shedding them. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are in hundreds of everyday products because of their durability. But last year a review of 500 studies found they were linked to 'serious health implications', including weakening the immune system and cancer. The Government is set to receive recommendations from a panel of experts later this year on how levels of PFAS can be reduced. Now researchers say the chemicals may also affect the body's metabolic process – which is how it converts food into nutrients. In the study, published in the Journal Of Obesity this week, researchers assessed 186 teenagers who had bariatric surgery – which works by making the stomach smaller and the patient feel fuller quicker. After the surgery, patients are at risk of slowly putting weight back on, and the researchers found people with high levels of PFAS were at a greater risk. They tested the participants' blood for levels of PFAS before the surgery and found that those with the highest levels of the chemicals put on twice as much weight in the five years after the surgery compared to those with the lowest levels. 'With the growing use of weight loss interventions around the world, it's critical for us to understand the association between PFAS and successful weight loss management, including what this means for long-term outcomes,' said Dr Brittney Baumert, a researcher at the University of Southern California's Keck School of Medicine who led the study. 'PFAS are a modifiable risk, which is why protective policies are so important to reduce exposure and safeguard public health – especially for vulnerable populations.' Experts say that while their research looked specifically at bariatric surgery, the findings may also be relevant for people on fat jabs. 'We're also interested in exploring whether PFAS exposure is relevant to other weight loss interventions, including GLP-1 medications such as Ozempic,' said Dr Baumert.
Daily Mail
8 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Using AI to analyse ultrasound scans lets parents pinpoint exact due date of babies, study claims
Using artificial intelligence to analyse ultrasound scans could give parents the exact day their child will be born with 95 per cent accuracy, a study has claimed. Doctors currently estimate a foetus's due date by adding 40 weeks to the first day of the mother's last menstrual period. This rough calculation is known as Naegele's rule and assumes the woman has a 28-day menstrual cycle and ovulates on day 14, which, for many, is not true. In the UK, just four per cent of babies are born on their due date. But a group of US researchers say using AI to analyse ultrasounds could predict a child's date of birth with 95 per cent accuracy. Using a software developed and trained using more than two million ultrasound images from women who gave birth at the University of Kentucky from 2017 to 2020, the scientists measured how well AI could estimate whether a baby would be carried to term or not. The program, called Ultrasound AI, was able to predict whether a baby would be born early with 72 per cent accuracy, without relying on external information such as maternal history or clinical measurements. It was 95 per cent accurate in predicting the due date of babies carried to full term, and 92 per cent accurate for all births combined. 'AI is reaching into the womb and helping us forecast the timing of birth, which we believe will lead to better prediction to help mothers across the world and provide a greater understanding of why the smallest babies are born too soon,' said Dr John O'Brien, director of maternal-foetal medicine at the University of Kentucky. 'AI will eventually provide greater insights into how to target and prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes 'This work is an important first step in the start of a powerful advance in technology for the field of obstetrics.' Preterm birth is currently the leading cause of neonatal mortality in the world, and one in every 12 babies is born prematurely. It comes after the UK Government last year announced a plan to reduce the number of preterm births from 8 per cent to 6 per cent.
